The purpose of this module is to introduce you to several different repositories so that you can get a feel for what to expect, how to use the databases, and how to evaluate the databases. In this module, we will walk through how to use several different OER databases, including Merlot, Internet Archive, OER Commons, BCcampus, Lumen Learning, Education.com, OASIS, and Open Knowledge Repository, while also evaluating the repositories for their overall helpfulness and ease of use.
By consulting these materials, users will be able to:
Gain a general understanding of OER
Determine appropriate OER databases for their needs
Locate suitable OER within a database
Evaluate OER databases for suitability using a rubric
Open Educational Resources (OER) are publicly accessible teaching, learning, and research materials, which have been purposefully created and licensed to be free for users to engage in the 5R’s of OER, i.e., retain, remix, revise, reuse, and redistribute the materials (depending on the type of license), without the need to ask for permission. Unlike copyrighted resources, OER have been authored or created by an individual or organization that chooses to retain few, if any, ownership rights. OER allow teachers to adapt and modify materials to meet their specific needs while also reducing the cost and expanding access to learning (Wikipedia, 2023).
OER are designed to reduce accessibility barriers by implementing best practices in teaching and to be adapted for local unique contexts. The development and promotion of OER is often motivated by a desire to provide an alternative or enhanced educational paradigm (OER Commons, 2023).
For additional information on OER in general, please visit the following link: Introduction of OER
OER Repositories are locations where users can access OER materials through the web and engage with the 5 R’s of OER activities (Retain, Reuse, Revise, Remix, Redistribute). As you will see, each repository may look a little different, but repositories are typically organized by the type of material, which can include, (1) open textbooks, (2) open educational resources, (3) open data, (4) open images, (5) open audio & video, (6) open tools, (7) resources for English language learners, (8) OER guides, (9) open courses, (10) OER networks, and (11) OER podcasts.
For additional information on OER repositories, please visit the following link: Locating and Sharing OERs.
This rubric provides a framework for the educational community to evaluate the usability of various OER online Repositories.
Ease of Locating Site: Can the repository be easily located through public channels?
Ease of Locating OER: How easy is the repository to search and filter for specific OER materials?
Site Navigation: How easy is the repository to navigate?
Licensing & Copyright Information: Is licensing and copyright information for OER materials easy to locate and understand?
Accessibility: Is the website accessible to users with a varied range of abilities?
Presentation & Professionalism: Is the presentation of content clear and high quality?
Adherence to the 5R’s of OER (Non-Scored): To what extent do the materials presented in this repository adhere to the 5R’s of OER?
Review existing OER repository websites
Inform the user of the general ease of use, accessibility, and licensing information for the site
Enhance the capacity of OER developers and users to evaluate and improve the ease of use and quality of OER repository sites
* This rubric is NOT designed to evaluate a single OER, stand-alone OER, or associated activities. The ratings expressed in the rubric are the opinions of the reviewer.
For each rubric criterion, select a rating from 0 (Unsatisfactory) to 3 (Superior).
0 - Unsatisfactory: The site has not met the criterion, or there are major issues pertaining to that criterion.
1 - Needs Improvement: The site has significant areas that require additional work for that criterion.
2 - Satisfactory: The site has met the minimum criterion requirements.
3 - Superior: The site goes above and beyond the criterion
After scoring each criterion, total up the scores from the last column to obtain a total score for the repository site. Total scores can range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating the site is overall satisfactory to superior across all criteria.
The Site Critique portion of the rubric allows for a qualitative review of OER Repositories.
The first portion includes high-level information for the OER repository, such as the types of materials available and the intended target audience. The Final Verdict section shows whether the OER Repository is Recommended, Use with Caution, or Not Recommended. You can also use this portion of the rubric to provide additional details for each rubric criterion.
The OER Repository Critique Rubric was developed by Graduate Students at the Florida State University, Instructional Systems and Learning Technology (ISLT) program for EME 5250. This rubric was partially adapted from materials prepared by RubiStar Rubrics and the Washington Quality Review Rubric for Lessons & Units.
To see the sources adapted to create this rubric framework, please see the References section.
OKR is an open access repository for materials created by the World Bank organization. Most materials adhere to various OER community standards and are distributed with a CC BY license. This repository emphasizes materials related to business, global economies, world development, and related topics.
Website: Open Knowledge Repository
Target Audience: Professionals in the Global Finance/Development sector
Materials Available: Reports, metadata, books, manuscripts, journal articles, and related materials
Cost: Free
Although OKR’s website is basic, the collections are comprehensive and open.
See the full rubric review for OKR.
See the video based review for OKR.
Education.com hosts a variety of supplemental learning materials for Pre K-8 students. Each resource can be checked against a dropdown menu of educational standards, and all resources are aligned with USA State and Common Core Standards.
Website Address: Education.com
Target Audience: Pre K-8
Materials Available: Worksheets, Lesson Plans, Activities, Exercises, eLearning Games/Guided Lessons
Cost: Mostly free to access, some materials require paid subscription
High-quality materials, but some licensing/access restrictions may limit usability.
See the full rubric review for Education.com.
See the video based review for Education.com.
Lumen Learning aims to provide affordable course materials to strengthen learning using open educational resources (OER).
Website Address: Lumen Learning
Target Audience: Higher Education
Materials Available: LMS compatible courseware, study plans, assessments, and professional development for instructors
Materials Cost: Free materials with some paid components, such as supplemental activities and professional development
Lumen Learning provides high-quality and credible materials for use in higher education, and the licensing allows users to freely use the resources for any purpose.
See the full rubric review for Lumen Learning.
See the video based review for Lumen Learning.
Openly Available Sources Integrated Search (OASIS) is a search tool that aims to make discovering open content easier. OASIS currently searches open content from 115 different sources and contains 440,380 records. OASIS is being developed at SUNY Geneseo's Milne Library.
Website: OASIS
Target Audience: Higher Education
Materials Available: Resources from 115 sources, including courses, course materials, textbooks, public domain and open access books, videos, and podcasts.
Cost: Generally free, although some individual materials may incur costs.
OASIS is an excellent resource for searching for OER. Because OASIS links to various sources, there is some variability in elements such as licensing and accessibility. However, the benefit of being able to search 115 different sources containing 440,380 records at one time outweighs any drawbacks of this site.
See the full rubric review for OASIS.
See the video based review for OASIS.
Merlot is a community of staff, volunteers, and members who work together in various ways to provide users of OER teaching and learning materials with a wealth of services and functions that can enhance their instructional experience.
Website: Merlot
Target Audience: Higher Education focused (also has Pre-K, Grade, Middle, & High School)
Materials Available: Open access textbooks, full courses, simulations, tutorials, animations, case studies, assessments, syllabi, workshop and training material, etc.
Cost: Mostly Free, with some paid materials (built-in search features allow users to filter for free materials only).
Merlot is a free and open online repository of over 92,000 high-quality and credible educational resources; however, the site is not very easy to find, is not overly accessible, sometimes the licensing is not clear, and sometimes there may be costs associated with the materials.
See the full rubric review for Merlot.
See the video based review for Merlot.
OER Commons, launched in 2007, aims to foster a sustainable culture of sharing and improvement among educators. It provides a comprehensive infrastructure for educators to collaborate, identify high-quality OER, and adapt and evaluate them to address the needs of teachers and learners.
Website: OER Commons
Target Audience: Preschool through adult education, including career training
Materials Available: Textbooks, syllabi, lessons, lectures, homework, full courses, activities, etc.
Cost: Free
OER Commons is a free and open online repository of hundreds of thousands of high-quality, peer reviewed, and credible educational resources. The only drawback seems to be accessibility.
See the full rubric review for OER Commons.
See the video based review for OER Commons.
BCcampus OpenEd is a free repository of open-access textbooks that can be read and downloaded without an account. Other OER collections may require creating a free account. Their content is licensed as CC BY, allowing the use of the 5R's with proper attribution.
Website: BCcampus OpenEd
Target Audience: Post-Secondary Educators and students in British Columbia; General public
Materials Available: Textbooks, Course materials, Evaluation tools
Cost: Free lifetime access, no subscription/account required
High quality design, clearly distinguished licensing and use, easy to use.
See the full rubric review for BCcampus OpenEd.
See the video based review for BCcampus OpenEd.
Internet Archive is a non-profit library for various free and open materials. IA is unique in that it archives materials uploaded to the web, so copies are accessible even if the original versions are no longer available. IA’s library hosts a massive 735 billion digital materials dating back to 1996.
Website: Internet Archive
Target Audience: Researchers, Historians, Scholars, General Public
Materials Available: Reports, metadata, books, manuscripts, journal articles, and related materials
Cost: Free
High-quality materials, professional and efficient site, but some licensing/access restrictions may limit usability. Materials housed do not qualify as OER but are open access.
See the full rubric review for Internet Archive.
See the video based review for Internet Archive.
Download the OER rubric template to
conduct your own reviews.
Download the full version reviews of the
8 OER databases.
Download the abridged version reviews of the 8 OER databases.
Kalkman, D. (2003). Website evaluation rubric. RubiStar. Retrieved from https://cdn5-ss2.sharpschool.com/UserFiles/Servers/Server_3333710/File/Website_Evaluation_Rubric.pdf
OASIS. (n.d.). SUNY Geneseo's Milne Library. Retrieved March 3, 2023, from https://oasis.geneseo.edu/.
OER Commons & Open Education. OER Commons. (n.d.). Retrieved March 3, 2023, from https://www.oercommons.org/about#:~:text=Open%20Educational%20Resources%20(OER)%20are,%2C%20if%20any%2C%20ownership%20rights
Open Educational Resources, BY Wikipedia. Retrieved March 5, 2023 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_educational_resources. Licensed under CC-BY-SA IGO 3.0 (license statement/permission).
The Washington Quality Review Rubric for Lessons & Units. (2020, December 10). Washington Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction is based on the EQuIP rubric facilitated by Achieve. Retrieved from https://www.oercommons.org/courseware/lesson/75633/overview?section=1