TLDR;
What's the problem?
Reliable time constraints in many Paleoproterozoic sequences around the world remain largely unknown, an issue that hinders interbasinal correlations.
Why is this important?
Because this problem prevents the proper understanding of global processes, exactly how and when did they occur.
How do we address this problem?
We conducted a geochronological study, including high-precision U-Pb zircon dating, in various units of the Transvaal Supergroup (South Africa).
What's the outcome?
The Griqualand West Basin has now a robust temporal control, specially true for the younger than the Campbellrand Subgroup.
Abstract
The Transvaal Supergroup, on the Kaapvaal Craton in South Africa, is widely accepted as one of the best preserved sedimentary archives to constrain planetary-scale environmental changes during the late Archean and early Proterozoic, yet the sedimentation age for certain stratigraphic intervals remains poorly constrained. To improve the temporal control on some of the first-order global changes recorded in these rocks, we carried out U-Pb analyses of detrital zircon populations from several clastic and volcano-clastic sedimentary units of the Transvaal Supergroup. We applied the Chemical Abrasion-Isotope Dilution-Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometry (CA-ID-TIMS) technique on detrital and volcanic zircon populations that had been previously screened using the Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) technique. We report here new maximum depositional age estimates for the Pannetjie (2456.6 ± 7.0 Ma), the Heynskop (2451.5 ± 2.5 Ma), the Makganyene (2423.1 ± 1.0 Ma) and the Hekpoort formations (2248.0 ± 1.1 Ma).
A ca. 2.25 Ga-old cluster of LA-ICP-MS analyses in the Makganyene Formation was identified to be spurious, since it was completely removed during the chemical abrasion. Thus, we speculate that circulation of hydrothermal fluids and associated Pb-loss from a radiation-damaged lattice during the emplacement of the much younger Hekpoort Formation or possibly the Ophthalmia Orogeny, recorded in Western Australia, may have reset the U-Pb system of this zircon population. This implies that the accurate maximum depositional age of the Makganyene Formation is ca. 2.42 Ga, which denotes the age of the oldest glacial event of global extent during the Paleoproterozoic. Therefore, we suggest that the combination of both dating techniques is essential to ensure accurate maximum depositional age constraints for ancient detrital sedimentary rocks. Additionally, our data provide constraints on a period when the Earth’s atmosphere recorded major fluctuations in oxygen content during the early Proterozoic Linkages between these glaciations and oxygen fluctuations remain to be explored, supporting the complex nature of this time period.
Citation:
Senger, M. H., Davies, J. H. F. L., Ovtcharova, M., Beukes, N., Gumsley, A., Gaynor, S. P., ... & Schaltegger, U. (2023). Improving the chronostratigraphic framework of the Transvaal Supergroup (South Africa) through in-situ and high-precision U-Pb geochronology. Precambrian Research, 392, 107070.
This project was also presented in:
Senger, M.H.; Davies, J.F.H.L.; Ovtcharova, M.; Beukes, N.J.; Mukwevho; R.; Gaynor, S.P.; Schaltegger, U. 2022. U-Pb geochronology of the Transvaal Supergroup, South Africa. GSA CONNECTS 2022, Denver, USA, 7-12 October.
Senger, M.H.; Davies, J.F.H.L.; Ovtcharova, M.; Beukes, N.; Gumsley, A.; Gaynor, S.P.; Ulyanov, A.; Schaltegger, U. 2022. U-Pb zircon geochronology combining both in-situ and bulk-grain techniques in the Transvaal Supergroup, South Africa. EGU General Assembly, 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23-27 May. https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-1666
Senger, M.H.; Schaltegger, U.; Reuben, N., Beukes, N.; 2021. New high-precision U-Pb zircon CA-ID-TIMS ages on the Paleoproterozoic Makganyene Formation, Griqualand West Basin, South Africa. Swiss Geoscience Meeting 2021, Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Arizona
Department of Earth Sciences
1040 E. 4th Street
Tucson, AZ 85721, USA