To create a model to curb the problem of stubble burning.
DATA COLLECTION
We divided our data collection phase into the following 4 parts :
1.Brief History of Stubble Burning - Why is it practiced?
2.Existing Solutions to the problem of Stubble Burning
3.Effects of Stubble Burning
4.Geographical Aspects of Stubble Burning
BRIEF HISTORY OF STUBBLE BURNING - WHY IS IT PRACTICED ?
“I don’t remember a time when we have not burned [stubble] in our 12 acres of land,” said Harminder Singh (name changed), a 32-year-old resident of Tarn Taran’s Golwara village. “I know it destroys soil nutrients, but it is not easy to change.”
Harminder wants to buy a Happy Seeder but only sees it “as an additional source of income [in the form of rent paid by other users]”. Excess moisture has so far prevented him from burning this year’s paddy residue, but he told us he intended to burn it “in the next few days”. Like the other 11 paddy farmers we spoke to, Gurjinder is aware that burning residue degrades soil health; yet he and six others were likely to do so this year. The force of habit, coupled with risk aversion, has made many farmers reluctant to try better crop residue management practices.
In the 1960s, as part of the Green Revolution, farmers in Punjab and Haryana were encouraged to do wheat-paddy crop rotation to make India self-reliant in grain production.
As a result, and because of assured procurement of rice and subsidies, rice acreage increased.
The Punjab Preservation of Subsoil Water Act (2009) made it mandatory for farmers to transplant paddy late during the Kharif season to prevent loss of water.
This gives the farmers very little time between harvesting the rice crop and preparing the field for the next winter crop.
Hence, stubble burning is a quick, cheap and easy way to clear the field of any rice chaff residue.
One reason for the large quantity of rice stubble left behind after harvesting is the increased modernisation and mechanisation of agriculture. Mechanised harvesting extracts the rice grains only leaving behind a huge residue. Manual harvesting is not an option for farmers because of the huge labour charges and the increased time taken.
Earlier, the stubble used to be used by farmers as hay to keep animals or homes warm, and even for cooking. However, these uses of stubble have now become outdated.
Also, rice straw is not considered suitable as fodder for animals because of its high silica content (this is true for the non-basmati variety of rice).
Despite the Punjab government making available tractor-mounted ‘happy seeders’ to cut down the rice stubble and sow wheat seeds simultaneously, many farmers find the prices of these machines or their rents prohibitive. So, they continue to burn stubble.
To use a ‘happy seeder’ machine, farmers must shell out Rs.1000 per acre of land as machine rent and a further Rs.2000 for diesel.
A few other machines/devices have been introduced by the government. However, many farmers cite suitability as an issue.
Also, stubble burning requires only a matchbox whereas the adoption of these machines incurs additional costs for the farmers.
- NEHA RATAKONDA
EFFECTS OF STUBBLE BURNING
1. Gas Pollutants
CO2, CO, NOX, SOX, CH4,
PH10, PH2.5 (Particulate Matter)
Burning of stubble poses a serious threat to the air quality of the exposed environment.
Burning can release many years of stored C02 into the atmosphere in a very short amount of time.
Increased ozone pollution.
Air pollution poses a grave threat to human health and wellbeing leading to a rise in mortality and morbidity rates in many parts of the world. According to WHO, toxic air, as a result of pollution, results in the death of about 7 million people in the world annually .
2. 63 Mt of Crop Stubble Produced Annually
3.4 Mt of CO
0.1 Mt of NOX
91 Mt of CO2
0.6 Mt of CH4
1.2 Mt of PM
Elevated levels of Nitrogen Oxide can cause damage to the human respiratory tract and increase a person’s vulnerability to, and the severity
of, respiratory infections and asthma. Long- term exposure can cause chronic lung disease.
Sulphur dioxide affects the respiratory system, particularly lung function, and can irritate the eyes. Sulphur dioxide irritates the respiratory tract and increases the risk of tract infections. It causes coughing, mucus secretion and aggravates conditions such as asthma and chronic bronchitis.
High levels of methane can reduce the amount of oxygen breathed from the air. This can result in mood changes, slurred speech, vision problems, memory loss, nausea, vomiting, facial flushing and headache. In severe cases, there may be changes in breathing and heart rate, balance problems, numbness, and unconsciousness.
The states most affected by the severe pollution are Delhi, Uttar Pradesh (U.P), Punjab, Haryana, Bihar, and West Bengal. These states are also the most agriculturally productive in India . Punjab, for example, is sometimes regarded as the country's breadbasket and provides about 30% of the country's grain supply. Survey has shown that U.P has the highest number of farmers counting to about 23.8 million.
3. More austere in India , due to intensive rice- wheat rotation system (generates large amount of stubble)
4. 352 Mt of stubble generated in India annually. (22% is Wheat stubble, 34% is Rice Stubble)
5. Common health conditions:
Skin and Eye irritation.
Severe Neurological , cardiovascular, and respiratory diseases.
Asthma
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
Bronchitis
Lung Capacity loss
Emphysema etc.
6. Leads to an increase in mortality rate. (Due to prolonged exposure to high pollution). Also , black soot generated during stubble burning results in poor visibility (Increased Road accidents)
7. There is also risk of fire spreading out of control during stubble burning. Many farmers have even lost their lives to it.
8. The harsh haze observed over South Asia during the winter season has been linked to biomass burning as it coincides with the stubble burning periods. In India, New Delhi, and the other NCR (National Capital Region) cities have been experiencing harsh pollution from smog and haze caused by various anthropogenic activities and lower temperatures during the winter especially during October to December months every year.
9. Affects soil fertility (thru destruction of nutrients)
The heat from burning paddy straw penetrates 1cm into the soil, elevating the temperature to 33.8 to 42.2 degree Celsius. This kills the bacterial and fungal population critical for a fertile soil.
Burning of crop residue causes damage to other micro-organisms present in the upper layer of the soil as well as its organic quality. Due to the loss of ‘friendly’ pests, the wrath of ‘enemy’ pests has increased and as a result, crops are more prone to disease. The solubility capacity of the upper layers of soil have also been reduced. Also leads to an increase in erosion.
10. Affects economic development
Air pollution in general affects economic development both on the local and regional scale. It claims approximately 5 trillion dollars from the global economy annually .
The poor visibility in the NCR as a result of air pollution has caused many people to migrate out of the region especially during severe pollution episodes which conversely affects tourism, especially in Delhi.
A survey on tourism, in 2018, reported that the inflow of tourists into Delhi has decreased by about 25-30 % as a result of air pollution . Air pollution, therefore, has a great impact on tourism and economic development.
The productivity of workers in different disciplines is also affected by air pollution through sickness and poor visibility
11. Affects Climate
Emissions from stubble fires have a direct effect on weather and climate through the release of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) which may potentially lead to global warming. About 17% to 32% of the total annual greenhouse gas emissions in the world are contributed by the agricultural sector
India contributes about 12.2% to the global greenhouse gas emissions, which is about 658.823 Tg CO2 equivalent.
It was reported that India lost about 36% of its expected annual wheat yield in 2018, which was linked to the poor quality of air and change in the weather patterns.
CONCLUSION:
Large-scale rice-wheat crop rotation system practiced in India has resulted in the generation of significant quantity of crop stubble often more than the quantity of grains harvested. A considerable portion of these stubbles is usually burnt on-field to clear the farm for the next planting, thus releasing toxic pollutants to the atmosphere which leads to the deterioration of air quality. It may be concluded (based on the existing evidence) that the combined effects of stubble burning emissions and meteorological conditions are the cause of the severity of air quality especially during rice stubble burning episodes in north Indian cities.
The pollutants from stubble burning pose a grave risk to the health of the exposed population as they are linked to several health issues and even death, in severe cases. In addition to atmospheric pollution, stubble burning may also lead to climate change, global warming, and the destruction of soil nutrients . It is, therefore, the need of the hour to implement exhaustive policies to curb this menace at its base.
The impact of stubble burning may increase in the coming years with the increase in population and food demand. A report by the United Nation pointed out that the world population may rise to 10 billion by 2050, which will in turn lead to increased food demand. In India, crop production is projected to increase by 45% by 2050, i.e., from 619 Mt in 2017 to 899 Mt in 2050. This will necessitate the production of more food and consequently the generation and burning of more stubble.
Despite the strict policies and legislations put in place by the Indian government at the federal and state levels to ban the burning practices, the activity continues in most parts of northern India especially in Punjab, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh. Patriotic compliance with these policies requires effective follow-up with timely and continuous monitoring at all places.
- SIDDHARTH REDDY
- NANDIKA SONI
GEOGRAPHICAL ASPECTS OF STUBBLE BURNING
An estimated 9.6 million hectares of land are utilized annually for the rice-wheat cropping system in India (Sharma et al., 2010). Most of the farmers in this region use combine harvesters for planting and harvesting the crops thereby generating a significant quantity of stubble.
The states most affected by the severe pollution are Delhi, Uttar Pradesh (U.P), Punjab, Haryana, Bihar, and West Bengal.
Uttar Pradesh generates the highest quantity of stubble, about 72Mt, followed by Punjab (46Mt), West Bengal (37.3Mt), Andhra Pradesh (33Mt), and then Haryana (24Mt) (IARI, 2012).
An estimated 9.6 million hectares of land are utilized annually for the rice-wheat cropping system in India (Sharma et al., 2010). Most of the farmers in this region use combine harvesters for planting and harvesting the crops thereby generating a significant quantity of stubble.
According to the Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), approximately 14 million tons (Mt) out of the 22 Mt of the rice stubble (about 63.6%) generated each year in India is set to fire (IARI, 2012). Haryana and Punjab, two of the key agricultural states of India, alone contribute 48% to this amount (Gadde et al., 2009). In the Punjab region, rice and wheat account for about 85.91% of the total cultivation with other crops produced in relatively minor quantities.
Dipankar Saha, a former scientist at CPCB, said the pollutants rising from the farm fires can sometimes go even higher into the atmosphere and get pushed over Rajasthan, from where these enter the Indo-Gangetic plains’ corridor and raise pollution levels there.
The maximum stubble is generated by cereal crops constituting about 58% of the total annual crop production. For most of the grains, the amount of stubble generated is higher than the grain produced. In the case of rice and wheat, the stubble is approximately 1.5 times the grain produced.
A survey on tourism, in 2018, reported that the inflow of tourists into Delhi has decreased by about 25-30 % as a result of air pollution (Sharma et al., 2019). Air pollution, therefore, has a great impact on tourism and economic development.
Dipankar Saha, a former scientist at CPCB, said the pollutants rising from the farm fires can sometimes go even higher into the atmosphere and get pushed over Rajasthan, from where these enter the Indo-Gangetic plains’ corridor and raise pollution levels there.
In India, New Delhi and the other NCR (National Capital Region) cities have been experiencing harsh pollution from smog and haze caused by various anthropogenic activities and lower temperatures during the winter especially during October to December months every year.
Burning of firecrackers during Diwali, a major festival in India, was suggested by some (Arora et al., 2018) as the cause of poor winter air in India.
They compared the stubble burning periods with and without Diwali and found an increase of about 40 µg/m3 PM2.5 (Particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 microns) concentration during Diwali days in 2018.
There's been a 30-40% surge in air purifier sales in the past 10-14 days over the same period last year. “Due to the deteriorating air quality across the country and especially in Delhi and surrounding areas, we are seeing a trend of increased usage amongst people from all walks of life,” 3M India Senior General Manager, Personal Safety Division Nandakumar said.
New Delhi has been identified as one of the most polluted cities in terms of particulate matter (PM), with a peak value of 350 g/m3, which is 3.5 times higher than the allowable limit of 100 g/m3 (WHO, 2016, NAAQS, 2009). Crop burning have had a significant impact over Delhi’s climate although in general air pollution from different sources contributes to the overall degradation of the climate but in recent years stubble burning pollution have consistently increased its share upto 40% of total air pollution. It has a major impact on climate and human health as it is one of the major source of atmospheric aerosol and trace gases emission.
- JANVI AGARWAL
EXISTING SOLUTIONS AND THEIR LIMITATIONS
Its compact design allows for convenient storage and administration, ensuring the optimal quantity required for a single intake, enhancing ease and effectiveness.
The Pusa Capsule image showcases a single-dose capsule, indicating the required quantity for one administration.
- SWARNIM SAWANE
- ANOUSHKA ALEX
EMPATHISING
We conducted a survey to understand a farmers point of view.
A total of 44 responses were received which helped our team to understand the situation better .
What 'they' think about stubble burning?
Their Viewpoints for stubble burning
Suggested solutions
WHY STUBBLE MANAGEMENT IS NOT POSSIBLE
Farmer see it hard labour n want quick option for preparing field for next crop
Viable options are not really available
There is not much awareness about the same
Economic viability
Farmers are not ready to accept it
Lack of political will
Farmers are not getting any incentive and burning is the cheapest way for them
1) Lack of sincere efforts by the government
2) Burning of stubble is considered as the easiest way
3)It doesn't cost
4) Paddy stubble is too hard to be decomposed naturally in the soil.
Lack of awareness on large scale
Not enough willpower from the farmers as well as the governments concerned.
This is a cheapest method for farmers
In our country,when there are proper regulations,then only it works , pollution pay principle will work
May be due to lack of education or not knowing other methods
Amount of stubble is very huge,lack of awareness program
No motivation or support to farmers.
Because it’s quick and cost effective
Year Old habit of easy method
Lack of options and schemes to do so
The alternative method suggested are not acceptable to farmers as they need to bear the cost.
No solution is cost effective
Because implements required to manage it are too expensive
It is not cost effective,
implements should be more powerful for certain crops,
some initiatives taken by the government don't actually reach the farmer.
The other methods seem to be expensive for a mere farmer
Because it is not being implemented properly
It's costly and time consuming
Lack of awareness
Because the government is not paying any attention to the cause .
Farmers are not motivated enough and seek for quick and cost effective relief from stubble to start prep off the field for next crop.
Needed good and economic programes which r farmers friendly .
As there is no
Other alternative prevention is not
Possible
Motivation
Farmers are not well informed
Not enough motivation and incentives for farmers.
Lack of ecosystem supporting stubble to be used for other purposes
Due to economic difficulties
Any application that guarantees economic stability will be adapted by farmers immediately
It should be free
Very little time bracket available. Very costly
Lack of resources to adopt alternative to stubble burning
Farmers feel no one is going to take any action against them so they do their own as they wish. In India government policies are not strict
Awareness
Air pollution resulting in reduce visibility and also causing eye health issues.
The incentive is not very lucrative, secondly collection of stubble by agencies is not quick enough thus adding improbability in sowing next crop, social n political barriers
Lack of viable options
Non cooperation by Farmers as well as Govt
OTHER SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS
Yes.subsidised mulching machines
For Ethanol making
Yes, providing biosprays to degrade stubble
No effective program.
Not sure,but research on this field is happening
No idea
Awareness about possible uses of stubble
Awareness and provision of penalty
Paper pulp collection, collection for fuel
Govt is giving subsidy and equipment which will help them for disposing naturally
Yes, there are subsidised implements but very few farmers are able to avail the benifits
Its just awareness prog conducted to make people aware
Nothing effective
Yes, Government workers
Yes but no one follow it
Pulp for paper.
For fuel
Buy back program now implemented by some states
- Harshveer Singh Thind