Ofer is interested (as a curiosity) in the science of the scientific method itself, and how it has evolved over the years (for better and worse). This includes dynamics of research, publishing, research evaluation, as well as the level of influence and impact science has over society.
Here are some interesting reads we've collected over the years to get the juices flowing:
"Catchy, clear, concise: three-part phrases boost research paper citations"
"Shoddy commentaries—a quick and dirty route to higher impact numbers—are on the rise"
"Do grant proposal texts matter for funding decisions? A field experiment"
"A researcher who publishes a study every two days reveals the darker side of science"
"Surge in number of ‘extremely productive’ authors concerns scientists"
"Authors’ names have ‘astonishing’ influence on peer reviewers"
"These four journals publish the most Nobel Prize-winning papers in physics"
"Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science?"
"In some scientific papers, words expressing uncertainty have decreased"
"Wavering impact-factor trajectories: How academia is exploring new approaches for evaluating researchers"
"Revealed: the millions of dollars in time wasted making papers fit journal guidelines"
"Distortion of journal impact factors in the era of paper mills"
"EU council’s ‘no pay’ publishing model draws mixed response"
"Nine reasons why Impact Factors fail and using them may harm science"
"Exploring Gender Bias in Six Key Domains of Academic Science: An Adversarial Collaboration"
"Saudi universities entice top scientists to switch affiliations — sometimes with cash"