When you're hunting for a cheap VPS with decent specs—2GB RAM and at least 60GB disk space—it's easy to feel overwhelmed by the sheer number of options out there. Whether you're hosting a small website, running a personal project, or just need a reliable development environment, finding the sweet spot between price and performance matters. This guide breaks down real-world offers from hosting providers, helping you understand what's actually available in the budget VPS market without the marketing fluff.

What People Are Actually Offering

So someone posted this exact question on a hosting forum: "I need 2GB RAM, 60GB+ disk, any CPU, one IPv4. Just looking for the cheapest possible option."

And honestly? The responses were all over the map.

The Absolute Cheapest Routes

Let's start with the rock-bottom prices. One provider threw out a custom quote for Germany: 2 cores, 2GB RAM, 70GB NVMe storage for $3.60/month. That's pretty wild. Another offered something similar in Seattle for $1.25/month with a promo code, though the disk was only 20GB—they said they could add more on request.

Here's the thing about these ultra-cheap deals: they exist. They're real. But you're usually looking at smaller providers, sometimes newer ones building their customer base. Nothing wrong with that, but it's worth knowing what you're getting into.

The Middle Ground

Most responses clustered around the $5-7/month range. One provider offered 4GB RAM (double what was requested) with 50GB storage for $5/month. Another had 4GB RAM with 40GB disk at €7.80 monthly. These aren't quite hitting the 60GB disk requirement, but they're throwing in extra RAM instead.

There were also some annual deals. One came in at $50/year for 2GB RAM and 30GB storage—again, not quite the disk space requested, but the math works out to about $4.17/month. Another provider mentioned a $7/year clearance deal, though specs weren't fully detailed in their response.

When You Want More Breathing Room

A few providers went bigger. One offered 8GB RAM (way more than requested) with 80GB NVMe for a higher monthly cost in Switzerland. Another had 4GB RAM with just 30GB storage but only 250GB bandwidth for $4.99/month.

The pattern here is interesting: providers seem more willing to upgrade RAM than storage. Storage costs them real money in a way that RAM allocation sometimes doesn't, at least on oversold VPS nodes.

Looking for reliable hosting that won't break the bank?

If you're comparing all these options and feeling decision fatigue, 👉 check out affordable VPS plans that balance price with solid performance—perfect for small projects and dev environments. Sometimes the best choice isn't the absolute cheapest, but the one that saves you headaches down the road.

What Actually Matters Beyond Price

Look, price matters. Obviously. That's why you're reading this. But here's what people often forget when they're chasing the lowest monthly cost:

Location matters more than you think. If you're in the US and you grab a $2/month VPS in Bulgaria, your latency might make that savings pointless for certain use cases. Conversely, if you're just running scheduled scripts or backups, who cares?

Bandwidth limits are the silent killer. A bunch of these offers mention bandwidth caps—2TB, 5TB, sometimes less. For personal projects, that's probably fine. But if you're moving data around or serving any kind of media, that number matters more than disk space sometimes.

"Shared" CPU cores vs. dedicated makes a real difference. When a provider says "2 cores" without specifying dedicated, you're sharing. Which is fine! Most of the time. Until it's not. If you need consistent performance, ask about CPU allocation.

NVMe vs. SSD vs. HDD still matters in 2025. Most of these offers specify NVMe, which is good. But some don't mention it at all, which makes you wonder what you're getting.

The Actual Requirements Were Pretty Flexible

The original poster said "can be hosted anywhere" and "can be any billing period." That flexibility opened up a ton of options. When you have hard requirements—like "must be in the EU" or "needs Windows" or "requires monthly billing only"—your options narrow fast.

They also didn't specify:

• Operating system preference

• Bandwidth needs

• Backup requirements

• Support level expectations

• Uptime guarantees

All of which matter depending on what you're actually doing with the VPS.

What Would I Actually Do?

If I were in this situation? I'd probably ignore the absolute cheapest options unless I was just experimenting or learning. The $3-5/month range from providers with some forum presence and reviews seems like the sweet spot.

I'd also look at what happens after the first billing period. Some of these prices are promotional. Year two might look different.

And honestly? I'd probably go slightly over-spec on what I needed if the price difference was minimal. Getting 4GB RAM instead of 2GB for an extra dollar a month feels like good insurance against "I wish I had more RAM" situations three months from now.

The Forum Dynamics Were Interesting

What's funny about reading through this thread is watching providers try to one-up each other. Someone would offer 2GB RAM, and the next response would be 4GB for basically the same price. Then someone would throw in "premium DDoS protection" like that's a deciding factor for someone asking for the cheapest possible option.

It's like watching a very polite price war play out in slow motion.

Several providers offered custom plans or said "DM me." Which suggests there's wiggle room in pricing if you're willing to ask. The listed prices might not be the final prices.

Bottom Line

Can you get a VPS with 2GB RAM and 60GB+ disk for cheap? Yes. Very yes. Options range from under $2/month to around $8/month depending on extras, location, and provider reputation.

Should you automatically pick the cheapest? Probably not. Read reviews. Check the provider's forum presence. See how they handle support requests. A VPS that costs $3/month but goes down every other week isn't actually a good deal.

Wrapping This Up

Finding a budget VPS isn't rocket science, but it does require looking past the headline price. The hosting market is competitive enough that good deals exist—you just need to know what trade-offs you're making. Whether you go with the $1.25/month experimental option or the $7/month established-provider route, make sure it actually fits what you need to do. And if you're still weighing options after reading through dozens of forum posts, 👉 consider providers with consistent uptime and straightforward pricing—sometimes the middle path saves the most hassle.