Kings Pond Parish Poll Info! Date: 21/01/2026 Time: 4PM - 9PM Location: Your Local Polling Station
The Council are proposing we create an offline pond, this means seperating the pond from the river Wey.
This would require filling in large amounts of the pond resulting in one straight stream and one small body of water.
On the design this looks wonderful! But in reality, this change would be catastrophic for our town.
Removing King’s Pond from the River Wey could significantly increase the risk of flooding in Alton, including the town centre. A formal flood risk assessment published in 2022 warns that changing water levels and flows in the River Wey has the potential to cause floodwater to spread beyond the river channel and into developed areas. The assessment identifies Alton as already vulnerable to flooding from the river, surface water and groundwater, and makes clear that altering how water is held back or released — such as removing a pond or modifying a weir — could make flooding more severe and more frequent during heavy rainfall if not extremely carefully managed. This means any decision to remove the pond carries a real risk of flooding homes, businesses and infrastructure in Alton.
Sources - East Hampshire District Council, Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (2022)
Removing King’s Pond from the River Wey by altering or removing the weir would pose a serious threat to the birds and wildlife that depend on it. The pond provides calm, shallow water that supports fish, insects and aquatic plants — a vital food source for swans, ducks, moorhens, coots, herons and many other species. If the pond is reduced or dries out more frequently, these food supplies and habitats would be lost, leading to fewer birds, disrupted breeding, and the possible disappearance of long-established species. Swans in particular rely on open water to build enough speed to take off; without it, they may become grounded and forced to abandon the area. During the extreme heat of this past summer, falling water levels and reduced food already caused swans, ducks and their young to cross Ashdell Road in search of water and feeding areas, putting them at clear risk — a stark warning of what could happen more often if the pond is taken off the river. Removing King’s Pond would make these conditions more frequent and more severe, increasing danger to wildlife and permanently damaging an important local habitat.
Sources -
East Hampshire District Council, Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (2022)
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB): guidance on wetland loss, food availability and breeding habitat
Environment Agency: impacts of altered water levels on river and wetland ecosystems
Local resident observations during summer heat and low-water conditions at King’s Pond
Removing King’s Pond from the River Wey would pose a serious threat to the large and diverse bat population that depends on it. Independent bat activity and emergence surveys commissioned by Alton Town Council recorded at least 12 identified bat species plus additional Myotis spp. using the pond area for feeding and commuting, showing that the site is a key habitat for bats in the town.
Bats rely on the insects that thrive over calm, open water and along vegetated edges, and lowering water levels or allowing the pond to shrink would sharply reduce insect food sources and feeding opportunities, forcing bats to travel farther at night with increased stress and lower survival, especially for young bats. King’s Pond also forms part of an important dark, sheltered flight corridor linking bat roosts with feeding grounds; altering water levels could disrupt these flight paths, leading to collisions with lights and greater predation risk. All UK bat species are legally protected because they are vulnerable to habitat loss, and damage to this vital wetland habitat could lead to significant declines in local bat numbers if the pond is taken offline from the river system.
Sources -
Alton Town Council, King’s Pond Bat Activity and Emergence Surveys (2025) alton.gov.uk
Bat Conservation Trust: guidance on bat habitats and legal protection (general background)
Removing King’s Pond from the River Wey would pose a serious risk to amphibians such as frogs, toads and newts, which depend on stable freshwater habitats to survive and breed. Amphibians rely on ponds with consistent water levels for spawning, with eggs and tadpoles developing over several weeks or months; if water levels drop too quickly or ponds dry out more frequently, entire breeding cycles can fail, killing eggs and larvae before they mature. King’s Pond also provides shallow, vegetated margins that offer shelter from predators and safe routes between water and surrounding land habitats. Altering or removing the pond would reduce these vital conditions, leading to sharp declines in local amphibian populations and forcing animals to move across roads and developed areas, increasing mortality. Amphibians are already among the UK’s most threatened wildlife groups, and further loss or destabilisation of wetland habitat at King’s Pond could cause long-term and potentially irreversible damage to local populations.
Sources -
Froglife: impacts of pond loss, drying and fluctuating water levels on amphibians
Natural England: amphibian habitat requirements and legal protection guidance
Environment Agency: wetland and freshwater habitat management impacts on wildlife
Removing King’s Pond from the River Wey would also threaten a wide range of other animals that rely on the pond and its surrounding habitat, including fish, small mammals, reptiles and countless invertebrates. Fish depend on stable water levels, oxygen-rich water and shaded areas; sudden changes to flow or water depth could lead to fish deaths and the collapse of aquatic food chains. Small mammals such as water voles, hedgehogs and rodents use the pond margins for shelter, feeding and safe movement through the landscape, while reptiles like grass snakes rely on wetlands for hunting amphibians and basking nearby. Invertebrates — including dragonflies, damselflies, beetles and freshwater snails — are particularly vulnerable, as many spend part of their life cycle in water and cannot survive if ponds dry out or water quality declines. These species form the foundation of the entire ecosystem, supporting birds, bats and fish; once lost, they are extremely slow and difficult to replace. Removing or destabilising King’s Pond would therefore cause widespread ecological damage, not just to individual species but to the whole natural system that has developed there over decades.
Sources -
Environment Agency: impacts of altered water levels on river and wetland ecosystems
Wildlife Trusts: importance of ponds and wetlands for freshwater biodiversity
Natural England: freshwater habitats and species dependency guidance
Removing King’s Pond from the River Wey would cause serious harm to the plant life that depends on stable water levels and wet ground. The pond supports a range of aquatic and marginal plants — including reeds, grasses, wildflowers and submerged vegetation — that rely on consistent moisture to survive. These plants stabilise riverbanks, improve water quality, support insects and provide shelter and breeding material for birds, amphibians and small animals. If the pond is removed and the area dries out, especially during summer heat, many of these plants would die off or be replaced by poorer-quality, drought-tolerant species, leading to a loss of biodiversity and a degraded landscape similar to what has already been seen at Flood Meadows when water evaporates. Once lost, wetland plant communities are extremely difficult and costly to restore, meaning the removal of the pond could permanently damage the natural character and ecological health of this area.
Sources -
Environment Agency: role of wetland and river plants in healthy ecosystems
Natural England: freshwater and wetland plant habitats and biodiversity
Wildlife Trusts: importance of ponds and marginal vegetation for nature recovery
Removing King’s Pond would also have a serious impact on mental health and wellbeing in Alton, particularly because it is one of the town’s few accessible green and blue spaces. The pond is used daily by local residents and families of all ages for calm, connection and respite — including elderly people who rely on level, peaceful walking routes, students from Treloar’s who visit the area for fresh air and quiet, and residents with disabilities and neurodivergent conditions. Spaces like King’s Pond provide essential sensory relief, routine and emotional regulation; the presence of water and wildlife can reduce anxiety and bring genuine happiness. If the pond is removed and the area dries out in summer — as has already happened at Flood Meadows — it would no longer offer the same benefits, leaving no water, no wildlife, and no restorative place to visit. Losing King’s Pond would therefore mean losing not just a habitat, but a vital space that supports mental health, inclusion and quality of life for many people in Alton.
Sources -
NHS: green and blue spaces and mental wellbeing
Mind: benefits of nature for mental health
Natural England: Green space, wellbeing and health outcomes
Public Health England: access to natural spaces and mental health
Removing King’s Pond from the River Wey would also carry significant financial risks for the town and its residents. Large-scale river engineering works — including altering or removing a weir, managing sediment, redesigning channels, carrying out flood mitigation, and completing legally required environmental assessments — can cost millions of pounds, particularly when protected species and flood risk are involved. Any increase in flood risk could lead to further long-term costs through flood damage, higher insurance claims, emergency works, and ongoing maintenance. In addition, the loss of wildlife habitats and public green space could reduce the area’s attractiveness, impacting local businesses and property values. Once undertaken, these changes would be impossible to reverse, meaning the financial consequences could fall on local taxpayers for decades, not just during the initial construction period.
Sources -
Environment Agency: costs and risks associated with river and flood management schemes
National Audit Office: cost overruns and long-term liabilities in flood and infrastructure projects
UK Government: guidance on flood risk, insurance and public infrastructure spending
Removing King’s Pond from the River Wey would be a permanent and high-risk change with far-reaching consequences for Alton. Evidence shows it could increase flood risk, potentially affecting the town centre, while also destroying an established wetland ecosystem that supports birds, bats, amphibians, fish, invertebrates and plant life. The pond has already shown how vulnerable it is during extreme heat, with wildlife forced to leave in search of water; removing it would make these conditions more frequent and more severe. Beyond nature, King’s Pond is one of Alton’s few accessible green and blue spaces, providing calm, inclusion and mental-health benefits for elderly residents, students, disabled and neurodivergent people, and the wider community. The financial cost of removing the pond and managing the consequences could run into millions of pounds, with long-term liabilities for flood management, maintenance and potential damage. Once removed, the pond — and everything it supports — would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to restore. The risks are high, the losses are permanent, and the evidence shows that King’s Pond is something Alton cannot afford to lose.
This question addresses resident trust and engagement. Many local people have expressed concerns about the pond’s wildlife, mental health value, and flood and financial risks.
Yes vote: Indicates belief that the council is responsive to community concerns.
No vote: Indicates belief that the council is not fully taking resident feedback into account, suggesting further consultation may be needed.
Significant sums are involved in managing or altering the pond, including engineering, flood mitigation, and environmental surveys. Mismanagement could lead to millions in costs or unnecessary works.
Yes vote: Indicates confidence the council will manage funds prudently.
No vote: Suggests residents want careful oversight and consultation before spending large sums on pond-related works.
Further consultation ensures transparency and community input before committing to expensive works. Given the environmental and social value of the pond, residents’ voices are critical.
Yes vote: Residents want input before further funds are spent.
No vote: Council could make decisions without additional consultation.
Don Hammond currently runs the King’s Pond focus groups, but he has publicly stated that the group does not represent the views of the public, which raises serious concerns about impartiality and trust. Keeping the group under his leadership may undermine transparency and resident confidence in decisions.
Yes vote: Remove Don Hammond and appoint someone who has been legitimately voted in to chair the group, ensuring the process genuinely represents local residents.
No vote: Keep the current leadership, even though the chair’s impartiality is disputed.
Stage 1 involved initial research, surveys, and environmental assessments. The council has already spent £43,000 gathering this information. There is already sufficient evidence to make a decision, including on flood risk, wildlife, and the pond’s social value. Suggesting another Stage 1 is misleading residents and could be seen as an attempt to delay or manipulate public opinion, rather than providing genuinely new information.
Yes vote: Request restarting Stage 1, even though the necessary evidence already exists.
No vote: Acknowledge that enough information is available to make an informed decision to protect the pond.
Scientific evidence on the pond — including water quality, silt management, and wildlife habitat — supports dredging at its current size with improvements such as silt traps. The council has this evidence available on its own website but has largely hidden it from public view. Stopping other alternative investigations allows the council to implement a practical, evidence-backed solution that preserves the pond, protects wildlife, and maintains the benefits for residents.
Yes vote: Focus on dredging and improvements at the current size, supported by scientific evidence, ensuring the pond is protected.
No vote: Continue investigating other alternatives, which may delay action and put the pond at risk.
Protect King’s Pond — Your Voice Matters!
This pond is wildlife habitat, a green sanctuary,
and a place for our community.
One vote can help keep it safe.
Vote to protect King’s Pond!
When: 21st January 2026
Time: 4pm - 9pm
Where: Your local polling station
Question
Answer
Our Source
What is Silt?
Does Kings Pond Have Silt?
Yes, King's Pond needs to have it's silt removed every 25 years to remain healthy. The pond was last dredged in 1996, 30 years ago.
Why does Kings Pond have Silt?
Kings Pond has silt because large amounts of polluted water run from Alton into the pond.
Source
Where does the water in Kings Pond come from?
The source of the River Wey is just north of Alton. It includes water from rain, chemicals from the surrounding farms, sand and brick waste from the new housing estates and road run off.
Source
Why has Alton Town Council not dredged the Pond?
ATC claim dredging the pond is too expensive and an eyesore for the public.
Source
How do we limit the silt that flows into the pond?
Silt Traps. Special filters that only allow clean water to pass into the pond.
Source
Why doesn't Kings Pond have silt traps.
Good question...
Source