Objective: The purpose of this lab is to combine column chromatography and extraction to extract lycopene, polar sugars, organic acids, and amino acids found within tomato paste that are normally difficult to extract through other methods. In this lab, we will be using cartilage packed with resins that will allow us to extract the desired products. Each laboratory group will be using a different cartridge to allow for the comparison of results based on the different cartridge types.
Compounds of Study:
Formula: (C40H56)
Molar Mass: (536.87 g/mol)
MP: 172-173 °C
Polarity: (Non-Polar)
Image Source: Wikipedia
Formula: (C4H6O5)
Molar Mass: (134.08 g/mol)
MP: 131-133 °C
Polarity: (Polar)
Image Source: Phyto Tech Labs
Formula: (C8H11NO)
Molar Mass: (137.18 g/mol)
MP: 160-162 °C
Polarity: (Non-Polar)
Image Source: Sigma Aldrich
Pre-Lab:
After reading the introduction above, what are two objectives that you see for this second part of the lab? Include this in your “objectives” section along with the objective of the normal extraction lab.
The purpose of this lab is to combine column chromatography and extraction to extract lycopene, polar sugars, organic acids, and amino acids found within tomato paste that are normally difficult to extract through other methods. In this lab, we will be using cartilage packed with resins that will allow us to extract the desired products. Each laboratory group will be using a different cartridge to allow for the comparison of results based on the different cartridge types.
(Also pasted above in "objective" section of lab report)
Isolating and determining amounts of natural products in tomatoes is a very important field of research. Read the introduction sections of the papers linked below and give 3 reasons why in society determining amounts of lycopene is important.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N6uECNZzIMRfZ0oztnw-3MmMKd98rXJ4/view?usp=sharing
Lycopene has been shown to inhibit tumor growth in different parts of the body, including the colon, liver, lungs, prostate, and breasts.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1N99OXoKpxtkvdygAWa1YlZtjT1l_gpdg/view?usp=sharing
Lycopene is a known antioxidant and can remove free radicals from the body.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IbmAA1Rr1i6UeiykKb1ztw7ml9CyNUpL/view?usp=sharing
Lycopene gives tomatoes their red appearance. A greater presence of lycopene causes a tomato to appear more red, making it more likely to be purchased by consumers and helping to increase profit within the tomato industry.
The chemical composition of tomatoes is very complex. Refer to the paper linked at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1IbmAA1Rr1i6UeiykKb1ztw7ml9CyNUpL/view?usp=sharing that has been highlighted on canvas and conduct additional research on one amino acid and one organic acid that you find are interesting. Report on the structure, properties and give two interesting pieces of information about each one of the chemicals that you researched. Add these two chemicals to your “compound of study” section along with Lycopene.
Malic Acid -
Malic acid is a dicarboxylic acid and has the chemical formula C4H6O5.
Facts:
Malic acid has two known stereoisomers but only one form, the (L) form exists naturally. The (R) stereoisomer must be manufactured in a lab.
Malic acid helps to make foods taste sour and contributes to the sour taste of green apples.
Tyramine -
Tyramine is an amino acid and has the chemical formula C8H11NO.
Facts:
Tyramine has been known to help regulate blood pressure.
Tyramine is unable to cross the blood-brain barrier.
Before working with the SPE cartridge, the tomato has to be diluted with water. To make sure that the organic acids are in their non-polar acid form, we have to adjust the pH of the water. Should the water be made acidic or basic? Briefly explain.
The water should be made more acidic. The organic acids that we are attempting to isolate through this experiment are acidic in nature, therefore if we added a basic solution it would neutralize the acidic components, causing the product to not be isolated in the experiment.
Before adding the tomato to the cartridge, the cartridge needs to be preconditioned. The cartridges are dry. Answer the following questions.
The cartridges are to be preconditioned in a solvent that is of the opposite polarity of the resin. In the lab will you condition the resin with a polar or non-polar solvent? Explain. To answer, you need to consider what the polarity of the resin will be to capture our compounds of interest.
A polar solvent should be used to catch the nonpolar lycopene that will move through the system.
The cartridges are to be preconditioned in 6-10 times the hold volume of the cartridge. The hold volume of the cartridges we will be using is about 0.5 mL so how much should we use for preconditioning?
Approximately 3-5 mL should be used. (0.5*6=3 and 0.5*10=5)
Because there are a wide variety of chemical compounds that we wish to isolate, we are going to extract from the solid into several kinds of liquid solvents. The hope is that each solvent only extract one or two compounds of interest. This is a trick often used by natural product chemists to attempt to separate and isolate chemicals from one another. We have tried the same kind of trick before in an extraction lab by manipulating the pH of the extract. In this lab, we are manipulating the polarity of the extract. The rule is to begin with the most polar solvent and end with the most non-polar solvent. Rank the following solvents in order of most polar to least polar: acetonitrile, ethyl acetate, isopropanol, methanol, tetrahydrofuran, water.
From most to least polar: Water, Methanol, Acetonitrile, Isopropanol, Ethyl Acetate, and then Tetrahydrofuran.
Research the SPE cartridge type that you have signed up using the sign up sheet on the canvas page and give a brief report. You must report on the chemical composition of the resin in the cartridge (use words to describe and don’t upload a picture). You must state what kinds of compounds (polar or non-polar) that it is best used with. You must state if you would predict it would work well considering the objectives of this laboratory activity.
The SPE cartridge type that my lab partner and I have signed up for is a Si cartridge. Its chemical structure has two methyl groups with two Si atoms bonded to two hydroxy groups and one additional oxygen. The Si cartridge is a polar sorbent that is used to extract polar analytes from non-polar matrices. Due to lycopene being a non-polar chemical, I feel that the Si cartridge will not be effective at isolating lycopene but it may be effective at isolating another more polar organic compound found withing the tomato paste.
After reading the introduction and reviewing the links provided, what technique have you performed in the past that is a lot like solid phase extraction (SPE). Explain in good detail.
It seems that liquid column chromatography has a similar process to solid-phase extraction. Both processes require the use of a column, a resin for the chemicals to move through, and a solvent to extract the desired product. A good understanding of the nature of the chemicals used in both columns as well as the nature of the chemicals you are seeking to obtain as a product is also required for both procedures to ensure you are selecting the proper chemicals throughout the experimental process.
Solid Phase Extraction
Experimental:
Measured 0.30 g of tomato paste.
Measured 30 ml of water and added HCL until the pH was approximately 4.0.
Combined tomato paste, water, and HCL solution were stirred in a beaker until the paste had dissolved.
Vacuum-filtered the solution to remove any undissolved tomato paste remaining in the system.
Prepared the cartridges to conduct column chromatography.
Two 3.0 mL beakers were obtained of each of the five solvents that were to be used in today's laboratory proceedings (methanol, acetonitrile, isopropanol, ethyl acetate, and ether) were measured into test tubes.
The column was conditioned by running 3.0 mL of DI water through it three different times, being careful to ensure the column never ran completely dry.
5 mL of the tomato extract was then run through the column. The cartridge turned a faint orange color.
The column was then rinsed with DI water three times.
The column was then run through with 3.0 mL of methanol twice.
The tube collecting the methanol and extracted compounds was then put into a heated sand bath to evaporate some of the solvent.
This process was repeated with each of the remaining in order of decreasing polarity, beginning with acetonitrile, isopropanol, ethyl acetate, and then ether, and they were left to boil to remove the solvent.
Once 0.5 ml of the solvent had evaporated from each tube, TLC analyzed them using a 3:1 hexane-ethyl acetate solvent.
Our TLC plates were analyzed and compared to those of other groups with different column types.
Results:
Solvent: 3:1 hexane/ethyl acetate solvent.
The TLC resulted in very faint spots.
Height of the Solvent Front Plate 1 (Far Left):
Height of the Solvent Front Plate 2 (Middle):
Height of the Solvent Front Plate 3 (Far Right):
TLC:
Solvent Front for ethyl acetate plate("EA") = 4.2 cm
EA (Left) - (ethyl acetate): 4.1 cm
EA (Right) - (ethyl acetate): 4.1 cm
Spots 1 and 2 Rf =4.1/4.2 = 0.98
Solvent Front for methanol and isopropanol plate("Met" and "Iso) = 4.7 cm
Met (Left) - (methanol): 4.4 cm
Met (Right) - (methanol): 4.4 cm
Spot "Met" 1 and 2 Rf = 4.4/4.7 = 0.94
Iso (Left) - (isopropanol): No spot.
Iso (Right) - (isopropanol): No spot.
Solevnt Front for ether and acetonitrile = 4.6 cm
Eth (Left) - (ether): 4.6 cm
Eth (Right ) - (ether): 4.6 cm
Act (Left) - (acetonitrile): 4.6 cm
Act (Right) -(acetonitrile): 4.6 cm
Spots "Eth" 1 and 2 and "Ace" 1 and 2 Rf = 4.6/4.6 = 1
TLC of Felix's Column:
Solvent: 3:1 hexane/ethyl acetate.
The TLC resulted in faint spots, yet these spots were still arguably darker than the ones collected by my laboratory group.
Height of Solvent Front Plate 1: 2.5 cm
Height of Solvent Front Plate 2: 3.0 cm
Plate 1:
M1 (methanol)
No Spots
M2 (methanol)
Spot 1: 1.75cm
2.75/3.5 = RF 0.7
A1 (acetonitrile)
Spot 1: 1.75cm
RF 0.7
Spot 2: 2.5cm
RF= 1
A2 (acetonitrile)
Spot 1: 1.75cm
RF 0.7
Spot 2: 2.5cm
RF= 1
I1 (isopropanol)
Spot 1: 2.5cm
RF = 1
Plate 2:
I2 (isopropanol)
No Spots
Ey1 (ethyl acetate)
Spot 1: 2.3cm
2.3/3= RF 0.766
Spot 2: 1.7cm
1.7/3 = RF 0.566
Ey2 (ethyl acetate)
Spot 1: 2.3cm
2.3/3= RF 0.766
Spot 2: 1.7cm
1.7/3 = RF 0.566
Ee1 (ether)
Spot 1: 2.3cm
2.3/3= RF 0.766
Spot 2: 1.7cm
1.7/3 = RF 0.566
Ee2 (ether)
Spot 1: 2.3cm
2.3/3= RF 0.766
Spot 2: 1.7cm
1.7/3 = RF 0.566
Discussion:
What fractions have spots? What does this indicate about the polarity of the compounds in tomatoes?
In our experiment, we used a Si cartridge, a polar compound that is best at extracting polar compounds. The results indicate this to be the case, as my laboratory group had TLC spots for ethyl acetate, methanol, ether, and acetonitrile and no TLC spots for isopropanol. Methanol had the darkest TLC spots, which indicates its polar nature. The other compounds had spots, but the compounds that migrated to the top of the plate were the compounds that were more non-polar in nature. It is important to note that most of the spots on our TLC appeared to be very faint, and despite evaporating and spotting several times, it was difficult to get a dark spot for TLC.
Do different fractions have the same spots? Are the same compounds eluting with different solvents? How selective is the extraction?
Due to the similarity of many of our Rf values and many of the spots beginning to appear the same as the chemicals became more non-polar, the same compounds may be eluting with different solvents. I would argue that the extraction process is somewhat but not entirely selective.
How many spots in total did you observe? What does this indicate about the number of major organic compounds in tomatoes?
In total, seven fairly distinct compounds can be observed on the TLC plate. This indicates that there is a somewhat large number of major organic compounds within tomatoes but that not all of these compounds can be effectively eluted through SPE.
How does your data for SPE extraction compare to the extraction by normal conditions (lab 9A)? What conclusions can you draw about the effectiveness of different extraction types? What conclusions can you draw about the effectiveness of your extraction by SPE compared to normal extraction? Is one more effective than the other at isolating one pure compound? Is one more effective than the other at isolating a variety of chemical compounds?
When compared to the previous lab, it is evident that a greater variety of chemicals was extracted from the tomato paste making SPE more effective at removing multiple chemical components at once from any given mixture than just extraction. However, a much greater quantity of the original chemical and a purer sample was obtained from simple extraction. It is clear to me that there are benefits and downsides to both chemical processes.
How does your data for SPE extraction compare to the SPE isolation of other groups? What conclusions can you draw about the effectiveness of different SPE column types? Is one more effective than the other at isolating one pure compound? Is one more effective than the other at isolating a variety of chemical compounds?
In comparing our laboratory data to Felix's CN cartridge, which is also a polar compound, Felix also noted the darkest TlC spots in the more polar chemicals, stating that his methanol and ether fractions had the darkest spots in his laboratory report. This would mean there was a very polar compound that moved well in methanol. Felix's TLC plates showed faint spots for more non-polar chemicals, such as isopropanol. The appearance of sports for isopropanol in Felix's TLC, though the spot was faint, leads me to believe that if my group and I had evaporated my solvent more, it is possible that we may have seen a TLC spot for this chemical as well. Given more time, I would have evaporated my eluted chemicals a bit longer and reported my TLC to see how my results would have been impacted.
It appears that both Si and CN were effective in isolating polar compounds but yielded little success in isolating non-polar compounds, making a non-polar cartridge likely a better choice for isolating these compounds.
Overall, does SPE seem to be an effective method to purify interesting organic compounds from tomatoes?
This technique seems to be an effective method for purifying organic compounds from tomatoes as many different spots were collected and shown on the TLC as predicted.
Conclusion: This lab was effective at eluting compounds from tomato paste. However, due to poor evaporation techniques, the spots present on the TLC plates were faint. With more time, it is possible that more compounds would have been present upon analysis.
Reflection: In this lab, I learned about solid-phase extraction and gained a deeper understanding of this laboratory process's relation to other laboratory practices such as column chromatography. I practiced laboratory techniques such as creating sand baths for the evaporation of solvents, TLC, and vacuum filtration. If I were to conduct this lab for a second time, I would evaporate more of the solvent in the hopes of creating clearer spots on all three of my TLC plates.