The first one, “0.009 second,” is a sample of a poor judgment. It is the final shiai of All Japan Kendo Championship in 2007. The winner won by a mere 0.009 second.
Why do I call this a case of “poor judgment?” Because kendo is not supposed to be a sport nor a competition to judge one’s speed. Yes, speed counts. Needless to say, you must get your opponent before he gets you. Nevertheless, what we train is the perfection/mastery of “waza” and the mental strength to overwhelm your opponent’s speed.
What is wrong and why I say it is a poor judgment to give the winning point to the man who is 0.009 second faster?
I tell you why… There are two reasons for my answer.
Reason #1) It is, indeed, wrong to pretend they could judge something they couldn’t even see with their bare human eyes, that is to say, who is faster by a mere 0.009 second. It is impossible for human eyes to see and discern who struck first. I couldn't tell no matter how closely I watched it and only until I watched it on the ultra high-speed video was I able to see the strik
However, some people may open an argument to defend those judges being able to see it because they are 8-dan, the highest masters. To support the argument they unanimously gave the point instantaneously to the same man.
It is a biased opinion based on the blind faith in the title of 8-dan. I will say it again - it is just not capable for any human beings to see the separation of 0.009 second.
Next, take a look at the second clip at this time – it is a match between Eiga & Miyazaki. Eiga, in actuality, won the game, but Miyazaki was given the winning point. In this case, it is so plain to see that Eiga was the victor; an obvious “misjudgment” by the judges that no one could deny. This match is a far easier one to judge then the first shiai, yet, the judges unanimously made the same mistake. This second clip is a collaborating evidence to prove that 8-dan senseis are all capable of making mistakes. And they must admit they are not demigods and couldn’t see the difference of 0.009 second.
How did these errors in judgment happen in both of these ‘shiai?’
In both shiai, the judges’ eyes are caught by the persons making the first move, which captivated their mind as well to pass a favorably judgment on them. This is how the man of 0.009 second won, and so did Miyazaki. The former judgment was a fluke, and the latter was a mistake. And both were wrong judgments.
Reason #2) It is because it is kendo or swordsmanship. It is absolutely irrational to make anyone a winner who is faster by a mere 0.009 second. In a real sword fight, which is the origin of kendo, the so-called winner of 0.009 second will be equally dead, killed a 0.009 second later by his opponent. Then, what is the point of giving him a victory? This is nonsense and absurd.
In my opinion, if two swordsmen mutually swing their sword on each other within a 0.5 second apart, both will be equally dead or equally injured. Therefore, in such a case in kendo shiai, how could any one be the winner and the other loser? Passing a judgment as such is only admitting that kendo is merely a sport that competes for speed.
What should be the outcome of the shiai, then?
The correct and rightful judgment in such case like this is -“Ai Uchi” in Japanese, and it is “No Count!”
Today's world of kendo is in a deplorable situation, I must say. All the kendoists throughout the world are making kendo into a speed game.