Synopsis: This paper develops a Hegelian argument for restricting the scope of private property. I argue that property at the level of Abstract Right suffers from two forms of indeterminacy: it is normatively indeterminate, lacking sufficient binding force and effectiveness; and ontologically indeterminate, unable to determine what can even count as property. Both indeterminacies can be resolved only in Ethical Life, which provides a socially shared understanding of property and sustains the practices that realize it.