Objective: The purpose of this lab is to gain a deeper understanding of the chemistry of ethers through performing three esterification reactions over the course of two weeks. The first reaction will involve synthesizing methyl benzoate from benzoic acid and methanol, the second will be synthesizing solid acetylsalicylic acid, and the third reaction will be the reaction of salic acid and methanol to form methyl salicylate. We will also continue to practice testing products for their purity through mp, TLC, RI, IR, and a new method Trinder's Qualitative Test.
Compounds of Study:
Formula: C6H5COOH
Molar Mass: 122.12 g/mol
Density: 1.27 g/mL
MP: 122.3 °C
BP: 250°C
Polarity: Polar
Refractive Index: 4.202
IR: ~1680 - 1710 cm-1;
Image Source: MedChem Express
Formula: HOC6H4COOH
Molar Mass: 138.12 g/mol
Density: 1.44 g/mL
MP: 158.6°C
BP: 336.3°C
Polarity: Polar
Refractive Index: 1.58
IR: 3233 cm-1
Image Source: MedChem Express
Formula: C9H8O4
Molar Mass: 180.158 g/mol
Density: 1.4 g/mL
MP: 136°C
BP: 140°C
Polarity: Polar
Refractive Index: 1.56
IR: ~1750 cm-1
Image Source: HomeworkStudy.com
Formula: C₈H₈O₂
Molar Mass: 136.15 g/mol
Density: 1.08 g/mL
MP: -12.35 °C
BP: 199.6 °C
Polarity: Polar
Refractive Index: 1.52
IR: 1730-1715 cm-1
Image Source: Sigma-Aldrich
Formula: C₈H₈O₃
Molar Mass: 152.15 g/mol
Density: 1.17 g/mL
MP: -9.0 °C
BP: 200 °C
Polarity: Polar
Refractive Index: 1.54
IR: ~3200 cm-1
Image Source: Medchem Express
Pre Lab:
Pre-Lab Questions
1. Copy the table below into you lab notebook and create a list of the work that you need to do in this first lab period for each of the three labs you are working on
Cyclohexene Lab
What analysis work do you still need to do? The post-lab is due this weekend
All experimental procedures completed, results, discussion, conclusion, and post-lab questions in lab book must be completed before the due date on 02/22/2025.
Grignard Lab
What workup and analysis work do you still need to do? The postlab is due in two weeks.
All of Activity #5 must be completed:
Add 20 mL of "wet" ether to the RBF kept in lab drawer from last week.
Shake the flask vigorously to clear all product from the side of the container.
Sonicate the flask in the sonicator.
Transfer all product from the RBF into a beaker.
If clumps of product remain add acetone to the beaker and to the ether layer until clumps dissolve.
Add 25 mL of 10% sulfuric acid and 15 of ice to the beaker.
Once bubbling stops, transfer the solution into a separatory funnel.
Wash the ether layer with 10% sulfuric acid.
Dry the ether filter and add 25 mL of hexane, ligroin, or petroleum ether.
Evaporate the ether-ligroin mixture using a steam bath until about 5 mL of solvent remains or crystals begin to appear.
Remove the filter flask from the heat, place on ice and add hexane to form the precipitate.
Weigh your product and determine percent yield.
Analyze product by TLC, melting point, and Mass Spec.
Perform Benzoic Acid Workup:
Heat the mixture to evaporate the ether until a precipitate is formed.
Isolate the benzoic acid by filtering.
Wash the precipitate with cold water and allow the crystals to dry for a week.
Write all experimental steps, results for part one of activity 5. Final part of lab next week.
Esterification Lab
What synthesis are you going to conduct 1st this week and what are the steps you will do in the lab (1st will… 2nd will…etc)
One (possibly two if enough time) esterification will be performed this week!
Instructions for Activity #1:
Add 5.0 g of benzoic acid and 13 mL of methanol to 50 mL RBF.
Cool this mixture on ice.
Add 3 mL concentrated sulfuric acid.
Swirl the contents and add boiling stones.
Connect RBF to reflux condenser and reflux the mixture for 1hr.
At the end of the hour, cool the reaction mixture.
Transfer reaction mixture into a separatory funnel.
Dilute 1:1 with water.
Extract with ether and wash the ether layer with water.
Was with saturated sodium bicarbonate.
Wash with a saturated salt solution.
Dry the solution and remove the ether by vacuum evaporation in the hood using heat until the ether is gone or no time remains.
When pure product has been obtained, collect and record yield.
Perform analysis through TLC, refractive index, and IR data.
Pour products into the “Student Prepared Methyl Benzoate” bottle.
Instructions for Activity #2 (If Time):
Add 3.0 g of salicylic acid and 4.2 mL acetyl chloride in a 100 mL Erlenmeyer flask.
Add 3 drops of concentrated sulfuric acid.
Swirl the solution to combine all the chemicals in the solution.
Place the flask in a steam bath.
Cover the steam bath with a watch glass and allow it to run for 15-20 minutes.
Remove from the steam bath and add 5 mL of ice water.
After the reaction has run to completion add 35 mL of water to the flask and place on ice.
Collect product via vacuum filtration.
Wash the solid using cold water.
Calculated yield percent.
Performed Trinder Qualitative test.
Further analysis of the product using TLC and IR.
Write experimental procedures for all lab activities. The other synthases will be performed in the following lab weeks.
2. Using curved arrow formalism, in single steps, draw the mechanism of the reaction to create the 1st ester that you are going to make. It is easiest to draw the mechanism ton paper and then upload the photo. Make sure that you refer either to the text or your class notes for the Esterification mechanism and draw it exact. For good practice you should draw all 3 mechanisms however, you only need to draw 1.
See Image Labeled "2.)."
3. Why is it important to measure out the salicylic acid accurately but not necessarily the acetyl chloride/acetic anhydride in activity #1?
The reaction with salicylic acid affects the stereochemistry of the reaction and will change the theoretical yield of the desired ester product. If an incorrect amount of alicyclic acid is used, a lower yield of the final product could be created than the desired theoretical yield. Acetyl chloride/acetic anhydride are highly reactive and large amounts in solution can help to ensure that the reaction runs to completion.
4. An acetyl chloride molecule contains a better leaving group than a carboxylic acid molecule which is why it is often used as an electrophilic compound. What is the leaving group carboxylic acids? What is the leaving group for acetyl chloride?
The leaving group in a carboxylic acid is the hydroxyl group (-OH), a generally poor leaving group that often has to be protonated into the very good leaving group (HOH).
The leaving group fro acetyl chloride is the chloride ion (-Cl), a very good halide leaving group.
5. When we use an anhydride as a reagent, the workup step requires hydrolysis of the anhydride to “destroy” it so that it is easily washed away during the extraction process. Using curved arrow formalism, draw the reaction that happens between acetic anhydride and water in the hydrolysis step. What is the product?
The oxygen of water is your nucleophile
The carbonyl carbon of the anhydride is the electrophile.
Draw the mechanism from what you know about how electrons usually move with an ester (especially in the month of February 🙂).
See Image Below labeled "5.)."
6. There is a lot of extraction in this laboratory and it is important to make sure that you always keep the correct layer. Consider these two scenarios
When you have a mixture of dichloromethane and a solution saturated with sodium bicarbonate, which layer contains the DCM, the top or the bottom?
Dichloromethane will be at the bottom of a separatory funnel as it is more dense than sodium bicarbonate.
When you have a mixture of ether and a solution saturated with salt, which layer contains the ether, the top or the bottom?
The saturated salt solution will be at the bottom of a seperatory funnel as it more dense than ether, making ether the top layer.
7. After extraction and washing steps, experiments in this lab state to dry and then evaporate. What is the process of “drying” and what must you do between drying and evaporation? It might be good to visualize in your mind these steps to answer the question.
"Drying" a solution means to remove any excess water from within it. One of the ways we most commonly dry a solution in our lab is by using sodium sulfate. By adding sodium sulfate and swirling it in the solution until no more obvious clumps form you cause water within the solution to bond to the "dry" material.
The sodium sulfate is then filtered out of the solution using gravity filtration and the solution can then be evaporated using heat to remove all remaining organic solvent, leaving behind only the desired product.
8. For making the two liquids methyl salicylate and methyl benzoate, you evaporate all ether or DCM to isolate the final product and a common question is, how do I know when it is all evaporated. One method is to evaporate until you have heated the flask to the boiling point of the solvents. What is the boiling point of ether and DCM in oC and oF? And finally for comparison, what is the boiling point of water in oC and oF. Since day-to-day, we use oF, it is sometimes easier to think in Fahrenheit when assessing the temperature by feel.
In Celsius: 34.6°C
In Fahrenheit: 94.3°F
In Celsius: 39.6°C
In Fahrenheit: 103.3°F
Boiling Point of Water:
In Celsius: 100°C
In Fahrenheit: 212°F
9. Again for making the two liquids methyl salicylate and methyl benzoate, you can assess complete evaporation by yield. To explain, if you know you should only have a yield of 10 mL however there is 20 mL in your flask then evaporation is not complete. Calculate the theoretical yield for both reaction #2 and #3. You must calculate the moles of expected product from the moles of starting material, convert the moles to grams using molar mass and then convert from grams to mL using density. You need to show your calculations.
See Image Below Labeled "9.)" for work.
Theoretical Yield:
Methyl Salicylate: 3.34 mL
Methyl Benzoate: 3.12 mL
10. The lab reading includes special notes for each kind of analysis so as to ensure that you have good data to interpret
For TLC, what is likely the reason why your standard and your product have very close Rf values but not exactly the same value? What can you do to correct this?
The esterification reaction produces esters, which might have slightly different polarity than expected due to solvent retention.
Rf values may also differ from impurities caused by an incomplete reaction or side reactions. These differences could be addressed by ensuring that the standard and product are dissolved in the same solvent before spotting, making sure the TLC plate is completely dry before running it, and using a more dilute sample to prevent impurities from appearing on the TLC plate.
For IR, what is likely the reason why you might have really broad peaks and transmission only 0-10%? What can you do to correct this?
Broad peaks are often the result of moisture contamination when water is absorbed in the system during workup. This can be prevented by ensuring the sample is completely dry before analysis.
For MP/RI, what is likely the reason why you have bad data although all indications are that you made the correct product and that it is pure? What can you do to correct this?
Bad data may be caused by residual solvent present in the system, which can lower melting points or shift the refractive index. Experimental errors in temperature control (for MP) or improper calibration of the refractometer (for RI) can also lead to incorrect values. For both RI and MP analysis, allowing the product to dry will allow the solvent to be fully removed from the system to prevent inaccurate data.
Methods:
Activity #2: Synthesis of Acetylsalicylic Acid
Combined 3.0 g of salicylic acid and 5 mL of acetic anhydride in a round bottom flask.
Added 3 drops of concentrated sulfuric acid to the flask.
The flask was swirled to combine the contents of the solution and placed in a steam bath on a hot plate setting of 8. The flask was covered with a watch glass to prevent excess loss of water.
Monitored reaction and allowed the solution to run in the steam bath for 20 minutes.
Removed from heat and added 5 mL of ice water to solution.
Monitored reaction and added an additional 35 mL of water.
Placed flask on ice to cool to room temperature, periodically checking product to determine if white crystals had formed.
Removed flask after approximately 25 minutes on ice. Several white crystals had appeared in the bottom of the glass.
Vaccum-filtered product and washed with another 5 mL of cold water, this resulted in powdery white, but still damp appearing crystals.
Used a small amount of product to conduct Trinder's test analysis. Placed remainder of solution in lab drawer covered with a Kim wipe to dry for one week and allow for full evaporation of water from the final product.
Activity #4: Synthesis of Isoamyl Acetate
Combined 3.0 mL of isoamyl alcohol and 4.0 mL of acetic anhydride in an Erlenmeyer flask.
Added 3 drops of concentrated sulfuric acid to the flask.
The flask was swirled to combine contents and placed in a steam bath. Over a hot plate set to 7. The top of the flask was covered with a watch glass to minimize unnecessary loss of water. The reaction began almost immediately.
Allowed reaction to run for just over 15 minutes before removing the flask from the steam bath and adding 15 mL of water.
After all signs of a chemical reaction stopped another 15 mL of water was added to the solution.
The reaction mixture was transferred to a separatory and 30 mL of dichloromethane was added for extraction. The funnel was inverted several times, venting occasionally to relieve excess pressure, and then allowed to sit to allow layers within the solution to separate.
The dichloromethane layer was drained off of the product and the extraction process was then repeated with an additional 10 mL of dichloromethane.
The dichloromethane was washed with water and a saturated sodium bicarbonate solution.
The dichloromethane was then evaporated from the product using vacuum evaporation. This resulted in several mL of a clear solution that smelled like artificial banana flavoring.
The final product was covered with a rubber stopper and placed in the lab drawer for analysis the following week.
Week 2
Activity #3: Synthesis of Methyl Salicylate
Combined 3.0 g of salicylic acid and 8.5 mL of methanol in a round bottom flask.
The contents of the flask were swirled while on a gentle heat until salicylic acid was fully dissolved.
Slowly added 3 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid to the flask drop by drop.
A refluxing apparatus was prepared and the round bottom flask was attached.
The solution allowed to gently reflux for just over one hour.
After the one-hour mark, the round bottom flask was removed from heat and allowed to cool to room temperature ( approximately 20 degrees Celcius).
After cooling, 20 mL of dichloromethane was added to the solution.
The solution was then transferred to a separatory funnel and 10 mL of water was added. The separatory funnel was inverted to mix the solution, venting occasionally to release excess pressure, and then left to sit until distinct layers appeared within the solution.
Once two distinct layers formed within the funnel the dichloromethane layer was drained off and an additional 10 mL of dichloromethane was added to the funnel and the above extraction process was repeated.
Combined the two dichloromethane layers in a flask and washed the solution once with water and twice with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution.
Separated organic layer and evaporated dichloromethane using vacuum evaporation using low heat, this resulted in several mL of clear product.
Analyzed product via % yield, IR, RI, and TLC analysis.
Activity #2 and #4 Continued:
Retrieved both the acetylsalicylic acid and isoamyl acetate products from the previous week from lab drawer.
Determined % yield for both products.
Ran RI analysis for isoamyl acetate.
Ran melting point analysis for acetylsalicyclic acid.
Ran TLC and IR analysis for both products.
Results
Activity #2: Acetylsalicylic acid
Theoretical Yield: 3.34 g
Isolated Yield: 3.12 g of white powder
% yield: 3.12 g / 3.34 g = 93% yield.
Tinder Test: Positive
Melting Point: 126.2-128.4°C
TLC: TLC was performed using a solvent with a ratio of 3:1 hexane to ethyl acetate. Lab-prepared acetylsalicylic acid was compared with an instructor-provided standard.
IR: See below image.
Image of 3.12 g Pure Acetylsalicylic Acid Product:
TLC: Acetylsalicylic Acid:
Solvent Front: 5.2 mm
Spot 1: 3.5 mm
Rf Value: 0.67
Infrared Spectroscopy of Acetylsalicylic Acid:
Wide/broad peaks around 3000 cm-1 range: Indicates Carboxylic Acid presence
Strong narrow peak at 1600 cm-1: Consistent with Aromatic Ring
Strong, spiked peaks around1700 cm-1: Consistent with Ester
Peaks of varying height are noted throughout the fingerprint region.
TLC: Methyl Salicylate
Activity #3: Methyl Salicylate
Theoretical yield: 3.12 mL
Isolated Yield: 1.45 mL
% yield: 1.45 mL/3.12 mL = 46% yield
TLC: TLC was performed using a solvent with a ratio of 3:1 hexane to ethyl acetate. Lab-prepared methyl salicylate was compared with an instructor-provided standard.
Solvent Front: 1.9 cm
Student Sample Spot: 1.75 cm
Standard Sample (X) Spot: 1.75 cm
RI of Student Sample: 0.92
RI of Standard (X): 0.92
RI: 1.427
IR: See below image.
Infrared Spectroscopy Methyl Salicylate:
Strong peaks in the fingerprint region.
Activity #4: Isoamyl acetate
Theoretical yield: 4.1 mL
Isolated Yield: 2.6 mL / 2.6 g of pale yellow, pleasant-smelling liquid.
% yield: 2.6 mL/4.1 mL = 63% yield
TLC: TLC was performed using a solvent with a ratio of 3:1 hexane to ethyl acetate.
RI: 1.3990
IR: See below image.
TLC: Isoamyl Acetate:
Student Prepared Sample
Solvent Front: 3.7 mm
Spot 1: 1.9 mm
Rf Value: 0.51
Lab Standard:
Solvent Front: 3.7 mm
Spot 1: 0.9 mm
Spot 2: 2.3 mm
Rf Value of Spot 1: 0.24
Rf Value of Spot 2: 0.62
Infrared Spectroscopy of Isoamyl Acetate:
A small broad peak was noted around 3000 cm-1: Likely related to methyl character.
Peaks around 1800 cm-1: Likely consistent with ester functional group.
Peaks in and around the fingerprint region of IR.
Discussion:
Acetylsalicylic Acid:
The synthesis of acetylsalicylic acid resulted in 3.12 g of white powder. This experiment had a high yield of 93%. Melting point analysis revealed a melting point of 126.2-128.4°C, which is 7.6°C lower than the expected melting point literature value of 136°. The difference in melting points could be related to contaminants or possible unreacted materials.
The Trinder's test for this product was positive, indicating that there was salicylic acid present in the compound. This test indicates that there is likely acetylsalicylic acid present in the final product.
The TLC for the acetylsalicylic acid product had a single spot with an RF value of 0.67. The lack of multiple spots indicates a likely pure product.
The IR obtained for the Acetylsalicylic Acid indicates peaks associated with the presence of an aromatic ring, carboxylic acid, and ester. All IR peaks are consistent with functional groups present in acetylsalicylic acid, such as an ether, aromatic ring, and a carboxylic acid.
Methyl Salicylate:
The synthesis for methyl salicylate resulted in 1.45 mL of product or a 46% yield. This yield is less than 50%, making it less than the desired results. The RI for this methyl salicylate product was 1.427, which is 0.113 away from the expected literature value of 1.54.
TLC for methyl salicylate product indicates 1 spot with an RF value of 0.92, which is consistent with the RF value of the lab standard.
The IR for methyl salicylate shows strong peaks in the fingerprint region but several key characteristics we would expect to see for methyl salicylate, such as an aromatic ring, ester, and an alcohol.
Isoamyl Acetate:
The synthesis of isoamyl acetate produced 4.1 mL of product. The experiment had a 63% yield. The RI for the product was 1.3990, this is consistent with the expected literature value.
The TLC for this experiment resulted in 1 spot for the lab-prepared product with an RF value of 0.51. The laboratory-prepared sample had a TLC with two spots, the first spot having an RF value of 0.24 and the second having an RF value of 0.62. This is different than the expected results as typically pure samples would have only 1 TLC spot. The RF value of the product and the second RF value for the lab standard differ by 0.11, indicating that the two products have different polarities.
The IR peaks are consistent with functional groups present in isoamyl acetate, such as an ether and a methyl group.
Conclusion:
The results of this experiment indicate that, based on IR testing (and the trinder test for acetylsalicylic), both acetylsalicylic acid and isoamyl acetate were likely synthesized with good yield despite some impurities. The IR of methysalicylate indicates that another compound may have been synthesized with a lower-than-anticipated yield.
Reflection: In this lab, I learned how to analyzed both solid and liquid compounds through infrared spectroscopy. I continued to practice refluxing procedures through the synthesis of methyl salicylate and steam distillation for the synthesis of isoamyl acetate and acetylsalicylic acid. If I were to repeat this lab, I would repeat the TLC analysis of isoamyl acetate as the laboratory standard showed two spots, indicating some contamination in these standards. Repeating the TLC could be beneficial for a more accurate comparison between my sample and the laboratory standard.
Post-Lab:
1A. List the major IR absorbances for each of the three products.
Peaks Noted on IR for Acetylsalicyclic Acid:
Wide peaks noted from 2500-3200 cm-1
Strong, spiked peaks around 1600, 1700, and 1800 cm-1
Peaks of varying height are noted throughout the fingerprint region
Peaks Noted on IR for Methylsalicylate:
Wide peaks noted from 2500-3200 cm-1
Strong, spiked peaks around 1600, 1700, and 1800 cm-1
Peaks of varying height are noted throughout the fingerprint region.
Peaks Noted on IR for Isoamyl Acetate:
A small broad peak was noted around 3000 cm-1.
Peaks around 1800 cm-1 and 1600 cm-1.
Peaks in and around the print region of IR
1B. Identify the functional group(s) indicated by the IR absorbance.
Note: In your written conclusions, you should be discussing if the indicated functional groups match what you expect for your product and or. It could be that you have absorbances that match your starting material in which case you should then talk about the purity of your compound.
Acetylsalicylic Acid:
Wide/broad peaks around 3000 cm-1 range - Indicates Carboxylic Acid presence
Strong narrow peak at 1600 cm-1 - Consistent with Aromatic Ring
Strong, spiked peaks around1700 cm-1 - Consident with Ester
Peaks of varying height are noted throughout the fingerprint region
MethylSalicylate:
Peaks of varying height in the fingerprint region
I would normally expect very strong peaks around 1600 cm-1, consistent with an aromatic ring, a very strong and narrow peak around 1740 cm-1 showing an ester group, and a strong and broad peak around 3300 cm-1 indicating an alcohol group.
Isoamyl Acetate:
Small, broad peak was around 3000 cm-1: Likely related to methyl character.
Peak around 1800 cm-1: Likely consistent with ester functional group.
Peaks in and around the print region of IR.
2. Replicate the table below into your lab notebook. Below each analysis test write in if the test indicates that the material is pure or not pure.
See table below named "Question 2."
3. Replicate the table below in your lab notebook. Fill in the percent yield as calculated from moles of the limiting reagent and write in if the percent yield is acceptable or not.
See table below named "Question 3."