health care professions and arenas would enable RLP to reach a larger population. Also, web-based resources could reach women and men outside of the health care system, and provide health care personnel with easy to find and updated information. Future directions for research will be to study the implementation process in routine care through different health care providers and investigate the effect of the RLP in contraceptive counselling among a general population of women in various settings. More knowledge is required on how the RLP is perceived by different groups, such as women of different ages, and how counselling can be more effective in reaching less accessible groups of women. Future studies will also be needed on the feasibility and effect of the RLP in other arenas, such as school health and post-natal care services, and for other target groups. Conclusions Swedish midwives generally adopted the RLP in contraceptive counselling, had predominantly positive experiences of the RLP and considered it a feasible tool for promoting reproductive health. This underlines the promise of the RLP, and the relevance of exploring the use of RLP by other health professionals and in nations other than the USA and Sweden. Acknowledgements We are grateful to all midwives who participated in the study. 1154 Stern et al. Downloaded from 590484 by guest on 02 February 2022 Authors’ roles J.S., M.B., T.T. and M.L. planned and designed the study. J.S., M.B., T.T., M.L., L.A. and B.S. contributed to the acquisition of data. J.S., M.B., M.G., T.T. and M.L. analysed the data. J.S. provided a draft manuscript. All authors were involved in revising the manuscript and approved the final version. Funding Grantswere received from theMedical FacultyatUppsalaUniversityand the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health (3297 EUR). Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by the Medical Faculty at Uppsala University. Conflict of interest None declared. References Burnard P, Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B. Analysing and presenting qualitative data. Br Dent J 2008;204:429– 432. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care—United States: a report of the CDC/ATSDR Preconception Care Work Group and the Select Panel on Preconception Care. MMWR Recomm Rep 2006;55:1 – 23. Coffey K, Shorten A. The challenge of preconception counselling: using reproductive life planning in primary care. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract 2013; 26:255– 262. Dunlop AL, Jack B, Frey K. National recommendations for preconception care: the essential role of the family physician. J Am Board Fam Med 2007;20:81 – 84. Dunlop AL, Logue KM, Miranda MC, Narayan DA. Integrating reproductive planning with primary health care: an exploration among low-income, minority women and men. Sex Reprod Healthc 2010;1:37 – 43. Files JA, Frey KA, David PS, Hunt KS, Noble BN, Mayer AP. Developing a reproductive life plan. J Midwifery Womens Health 2011;56: 468 – 474. Fleuren M, Wiefferink K, Paulussen T. Determinants of innovation within health care organizations—literature review and Delphi study. Int J Qual Health Care 2004;16:107 – 123. Gavin L, Moskosky S, Carter M, Curtis K, Glass E, Godfrey E, Marcell A, Mautone-Smith N, Pazol K, Tepper N et al. Providing Quality Family Planning Services Recommendations of CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs. MMWR Recomm Rep 2014;63:1– 51. Hochbaum GM. Public Participation in Medical Screening Programs: A Sociopsychological Study. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 1958. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 4th edn. Thousands Oakes, CA: Sage Publications Inc., 2009. Lampic C, Skoog Svanberg A, Karlstro¨m P, Tyde´n T. Fertility awareness, intentions concerning childbearing, and attitudes towards parenthood among female and male academics. Hum Reprod 2006;21:558 – 564. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1985. Lopez LM, Steiner M, Grimes DA, Hilgenberg D, Schulz KF. Strategies for communicating contraceptive effectiveness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;30:4:CD006964. Medical Products Agency. Antikonception—behandlingsrekommendation. Information fra˚n La¨kemedelsverket. 2014;25:14– 28 (in Swedish). Recommendation for anticonception. Mittal P, Dandekar A, Hessler D. Use of a modified reproductive life plan to improve awareness of preconception health in women with chronic disease. Perm J 2014;18:28 – 32. MLearning at work and university: Midwifery students and sexual health advice Practitioner Research In Higher Education Copyright © 2013 University of Cumbria Vol 7 (1) pages 63-77 Susan Walker, Geraldine Davis Anglia Ruskin University geraldine.davis@anglia.ac.uk Abstract: Concerns about the theory-practice gap and discussion regarding the role of the preregistration programme in preparing registered health care practitioners, are two recurring themes in the literature. This study was carried out in a higher education institution in England and was conducted over a twelve month period. It examined how well the undergraduate programme in midwifery prepares student midwives to provide sexual health