AASL Standard 1

The Learner and Learning

Candidates in school librarian preparation programs are effective educators who demonstrate an awareness of learners’ development. Candidates promote cultural competence and respect for inclusiveness. Candidates integrate the National School Library Standards considering learner development, diversity, and differences while fostering a positive learning environment. Candidates impact student learning so that all learners are prepared for college, career, and life.

1.1 Learner Development: Candidates demonstrate the ways learners grow within and across cognitive, psychomotor, affective, and developmental domains. Candidates engage learners’ interests to think, create, share and grow as they design and implement instruction that integrates the National School Library Standards.

1.2 Learner Diversity: Candidates articulate and model cultural competence and respect for inclusiveness, supporting individual and group perspectives.

1.3 Learning Differences: Candidates cultivate the educational and personal development of all members of a learning community, including those with diverse intellectual abilities, learning modalities, and physical variabilities.

1.4 Learning Environment: Candidates create both physical and virtual learner-centered environments that are engaging and equitable. The learning environments encourage positive social interaction and the curation and creation of knowledge.

HOW IT ALIGNS:

The lesson plans designed and executed in 654 and 693 require us to consider every aspect of the learner and how they learn. It also made me consider the best ways to engage the learners at their own individual levels. My engagement project in LIS 692 specifically targeted higher learners focusing on that one learning difference while also encouraging them to consider very diverse perspectives via the chosen books and conversations.

WHAT I LEARNED:

Prior to these classes I had little to no experience writing lesson plans. I learned how valuable it was to have things planned out, especially as a new teacher, so that your focus can be on the students and not on the lesson itself. The inquiry unit plan also encourages you to consider building lessons using the backwards design concept as well as based on what is going on in the students’ main classroom. Because they are already learning something connected, students are better able to participate and make their own connections between what they are learning. The plan, with the requirement to include a makerspace at least once, forces us to plan a variety of learning experiences which aids in differentiation and potentially teamwork.

The engagement project in LIS 692 specifically focused on higher learners. A lot of time and effort is put into learners who are struggling for one reason or another and higher learners are often left to educate themselves. Creating a space for those students showed the value of acknowledging learner diversity and creating a space for them.

The collaborative learning experience in LIS 693 highlighted just how important it is to know the students that you are teaching, especially when doing a collaborative unit. You cannot make assumptions about what they have already learned. It also made me realize that I have a tendency to try to accomplish too much or too broad of a topic. Narrowing your focus can work to your benefit.

IMPACT ON STUDENTS AND CONNECTION TO BEST PRACTICES:


"Motivation is a key component in learning" (Small et al., 2012, p.6).


Students learn best and are more engaged when they are involved in what they are learning. When we formulate lessons to allow students a higher level of power over their learning, they often have a larger motivation to be involved and, as such, retain more of the information. When we consider the idea of learning through interests, it seems like a no-brainer. Just consider the 5 year old obsessed with dinosaurs who soaks up every piece of information given to him. That desire for knowledge encourages exploration which turns into inquiry which leads to assimilation of knowledge, inference, and reflection (Callison & Baker, 2014).


This style of education is what we have seen encouraged as best practices while at UNCG. The constructivist teaching of John Dewey show that that students learn best through experience (Stripling, 2008); they are more engaged when they have a say in what they are learning. Research suggests that inquiry-based learning helps students understand concepts on a deeper level, helps them develop critical thinking skills, and gives them a sense of accomplishment (Northern, 2019). At the same time, each student comes to the classroom with a different background and set of skills. For us to have the most impact on student learning, it is important to address those differences rather than forcing students to conform to a single mode of learning.


I had never heard the concept of essential questions with regard to students prior to this program. But it is evident through readings that we have done that essential questions are vital for developing critical thinking skills (Levitov, 2016).

Tomlinson and McTighe break down a number of reasons why teacher responsiveness is important, but the two that stand out most to me are the need to make the material relevant to the students and to support different levels of readiness to learn (Tomlinson & McTighe, 2006).


Through my experiences during LIS 693, I came to see just how important understanding where your students are coming from and making sure that the library was a safe space. Many of the children that I worked with came from family and home situations that were less than stellar. While there were always goals in mind, making sure that they felt at home around the books and excited by the selection process, especially during the pandemic, became more important at times than making sure that they did an author study.

References:

Callison, D., & Baker, K. (2014). Elements of information inquiry, evolution of models, & measured reflection. Knowledge Quest, 43(2), 18-24.

Small, R. V., Arnone, M. P., Stripling, B. K., &; Berger, P. (2012). Teaching for inquiry: engaging the learner within. Neal Schuman Pub.

Stripling, B. (2008). Inquiry: Inquiring Minds Want to Know. School Library Media Activities Monthly, 15(1), 50-52). https://login.libproxy.uncg.edu/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/inquiry-inquiring-minds-want-know/docview/237139447/se-2?accountid=14604

Tomlinson, C. A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction & understanding by design: connecting content and kids. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/uncg/detail.action?docID=3002130