Higher Level Essay
What to Do
Choose a work or body of work with real depth and academic merit.
You must write about at least two texts from one author or producer.
Base your essay on a clear line of inquiry (a focused question).
Stay analytical. Don’t summarise or tell the story.
Keep it formal, proofread carefully, and stay under 1,500 words.
Reference consistently using an accepted style (MLA, APA, etc.).
What to Avoid
Writing about:
Only one short text or extract.
Historical, sociological, or political background instead of the text itself.
Broad or vague topics like “transformation” or “identity.”
Two different authors or unrelated works.
Informal language, bullet points, or slang.
Writing Tips
Introduction: State your text(s), line of inquiry, and thesis clearly.
Body paragraphs: Develop argument with well-integrated evidence.
Conclusion: Link back to your thesis and insights.
Language: Academic, precise, edited for accuracy.
Visual/film texts: Analyse visual as well as written or spoken choices.
Examiner Advice
Don’t rely on online summaries (SparkNotes, Shmoop, etc.).
If you use visuals (ads, lyrics, comics), include examples or screenshots.
Make your argument your own, not just a rewording of classroom notes.
Internal Assessment (Individual Oral)
Structure
Global issue (clear, specific, and derived from the texts).
Two extracts – one literary, one non-literary.
Connect extracts to the whole work or body of work.
10-minute presentation + 5-minute teacher questions.
Key Advice
Choose a specific global issue (e.g., “gender inequality in education,” not just “gender inequality”).
Analyse how techniques show the issue — not just what the issue is.
Spend equal time on: literary extract, non-literary extract, whole work, and body of work.
Speak naturally, not memorised or read word-for-word.
Use academic but engaging language.
Common Mistakes
Choosing global issues unrelated to your texts.
Ignoring multimodal aspects (sound, camera angles, layout, etc.).
Unbalanced time (too much on one extract).
Overlong introductions or rushed conclusions.
Reading from bullet points.
Teacher Question Section
Be ready to expand ideas, not repeat them.
Practise answering spontaneous questions clearly and academically.
Paper 1 – Guided Textual Analysis
What It Tests
Your ability to analyse how meaning is created in unseen texts.
Preparation Advice
Learn to identify:
Audience and purpose
Tone, mood, structure, and layout
Linguistic and visual techniques
Use specific evidence. Don’t copy or paraphrase chunks.
Build a clear thesis linked to the guiding question.
Organise paragraphs logically; plan briefly before writing.
Write in a formal academic register (no slang or contractions).
Common Mistakes
Writing about both texts (SL only needs one).
Over-reliance on ethos/pathos/logos — dig deeper into structure and language.
Listing techniques without analysing how they create meaning.
Forgetting to link back to the guiding question.
Weak or missing conclusions.
Quick Writing Tips
Use phrases like “This suggests…”, “This implies…” to show interpretation.
Vary sentence structures and use accurate punctuation.
Keep introductions short and direct.
Paper 2 – Comparative Essay
What It Tests
Your ability to compare two studied works in response to one question.
Key Advice
Address the question directly . Don’t force pre-prepared essays.
Use detailed textual evidence (not just plot summary).
Compare authorial choices, not just themes or characters.
Structure your essay clearly:
Introduction (define key terms, outline argument)
Main body (comparative analysis)
Conclusion (synthesise insights)
Balance your discussion. Equal focus on both works.
Write clearly and manage your time.
Common Mistakes
Using memorised quotes that don’t fit.
Turning essays into plot summaries.
Ignoring one part of the question.
Forgetting to analyse how meaning is created.
Strong Essays
Show interpretation and originality.
Compare tone, structure, imagery, and narrative technique.
Move beyond “what happens” to “how and why it matters.”
Final Pointers for Success
Plan before you write.
Stay analytical, not descriptive.
Keep your argument focused and well-evidenced.
Use precise, formal, academic language.
Proofread! Spelling and grammar count.
Practise time management under exam conditions.
Be confident in interpreting authorial choices.
The individual oral is a 10-minute oral followed by five minutes of teacher questions. It is worth 20% of your final mark at HL and 30% at SL.
The individual oral addresses the following prompt: “Examine the ways in which the global issue of your choice is presented through the content and form of one of the works and one of the texts you have studied.”
For the individual oral, you select one extract each from a literary work and from a non-literary text that are representative of the global issue you have chosen. Each extract should not normally exceed 40 lines. Extracts may be complete texts. You bring unannotated copies of their extracts to the individual oral.
The individual oral should be in the form of an argument that explores the global issue through the ways the extracts and entire text/work show and represent the issue. That is, you need to demonstrate the relationship between the textual construction of ideas and the global issue. You should give roughly equal attention to both of their chosen extracts and text/work as a whole.
It’s important to remember that global issues have the following attributes: (a) they have significance on a wide/large scale; (b) they are transnational; (c) the impact is felt in everyday contexts.
The individual oral is internally assessed and moderated by the IB.
• The oral is expected to be specific and explicit in nature.
• Select very concise topics so that you are able to address both the form and content of the two texts you have studied. Terms such as race, gender, power, technology are far too broad to be handled effectively in a ten-minute presentation; a better choice would be “limited access to education” as an aspect of racism, or “treatment of women in the contemporary workplace” as an aspect of gender, and so on.
• Care needs to be taken to choose appropriate pairs of works, to ensure that you do not end up with a logically weak argument, or an argument that can only be made through assertion. Texts can be connected in terms of their treatment of a specific topic, so long as the topic itself is susceptible to such a connection—so long as apples are not being compared to oranges. It does not work to connect a text on the treatment of women in the workplace with the sexualization of the female in an advertisement. Please note, however, that there are many ways of making a topic specific, such as putting limitations on time or place.
• There will need to be a very clear definition of terms. There is, for example, a difference between an extract that is a song from the soundtrack of a movie, where the “work” is the movie, as opposed to a song from a body of songs by a particular song writer. If a song is from a movie as the “work,” that song could not be considered literature. However, if the song was studied in a body of songs, then it would fit the definition of a literary work.
• It is crucial not to treat the IO as a commentary on two extracts. You are only to use the extracts as springboards into discussing the larger works from which they were taken, and the oral, overall, should reflect your understanding of the writer’s position regarding the global issue based on and exemplified by your knowledge of the work as a whole. Your choice of extracts should show your understanding of the relevance of the part to the whole and enable coverage of both larger and smaller choices made by the writers to shape their perspectives on the global issue.
Ten minutes is a very short period of time to address the form and content of two complete works in regard to the global issue, so there will need to be quite a bit of choosing, cutting and editing to put in just the right pieces of information and, also, quite a bit of practicing the use of precise and concise language.
• You must ensure that all materials are fully and precisely labelled in terms of text type and provenance. Web links, if available, should always be included.
• Clear introductions will be crucial to a successful oral. Introductions should provide a clear statement of the aspect of the global issue being pursued, introduce the extracts and the works from which they were chosen, together with any relevant context, and give a thesis statement indicating how the texts will be linked to the issue.
• Beware of trying to cover so much that you race through the oral, making it difficult to follow the argument.
• Moderators do not have knowledge of classroom discussion or a study of the materials. As a result, the oral should provide sufficient context and detail and substance to stand as an argument on its own.
• A key to success is the realization that the individual oral is very much like an oral essay. If you have a single advertisement as the extract, there must be discussion of detail from that advertisement, but that part of the discussion should specifically show a larger awareness of the overall strategy and content of the entire advertising campaign (or whatever larger selection of materials was chosen as a “work”). The extract will be somewhat similar to you memorizing quotes for paper 2, where you can use the quote to discuss style and language features, or to pinpoint, say, characterization or setting, but this must be part of a larger argument regarding the full work, which, itself, might be characterized by a particular point of view, a structure or tone that also shapes the meaning.
The Individual Oral: 5 Essential Ingredients
1. The Global Issue as the Backbone
The global issue you choose should serve as the central framework for your entire presentation. It's not just a starting point, but the core element that connects all parts of your analysis.
2. Demonstrate In-Depth Knowledge
Superficial understanding is not enough. You need to show a comprehensive grasp of your texts, authors, and the contexts in which they were written.
3. Analyse Author's Choices
Focus on how the author uses the text to communicate ideas, rather than just describing what happens in the text.
4. Maintain Balance Between Texts
Ensure you give equal treatment to both texts in your presentation. This applies to both Literature and Language & Literature students.
Draw connections between the texts, showing how they approach the global issue in similar or different ways.
5. Engage Your Listener
Remember that your presentation is an oral communication. Your delivery should be engaging and show your passion for the subject.
Use variations in tone and pace to maintain interest.
Show enthusiasm for your chosen texts and global issue through your voice and word choice.
Structure your presentation clearly, with a strong introduction and conclusion to help your listener follow your argument.
The "zoom out" is a strategy where students show their knowledge of the entire body of work, not just the specific extract they've chosen for their IO.
When preparing your IO, ask yourself these two questions:
1. Where else in the text do we see examples of our global issue?
2. What authorial choices do I see in my extract that are also prevalent in the entire work or body of work?
Here are five key strategies for effectively "zooming out" in your IO:
1. Choose a global issue that is prominent throughout the text, not just in one isolated moment.
2. Provide concrete examples from other parts of the work, but be concise. Aim for about three examples in two minutes.
3. Consider making "zoom out" comments while discussing your extract. This shows a more integrated understanding of the text.
4. Use clear signposting to guide your examiner. For example:
"Now I would like to discuss the global issue in the body of work as a whole..."
"We also see this global issue in the chapter titled..."
5. Dedicate sufficient time to the "zoom out" section. Aim for about 2-2.5 minutes of your total presentation time.
How to Zoom In
The "zoom in" requires you to analyse an extract of no more than 40 lines.
Key Concepts
1. Selecting an Extract
- Choose critical moments from the text that connect to main themes
- Avoid peripheral incidents not central to the work's key ideas
2. Identifying "Hot Spots"
- Select 3-4 key areas within your chosen extract to analyse in depth
- Use highlighters or annotations to mark these areas
- Create a graphic organiser to plan your analysis of each hot spot
3. Providing Context
- Briefly explain where the extract fits into the larger work
- Give essential background information (time, place, situation)
- Keep context concise - a few sentences maximum
- Connect the context to your global issue
4. Analysing the Extract
For each "hot spot", follow this structure:
Textual reference: Quote or paraphrase the relevant part of the extract
Literary/stylistic feature: Identify the author's technique (e.g., metaphor, allusion, point of view)
Effect on reader/audience: Explain how this feature impacts the audience
Link to global issue: Connect your analysis to your chosen global issue
5. Using Sentence Stems
Employ sentence starters to structure your analysis clearly:
- "In line number X, we see..."
- "The author employs [literary device] when..."
- "This affects the reader by..."
- "This connects to the global issue of... because..."
Time Management
- Aim for 2-2.5 minutes for your extract analysis
- Practice timing yourself to ensure you can cover all key points
- Remember: You may have a chance to elaborate during the Q&A section
Global Issue Focus
- Keep your chosen global issue in mind throughout your analysis
- Consistently link your observations back to this overarching theme
- You may consider how the global issue is presented in terms of nature, cause and effect
Tips for Success
1. Stay calm and maintain a steady pace
2. Focus on author's choices and their effects
3. Use specific textual evidence to support your points
4. Practice with various extracts to improve your skills
5. Utilise the provided sentence stems to structure your response
Which global issue connects both extracts? Identify points of contact.
How does the global issue manifest in both extracts? Analyse with evidence.
What other points of contact and difference can you find? Identify & explain.
Why do the text, work and global issue matter? Explain.
How is the global issue portrayed in different forms/text types? Analyse.
How do the creators illustrate the impact, nature and cause of the global issue? Explain.
Why have the creators chosen their respective forms/text types to convey their ideas? How do they use these for effect? Justify, with evidence.
How do the creators generate meaning about the global issue using their literary forms/genres & non-literary text types? Analyse.
What are the creators’ purposes in highlighting the issue? Comment.
Who are the creators’ intended audiences (v.s. the actual audience)? Identify.
Do the creators achieve their respective purposes? Evaluate.
How do the creators achieve their intended effects? Describe.
How effectively do both creators portray the issue, overall? Evaluate.
What are the direct and implicit messages of both extracts? Examine.
How have authorial choices been used to present the issue? Analyse.
How do the extracts juxtapose/combine to shed new light on the issue? Synthesise and analyse.
What is the relevance of both extracts for modern day/future readers? Hypothesise.
How do the extracts combine to challenge/extend views on the issue? Offer your personal opinion.
Remember to link the global issue to a global field of inquiry.
Offer a hook leading into the global issue as part of your introduction.
Be careful with intro length but ensure there is a roadmap. The roadmap is essential to show how you will approach the discussion.
The introduction must include all 4 aspects of the discussion, not just the literary work and BOW but also where the extracts come from in relation to the broader work.
As an example, the format of the introduction could be something like this:
Hook. Within the global field of inquiry of XXXX, I will explore global issue of XXXXX and consider the ways in which this issue is presented through the content and form of XXXX (lit work), by XXXX (author) and the body of work of XXXX (author). XXXXX (global issue) is XXXX (briefly describe the nature of the global issue). In my examination of how this global issue is presented in the works I have identified, I will first consider XXXX (literary text title), XXXXXX (apposition information) as a whole, and then more closely analyse an extract from XXXX (chapter number or title). I will also focus on the way XXXXX (BOW author name), XXXXX (apposition information) presents the global issue in his/her XXXXXs (name the text type of the BOW) and specifically analyse an extract from XXXXX (title of text). In so doing, I will show how XXXXX (literary text author) (give a general statement of how the author presents the global issue). While XXXX (BOW author) (give a general statement of how the author presents the global issue).
Watch balance of texts. There must be equal time spent across both texts. And within the texts themselves, there needs to be a reasonable balance between discussing the whole work and the extract.
Avoid sweeping, broad, absolute statements. You need to be precise in your language use and absolute statements show that you are not articulating your thinking with accuracy. Remember, when you use an absolute statement, a person has to find only one counter example to disprove your statement. Be precise in your expression!
Clearly delineate through transitions when you are dealing with the whole text and when you are dealing with the extract.
Related to this is the need to effectively use transitions. “Moving on” “Now” are terrible transitions!
Reference intended audience, particularly when discussing the BOW.
Use of accurate terminology is essential. Accuracy and precision are required here.
Focus on analysing not describing. Don’t just use evidence and say it proves your point.
Ensure you are:
Interpreting
Evaluating
Justifying and
Showing significance in presenting the global issue
There must be a topic sentence for each of the 4 elements of your discussion. Similarly, there must be a link to the guiding question at the end of each element – How is the global issue presented through the content and form of the work and extract?
For the L of the PEEL paragraph, you cannot simply say, “This links to the global issue” – state explicitly what it is saying in relation to the global issue. Remember that they don’t “deliver the global issue” but “comment on and present the global issue” and you must state explicitly what the comment/presentation is in relation to your global issue.
Think of it as a mini-conclusion
When discussing the broader works, analysis of authorial choices was generally lacking and there was a tendency to describe rather than analyse.
For the discussion of the broader works, use titles for the BOW and chapter titles or numbers for the literary text to give specificity to your examples.
It is essential to refer to lines or panels when analysing the extract.
Your first instinct might be to re-state everything you've just said. Resist it. The examiner has just listened to you for 9 minutes; they don't need a play-by-play replay.
Synthesise by showing why their combined effect is significant to your global issue.
You started with a broad global issue. Return to this! Re-connect your specific analysis to the wider world. Your conclusion should answer the question: "What does this close analysis of these two texts ultimately reveal about the nature of my global issue?"
Example: "Therefore, while xxxx examines yyyy and zzzzzz aaaaa, together they demonstrate that bbbbb."
This frames your entire oral as a meaningful commentary on a matter of global significance.
End with a strong, insightful closing sentence. It should be a concise and polished statement that encapsulates the core argument of your oral.
A Simple Template to Get You Started:
Synthesis Sentence: Briefly state the core connection between your two texts in relation to the global issue. Use a keyword from your thesis.
Broader Implications Sentence: Explain what your exploration tells us about the global issue beyond the pages of the texts.
Final, Resonant Statement: A single, powerful sentence that provides a sense of closure and insight.
Example Using the Template:
"Both (Author X) and (Author Y), through their depictions of (Global Issue), demonstrate ..... (3) This is not merely a historical or fictional concern; it is a pressing global issue in an era of digital misinformation and algorithmic curation. (4) Their work serves as a chilling warning that the freedom of thought is the final frontier of human liberty, and the first casualty of tyranny."
Crucial Pitfalls to Avoid:
Introducing New Evidence: Your conclusion is not the place for a new example or a third text. Everything you say should be a logical outgrowth of the analysis you've already presented.
Apologizing or Undermining Yourself: Never end with "So, yeah, that's it," or "I hope that made sense." Finish with confidence.
Rushing: Practice your conclusion so you can deliver it calmly and clearly, even if you're running short on time. A rushed conclusion undermines your entire performance.
Your conclusion is your final chance to show your deep understanding and leave the examiner thinking, "Wow, that was a sophisticated and insightful analysis." Make it count. Now, let's practice.
Paper 1 is an examination using unseen non-literary texts.
Paper 1 asks you to write a guided textual analysis about one (SL) or both (HL) of the texts provided.
Passages for analysis may be complete pieces of writing or extracts from larger works.
Paper 1 counts for 35% of the final grade at both SL and HL. It is assessed externally.
Paper 1 is out of 20 marks for SL and 40 marks for HL.
During your studies, you will be exposed to various kinds of non-literary texts. Whenever you come across a new text type, go to your text type table and identify key aspects including formal features and approach.
You should feel reasonably comfortable writing an analysis of previously unseen passages from any text type in an examination situation, applying your understanding of different purposes and audiences (as well as structural, formal and stylistic conventions associated with various text types) to the texts presented.
Extracts from print or online media sources are often presented in examinations. In dealing with journalistic texts, you need to demonstrate understanding of the differences between news articles, feature articles, opinion columns and editorials. These text types have very different formal and stylistic conventions, audiences and purposes.
Each individual text is presented with a guiding question. This guiding question will be about a technical or formal aspect of the text. While you do not have to answer the guiding question, and you can propose your own line of argument about the text, it must be focused on a particular aspect that provides focus to the analysis. Nevertheless, be aware of the assessment criteria which indicates what aspects of the text must be considered—you must not only indicate and support your understanding of the text, but also “analyse and evaluate how textual features and/or authorial choices shape meaning”.
I. Introduction Section
A. Hook
- Start with an engaging opening related to the topic of the text
B. Text Overview
- Identify the text type (e.g. blog post, infographic, article)
- Name the author (if provided)
- Describe the intended audience
- Briefly summarise the main content
C. Thesis Statement
- Include language from the guiding question
- Present a rich idea or central argument about the text
II. Body Paragraphs
A. Topic Sentence
- Clearly state the main idea of the paragraph
- Connect to your thesis and the guiding question
B. Analysis (the "meat" of the paragraph)
1. Rich textual references
- Quote or paraphrase specific parts of the text
2. Authorial choices
- Identify specific techniques or strategies used by the author
3. Discussion of meaning
- Explain how the author's choices shape the text's meaning and impact
C. Implications
- Discuss deeper meanings or "read between the lines"
- Show critical thinking about the text's broader significance
D. Evaluation
- Assess the effectiveness of the author's choices
E. Transitions
- Use transitional phrases within paragraphs to connect ideas
- Include transitions between paragraphs for overall cohesion
F. Concluding Sentence
- Echo the paragraph's topic sentence and the overall thesis
III. Conclusion
A. Restate Central Argument
- Rephrase your thesis in a new, insightful way
B. Synthesise Main Ideas
- Don't simply summarise, but show relationships between key points
C. Final Thoughts
- End with a thought-provoking statement related to the text's topic
IV. Language Considerations
- Maintain formal, academic register throughout
- Vary sentence structure (mix of short and long sentences)
- Choose vocabulary carefully to demonstrate sophistication
- Infuse your writing with a scholarly yet personal voice
V. Final Tips
- Keep the guiding question in mind throughout your response
- Manage your time effectively to complete all sections
- Review this checklist right before the exam for a refresher
- Stay calm and confident in your analysis skills
1. Read and annotate carefully.
○ Remember, this is a reading test first. Take your time, use the margins to write down big ideas, and pay attention to authorial choices. Students who read and annotate carefully will almost always score better than those who do not.
2. Focus on the question.
○ Don’t ignore that guiding question; it’s there for a reason! Read that question carefully and identify “keywords” that should appear in your thesis statement and topic sentences. You may want to use synonyms for these keywords from time to time to prevent redundancy in your paper.
3. Make an outline or plan.
○ This is critical! Take a few extra minutes and create a rudimentary outline to guide your writing. This isn’t the time to be detailed and thorough, but capturing paragraph topics and briefly outlining your paper BEFORE writing will keep you focused and on track during your race to the finish.
4. Understand and articulate the message of the text.
○ Summary alert! Do not summarize what the author has said. Instead, consider the main message of the text, the purpose, and the implications. Look for nuances and details and explore the main claim the author is trying to make.
5. Discuss the author’s choices. (Know your technical terms!)
○ Know those terms, be able to identify them in a range of text types, and be sure to explain how authors use those choices to shape meaning.
6. Connect author’s choices directly to the effect on the reader and/or message of the text.
○ Remember that all texts have a precise target audience and have been intentionally crafted and created to convey a precise message to that audience. So, when writing, discuss the impact of authorial choices on the reader or audience.
7. Explore implications and subtleties.
○ Go beyond the obvious! Consider what most students will identify in the text and the “common” arguments writers are likely to make. Once you have those, keep on thinking! Learn how to read “between the lines” and identify nuances. What is the author indirectly suggesting or implying (but not overtly saying) in the text?
8. Write clear focused paragraphs with topic sentences that use wording of the GQ.
○ Write as many focused body paragraphs as you can that explore a range of rich ideas linked to the Guiding Question.
9. Maintain academic language and register, be precise, but don’t be afraid to be yourself and have some voice.
○ Yes, this is textual analysis, but it doesn't have to be boring and devoid of voice. Pay attention to your word choice, and showcase your best academic language. However, be human. Try starting with a (short) engaging hook, pepper some voice in the body paragraphs, and insert some personality in the conclusion. It just might make your paper stand out!
10.Breathe and Relax.
○ Hey, we know you’re nervous. However, it’s important to breathe, relax, and stay centered. Research has shown time and time again that students do not perform well when they are highly anxious. So, use a calming routine that works for you prior to the exam. Maintain perspective during the assessment. This isn’t life or death. You’ve got this!
10 Pitfalls to Avoid in Paper 1
1. Ignoring the Guiding Question
○ This needs to be your focus in your thesis and in each topic sentence. The IB guide says that the GQ will address a technical and formal aspect. If the GQ asks about how the author uses humor to convey a message, then your response obviously needs to focus on humor! Use the words of the GQ in your paper!
2. Writing too soon without a plan
○ This is a reading test first. Remember to read and annotate carefully. Once that is done, make a rudimentary outline that focuses on the GQ. This planning is so key and will save you time in the long run.
3. Super long body paragraphs
○ No one wants to read a two page paragraph. If you are in the middle of one, break it up, use a transition and keep the paragraphs of a moderate length. Aim for 4-6 good body paragraphs for a strong Paper 1. Your rudimentary outline should reflect this.
4. Misreading an essential element or text type
○ Think carefully about what the text type is. The IB will TELL YOU in the footnote and give you important information here. Read this and think. If it’s an advertisement, you know they are selling something. Read carefully and understand the context and the main ideas. Misreading something can be a dreadful mistake.
5. Summarizing the text
○ Your job is to interpret and analyze and evaluate, not summarize. Focus on craft/author choices and talk about implications of the text. If you are using the author as your subject and using our magic sentence, you are on the right track.
6. Fire hose technique
○ Paper 1 is not about listing millions of techniques, as many as you can. This is overwhelming and counterproductive. Use features to elevate your analysis. Aim for 4-5 in each body paragraph and always explain the effect of each feature.
7. Long fluffy introductions
○ Your job is to introduce the topic of the text, summarize the main ideas/purpose of the text and also briefly consider context and audience. Focus on the text and end with your strongly worded thesis that focuses on the guiding questions and a main claim of the text.
8. Ignoring context or audience
○ Every text is written in a specific time and place for a given audience. This is always
something to consider. Avoid devoting whole paragraphs or huge amounts of writing on context or audience (like in the old course) but do consider both of these things as you analyze/discuss the text.
Read with a Critical Lens
Approach the text with an analytical mindset, questioning not just what is being said but how it is being communicated and why. Consider underlying assumptions, biases, and alternative interpretations.
Analyse the Effect of Textual Features
Avoid vague or generic phrases such as “engages the reader” or “makes it more memorable.”
Instead, be precise in explaining the specific effect of a textual feature on meaning and how it influences the reader’s understanding or response.
For example, rather than saying, “The use of repetition makes the message stick,” specify what message is being reinforced and how the repetition contributes to the tone, emphasis, or persuasive power.
Ensure Your Thesis Directly Answers the Guiding Question
Your thesis should be clear, direct, and focused on the specific prompt provided.
Avoid broad or generalised statements that do not engage with the guiding question.
Structure Your Analysis Around Key Ideas, Not Techniques
Rather than dedicating entire paragraphs to individual authorial choices, structure your essay around four key ideas that emerge from the text.
Use textual features (e.g., diction, structure, imagery) as supporting evidence for these ideas.
Each paragraph should explore a central concept or idea that answers the GQ, with techniques serving to reinforce and develop that concept.
Create Strong Transitions Between Paragraphs
Each paragraph should logically build upon the previous one, rather than simply listing separate techniques.
Use sophisticated transitions to establish a sense of continuity and progression in your argument.
Example: Instead of simply stating “Another technique used is…,” try “Building on the idea of [previous argument], the author further reinforces this through…”
Only Discuss Context, Audience, and Purpose if Relevant
Do not force a discussion of context unless it directly connects to the guiding question.
If applicable, discuss how context influences meaning or how the text interacts with its intended audience.
Go Beyond the Surface
Make the implicit explicit.
Explore deeper meanings, potential biases, or how different audiences might interpret the text differently.
Ask: What is implied but not explicitly stated? What are the broader implications of the message?
Avoid Summarising in Your Conclusion
Instead of restating points, zoom out to a broader perspective.
Consider: What is the significance of your analysis? How does the text contribute to a larger conversation? What is the lasting impact of the message?
Use Evaluative Language
Incorporate phrases that signal interpretation and analysis, such as:
“This highlights…”
“This serves to…”
“This suggests…”
“This reinforces the idea that…”
Please remember the following when writing your Paper 1 response:
Remain tightly focused on the guiding question throughout.
Your introduction should include a hook, a brief explanation of what it is about, including context and intended audience, as well as the issues it deals with. Once you have established this, write your thesis (the answer to the question) which will probably include a roadmap.
When identifying authorial choices, combine the authorial choices that have a similar effect and include these together in the body paragraphs.
The structure of the body paragraphs should be - Topic sentence, Evidence, Analysis, interpretation and explanation, and link back to the thesis.
Your topic sentence should not focus on the authorial choices, but rather on the intention, purpose, effect and significance. While you may include the authorial choices, this is not your focus, but rather the effect e.g. The writer ..... (discuss the intention/purpose/effect in relation to the guiding question) through .... (authorial choices). OR Through ..... (authorial choices) the writer .... (discuss the intention/purpose/effect in relation to the guiding question). The bold is the essential element!. Remember that your topic sentence is a mini-thesis statement. It is also advisable to include why this is significant - "so what?" or "why is this impoartant in answering the question?" This may be an additional sentence after your first topic sentence.
Your topic sentence and concluding linking sentence should be constantly going back to the thesis and as a result, the guiding question too; using key terms/words from the GQ (synonyms where possible).
Ideally there should be 3 to 5 body paragraphs, but you must decide on the weight of the topics whether there are more or less. 250 words is usually around the maximum for a paragraph.
When writing your body paragraphs, it is generally advisable to move from broad evidence to narrow, specific evidence. If you focus only on narrow, you cannot show a full appreciation for the entire text.
Paragraphs should balance depth with breadth.
The balance of evidence and analysis in your paragraphs should be: 30% evidence and 70% analysis.
When providing evidence, remember to refer to the text directly (quote where necessary) rather than speak in broad terms. If quoting, remember to integrate your quotes seamlessly into your sentences.
When analysing the effect of an authorial choice, you must
justify your claim,
explain "how" the effect is achieved and
suggest why this is significant to answering the GQ (so what?).
For multimodal texts do not only analyse the text and visuals separately, but also analyse how they work together.
Aim to write 2 1/2 to 3 pages - 800 to 900 words, but this also depends on the conciseness and precision of your expression.
Your conclusion will have an element of summary in it, but the most important aspect is synthesising - what are the significant observations, ideas and thoughts.
For the top score band, and only if you have time, you can offer alternate readings of the text to show your full and deep understanding.
Discuss how different features are used in this [text type] to create an impression of …
Discuss how different features are used in this [text type] to achieve the author's purpose.
How do text and image work together to shape meaning in this [text type]?
Discuss how different features are used in this [text type] to persuade the reader to take action.
How has the interplay of text and images been used to convey the overarching message contained in this [text type]?
Comment on how the interplay of text and images is used to appeal to multiple audiences.
How and to what effect is tone used to express the author's opinion in this extract?
In what ways is imagery used to provoke a narrative in the viewer's mind?
In what ways does the use of language in this [text type] help to interest and entertain the reader?
How are formal features such as layout, fonts and visuals used to create an effect in this [text type]?
Explore how the writer develops their argument about ...
Examine how the narrative voice is used in this text to create a sense of immediacy whilst also attempting to involve the reader.
How does this [text type] persuade the reader to rethink their approach to …?
How and to what effect do text and image work together in this [text type]?
How is tone used to shape the meaning of this text?
This is not an exhaustive list, but is a good starting point. Remember that for Paper 1, you must determine which of these are relevant and significant in answering the guiding question.
BROAD ASPECTS
1. Purpose
What is the text trying to do? (e.g. persuade, inform, entertain, provoke, advertise, call to action)
Is it transactional, expressive, informative, or instructive?
2. Audience
Who is the intended audience? (age, gender, demographic, cultural background, profession)
How does the text appeal to or engage this audience?
3. Context
Situational context – When, where, and why was it created?
Cultural/political context – What broader issues or debates does it connect to?
Production and reception context – What platform is it published on? How would that influence its tone, form, or content?
4. Message and Values
What are the main ideas or beliefs communicated?
What assumptions, ideologies, or perspectives underlie the text?
Are certain voices or perspectives emphasised, marginalised, or silenced?
SPECIFIC ASPECTS
5. Text Type and Genre Conventions
What are the conventions of this text type?
How does the text follow, bend, or subvert those conventions?
6. Language and Style
Diction and register (formal, informal, emotive, academic, humorous)
Sentence structure (e.g. short for impact, long for detail or complexity)
Tone (e.g. sarcastic, passionate, authoritative, urgent, conversational)
Use of inclusive or exclusive language ("we", "they", "you")
7. Persuasive and Rhetorical Techniques
Ethos (credibility), Pathos (emotion), Logos (logic)
Rhetorical questions
Repetition and parallel structure
Rule of three, contrast, hyperbole
Appeals to fear, pride, tradition, or common sense
8. Visual and Structural Elements
(Applies to multimodal or visual texts like ads, websites, brochures, political cartoons, infographics)
Layout and composition – How are elements arranged? (e.g. foreground vs background)
Colour and contrast – Mood, symbolism, or focus
Typography – Font size, bold/italics, capitalisation for emphasis
Imagery and symbolism – What do the images suggest? What connotations are invoked?
Logo and branding – How do they reinforce the message?
White space – Use of emptiness to focus attention
9. Structure and Organisation
Headline or opening hook – How does it grab attention?
Use of subheadings, bullet points, captions
Paragraph structure – topic sentences, transitions, development
Line breaks or spacing
Pacing of argument or information
10. Voice and Persona
Who is “speaking” in the text?
What kind of identity or tone is constructed? (e.g. expert, friend, victim, activist)
How does the voice position the audience?
11. Intertextuality and Allusions
Are other texts, slogans, historical figures, or cultural references evoked?
What effect does this create?
12. Bias and Reliability
Is the text objective or subjective?
Are there signs of manipulation, bias, or omission?
Does the text rely on facts, opinions, statistics, or anecdotal evidence?
1. Place the guiding question in context
Begin by showing that you understand what the guiding question is really asking and connect it to relevant English A concepts or global context. This shows that you’re thinking conceptually about how the text constructs meaning.
2. Introduce the text in one sentence
Identify the text clearly and concisely.
Include:
Text type
Author or creator (if known)
Source and date (if given)
Specific intended audience
Context or situation (if apparent)
3. Brief synopsis linked to the guiding question
Offer a short, focused summary that relates directly to the guiding question.
Avoid retelling content but rather highlight what the text does in relation to the question.
4. Thesis statement
End the introduction with a clear thesis that:
Directly answers the guiding question
Indicates how the author creates meaning (through what key techniques or features)
Reflects your overall interpretation of the text’s purpose and impact
1. Topic Sentence
Start with a clear analytical claim that links directly to the guiding question and your thesis.
Make an interpretive point about how meaning is constructed.
You must show how this is significant in answering the question.
2. Evidence (specific, short, relevant)
Support your claim with precise textual evidence: short embedded quotations or concise references.
Do not copy or paraphrase large chunks. Quote only what is necessary to make your point and integrate these quotes into your writing.
Choose evidence that reveals how language, structure, or style constructs meaning.
3. Analysis (the heart of your paragraph)
Your analysis is where you earn marks. Every piece of evidence must be analysed, not simply identified.
Answer these guiding questions in your analysis:
How does this authorial choice (word, image, structure, tone, etc.) create meaning?
Why is this meaning significant in answering the guiding question?
What effect does it have on the reader or audience?
How does it develop the author’s overall purpose or attitude?
Your analysis must move from description → interpretation → evaluation (why it matters).
4. Combine Authorial Choices with Similar Effects
Group related techniques to show how multiple features work together to produce meaning.
This demonstrates analytical sophistication and avoids device-by-device commentary.
Examples:
Effect Combined Choices
Authority statistics + expert allusion + formal diction
Empathy anecdote + inclusive pronouns + synthetic personalization
Irony or Contrast juxtaposition + antithesis + tone shifts
Urgency imperatives + repetition + short, abrupt syntax
5. Make sure you address Structure, Style, and Tone
Discuss the layout and structure (paragraphing, sequencing, progression).
Consider the style of writing (formal, colloquial, ironic, reflective).
Analyse the tone and mood (what atmosphere is created, and why?).
These choices shape how the text communicates meaning and position the reader in relation to the guiding question.
6. Link Back to the Thesis
End every paragraph with a clear statement connecting your analysis to the thesis and guiding question.
Show the examiner that you understand the paragraph’s relevance to your overall argument.
7. Building Logical Progression
Arrange paragraphs so that each develops logically from the previous one, creating a coherent argument.
Think of each paragraph as a “step” toward fully answering the guiding question.
Use transitions such as Furthermore, In contrast, Building on this, or This idea is extended when…
8. Work at Both Depth and Breadth
Depth: Explore key moments or techniques in detail, unpacking connotations, tone, structure, and implications.
Breadth: Over the essay, address a range of features to show a full understanding of how meaning is made.
9. Formal Academic Register
Write in a formal, objective style.
Use analytical verbs: constructs, evokes, contrasts, implies, amplifies, manipulates, reinforces.
Avoid “I think” or “the author wants to say”; instead use The author suggests that… or The text implies…
10. Other Features to Consider
Sentence structure and types
Repetition and patterning
Figurative language
Facts, statistics, numbers
Allusion (literary, cultural, historical)
Anecdote
Mixed register or tone shifts
Demotic/vernacular language
Synthetic personalization (direct address)
Pronoun use (inclusive/exclusive)
Lexical clusters (semantic fields)
Parallelism and syntactic rhythm
Juxtaposition, antithesis, contrastive pairs
Symbolism and metonymy
Rhetorical questions
The conclusion is your final opportunity to demonstrate insight and control.
It should synthesise your argument, not repeat it.
This means drawing together the key ideas from your body paragraphs — the topic sentences — into a unified, overarching response that directly answers the guiding question and reinforces your thesis.
A strong conclusion should feel inevitable and reflective, showing the examiner that you have reached a considered understanding of how meaning is created and why it matters.
1. What the Conclusion Should Do
Synthesis, not summary - Do not restate everything you’ve already said. Instead, synthesise by showing how your analytical points combine to form a coherent interpretation of the text as a whole.
Bring your argument to a thoughtful close, highlighting the overall significance of the author’s choices and the message or meaning they construct.
Weak summary: “In conclusion, the author uses tone, imagery and structure to persuade the audience.”
Strong synthesis: “Ultimately, the text unites tone, imagery and structure to transform a private concern into a shared moral imperative, reflecting the author’s conviction that language itself can mobilise change.”
Reaffirm your central argument in light of the evidence and analysis you’ve presented.
Show how your exploration has proven or deepened the interpretation offered in your introduction.
Explicitly answer the guiding question once more, but at a conceptual level.
Demonstrate how your interpretation resolves the question.
Leave a sense of closure and insight. Your final line should provide a sense of intellectual completion.
2. What the Conclusion Should Not Do
Do not list devices or repeat your topic sentences mechanically.
Do not summarise the essay’s content or paraphrase large sections.
Do not introduce new analysis, examples, or interpretations.
Avoid formulaic phrases such as “In conclusion” or “To sum up” — instead, use more refined transitions such as “Ultimately,”, “In essence,”, or “Taken together,”.
3. Suggested Structure
Opening synthesis: Draw the essay’s main insights together in a single, cohesive statement.
Reconnection: Reaffirm how these insights collectively support your thesis and answer the guiding question.
Final reflection: Offer a closing thought that reveals the broader significance of the text’s meaning or effect.
This is applied to all assessment components.
Captivates
The vivid imagery captivates the reader from the outset.
(Add to: Imagery or Symbolism)
Engages
The direct address engages the audience immediately.
(Add to: Persuasion or Influence)
Draws in
The opening anecdote draws the reader into the narrative.
(Add to: Emphasis or Strength)
Appeals to the reader
The emotional language appeals to the reader’s...
(Add to: Persuasion or Influence)
Commands attention
The dramatic shift in tone commands the reader’s attention.
(Add to: Emphasis or Strength)
Moderate / Common Synonyms
These are neutral and versatile:
Attracts the reader
Stimulates curiosity
Captures attention
Precise Alternatives Based on Technique
Use these when a particular strategy is used:
Provokes curiosity (e.g. through a question or mystery)
Challenges the reader (e.g. through shocking or subversive statements)
Creates intrigue (e.g. with ambiguity or suspense)
Startles (e.g. with a surprising claim or image)
Demands attention (e.g. with an authoritative tone or bold claim)
Strikes the reader (e.g. with a powerful image or metaphor)
This is applied to all assessment components.
Avoid repetition of verbs like “shows” or “says” — instead use purpose-specific verbs.
Use verbs that clearly indicate the effect on the audience or reader.
Verbs to Introduce Ideas or Arguments
suggests
indicates
implies
reveals
proposes
posits
presents
asserts
advances
theorises
introduces
outlines
Verbs to Show Emphasis or Strength
emphasises
highlights
underscores
stresses
reinforces
accentuates
draws attention to
amplifies
intensifies
foregrounds
Verbs to Show Contrast or Challenge
contrasts
opposes
challenges
critiques
refutes
subverts
undermines
complicates
questions
disrupts
Verbs for Persuasion or Influence
persuades
convinces
appeals to
manipulates
influences
positions (the audience)
justifies
legitimises
normalises
stirs (emotion)
Verbs Related to Tone or Attitude
conveys
evokes
establishes
adopts (a tone)
assumes
projects
mirrors
communicates
aligns (with a perspective)
reflects
Verbs Related to Technique or Craft
employs
incorporates
integrates
deploys
constructs
builds
crafts
orchestrates
shapes
Verbs for Imagery or Symbolism
symbolises
represents
signifies
alludes to
connotes
reflects
encapsulates
evokes
mirrors
illustrates
Verbs for Argument Development or Progression
develops
builds upon
elaborates
extends
deepens
transitions
evolves
progresses
expands
Both HL and SL answer 1 of 4 essay questions. SL and HL students receive exactly the same 4 questions.
Both HL and SL must answer one question in relation to two literary works studied in the course.
Both HL and SL students cannot write about any literary work studied that was used in any previous assessment component.
Both HL and SL have 1 hour and 45 minutes answer this essay question.
Both HL and SL are graded using the same criteria.
At SL, Paper 2 grade counts for 35% of the final grade.
At HL, Paper 2 grade counts for 25% of the final grade.
Even though questions may not address the analysis of formal features specifically, an exploration of how authors’ choices create meaning is a key feature of the paper.
• Engagement with the works chosen for paper 2 is the most important element of success. Beyond any kind of preparation, practise, research or memorization, reading and thinking about the works is the most important work you can do. Reading and responding will create a more intimate knowledge of the works than available in any study method and will help to increase flexibility when approaching unique questions.
• Do not use formulaic approaches to analysis, memorized responses to previous questions and “fill-in-the-blank” approaches to building an argument. In relation to formulas and strategies, not all elements, context, imagery, critical views, are important in response to every question. In relation to structure, a three-part thesis statement, for example, may be the right approach to some questions and not to others. In relation to memorized responses, an answer about “physical environment”, for example, may not necessarily be easily shaped to fit a question about “sense of place”.
• Finally, examiners consistently find that focus on the question is one of the most important elements for a sound response.
1. Answering the Question: Respond directly and thoroughly to the chosen prompt.
2. Understanding Themes and Details: Show deep knowledge of the literary works' main ideas and specifics.
3. Analyzing Style and Language: Discuss the authors' craft and techniques.
4. Comparing and Contrasting: Highlight similarities and/or differences between the texts throughout your essay.
1. Novels
Novels are lengthy prose narratives typically read over multiple sittings. Key aspects to consider include:
- Narrative point of view (e.g., first-person, third-person, omniscient)
- Character development over time
- Structure (linear vs. non-linear, chapters, etc.)
- Passage of time (e.g., days, years, generations)
- Rich descriptive language and dialogue
2. Drama
Plays are meant to be performed on stage. Important elements include:
- Theatrical elements (lighting, sound, props, costumes)
- Stage directions and blocking
- Dialogue as the primary means of conveying information
- Act and scene structure
- Character interactions and development
3. Poetry
Poems are concise, often emotionally charged pieces. Consider:
- Speaker and point of view
- Rich imagery and figurative language
- Metrical and rhythmic patterns
- Structure and form (e.g., stanzas, free verse)
- Sound devices (alliteration, assonance, etc.)
- Emotional tone and shifts
4. Graphic Novels
Graphic novels combine visual art with written narrative. Key aspects include:
- Interplay between visuals and text
- Panel layout and sequencing
- Visual elements (shading, color, symbols)
- Perspective and "camera angle" in panels
- Character design and expressions
5. Short Stories
Short stories are concise narratives. Important elements to analyze:
- Compact story structure (exposition, rising action, climax, resolution)
- Character development in a limited space
- Focused setting and atmosphere
- Narrative point of view
- Concentrated use of imagery and figurative language
Broad Aspects of Literary Analysis
1. Theme
Central ideas or messages the text conveys (e.g. identity, power, freedom, love, death).
How themes are developed over time.
How multiple themes interact or conflict.
2. Purpose
Author’s intent or what the text is trying to do (entertain, persuade, criticise, reflect, provoke thought).
Social, political, or philosophical commentary.
3. Context
Historical context: When and where it was written/published.
Biographical context: Relevant information about the author.
Cultural/social context: Values, issues, or beliefs relevant at the time.
Literary context: Genre conventions, movements (e.g. Romanticism, Modernism).
More Specific (but still broad) Aspects of Literary Analysis
4. Narrative Voice and Point of View
First-person, second-person, third-person
First-person: central/peripheral; Reliable/unreliable
Third-person: Limited/omniscient; Objective/dramatic
Distance between narrator and events/characters.
5. Characterisation
How characters are constructed (direct vs indirect characterisation).
Development over time (static vs dynamic).
Relationships and roles (protagonist, antagonist, foil, etc.).
Motivations, flaws, internal conflict.
6. Structure and Form
Overall organisation (linear vs non-linear, framed narrative, dual timelines).
Use of chapters, stanzas, acts, etc.
Pacing and sequencing of events.
Parallelism, flashbacks, stream of consciousness.
7. Tone and Mood
Tone: Author’s attitude (e.g. ironic, sympathetic, melancholic).
Mood: Emotional atmosphere felt by the reader.
How tone shifts over time or contrasts between characters/settings.
8. Language and Style
Diction (formal/informal, abstract/concrete, colloquial).
Syntax (sentence structure, repetition, fragmentation).
Use of dialogue and internal monologue.
Registers and dialects.
9. Imagery and Symbolism
Use of sensory details to create vivid impressions.
Symbols (objects, settings, or actions that carry deeper meanings).
Motifs (recurring images or ideas that reinforce themes).
10. Figurative Language
Simile, metaphor, personification, hyperbole, irony, oxymoron.
Allegory or extended metaphor.
How these contribute to tone, theme, or characterisation.
11. Setting
Physical and geographical location.
Time period and historical reference.
How setting affects mood, theme, and character action.
12. Conflict
Internal (psychological/emotional struggles within a character).
External (against others, society, nature, fate).
How conflict drives plot and reveals theme or character.
Critical Concepts to Integrate
Juxtaposition and contrast: Used to highlight differences or complexities.
Intertextuality: References or relationships to other texts.
Foreshadowing: Hints of future events or outcomes.
Ambiguity: Open-ended meanings or unresolved tensions.
Perspective and bias: How ideology, class, gender, or race shapes the narrative.
When analysing literary works, we often examine their specific themes (those unique to the text) but we must also recognise how these works engage with universal themes that transcend individual stories. Paper 2 questions frequently emphasise these broader, cross-textual themes, requiring you to draw connections between different works. To prepare effectively, you should:
Identify the specific themes of a text,
Analyse how they reflect or challenge universal themes, and
Evaluate the relationship between the two—how does the text’s unique treatment of a theme deepen our understanding of its universal significance?
Universal literary themes are fundamental ideas, messages, or insights about the human experience that recur across cultures, time periods, and genres. These themes explore emotions, conflicts, and truths that resonate with people regardless of background, making them timeless and widely relatable.
Common Universal Literary Themes include:
Good versus Evil – The struggle between morality and corruption, often depicting heroes, villains, and moral dilemmas.
Love – Explores romantic, familial, or platonic love, including its power, sacrifices, and tragedies.
Coming of Age – The transition from youth to adulthood, involving self-discovery and personal growth.
Power and Corruption – How power can lead to moral decay, tyranny, or abuse.
Death and Mortality – Reflections on the inevitability of death and its impact on life.
Justice and Injustice – The fight for fairness, revenge, or the consequences of oppression.
Identity and Self-Discovery – The search for one’s true self, purpose, or place in the world.
Survival – The struggle to overcome extreme adversity, whether physical or psychological.
Freedom versus Oppression – The desire for liberty against societal, political, or personal constraints.
War and Peace – The effects of conflict on individuals and societies, and the pursuit of harmony.
Betrayal and Loyalty – The consequences of broken trust and the strength of faithfulness.
Ambition – The pursuit of success, wealth, or happiness, often with disillusionment.
Nature versus Civilisation – The contrast between the natural world and human society.
Fate versus Free Will – Whether destiny is predetermined or shaped by personal choices.
Isolation and Alienation – The psychological effects of loneliness or being an outsider.
Prejudice and Discrimination – The impact of racism, sexism, classism, or other forms of bias.
Technology and Humanity – The benefits and dangers of progress and technology.
Sacrifice – The act of giving up something valuable for a greater cause.
Hope and Despair – The endurance of hope in difficult circumstances.
The Supernatural – The presence of ghosts, gods, or unexplained phenomena in human life.
Your introduction should include the following:
1. Place the question in context
Where possible, relate the question to relevant English A concepts (such as identity, culture, creativity, representation, transformation, or communication).
Demonstrate an understanding of what the question is truly asking by identifying its key aspect.
2. Introduce the works
Provide a single, concise sentence that includes the title, author, period/context, and genre or form.
3. Brief synopsis linked to the question
Offer a short, focused summary of each work that directly relates to the question. Avoid unnecessary plot detail.
4. Show interpretation of the key aspect
Clarify how you interpret the central idea or concept raised by the question.
5. Thesis statement
Present your central argument: what your essay will demonstrate about both works as it relates to the question. This where you can bring in your areas for comparison.
Ensure the thesis addresses the question directly and establishes a comparative framework indicating both similarities and differences.
Begin each Area of Comparison (AOC) with a clear and fully developed topic sentence/s. Avoid brief or vague statements; instead, express your point in complete, precise terms to eliminate any ambiguity.
Your topic sentence should establish both the focus and the purpose of the AOC. In other words, it must explain what is being compared and why this comparison is significant in answering the question. What are you comparing? Why is it important to do this as it relates to the question?
After the first AOC, ensure that each subsequent AOC is logically connected to the one before it, creating a coherent and progressive line of argument throughout the essay.
The body of your Paper 2 essay develops your argument through a series of Areas of Comparison (AOCs). Each AOC should be organised around an idea that connects both works and directly addresses the question. The following guidance explains how to structure and develop your body paragraphs effectively.
1. Begin Each Paragraph with a Clear Topic Sentence (TS)
Refer to "Areas of Comparison and Topic Sentences"
2. Integrate Authorial Choices Naturally
Integrate broad authorial choices and evidence organically into your analysis rather than forcing them in. Don't think of dealing with each authorial choice and piece of evidence separately, but integrate them, especially when they have the same effect.
Identifying a technique is only the starting point! In your analysis, you must show the significance of this authorial choice as it relates to the question and the similarity or difference.
Take your broad knowledge of an authorial choice (everything from form and structure to characterisation and symbol) and apply it to the specific context that the question requires. This requires creative thinking!
Ask yourself:
What does this authorial choice achieve?
How does it relate to the question?
3. Use Evidence Effectively
Do not use quotations as isolated evidence. Instead, integrate quotations or references seamlessly into your own sentences. Remember that quotations are not expected for Paper 2.
Avoid the formulaic “Evidence → This shows that…” approach. Instead, let evidence emerge naturally from your interpretation.
4. Prioritise Analysis Over Description
Some description is necessary to establish context, but analysis must dominate.
Description tells the reader what happens, analysis explains why it matters.
Your goal is to interpret and evaluate, showing how an authorial creates meaning in relation to the question.
5. Develop Interpretation and Evaluation
In your analysis, go beyond identification. Offer a clear interpretation (what the choice means) and an evaluation (why it matters).
Consider:
How do the authors’ choices shape the reader’s understanding of the central aspect of the question?
What do these choices reveal about the authors’ perspectives or intentions?
Link each point explicitly to the question and to the comparison you are drawing (similarity or difference).
6. Maintain Coherence and Flow
Use effective transition words and phrases (e.g. similarly, in contrast, furthermore, however, consequently, by extension) to connect your ideas.
Avoid listing separate observations and interpretations. Instead, show how each idea builds on or contrasts with the previous one.
Every paragraph should feel like a logical continuation of your argument, not an isolated point.
7. Ensure Depth and Breadth of Analysis
Aim for both depth (close, detailed analysis of key moments) and breadth (awareness of the work as a whole).
Consider form, structure, and style in showing breadth of knowledge.
8. End Each AOC with a Linking Sentence
Refer to "Areas of Comparison and Linking Sentences"
Every Area of Comparison (AOC) should end with a linking sentence that draws your ideas together and clarifies what your analysis has revealed. This is a crucial step: it demonstrates that you are not simply listing comparisons, but developing a coherent and purposeful argument.
A good linking sentence does three key things:
Summarises insight – It captures what your discussion in that paragraph has revealed about the essay question. Think of it as answering:
“What understanding of the key idea has emerged from this comparison?”
It should not repeat earlier points, but rather synthesise your argument, showing what the analysis has proven or suggested.
Connects to your thesis – It should remind the reader, implicitly or explicitly, of how this paragraph contributes to your overarching argument. This reinforces a sense of direction and cohesion throughout the essay.
Prepares for the next paragraph – A well-crafted linking sentence also acts as a bridge, subtly leading the reader towards the next AOC.
The conclusion is your opportunity to bring together the insights developed throughout your essay and to leave the examiner with a strong, cohesive impression of your argument. It is not a summary of your points, but rather the final stage of interpretation, where you demonstrate the significance of your comparative analysis as a whole.
1. Reconnect with the Essay Question and Thesis
Begin your conclusion by returning to the wording of the question. Show the reader that you have maintained a clear focus on it throughout your essay. Reaffirm your thesis, but do not simply repeat it verbatim from the introduction. Instead, rephrase or refine it in light of what your analysis has revealed. It must show closure and development: the thesis has evolved through the essay.
Example:
“Ultimately, both authors..., suggesting that....”
2. Synthesise, Don’t Summarise!
The purpose of a conclusion is synthesis, not repetition.
Do not list what you discussed in each paragraph.
Instead, draw connections between your Areas of Comparison (AOCs). Show how your ideas interrelate and build upon one another to form a unified response to the question.
Think of it this way: your body paragraphs are individual pieces of a puzzle; your conclusion should reveal the complete image they create.
Ask yourself:
How do the similarities and differences between the works deepen our understanding of the question?
What overarching insight has the comparison revealed about human experience, art, or the writer’s craft?
3. Emphasise Key Takeaways
Your conclusion should give the reader a clear sense of the key takeaways from your discussion. This is your final opportunity to articulate the “so what?” of your essay.
You might:
Highlight a shared truth or tension that both writers explore.
Point to a difference in perspective or form that reveals each writer’s distinct vision.
Suggest how the works, read together, enrich our understanding of the concept/idea in question.
Example:
“By presenting .... as ....., Author 1 and Author 2 reveal ....”
4. Show Connection and Coherence
Ensure that your conclusion links all the threads of your essay together. It should show that your argument has been carefully structured and that each comparison has contributed to a coherent whole. Use connecting language to demonstrate this unity:
“Taken together…” / “Across both texts…” / “In this way…” / “Through these differing approaches…”
5. End with a Final Reflective Statement
Conclude with a final, thoughtful sentence that leaves the reader with a sense of closure and intellectual satisfaction. This should reflect the broader significance of your argument, either in literary, philosophical, or human terms and ultimately why it was important to compare these two works in answering the question.
Avoid over-using words like "both" and "similarly". While these words are good indicators of similarity, if they are used consistently, it makes your essay sound repetitive. Find variety! Remember, examiners are looking for nuance.
Here is a list of key vocabulary to show similarity:
Correspondingly: “Correspondingly, [Author A] uses …”
In a similar vein: “In a similar vein, [Author B] …”
Likewise: "Likewise, [Text B]..."
In the same way: "In the same way, [Author B] ..."
Mirror: “... in Text A mirrors ... seen in Text B.”
Echo: “... in Text A echoes the ... in Text B.”
Parallel: “... in Text A parallels ... in Text B.”
Converge: “Both texts converge on the idea that…”
"Just as": "Just as [Author A]..., [Author B]..."
"Shared Concern": "Both texts share a ..., though they (difference in similarity)."
"Mutual": "The mutual ... is evident in the ... of both texts."
Avoid over-using words like "in contrast" and "on the other hand". Once again, these words are good indicators of difference, but they must be used sparingly.
Here is a list of key vocabulary to show difference:
Conversely: “Conversely, [Author B] …”
In sharp contrast: “In sharp contrast to the ... of Text A, Text B …”
Alternatively: “Alternatively, [Author B] suggests that …”
Whereas: “Whereas [Text A] ..., [Text B] ...”
While: “While [Text A] ..., [Text B] ...”
Where: “Where [Text A] ..., [Text B] ...”
Unlike: “Unlike the ... in [Text A], [Text B]...”
Deviate: "The two works deviate in..."
Diverge: The two works diverge in..."
Contrasts with: "The ... in [Text A] contrasts with the ... in [Text B]."
Differs from: "The ... in [Text A] differs from the ... in [Text B]."
How do two of the works you have studied portray the struggle to be understood?
Some literary texts, although set in a particular place or time, convey ideas that are universal. In what ways is this true in two of the works you have studied?
Discuss how two works you have studied present concepts of good and bad, not as absolute notions, but as a matter of individual perception?
Referring to two works you have studied, discuss how the author has created a convincing “world”.
Discuss the ways that writers have presented characters that feel alienated from their society in two of the works you have studied.
“Great literature is simply language charged with meaning to the upmost possible degree.” Discuss some of the features that make the two works you have studied great literature.
Tension frequently builds to a critical point in literary works. How is tension created in two works you have studied and for what purpose?
To what extent do the form and content of two works you have studied reflect the time and place in which they were written?
“We are asleep until we fall in love.” To what extent has falling in or out of love changed the destiny or fate of characters in two works that you have studied?
Explore how race or ethnicity contributes to tension or conflict in two works you have studied.
To what extent do the formal characteristics of genre influence meaning in two works that you have studied?
Discuss the ways that the views and opinions of others have influenced or changed the way you understand two works that you have studied.
How is the identity of characters challenged or how does it change in two works that you have studied?
“Doomsday is near; die all, die merrily.” In two works that you have studied, how is the end of the world anticipated, and how have characters responded to this?
In two works you have studied, what techniques have writers used to stimulate an emotional response in the reader?
The personal biography of a writer can influence the form and/or content of what they write. To what extent is this the case in two works that you have studied?
In what ways have two of the works you have studied explored the role of the individual in society, and what conclusions is it possible to draw from these explorations?
Thinking critically often involves the ability to see the world in a variety of ways. How have writers in two works that you have studied used form and content to challenge your own understanding of the world?
In two of the works you have studied, how have writers used foreshadowing, and what is the effect of this foreshadowing?
Discuss the effect of contrast and/or juxtaposition in two of the works that you have studied.
“If there is meaning in life at all, then there must be meaning in suffering.” How has suffering been described in two works you have studied, and how could this be said to give meaning to life?
A literary work can be celebrated in one time or culture, but banned in another. In two works that you have studied, discuss the ways that these works may be understood or received in different ways.
In literature, tension is often established through contrasting the ‘new’ with the ‘old’. In two works that you have studied, how has this kind of tension been represented and to what effect?
Figurative language includes things like metaphor, simile, personification, oxymoron, and hyperbole. How is figurative language used and to what effect in two works that you have studied?
Explain how the authors of two literary works have portrayed a social group in a particular way and why.
It is often said that literature is a voice for social commentary. How is this true in two works that you have read?
To what extent can the meaning of a literary work change over time? How does this question apply to two works that you have read.
'Coming of age' is a common theme in literary works. With regards to two literary works, how is this depicted and why?
How are the characters from two two literary works representational of people from the time and place in which they were written?
Why might two of your literary works be considered 'timeless'?
With regards to two literary texts, explain why authors may have chosen to depict events in a particular sequence or order.
How do two literary works both reflect and challenge the spirit of the times in which they were written?
Referring to two works you have studied, how is an unconventional order of events used to achieve a specific effect?
How, and to what effect, do the writers in two works you have studied portray the societies they are writing about?
Referring to two works you have studied, how, and to what effect, do the different points of view expressed influence the reader?
Discuss how and to what effect contrast has been used in two works you have studied.
Referring to two works you have studied, discuss how the writers portray the significance of a journey.
With reference to two works you have studied, discuss the means by which the passage of time is communicated and the effect this achieves.
Referring to two works you have studied, compare and contrast the ways in which they show the main characters overcoming limitation.
With regard to two works you have studied, explore the representation of poverty.
Discuss how the writers of two works you have studied depict social tensions.
Referring to two works you have studied, discuss how effectively the writers communicate with the reader.
How does the narrative voice shape the reader's understanding of the characters' identities in two works you have studied.
How do the writers of two works you have studied represent gender and to what effect?
Referring to two works you have studied, consider the writers’ use of language and the effects this achieves.
Referring to two works you have studied, compare and contrast how good and evil characters are represented and the effect this has on the audience.
How do two works you have studied challenge cultural values?
Referring to two works you have studied, explore the importance of honesty.
The HLE is a 1200-1500 word formal, academic essay.
The HLE is a processed essay and will take time to develop.
The HLE is based on work(s) or text(s) studied in the course.
Students select their own topic, title, line of inquiry and thesis although you are there to guide and support them.
Students cannot base their essay on any work or text that was used for the Individual Oral or that will be used for Paper 2.
It is not a requirement to use or consult secondary sources.
• The HL essay is an investigation on a topic chosen by you. It is an academic-style essay with a clear line of inquiry, citations and a bibliography. It will show a focused analytical argument. It will go through the stages of research and drafting and redrafting.
• The preparation for the essay is linked to the learner portfolio, which is an ongoing record of your engagement with, and reflection on, the different texts and themes encountered during the course.
• The seven guiding concepts in the course are a starting point for choosing a topic, and though it is not compulsory to choose one of these, they are appropriate exemplars for the broad literary or linguistic focus required. Titles are written in the form of a question.
• The choice of literary texts is made according to the rules specified in the guide, choosing from the prescribed reading list with due diligence to balance literary form, period and place. The selection of non-literary texts is also subject to suggestions made in the guide.
• A text used for the HL essay cannot be repeated either for the individual oral nor for paper 2.
• The role of the teacher is that of guide and supervisor. The teacher assists in the framing of the topic of inquiry, and makes sure that the text(s) chosen are sufficient in depth and richness, to permit a suitably rigorous examination.
• The teacher advises on the suitability of the topic, and reads the first complete draft and comments on how it can be improved. After this intervention, you submit the final version. The teacher ensures, as far as possible, that the work is original.
• The HL essay is designed to permit the development of thinking and writing skills that are valued in higher education, pursued with autonomy by you as the candidate. While nothing is gained without sustained contemplation and effort, you should gain appreciation and enjoyment during the task as a result of the analysis and synthesis you engage in.
• It is probable that the HL essay will be written in the second year of the course, when awareness and skills are more enhanced. However, due to the ongoing engagement demonstrated in the learner portfolio, the planning for the essay may be present in embryonic form early in the course.
• It is recommended that you practice forming questions that are suitable for the HL essay from the start of the course, and to practice writing analytical style essays as part of your preparation and ongoing assessment. This is where your portfolio comes in, and why it is so important to be actively engage in using it.
• While citations (for example references to quotations from a text) are expected, footnotes in the form of added text are not appropriate, since this would increase the word count.
• If non-literary visual texts are used, care should be taken to ensure that the text has sufficient complexity to sustain an inquiry, or alternatively a series of related texts may be investigated to permit the inquiry to have depth and breadth.
Look back at your learner portfolio. Which literary work(s) and non-literary text(s) jump out? What interests you? Alternatively, look at the 7 concepts of the course. What do you find interesting or worth exploring in greater depth?
Narrow your ideas down into a possible topic, title or question you want to answer. Talk with your teacher, with your peers, with anyone who will listen. Clarify your ideas and arguments through discussion.
Once you have decided on a line of enquiry, draw a spider diagram for it. Branch out from each aspect of your thinking and answer all parts of it in relation to the text or work you are focusing on. Share your thinking with others to clarify your ideas even more.
Write a thesis statement which will come at the end of the first paragraph. In your thesis statement, provide a focus for your essay. What are you arguing and why?
Quote hunt. Find quotations from the primary source that help you explore your line of inquiry. Rewrite them on pieces of paper. Look for similarities between the quotations and start to cluster them. What is the guiding idea behind each cluster of quotations? Could this ‘guiding idea’ become a ‘topic sentence’? How might these tie in to the thesis statement?
Write an outline to your essay using your spider diagram, thesis statement, quotations and more. Make sure you stick between the 1200-1500 word limit.
Assess several samples using the assessment criteria. Review the expectations and what quality looks like.
After you have written the first draft of the essay, think about how you can revise, edit, and proofread (and not just the night before!).