Fall 2021

Week 12: STEM Identity

Guiding Questions

  1. How might an emphasis on brilliance impact students’ selection of academic fields? How might this create a divide among students along racial/gender lines?

  2. What connections do the authors draw between stereotype threat, growth mindset and representation in STEM more broadly? How does this relate to or differ from our past discussion on these topics?


Cimpian and Leslie. 2017. The Brilliance Trap.pdf

Reading for this week

5c guide - Chae and Camilla.pdf

STEM Identity Vision Board

Skim as preparation for in-class activity

Week 11: Mental Health & Emotional Support

Cage et al. 2021. Student mental health and transitions into, through and out of university.pdf

Cage et al. 2021. Student mental health and transitions into, through and out of university

Week 10: Imposter Syndrome

Guiding Questions

  1. What is imposter syndrome? How does it differ from low self esteem?

  2. What is pluralistic ignorance and how does it contribute to imposter syndrome?

  3. In Holden et al., is there a difference in the degree to which imposter syndrome is experienced by first-generation vs. continuing generation students?

  4. How do self-oriented perfectionism, socially prescribed perfectionism, and others-oriented perfectionism differ?

  5. How did the researchers go about measuring imposter syndrome? What were their suggestions for mitigating it (in the Discussion section)?


Holden et al. 2021. Imposter Syndrome Among First-and Continuing-Generation College Students_ The Roles of Perfectionism and Stress.pdf

Holden et al. 2021. Imposter Syndrome Among First- and Continuing-Generation College Students

TedEd: "What is Imposter Syndrome and How Can You Combat It?"

Week 10: Imposter Syndrome

Meeting Notes

Week 9: Stereotype Threat

Guiding Questions

  1. What is a stereotype threat? How does stereotype threat manifest differently in a single test-taking experience compared with a more long-term academic experience (i.e. a semester/major)?

  2. How does stereotype threat differ from “self-fulfilling prophecies”?

  3. How might stereotype threat lead to disidentification with the field of study? Why does this seem to occur more frequently among high-achieving students?

  4. How can departments/organizations prevent or reduce stereotype threat according to Steele (or your own ideas)? What should be the role of mentors/TAs in these efforts?


Steele. 1999. Thin Ice_ Stereotype Threat and Black College Students.pdf

Steele, 1999. Thin Ice: Stereotype Threat and Black College Students

Week 9: Stereotype Threat

Meeting Notes

Week 8: Opportunity Gap

Guiding Questions

Pendakur:

  1. How does Pendakur’s ‘opportunity gap’ in higher education differ from the more commonly discussed ‘achievement gap?'

  2. What harm can standardized, identity-neutral approaches to education do, especially for historically underrepresented populations?

  3. What is the difference between an identity-conscious and identity-centered approach to learning/academic environments?


Dounas-Frazer:

  1. This article mentions research that measures several harmful effects that some active learning strategies have on certain students. What are these, and how do they happen?

  2. What strategies does the article suggest to address instances that might otherwise marginalize or exclude students?


Pendakur, ed. 2016. Closing the Opportunity Gap Identity-Conscious Strategies for Retention and Student Success.pdf

Vijay Pendakur, ed. 2016. Closing the Opportunity Gap: Identity-Conscious Strategies for Retention and Student Success

Read the foreword & introduction (p. 2-8 )

Dounas-Frazer and Chini. 2019. Active Learning Isn't Enough Cultivating Inclusive Learning Environments.pdf

Dounas-Frazer and Chini. 2019. Active Learning Isn't Enough: Cultivating Inclusive Learning Environments

Week 8 Opportunity Gap

Week 9
Discussion Notes

Week 6: Feedback

Guiding Questions

  1. Some of the recommendations in Ambrose are geared more towards faculty, but what are some ways mentors implement “goal oriented practice” and provide “targeted feedback”? How might this change for TAs or graders?

  2. Refer to Figure 1.1 in Hattie & Clarke summarizing their recommended feedback strategies. Which of these stand out to use as potentially most effective? Least effective?

  3. According to Hattie & Clarke, how have grades and feedback used together affect the students’ mindsets and attitude toward academics?


Ambrose et al. _2010_ _ch 5_.pdf

Ambrose et al., Chapter 5 from How Learning Works

SKIP pages 127-144 (see document for exact sections)


Hattie _ Clarke _2019_.pdf

Hattie & Clarke, Visible Learning: Feedback

Week 5: Midterm Review Session/QSC

Guiding Questions

  1. What are your thoughts about structuring a review session?

  2. Explore a few ways to incorporate the topics we discussed in class into a midterm review session (i.e. metacognition, growth mindset, associative learning, and other teaching strategies we explored).


Frisch et. al. 2020 A preference for peers over faculty_ implementation and evaluation of medical student-led physiology exam review tutorials.pdf

Frisch et al. 2020. A preference for peers over faculty: Implementation & Evaluation of Medical Student-Led Physiology Exam Review Tutorials

Week 5

Discussion Notes

Week 4: How Learning Works

Guiding Questions

  1. What is associative learning? What are some methods of using associative learning (i.e. metaphors, humor, analogies etc.) How does Khan use these tactics in his writing?

  2. Khan claims “you can standardize curricula, but you can’t standardize learning.” How do you interpret this as a learner and/or a mentor?

  3. What is the difference between metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation?

  4. How does collaborative problem solving foster metacognitive skills among students?

Khan. How Education Happens. excerpt from The One World Schoolhouse.pdf

Khan, S. 2013. How Education Happens. From One World Schoolhouse

Mota et al. 2019. Homework as a metacognitive tool in an undergraduate physics course.pdf

Mota, A. R. et al. 2019. Homework as a metacognitive tool in an undergraduate physics course

Week 4: How Learning Works & Metacognition

Discussion Notes

Week 3: Mindset

Guiding Questions

  1. What are the instances of mindset intervention that Yeager and Dweck outline, and which are/aren’t supported by evidence?

  2. If students demonstrate evidence of a fixed mindset, what type of interventions could mentors/TAs use to assist them? Based on the readings, do you think such interventions are effective?

  3. What is “challenge-avoiding pre-failure disposition” (Henry et al., minimodel 1), and why could this happen, even to those with a growth mindset but mastery-avoidance goal orientation?

  4. How do goal orientations change based on different learning environments?

  5. Refer to Figure 5 in Henry et al. As mentors, how would you support students in both pre-failure and post-failure contexts?

Henry et al. 2018. Fail is not a four-letter word.pdf

Henry, M.A. et al. 2019. FAIL is not a 4 letter word

Yeager and Dweck. 2020. What Can Be Learned from Growth Mindset Controversies.pdf

Yeager, D. S. and Dweck, C. S. 2021. What Can Be Learned from Growth Mindset Controversies?

Read Introduction and Controversy #2; skim other sections’ conclusions

Week 3: Mindset

Discussion Notes

Week 2: Teaching Strategies

Guiding Questions

Horii et al.

  1. What is active learning and why is it relevant to mentor sessions?

  2. What is the benefit of understanding your own problem-solving process as a mentor?

  3. What are some useful strategies when working at a board/with a big group/with a small group?


Tanner et al.

  1. Tanner #15: What is the role of mentors and TAs in cultivating an environment of access and equity for students?

  2. Tanner #18: How can the hypothetical situation mentioned in this section come up in a mentor session?

Horii. Strategies for guiding student problem solving in PMA.pdf

Horii, C. Strategies for guiding student problem solving in PMA

Tanner. 2017. Structure Matters_ Twenty-One Teaching Strategies to Promote Student Engagement and Cultivate Classroom Equity.pdf

Tanner, K. D. 2017. Structure Matters: Twenty-One Teaching Strategies to Promote Student Engagement and Cultivate Classroom Equity

Week 2: Teaching Strategies

Discussion Notes

Week 1: Transitioning in COVID-19

Guiding Questions

  1. Which of the considerations outlined by Pownall et al. have you experienced (if any) during your first week of classes?

  2. What is the role of mentors in helping students navigate the “hidden curriculum” and attaining the hot/cold knowledge?

  3. What elements of mentoring/TAing in person are you most excited about and most nervous about? If you are not a mentor or TA this semester, what are you most excited or nervous about as a student?

Pownall et al. 2021. Supporting students during the transition to university in COVID-19: Five key considerations and recommendations for educators.pdf

Pownall, M. et al. Supporting students during the transition to university in COVID-19: Five key considerations and recommendations for educators

Week 1: Intro/Return to Campus

Discussion Notes