Gerullis, M., Beel, A., and Seifert, S., Spirit in the Sky(line): An Algorithmic Frontier Approach to Digitalizing Variety Admission, presentation at the XVII European Association for Agricultural Economics Conference 2025, August 26-29th, Bonn, Germany.
Climate change necessitates new crop breeding objectives to address temperature and precipitation shifts, including tolerances against climate extremes such as droughts, winter kills, and floods. Using digital technologies in plant breeding aims to aide in reducing climatic stresses to crops. Yet, Using digital technologies requires identifying improvements in yields and other crop variety evaluation criteria without endangering the underlying crop genetic resources. With a focus on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum), this paper evaluates whether new varieties shift the breeding frontier by adding improved traits. We base our analysis on a unique and detailed unbalanced panel dataset of the German variety admission of 407 winter wheat varieties for 2007-2024, where we observe 32 variety-specific characteristics related to cultivation, yield and quality. Using non-parametric FDH and skyline algorithms, we benchmark newly admitted wheat varieties against existing varieties. Preliminary results indicate that throughout the observation period, nearly all new varieties have pushed the frontier, although the observed frontier shift is small. To improve further our analysis, we plan to address concerns related to the high dimensionality of the wheat characteristics, considering dimension reduction tools such as principal component analysis. Our procedure may serve as a first step towards developing a decision support system selecting varieties during variety admission processes.
Gerullis, M.“Integrating Cultural Evolution in Plant Breeding Science: A framework for Coevolution in Modern Knowledge Systems” presentation at Cultural Evolution Society Conference 2024 September 09th.
Accelerating modern plant breeding and stirring it towards stewardship of agricultural systems whilst dealing with global policrises demands a better insight in how modern knowledge systems in plant breeding play coevolve with the crops they create. Modern plant breeding together with its tools for gene editing, global marketing strategies for seed, and climatic changes of the last decades have led to a multitude of selection, replication, and innovation mechanisms that need to be put in context on multiple levels. Drawing from Multilevel Selection Theory, I analyze how variation, selection, replication, and innovation operate across different levels in knowledge systems of plant breeding science, based on the cases of the German seed system in canola and winter wheat. Cultural evolution introduces additional mechanisms of replication, including the cumulative retention of information in technologies, which are embodied in crops and their underlying genetic diversity. I propose a framework for looking these with a coevolutionary lens that explicitly includes and explains the socio-cultural factors influencing path-dependencies in plant science. Goal is to develop a framework useful to analyze genetic diversity in crops to investigate patterns of change over time.
IASC-ECN Power Collective "Toward making power more explicit in the IADF: A review and diagnostic approach to power theories"
In commons and institutional research, the Institutional Analysis and Development framework (IADF) has proven itself as a useful tool to investigate the complexities of socio-environmental systems. It is effective in guiding researchers through the process of understanding complex problem situations. The framework help to conceptually unravel the institutional scaffoldings structuring human-nature interactions. Yet, a long-standing critique of the IADF and its derivatives is that they fall short of making different workings of ‘power’ explicit, especially those illuminating structural and intersectional aspects. We believe that the IADF holds potential to help operationalise a large variety of perspectives on power and visualise how they may play out in commons governance regimes – a potential that has been underused thus far. In this paper, we draw on discussions about the necessity and advantages of integrating the study of institutions and power and engage with various conceptualisations of these terms. We reflect on existing proposals for such an integrated analysis, highlighting the contribution of our broad approach to understanding power. Further, we lay out the methodology we used for reviewing literature on power theory and identifying related empirical questions, mapping these questions to different IADF elements in a coding matrix, and creating the basis for the development of a diagnostic tool from this initial mapping. In a section dedicated to theoretical framing, we outline the main approaches to power that inform this paper and then continue to introduce the pathway toward our diagnostic tool through a few exemplary applications, including a discussion on limitations and potential next steps.