All submissions will be handled electronically via OpenReview at TBA_link. When submitting, please make sure to select the correct track (TBA).
The paper submission format is the same as for the ECCV 2026 main conference. For details, please refer to the ECCV 2026 Submission Policies.
MUSTCV26 paper reviewing will be double-blind. Citation of any of the co-authors’ published work must be done in the third person. Reference to unpublished work can be made by anonymizing it, including it as supplementary material, and referencing it as Anonymous.
Each submitted paper will be revised by three expert reviewers.
All accepted contributed papers will appear in the ECCV 2026 workshops proceedings archival workshop).
The paper length should match that intended for final publication. Papers are limited to 14 pages (excluding references), including figures and tables in the LNCS style of Springer. Additional pages may only contain cited references. Note also that the template has changed since ECCV 2024. Authors must thus use this new template instead of templates from older conferences.
Please download the ECCV 2026 Author Kit (see ECCV 2026 Submission Policy) for detailed formatting instructions. While there is no limit to the number of references, reviewers are instructed to check for pertinence.
Authors may optionally submit additional material that could not be included in the main paper due to constraints of format (e.g., a video), space (e.g., a proof of a theorem or an extra figure or table) or anonymity.
Authors may use any tools they find productive in preparing a paper, but must be aware that they are responsible for the entire content of their paper, including any misrepresentation, factual inaccuracy, or plagiarism. Papers containing citations of non-existent material will be rejected when found, and may be rejected without review. Similarly, papers containing obvious factual inaccuracies will be rejected when found and may be rejected without review. It is not a defense to a charge of plagiarism or of inaccuracy to argue that “an LLM did it”. Authors are responsible for what they submit. The authors should be aware that LLMs may repeat parts of their training data, which could cause plagiarism issues. Finally, if a submission is found to contain prompt injection, it may be desk-rejected without review, and the authors may be subject to further sanctions.
Papers that are not blind, do not use the template, or exceed the page limit will be rejected without review.
Authors may submit extended abstracts describing published or ongoing works.
These works will not follow the standard peer review process and hence will not be published in the workshop proceedings. They will, however, be checked for relevance with respect to the workshop topics. Authors may submit extended abstracts describing published or ongoing work. These submissions will not undergo the standard peer review process and, therefore, will not be published in the workshop proceedings. However, they will be reviewed for relevance to the workshop topics.
Accepted abstracts will be published on the workshop website (subject to author consent) and may be selected for presentation during the workshop's poster session.
Extended abstracts should be at least 2 pages and at most 4 pages long, including references.
The extended abstract papers will use the same template as the other workshop papers, see ECCV 2026 Author Kit (see ECCV 2025 Submission Policy).
Each paper must have at least one registered author (in-person workshops/tutorials passport with student fee if applicable).
Virtual registrations will not cover a paper submission. If circumstances prevent you from attending in person to present your paper, you may attend virtually but you must register and pay for your paper under an in-person registration.
Additional registration info can be found on the official ECCV 2026 Registration page.
TBA