Before beginning Term Three, Pete and myself sat down and worked out how we could approach the term working with the P/1/2 unit. We asked to feedback from the teachers who we had already worked with and they mentioned that they would like to see us demonstrate the lesson structure more before they attempt it with their students. From our analysis, we also felt that five weeks didn’t give us enough time to work with teachers and make long-lasting change in their practice. After developing a structure that we felt would better support teachers, we worked with our Principal to adjust the timetable so we were better utilising our release time.
We created a term overview where we broke the term into three distinct stages Term 3 PMS Overview P.1.2
Stage One: Watch us – model teaching approach
Stage Two: Watch you – shifting planning towards teams with our support
Stage Three: Delve deeper – how can we turn good lessons into great ones?
We shared our plans with the P/1/2 unit who were excited to get started.
From there, we looked at their term planner to see what they were aiming to teach at the beginning of the term. With their focus to be Place Value, we took inspiration from Ann Downton’s presentation in relation to how to use the Mathematics Online Interview (MOI) data and the growth points to guide our lesson design. One of the lessons she provided at the PMS Learning Block 2 was titled Prove Me Wrong which was published in Prime Number: Volume 30, Number 4. 2015.
We decided to do our lesson study using this lesson. The structure of how we are working with the unit allowed us multiple opportunities to observe each other teach and hold debrief with each other but also other colleagues.
The challenges that we think may arise are:
How do we assess student understanding in a manageable way?
We trialled a checklist based on the growth points students had achieve in the MOI assessment in March.
How do we create appropriate enablers and extenders?
We decided begin the lesson with a visualising numbers acitivity. This demonstrated to students that we see numbers in different ways. We felt that this was important as it linked well to the lesson ‘you can solve this problem in lots of ways too’. It also allowed us to spend some time practising subitising which Di Siemon mentioned in her presentation is a critical part of Early Years Maths learning.
Introducing the problem with a challenge and a misconception was a highly effective way of engaging the students. Pete used me as the stimulus – Sam thinks that 19 is bigger than 31. He said it has to be because the 9 in 19 is bigger than the 1 in 31. Prove him wrong. I had students running up to me in the yard for the next two days telling me that I was wrong… and silly… and how could I not know about the tens! The TENS Sam!
Notes:
Visualising Warm Up
“I see 4. That’s all I see”, “I’m thinking”, “I saw the body of a dinosaur. I saw it’s mouth, an upside down smiley-face and an eye.”, “I saw a 4 on a dice and a one and another one. I’m not sure about the bottom thing.”, “I saw three here, three here and three here.”, “Still thinking…”
Prove Me Wrong
We noticed that a lot of students needed time to explore the materials around the room, playing with them first for a while before attempting the task. We let them do this and tried to use targeted questions to get them to begin working on the problem. Some were inclined to keep playing, while others were quick to get started.
Most students demonstrated strong problem solving skills but didn’t have the understanding or fluency to apply thinking in tens. The few students that did were used as explicit teaching opportunities to show other students ways that they could tackle the problem. Being the first lesson, most students just went back to their way to try and solve the problem which we were of course, fine with.
We used number cards on necklaces as a consolidating task, getting the students to compare numbers, saying which is bigger/smaller. We also asked them to get in line from smallest to largest, buddy up with another number that makes 10 etc. They loved this activity and it was good to see them applying their understanding of place value to a different style of activity.
We reflected on our first lesson and both noted that we didn’t have many students thinking in tens. After a discussion of how to do this and looking through the evidence we had captured in our lesson, we decided to use a picture of a students work to provoke their thinking in the next lesson. A prep student had solved the problem, counting out frogs one-by-one into two piles. One pile had 19 and the other 31. She was very clear in her understanding that 31 was bigger 19 because the pile with 31 was ‘waaayyyyy’ bigger. It was hard to disagree with her thinking but it did give us the perfect image to move ahead with the next lesson.
We decided that we would repeat pretty much everything from the first lesson with minor tweaks. This is a focus of ours from Peter Sullivan’s theory that a relentless consistency to Maths tasks will allow students to form deeper understandings. We changed our visual pattern for the warm up and changed our prove me wrong numbers to 26 and 42 but this time, we added in the student image…
First lesson – explore, compare, greater or less than
Students were given a problem within a story shell: Sam thinks that 19 is bigger than 31. He thinks so because 9 is bigger than the 1 in 31 so it must be bigger! Prove him wrong.
Insights:
Students need time to play and explore with materials.
Story shell worked well. We related it to teachers. Engaged and outraged!
Hard for students to prove it.
Problem first approach – what to do when students think they are finished? What’s next? What does success look like?
Using students as teachers: Being brave – linking to our pro social skills program.
Wording: “They’re going to be the teacher now”
Capturing evidence can be challenging, especially when it’s not your class. Maybe a focus of 4 students per lesson would make this more manageable.
Teaching Preps in the afternoon is nigh on impossible!
Tweaks from first lesson:
Changing teacher thinking: don’t expect mastery in the first lesson. A relentless consistency with small adaptations each lesson will allow students to gain a deep understanding over time.
Managed the lesson and delivery of instruction: what do we want students to do once they have solved the problem in one way.
Enablers and extenders: prepared but didn’t use. This would be easier for a classroom teacher to do as they know their students well.
Visual numbers warm up: varying success between different classes.
Visualising Number Warm Up Version 2
Prove Me Wrong 2
Pete again said that “Sam thinks 26 is bigger than 42…” this got a few eye rolls from some Prep/One students who couldn’t believe I was so silly! Then we introduced the photo from the last lesson.
Pete asked the students, “It’s pretty hard to tell that there is 31 in that pile… How can we make it a easier to count the numbers?” We changed the materials that were available to make it more obvious what we were wanting the students to do. We included pop-sticks, frogs on logs, abaci, unifix blocks along with counters etc.
Students:
“I’m trying to make the top number by outing all the pop-sticks in one pile.”, “I’m trying to make them end-to-end so it’s easier to count.”
T: “Why are you using the logs?”
S: “I know that the logs have 10 bumps.”
T: “How do you know?”
S: “I counted them. Then I counted them on another log and it was the same. I’ve got 30 and I’m making 42.”
Student was given enabler – 8 and 17
“I actually have acorns! I’m going to use them to hold the logs together!”
Counted one-by-one, had 20, took five off. Counted again and then added two more to make 17.
A student explaining how she used the abacus to make tens and solve the problem.
Consequently, other students started to use the abacus
“Sam, I think I’ve solved the problem. I was inspired by _____ photo and I think I’ve made it easier to count.
Student explained their approach to the class. I challenged the student to see if they could think of any ways to make it even easier? I suggested he could have a look around the room at what other people are doing or see if there is anything around the room that could help him like displays…”
After a short time, the student came over again and said he thinks he’s done it. He saw that they had used 10 frames in a 100 days of school activity the day before and he put 42 into 4 tens (structured like a tens frame) and 2 ones.
Using tens frames to solve the problem
We both felt that there was a clear growth in student understanding from the first lesson to the second. A lot more students were able to say that 42 is bigger than 26 because it has 4 tens and 26 has 2 tens. We used the growth points as a guide for our assessment and if they were able to demonstrate how they came to this conclusion we marked them accordingly.
Using the students as teachers is a powerful tool and teachers need to be skilled questioners to direct student learning. Having regular opportunities to stop, look at a student’s approach and discuss it as a class seemed to be a great way to engage students and expose them to varied approaches.
Second lesson – focus on thinking in tens, greater or less than
Insights:
Challenging students with a picture from the last lesson of a successful yet tedious strategy. This allowed us to guide students thinking towards using tens to count collections with greater ease.
Becoming more familiar with the students and the lesson as we had already taught it.
Seeing what other classes at later stages are doing, gives a great insight to where my class could head and what direction I will lead them in/strategies I will expose them to.
Using the students as teachers can be really powerful.
The use of language as a tool for motivation “Sorry to interrupt your work but we’ve got a problem. Can you please come over to this table and see if you can help us?”
Exploring the problem with the students. At no time we’re we the experts and we became more comfortable with teaching through well-chosen and timely questions.
Young kids can show incredible persistence whether it be tying a rubber band, taking the time to think about what they’re going to say or working on challenging extenders… We need to encourage and acknowledge these amazing skills in not only Maths lessons, but all subject areas.
Technology can sometimes be such a wonderful tool! We were finding it hard to question students, gather evidence and mark our checklist; we decided to use a digital version of the checklist and add evidence directly to it. It worked really well and is something that we will continue to trial/tweak!