When making decisions in everyday life, we rarely rely on a single source of information. Imagine you are planning to buy a car. Would you walk into the first showroom and purchase the first car you see? Most likely not. You would ask for advice from friends, read online reviews, compare features, and perhaps consult a few experts before making a decision. The same logic applies when choosing a movie to watch. You might consider your friends’ opinions, critic reviews, and your own preferences before deciding.
Why do we seek multiple perspectives? The reason is simple: individual opinions can be biased. One person’s negative experience at a particular destination doesn’t necessarily reflect the experiences of everyone else. By collecting multiple perspectives, we reduce bias and arrive at a more balanced decision.
This same principle of combining multiple opinions is the foundation of a powerful concept in data science called ensembling.
In analytics, ensembling is a technique where multiple models are trained on the same dataset, and their outputs are combined to produce a final prediction. Think of it as consulting multiple experts rather than relying on just one. Each model can have its own strengths and weaknesses, but by combining them, we can create a stronger and more reliable system.
The outputs from these models can be combined in various ways. For example, when predicting numerical outcomes, we can take the average of predictions from multiple models. For categorical outcomes, such as classifying an object or event into categories, a “majority vote” approach can be used—the class predicted by most models becomes the final result.
This approach is particularly effective when individual models, known as weak learners, are not highly accurate on their own. By aggregating multiple weak learners, we can create a robust prediction system that significantly improves accuracy.
One of the most popular and powerful ensembling algorithms is the Random Forest. At its core, a Random Forest builds multiple decision trees and combines their outputs to make a final prediction.
Decision trees are intuitive models that classify data points based on certain features. Each decision tree asks a series of yes/no questions to split data into groups that are as pure as possible, eventually leading to a classification. While decision trees are simple and easy to interpret, they are often weak predictors on their own. They are highly sensitive to variations in the data and may overfit, meaning they perform well on training data but poorly on new data.
Random Forest overcomes this limitation by constructing many decision trees, each using a random sample of data points and features. This randomness helps to reduce bias and variance, making the overall model more accurate and reliable.
Imagine a scenario where a company wants to predict whether a car will be considered acceptable, good, or very good by customers. Factors such as buying price, maintenance cost, number of doors, passenger capacity, boot space, and safety ratings all play a role. By applying a Random Forest model, the company can train multiple decision trees on historical car data and predict the acceptability of new car models with high accuracy.
In practice, Random Forest models have consistently outperformed single decision trees in such scenarios. While a single decision tree might misclassify a significant number of cars due to overfitting or bias, the Random Forest, by considering multiple trees, is able to achieve almost perfect classification accuracy.
Many organizations conduct multiple rounds of interviews before hiring an employee. Even if the questions are similar in each round, different interviewers may assess candidates differently. This multi-round, multi-opinion process is analogous to ensembling in machine learning.
Random Forest can be applied to recruitment data to predict whether a candidate will succeed in a role based on their qualifications, test scores, past experiences, and interview performance. By training multiple decision trees on subsets of candidate data, the model can make more robust predictions than a single decision tree, helping HR teams make better hiring decisions.
In healthcare, accurate diagnosis is critical. Suppose a hospital wants to predict whether a patient has a particular disease based on symptoms, lab results, and demographic data. A single decision tree might give inconsistent results due to slight variations in patient data. Random Forest, by combining predictions from multiple trees, provides a more reliable diagnosis.
For example, studies have shown that Random Forest models outperform single decision trees in predicting diseases such as diabetes, heart disease, and certain cancers. By leveraging the ensemble approach, doctors can gain an additional layer of confidence in their decisions.
Banks and financial institutions often need to assess the creditworthiness of applicants. Traditional decision trees might misclassify risky applicants as safe or vice versa. Random Forest models, however, can analyze historical loan data, applicant income, debt levels, and other financial factors across multiple trees, producing more accurate risk predictions.
In one case study, a Random Forest model reduced loan default misclassifications by nearly 50% compared to a single decision tree, saving the bank millions of dollars in potential losses.
High Accuracy: By combining multiple trees, Random Forest often achieves higher accuracy than individual decision trees.
Robust to Overfitting: The randomness in selecting data points and features for each tree reduces the likelihood of overfitting.
Handles Large Datasets: Random Forest can process datasets with a large number of variables and observations efficiently.
Variable Importance: It identifies the most influential factors in prediction, helping businesses focus on critical aspects.
Versatility: Random Forest can be used for both classification (categorical outcomes) and regression (numerical outcomes).
Decision trees are simple and interpretable but can struggle with accuracy and consistency. Random Forest takes the strengths of decision trees and amplifies them while mitigating weaknesses:
Decision Tree Accuracy: Often lower due to overfitting and sensitivity to small changes in data.
Random Forest Accuracy: Higher due to ensembling, random sampling, and aggregation of multiple trees.
In practical applications, Random Forest consistently outperforms single decision trees, providing businesses and analysts with a more dependable prediction tool.
Random Forest is one of the most powerful tools in a data scientist’s arsenal. Its ability to combine multiple weak learners into a strong predictive model makes it invaluable across industries—whether predicting car acceptability, hiring the right candidate, diagnosing diseases, or assessing financial risks.
By understanding the principles behind Random Forest and learning how to implement it in R, businesses can make smarter, data-driven decisions. The model’s interpretability, combined with its high predictive power, ensures it remains a favorite among both beginners and experienced analysts.
Random Forest demonstrates a fundamental lesson applicable beyond data science: combining multiple perspectives leads to better decisions. Just like consulting multiple friends before choosing a movie or car, consulting multiple decision trees gives us the most reliable outcome.
Happy Random Foresting!
This article was originally published on Perceptive Analytics.
In United States, our mission is simple — to enable businesses to unlock value in data. For over 20 years, we’ve partnered with more than 100 clients — from Fortune 500 companies to mid-sized firms — helping them solve complex data analytics challenges. As a leading Marketing Analytics Company in San Jose, Marketing Analytics Company in Seattle and Excel Consultant in Philadelphia we turn raw data into strategic insights that drive better decisions.