Lecture given at the conference "La clemenza di Tito and Mozartian Aesthetics," at the Kungliga Myntkabinettet, Stockholm, 24–27 August 2013, organized by the Nordic Network for Early Opera
On 5 October 1789, a mob consisting mostly of women marched from Paris to Versailles, attacked the palace, and forced King Louis XVI and Queen Marie Antoinette to return with them to Paris. Later, to the judges who came to take her deposition against the mob, Marie Antoinette, putting the best face she could on the unspeakable outrage that had just occurred, expressed royal magnanimity: “J’ai tout vu, tout su, et j’ai tout oublié.”[1] Her words echoed those of Emperor Augustus at the end of Corneille’s Cinna, ou La Clémence d’Auguste (1639): “Auguste a tout appris, et veut tout oublier.” She came even closer to Metastasio’s libretto La clemenza di Tito—a libretto written for her grandfather, Emperor Charles VI—and the final words of Tito’s final monologue: “Sia noto a Roma / Ch’io son l’istesso, e ch’io / Tutto so, tutti assolvo, e tutto obblio.”
The queen’s patently theatrical gesture—we might call it “La clemenza di Maria Antonietta”—reminds us that Mozart’s La clemenza di Tito was a product of a time in European history dominated by a single event: the French Revolution. Marie Antoinette’s words also remind us of the pervasiveness of theater in the everyday life of eighteenth-century Europe. For both the queen and her subjects, the theater helped to shape their understanding of themselves, of their place in society, and of contemporary events; those events, in turn, helped to shape theater, including opera. This was as true in Vienna as it was in Paris, and it helps to explain why so much thought, money, and energy was put into opera during a period such momentous politcal change. A little less than two years after the queen paraphrased Tito’s declaration of clemency, while the Revolution continued to unfold, Mozart directed the first performance of his setting of La clemenza di Tito for the coronation of Leopold II, Marie Antoinette’s brother, as king of Bohemia.
In July 1790, four months after the death of Emperor Joseph II, an anonymous critic evaluated musical life in Vienna during his reign for a German music journal. Turning to Joseph’s successor, he continued:
The present king has not been in the theater, nor has he had his music in private, nor has he shown any other sign of being a music-lover. Malum signum, cry our pseudo-prophets. But I believe that once the enormous burdens of statesmanship that lie on his shoulders are reduced to minor difficulties, once he has bestowed golden peace on his dominions, then too will we have a new Golden Age of music.[2]
The writer’s hopes were not fulfilled. Emperor Leopold II died after a reign of only two years, and it can hardly be called a golden age of music. Yet his reign deserves study as a period of intense musical activity and change—much of it initiated by Leopold himself as part of a reorganization of the court theaters’ personnel and repertory that he oversaw in 1791. That reorganization is an important part of the context of Mozart’s last two operas, Die Zauberflöte and La clemenza di Tito.[3]
Leopold’s reign fell between two periods of relative stability in the evolution of Viennese musical life. The 1780s, the years when Joseph II ruled alone after the death of Maria Theresa in 1780, were shaped by his artistic direction, which favored the hegemony of a particularly complex and sophisticated kind of opera buffa, the virtual absence of opera seria and ballet, a turning-away from church music by the best composers, and the cultivation of a rich and highly developed language of instrumental music. The years following Leopold’s reign present a very different picture. The brilliant comic operas of Mozart were absent from the court theaters for most of the 1790s, replaced by Italian works of a simpler kind. Comic opera, instead of dominating the stage, shared it with other genres, such as Italian serious opera and ballet, which enjoyed the prestige it had won during the days of Angiolini and Noverre. Outside the theater, church music regained its former attraction to composers.
In short, Viennese musical life was transformed, and much of the transformation took place during Leopold’s reign. The departure from Vienna in early 1791 of Lorenzo da Ponte signalled the end of an era in Viennese comic opera; Mozart’s death later that year removed from the scene the author of the greatest musical achievements of the Josephinian decade. The debuts of Leopold’s Italian ballet and opera seria troupes less than a month before Mozart’s death reintroduced the Viennese to genres with which they had grown unfamiliar. A decree promulgated by Leopold in March 1791 sanctioning the performance of orchestrally accompanied music in churches contributed to a revival of church music, of which Mozart’s Requiem, commissioned a few months later, was but one product. The year of Leopold’s death saw the arrival in Vienna of two musicians who would do more to shape Viennese music during the next decade than any others. Haydn, still to write his late masses and oratorios, returned from his first trip to London; and Beethoven arrived from Bonn.
Emperor Leopold II, fully aware of the theater’s symbolic power, used it skillfully. During the first year of his reign he pointedly ignored the theater, as a way of projecting the image of a sovereign too busy with the affairs of government to dabble in such trivial matters; then, in 1791, he initiated and supervised a theatrical reorganization the lavishness of which Vienna had not experienced since the days of Maria Theresa—a reorganization that featured the return to Vienna of genres for which it had once been famous; one of those genres was, of course, opera seria.
Coming to the throne of the Habsburg monarchy at a time of crisis, Leopold faced threats both external (the French Revolution, war with Turkey) and internal (rebellion in the Austrian Netherlands, the nobility of Bohemia and Hungary pushing back against Joseph’s reforms). With a mixture of concessions and firmness he divided and weakened opposing groups; at the same time he began an ideological offensive against the French Revolution and its sympathizers within the Habsburg monarchy.
Leopold consolidated power slowly: a process manifested in a series of coronations and other similar ceremonies. The first of these ceremonies was the oath of allegiance (Huldigung) to Leopold as archduke of Austria on 6 April 1790. In October 1790 Leopold was crowned emperor of the Holy Roman Empire in Frankfurt; a month later (November 1790) King of Hungary in Bratislava, and in September 1791 King of Bohemia. The Huldigung and the coronations that followed were opportunities to affirm, though the powerful symbolism of ancient rituals, the strength and resilience of enlightened absolutism.
The Huldigung and its surrounding festivities is particularly well documented in a series of colored prints by Hieronymus Löschenkohl.[4] They included a procession through the Graben to St. Stephens Cathedral, a specially constructed “Freuden-Gerüst” (stage of joy), and an orchestrally accompanied Te Deum in the Hofkapelle.
In Bratislava Leopold received the crown of St. Stephen in the cathedral; and an ox decorated with flowers was led to the slaughter by a military band before being roasted and fed to the masses.
Leopold basked in the warmth of pomp and applause, celebrating and renewing the traditions of the political system that kept him in power. His subjects not only applauded their new ruler but displayed their own traditions, demonstrating that they consented freely to be ruled by Leopold but that such consent came in exchange for his recognition of their rights and privileges.
Like most eighteenth-century coronations, Leopold’s were patently theatrical: dramas whose casts included the Habsburg monarchy’s richest and most powerful actors, the sovereign himself playing the leading role. In keeping with that theatrical quality, the production of plays and operas was an part of most of the festivities surrounding Leopold’s coronations. The Huldigung of April 1790 took place while the theaters were still closed in mourning for Joseph II, so opera could not be a part of that celebration. In Bratislava a new Harmoniemusik by Georg Druschetzky for twenty-one wind instruments (the combined Esterházy and Grassalkovitz wind bands) may have compensated, at least in part, for the absence of an opera.[4a] But in Frankfurt performances included several operas and plays. In Prague, at least three operas were performed in the days before and after Leopold’s coronation as king of Bohemia. But the main theatrical event in Prague was the premiere of a new serious opera on the evening of coronation day: Mozart’s La clemenza di Tito—in a setting of Metastasio’s libretto heavily revised by Caterino Mazzolà.
The opera had been conceived and executed in great haste, in a process well documented by Sergio Durante.[5] In this paper I will focus on the genre of Mozart’s opera, a choice made by the Bohemian noblemen who commissioned the opera in consultation with the impresario Domenico Guardasoni, considering their choice within the context of contemporary theatrical practices, Leopold’s theatrical reorganization in Vienna, and precedents set by previous coronations.
Although opera seria was, along with tragédie lyrique, the most prestigious and expensive of eighteenth-century operatic genres, it was not necessarily the automatic choice for a coronation in central Europe in the early 1790s. Vienna, the city that Metastasio made his home and that honored him with the title of court poet, rejected the kind of opera that he play so crucial a role in shaping. Opera seria maintained its fascination for Italian composers and audiences through the eighteenth century and into the nineteenth. It enjoyed favor in some of the musical centers of northern Europe as well, including London and Berlin. But in Vienna, where many of Metastasio’s dramas were first performed, opera seria was largely absent during the 1770s and 1780s.
This was partly a matter of the taste of Emperor Joseph II. In preparation for the visit of the grand duke and duchess of Russia in 1781 Prince Kaunitz, Joseph’s minister of state, urged him to arrange for the performance of opera seria and ballet. This would be an effective means of impressing the Russian visitors with the “power of this monarchy,” according to Kaunitz. But Joseph rejected the idea of an opera seria, and in doing so he made his opinion of the genre clear: “In regard to opera seria from Italy it is too late to arrange something good; and anyway, it is such a boring spectacle that I do not think I will ever use it.”[6] During the 1780s opera buffa and Singspiel flourished in Vienna. (I use the term “opera buffa” here loosely—referring to the wide spectrum of operas with comic situations and characters, many ensembles, including finales, which make use of singers who specialized in comic opera, but which also incorporate music and dramatic situations characteristic of opera seria.)
The dominance of opera buffa in the Burgtheater was reflected in its use in celebrating important dynastic events—not only in Vienna, but also in Prague, whose operatic repertory imitated that of Vienna. When the emperor’s niece (Leopold’s daughter) Archduchess Maria Theresa married a prince of Saxony in 1787, the bride’s travel to Dresden was marked by operas. Her arrival in Vienna was celebrated by the premiere of Martin y Soler’s L’arbore di Diana. Mozart intended the premiere of Don Giovanni to celebrate the archduchess’s visit to Prague in October 1787; a delay in the production of that opera meant that it had to be replaced by a gala performance of Figaro. But the most important dynastic event of the 1780s was the marriage in Vienna of Joseph’s nephew (Leopold’s son) Archduke Francis to Elisabeth of Württemberg in January 1788. To celebrate that event, the Viennese opera buffa troupe presented the first performance of Salieri’s Axur re d’Ormus, a dramma tragicomico that became Emperor Joseph’s favorite opera. All these operas have librettos by Lorenzo Da Ponte, whose success in Vienna was a direct result of Joseph’s operatic tastes and policies.
The use of opera buffa on occasions of state set a precedent that survived Joseph. 19 September 1790 was the day of the triple marriage that Leopold had arranged with his sister, Queen Maria Carolina of Naples. Archduke Francis, whose wife Elisabeth had died earlier in the year, married Princess Marie Therese of Naples, while two of Francis’s younger siblings married two of Marie Therese’s younger siblings. The whole Neapolitan royal family came to Vienna to witness the ceremony, and they stayed in Vienna for several months, enjoying with Leopold and his family a splendid succession of theatrical performances, concerts, banquets, and balls.[7]
The arrival of the Neapolitans was celebrated by the premiere of Joseph Weigl’s La caffetiera bizzarra (on yet another libretto by Da Ponte) on 15 September. In his autobiography (and looking back from a time when operatic aesthetics differed greatly from those of the Josephinian decade) Weigl blamed the failure of La caffetiera bizzarra on its belonging to the wrong genre for the occasion:
In the meantime I wrote another comic opera, La caffetiera, which takes place in the Prater. Because no other score was available, it was chosen for performance on the arrival of His Majesty the King of Naples, and it was a complete flop. How could a Prater story be of interest in the presence of such distinguished guests? I must openly admit that neither the book nor the music deserved a better fate, and I still cannot understand how a beginner (which I truly still was) could have been permitted to present such a plot on such a festive occasion.[8]
Salieri’s Axur, revived five days later, was evidently deemed more appropriate for this kind of Feyerlichkeit, probably at least in part on account of its having originally served to celebrate Franz’s first wedding in 1788. Count Zinzendorf, the Austrian bureaucrat whose diary serves as a crucial source of information about Viennese opera, had dismissed La caffetiera bizzarra as “un tres sot opera.”[9] But at the performance of Axur he directed his attention less to the opera itself than to the very first appearance in the Burgtheater of Joseph’s successor, Leopold: “Au Spectacle. Axur, Re d’Ormus. Toute la famille royale et Napolitaine. Notre roi y arriva quand Axur est sur son trone, et fut fortement applaudi.”[10] (Leopold was “notre roi” because he had not yet been crowned emperor.) Salieri’s Axur is wicked, and at the end of the opera he prefers to commit suicide than to be deposed. Leopold had no wish to be likened to Axur. But in one important respect they were the same: they were both kings. That was presumably enough for Zinzendorf to feel the appropriateness of Leopold’s arrival in the royal box while Axur (probably portrayed by the great buffo Francesco Benucci, who had created the role in 1788) sat in royal splendor on the stage.
Emperor Joseph’s operatic tastes and policies also influenced the choice of operas performed at the election and coronation in Frankfurt—an extemely Vienna-centric repertory that included Carl Ditters von Dittersdorf’s Der Apotheker und der Doktor, Salieri’s Axur, and Paul Wranitzky’s Oberon.[11]
Viennese opera of the 1780s was still dominating the repertory of the court theaters in early 1791, a year after Joseph’s death. On a festive day in February on which Leopold evidently pulled out all the stops to impress the king and queen of Naples, the opera clearly represented Josephinian values. The Gazzetta universale printed a report from Vienna dated 10 February:
Yesterday, in honor of Their Sicilian Majesties, the court gave a magnificent sleighride to Schönbrunn, where there was a splendid dinner attended by many members of the high nobility. On their return, the same procession passed through the principal streets and squares of this city, after which they attended the opera Le nozze di Figaro at the Italian Theater; then they went to the Redoutensaal, where the quality of the assembled guests made this one of the most beautiful spectacles ever seen.[12]
Yet seven months later, for the coronation opera in Prague, the Bohemian nobility that commissioned Tito conspicuously turned away from the precedent established by Joseph II and his preference for opera buffa and Singspiel, specifying instead a genre that Joseph had said he would never use.
In turning to opera seria, the Bohemian noblity probably took account of earlier Habsburg coronations in Prague. In 1723, the coronation of Charles VI as king of Bohemia had been celebrated with the splendid production of Fux’s Costanza e fortezza on an outdoor stage erected for the occasion just outside Prague castle. Twenty years later, in May 1743, a setting of Metastasio’s libretto Semiramide was performed as part of festivities at the coronation of Maria Theresa as queen of Bohemia. The libretto printed for the occasion mentions no composer; it was probably a pasticcio.[13] As an opera seria, Leopold’s coronation opera represented the continuation of a tradition to which both his grandfather and his mother had contributed.
The Bohemian nobility had yet another reason to celebrate Leopold’s coronation with an opera seria. Before succeeding his brother in 1790, Leopold had spent twenty-five years in Florence as grand duke of Tuscany. He and his wife Maria Luisa brought with them to Vienna operatic tastes very different from those of Joseph II. Opera seria was an essential part of the theatrical repertory in Florence, as in the rest of Italy: an average of just under four opere serie were performed each year in Florence during the 1780s. So it is not really surprising that the transformation of the Viennese theatrical personnel and repertory that Leopold launched in early 1791, shaped by his Italianate tastes and experience, included the formation of an opera seria troupe. Leopold engaged two of Italy’s leading singers of opera seria, the soprano Cecilia Giuliani and the tenor Vincenzo Maffoli, and he chose the operas in which they were to make their Viennese debuts.[14] A review of the careers of Giuliani and Maffoli not only shows that they had reached the pinnacle of Italy’s operatic hierarchy, but also suggests that Leopold himself was familiar with their singing from their performances in Florence and (in the case of Maffoli) other Tuscan cities.
Cecilia Giuliani received training and began her career at the Ospedale dei Mendicanti in Venice. After singing Latin oratorios for almost a decade in Venice, she entered the secular world of opera seria in Florence in 1785, in Angelo Tarchi’s Virginia. Also in Florence, Giuliani achieved one of her biggest early successes as Semiramide in Alessio Prati’s La vendetta di Nino, a melodramma tragico in which she is struck dead by her son in one of the final, horrifying scenes. During the next few years her engagements brought her to the theaters of Venice, Milan, and London, as well as Florence, where she made a triumphant return during Carnival 1791 in Sebastiano Nasolini’s Teseo a Stige and a revival of La vendetta di Nino.
Vincenzo Maffoli had achieved equal fame by the time Leopold engaged him to sing in Vienna. He made his debut in Rome in 1781 and remained a favorite there, returning in 1787 and 1790. But he was also know in Florence and elsewhere in Tuscany; he sang in Florence 1788 and 1791, and in Livorno, Pisa, and Siena. His appearance in Pietro Guglielmi’s Debora e Sisara in Florence during Lent 1791 was praised in the Gazzetta toscana.[15]
Maffoli was to sing the role of Sisara once more at least. In the audience in Florence was Emperor Leopold, in Tuscany to supervise the installation of his son Ferdinand as grand duke. Leopold must have been pleased with what he heard in Debora e Sisara. Maffoli entered imperial service in Vienna on 1 June 1791. He portrayed Sisara when Guglielmi’s dramma sacro was presented in Vienna during Lent 1792, the last production before Leopold’s death on 1 March of that year.
The third crucial member of Leopold’s opera seria troupe was Angelo Testori, a musico who differed from Giuliani and Maffoli in having enjoyed only a short career before singing in Vienna; evidently he was very young, and unable to demand the huge salaries that leading musici such as Luigi Marchesi and Gasparo Pacchierotti would have demanded. Testori did not join the troupe until October 1791, suggesting that Leopold had trouble finding a first-rate musico who was willing to move to Vienna and affordable.
Leopold’s opera seria singers made their Viennese debut in the two operas in which Giuliani had starred just a few months earlier in Florence. They celebrated the birthday of Empress Maria Luisa, on 24 November 1791, with a performance of Nasolini’s Teseo a Stige, and followed it a few weeks later with Prati’s La vendetta di Nino.
Although these performances did not take place until more than two months after the coronation in Prague, the preparations for the re-establishment of opera seria had begun much earlier in the year. Both Guardasoni and the Bohemian nobility, many of whom had residences in Vienna, must have been aware of them.
After hiring Giuliani, Maffoli, and Testori, Leopold filled out his opera seria troupe with singers from the opera buffa troupe already established in the court theaters. Guardasoni did exactly the same in preparation for La clemenza di Tito. His contract (carefully analyzed by Durante) required him to engage a first rate musico and prima donna; and in honoring this stipulation he brought to Prague the musico Domenico Bedini (who portrayed Sesto), and Maria Marchetti Fantozzi (who portrayed Vitellia). But for the rest of the cast the contract allowed him to use singers from his own troupe (including the tenor Antonio Baglioni, who portrayed Tito). Although those singers were most experienced in opera buffa (and a repertory similar to that of the court theaters in Vienna), they did have some experience with opera seria. During the years 1789–91 they had resided in Warsaw, where the repertory included several serious operas.[16]
La clemenza di Tito was not the first musical event to take account of and pay tribute to the Italianate tastes of Leopold and his family. Concerts given in Vienna in April 1791 included excerpts from an opera seria. And a celebration that occurred a month before the coronation in Prague also included a staged cantata. Both the concerts in April and the cantata in August anticipated the inauguration of Leopold’s opera seria troupe; in doing so, they also anticipated certain aspects of Mozart’s coronation opera.
On 16 and 17 April 1791 Vienna’s Tonkünstler-Societät presented excerpts from Giovanni Paisiello’s Fedra as part of the concerts that it regularly gave, near the end of Advent and Lent, for the benefit of musicians’ widows and orphans. Paisiello wrote Fedra for Naples, where it was first performed in 1788. It is based on the same story—the Greek tragedy of Phedra as recast by Racine—as Nasolini’s Teseo a Stige, the opera with which Leopold’s opera seria troupe was to make its debut later in 1791.
The playbill for the Lenten concerts lists three soloists and mentions that one of the aris to be sung was by Mozart:
An excerpt from the opera Phedra.
The singers will be:
In the role of Arizia . . . . . . . . Mad. Lange. [Aloisia Lange]
In the role of Hippolytus . . . . Herr Kalvesi. [Vincenzo Calvesi]
In the role of Theseus . . . . . . Herr Nenzini. [Santi Nencini]
Chorus
The music is by Johann Paisiello, with the exception of the aria sung by Mad. Lange, which is by Mozart.[17]
A manuscript collection of music from Fedra preserved in the Gesellschaft der Musikfreunde probably represents the opera as it was performed in the Burgtheater in April 1791: the one aria for Aricia in this collection is Mozart’s “Non, che non sei capace,” K. 419, written in 1783 for Aloisia Lange to sing in Anfossi’s Il curioso indiscreto.[18]
Surprisingly the poster does not mention the title role of Fedra, and the collection of excerpts that includes “Non, che non son capace” does not include any of Fedra’s music. This suggests that whoever came up with the idea of performing extracts from Fedra originally intended for Cecilia Giuliani to sing the role that she had sung in Nasolini’s opera in Florence a few months earlier, but that she arrived in Vienna later than expected. She started to receive her salary from the Burgtheater on 1 March 1791, so it would have been reasonable to expect her to be available to sing in Vienna a month and a half later. But her earliest known performance in imperial employ was in a concert at Laxenburg on 23 June 1791.[18a] With Adriana Ferrarese’s departure from Vienna at the end of the previous theatrical season, there may have been no singer in April 1791 who could perform the role of Phedra with the virtuosity and dramatic power that it required.
As for the primo uomo role of Ippolito, the assignment to Vincenzo Calvesi of this role followed what seems to have been a common practice where opera seria was performed but musici, for one reason or another, were not employed, of entrusting primo uomo roles to tenors. Leopold’s late engagement of Testori meant that a tenor had to take the role that Paisiello had written for the young—but soon to be famous—musico Girolamo Crescentini.
We do not know how it was decided to perform excepts from Fedra as part of the Tonkünstler-Societät a few months before Teseo a Stige came to the stage of the Burgtheater, and for what reason; but the performances quite possibly served as a kind of trial. Two important questions needed to be answered in view of Leopold’s intentions of reintroducing opera seria to Vienna. First, how would the Viennese public react to a genre with which it had become unfamiliar? If Fedra pleased, Teseo was likely to please as well. Second, to what extent was the current opera troupe, basically a comic troupe, capable of performing opera seria? Were the voices of Lange, Calvesi, and Nencini big enough, and was their stage presence strong enough to bring them success in opera seria? Preliminary answers to these questions might have been provided by the concerts of April 1791, well before Cecilia Giuliani, Vincenzo Maffoli, and Angelo Testori made their Viennese debuts.
The contract that Guardasoni signed on 8 July 1791 required that he find “a celebrated composer” to write the opera to celebrate Leopold’s coronation in Prague. Traveling quickly to Vienna, he first offered the commission to Salieri, but the Hofkapellmeister turned it down. It was evidently only after Salieri declined the commission that Guardasoni turned to Mozart.[19] Salieri later explained, in a letter to Prince Anton Ezterhazy, that he had to decline Guardasoni's invitation to compose the coronation opera for Prague because he was exceptionally busy during the summer of 1791 attending to the day-to-day affairs of the court theaters. His protégé Joseph Weigl, who normally attended to such matters, was occupied with the composition of a cantata for Prince Esterházy. The only reason that Prince Ezterhazy commissioned Weigl to write a cantata was that the prince’s Kapellmeister Haydn was in London. Haydn’s absence was thus indirectly responsible for Mozart’s receiving the commission for La clemenza di Tito.
The cantata that Weigl wrote for Prince Esterhazy, Venere e Adone, was given on 3 August 1791, as part of a three-day series of festivities celebrating the installation of Anton Esterhazy as the new prince—the successor to Prince Nicholas, who had died the previous year. This installation was the princely equivalent to a coronation, and the festivities surrounding it analogous to those surrounding a coronation.[20] Such festivities demanded opera, which put the new prince in a difficult position, since he had dismissed his father’s opera troupe soon after Nicholas’s death. Like Guardasoni, he turned to the Viennese court opera—not only for a composer but also for singers.
The libretto printed for the occasion emphasized the presence of the imperial court: Venere e Adone, cantata da rappresentarsi alla presenza dell’imperial corte. It names not only Weigl as composer, but also Giovanni Battista Casti as librettist and Pietro Travaglia as stage designer. Cecilia Giuliani took the role of Venere, having by now settled in Vienna. Calvesi sang Adone, Valentin Adamberger, a venerable tenor who had created the role of Belmonte in Mozart's Die Entführung aus dem Serail, sang Marte, and Dorothea Bussani (the first Despina in Così fan tutte) sang Erofile.
Although Weigl, in describing the occasion, mentioned Archduke Franz (Emperor Leopold’s oldest son) as the only member of the imperial family to be invited, other accounts make it clear that Prince Esterhazy had hoped to entertain the entire imperial family, but that the emperor himself declined the invitation. Yet Weigl must have welcomed this opportunity to redeem himself before the court after the failure of La caffetiera bizzarra less than a year earlier:
Franz, at that time crown prince, was invited to a great celebration given at Esterhaz by Prince Anton Esterhazy. I had received a commission from the prince to write the grand cantata Venere ed Adone and to supervise the entire production, since Kapellmeister Haydn was at that time in London. I took care of everything—the singers, the chorus, the ballet troupe—and the cantata was performed at Esterhaz with great splendor and to the satisfaction of the members of the imperial family; and we were all generously rewarded by the prince.[21]
A report in the Wiener Zeitung confirms that the cantata was a success:
Regarding the recent celebration at Esterhaz, all accounts agree that in the series of amusements that distinguished themselves in organization, taste, and beauty and competed with one another to delight those attending, the cantata performed on this occasion, Venus and Adonis, won first prize. The libretto is by Herr Abbate Casti, the music by Herr Joseph Weigl, in the service of the National Theater—music honored by Their Highnesses the archdukes as well as by the high nobility and other guests with the loudest applause, which it also received from connoisseurs of music. The cast consisted of four members of the Viennese court theater: Demoiselle Giuliani, Madame Bussani, and Herrn Calvesi and Adamberger.[22]
Note that the cast (like that of Fedra in Vienna) did not include a musico. Calvesi created the primo uomo role of Venere's young lover; the older singer Adamberger sang the secondo uomo role of Venere's husband. That a tenor took the role that would have naturally gone to a castrated singer reflects the continued absence of a musico from the Viennese troupe.
Another report, in the Gazzetta universale of Florence, contains more information about the staging of Venere e Adone, its reception, and the rewards received by some of the participants. We learn that this was Giuliani’s debut “on these stages,” presumably meaning theaters in and near Vienna. The Gazzetta universale also emphasized the importance of Travaglia’s scenery: this cantata was obviously no mere concert piece (in this respect very different from the performance of excerpts from Fedra earlier in the year). Contradicting Weigl's claim that he "took care of everything," the Gazzetta universale attributed a supervisory role to Giuliani's brother Francesco, a violinist who served for many years as a concertmaster (primo violino) in the theaters of Florence, and who accompanied his sister to Vienna. Indeed, this account gives him and his sister so much attention (at the expense of everyone else involved in the production except Casti and Weigl) that it raises the possibility that Francesco Giuliani wrote it himself for his hometown paper:
It is worth reporting the contents of a letter from Eszterhazy [i.e. Eszterhaz] in Hungary, dated 8 August, which mentions the splendid festivities given by Prince Eszterhazy [starting] on 2 August to celebrate the sacred memory of the favors granted by Leopold II. Although His Majesty, due to his pressing occupations, was unable to attend, the festivities were attended by the whole royal family, accompanied by one hundred members of the Viennese nobility, as well as by 600 members of the Hungarian nobility, who enjoyed three days of continuous entertainment. On the first day, shortly after the arrival of the court, a cantata entitled Venere e Adone was given in the theater. The poetry by Sig. Abate Casti and the wonderful music by the young Sig. Giuseppe Weigl, presently in the service of the theater of His Imperial Highness, earned unanimous applause. Sig. Giuliani, appearing for the first time on these stages, met the expectations with which she had been justifiably acclaimed. She lacked none of those things that one expects in a great singer. After the first performance, she was immediately rewarded with a gorgeous diamond ring and 500 zecchini, and all the others who contributed to the success of the festivity received equal recompense. The scenery, the costumes, and the machines all worked together, because everything was under the excellent direction of Signora Giuliani’s brother. In the final scene several of these machines lowered various clouds, which the characters enter; rising again in view of the audience, the clouds reveal the stage, transformed into a ballroom. The royal court and the other spectators applauded this transformation, whose inventor received as a gift a snuffbox with 200 zecchini.[23]
Even if Francesco Giuliani's role went beyond his normal responsibilities as concertmaster, the designer of the scenery (including the stunning transformation at the end of the cantata) was Travaglia, as named in the libretto: "Lo scenario è d'invenzione del signor Travaglia pittore al servizio di S. A. il principe regnant d'Esterhazy." He must have left Eszterhaza shortly after pocketing this reward: a month later he was supervising the scenery for La clemenza di Tito in Prague.
Venere e Adone is a large-scale, elaborately staged music drama in two parts that might take ninety minutes in performance. It differs from an opera seria only in being slightly shorter than a typical late eighteenth-century dramma per musica, having a cast of four, instead of the six or seven soloists demanded by most drammi per musica, and in lacking a part for a musico. Its performance near Vienna, before an audience consisting of members of the imperial family and the Viennese and Hungarian aristocracy, must have been understood as a response to Leopold’s ongoing preparations for the restoration of opera seria to the Viennese court theaters—and a kind of preview of the performances that the imperial troupe would begin later in 1791. La clemenza di Tito could have been interpreted along the same lines.
Since the first performances of Venere e Adone and La clemenza di Tito took place only a little more than a month apart, it is not too surprising that only a single person—Travaglia—contributed to both productions. But that should not prevent us from thinking of both of these works as responses to Leopold’s reorganization of the court theaters, and in particular of his reintroduction of opera seria to Vienna. Thinking of them in this way suggests the possibility that Weigl and Mozart as composers, Casti and Mazzolà as librettists, Travaglia as stage designer, and Francesco Giuliani as concertmaster shared some of the same motivations in contributing to these works. All of them stood to benefit from demonstrating to Leopold their abilities to contribute effectively to his opera seria troupe.
Let us conclude by returning to where we started, Paris, and with yet another operatic performance in 1791—a performance that reminds us once again of the political context in which La clemenza di Tito was conceived and performed and can give us insights into the thoughts and feelings with which its first audience perceived it. About a month and a half before Mozart’s opera was first performed on Leopold’s coronation day, King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette had fled Paris, but had been stopped at Varennes and returned to virtual imprisonment in the Tuileries Palace. On 20 September, two weeks after Leopold and his family attended La clemenza di Tito in Prague, Louis and Marie Antoinette attended a performance of Rameau’s Castor et Pollux, heavily revised by Pierre-Joseph Candeille, to mark the proclamation of the new French Constitution. According to a royalist newspaper, “The king was deeply moved by the welcome given him by the people, previously depicted to him as a mass of savages and regicides.”[24] An Englishman in the audience noted: “One verse, ‘Régnez sur un peuple fidèle,’ was encored, and amazingly clapped.”[25]
Fire plays as important a role in Castor et Pollux as in La clemenza di Tito. Madame de Staël wrote of that evening in her Considérations sur la Révolution Française: “When the furies were dancing and shaking their torches, and the brilliance of the fire illuminated the whole auditorium, I saw the face of the king and queen in the dim glow of this imitation of the inferno, and I was seized by melancholy forebodings of the future.”[26] This was the last time the royal family attended the Opéra. A year later the National Assembly abolished the constitutional monarchy and ordered the king arrested. Found guilty of high treason, he was executed in January 1793. Nine months later, Marie Antoinette followed him to the guilletine.
Appendix: Timeline
Events in France are indicated with italics.
1789
January Rebellion against the reforms of Joseph II breaks out in the Austrian
Netherlands
14 July Fall of the Bastille; beginning of the French Revolution
26 August Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen published
5 October A mob forces the royal family to move from Versailles to Paris; Marie
Antoinette paraphrases Corneille’s Cinna and Metastasio’s La Clemenza di
Tito: “J’ai tout vu, tout su, et j’ai tout oublié.”
27 October Rebel army in the Netherlands defeats the Austrians at Turnhout
November Anti-Austrian rioting in Ghent
2 November Church property nationalized
1790
11 January Rebels in the Austrian Netherlands form the United States of Belgium
26 January Premiere of Mozart’s Così fan tutte
30 January Joseph II withdraws almost all his reforms in Hungary
20 February Death of Joseph II
6 April Oath of allegiance (Huldigung) to Leopold as archduke of Austria
9 May Leopold issues decree forcing many Bohemian serfs, freed by Joseph,
back into servitude
19 May National Assembly abolishes nobility
12 July Civil Constitution of the Clergy requires priests to take an oath of loyalty
to the state
12 July Representatives of the Bohemian Estates convene the “Big Bohemian
Diet” of 1790–91 in Prague, to formulate grievances addressed to Leopold
25 July Treaty of Reichenbach between Austria and Prussia
15 September Premiere of Weigl’s La caffetiera bizzarra in celebration of the arrival
of King Ferdinand and Queen Maria Carolina of Naples in Vienna
19 September Triple Marriage: Archduke Franz to Princess Marie Therese of Naples,
and marriages between four of their younger siblings
20 September Salieri’s Axur performed before the Austrian and Neapolitan royal families
9 October Coronation of Leopold as emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, with
associated events that included performances of Dittersdorf’s Der
Apotheker und der Doktor and Betrug durch Aberglauben, Salieri’s Axur
and Il Talismano, Benda’s Romeo und Julie, and Wranitzky’s Oberon.
11 November Coronation of Leopold as King of Hungary
December Rebellion in the Austrian Netherlands suppressed
1791
1 January Haydn arrives in England
29 January “Big Bohemian Diet” adjourned
9 February After a sleighride to Schönbrunn, the king and queen of Naples attend a
performance of Mozart’s Figaro
March End of the Viennese tenure of Lorenzo da Ponte and Adriana Ferrarese
(Mozart’s Fiordiligi)
1 March Opera seria soprano Cecilia Giuliani begins tenure at the Viennese Court
Theaters: one of the first steps in the Leopold’s transformation of Viennese
theater
1 June Opera seria tenor Vincenzo Maffoli begins tenure at the Viennese Court
Theaters
20 June Flight to Varennes: Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette foiled in their attempt to
flee France
2–4 August Installation of Anton Esterhazy as prince; premiere of Weigl’s Venere e Adone
at Eszterháza with Cecilia Giuliani in the role of Venere
4 August Treaty of Sistova establishes peace between Austria and Turkey
25 August In the Declaration of Pillnitz, Leopold and the king of Prussia declare their
readiness to intervene militarily in France
6 September Coronation of Leopold as King of Bohemia; premiere of Mozart’s La
clemenza di Tito
13–14 September Louis XVI formally accepts the Constitution
20 September Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette attend a performance of Rameau’s Castor et
Pollux in celebration of the Fête de la Constitution
30 September Premiere of Mozart’s Die Zauberflöte in Vienna
1 October The musico Angelo Testori and the balletmaster Antonio Muzzarelli begin their
tenures at the Viennese Court Theaters
15 November In celebration of Leopold’s nameday, his ballet troupe makes its debut in Il
Capitaneo Cook alli Ottaiti
24 November In celebration of Empress Maria Luisa’s birthday, Leopold’s opera seria troupe
makes it debut with the Viennese premiere of Nasolini’s Teseo a Stige
5 December Mozart’s death
1792
6 January Viennese premiere of Prati’s La vendetta di Nino
7 February Premiere of Cimarosa’s Il matrimonio segreto in Vienna
1 March Death of Leopold II, succeeded by his son Franz
20 April War declared against Austria
29 July Haydn arrives in Vienna after his first visit to London
22 September France declared a republic
1793
21 January Louis XVI executed
11 March Monarchist rebellion in the Vendée begins
13 July Assassination of Marat
27 July Robespierre elected to the Committee of Public Safety
September Reign of Terror begins
16 October Marie Antoinette executed
[1] Elisabeth Vigée Lebrun, Souvenirs, 3 vols., H. Fournier, Paris 1835–37, vol. 1, p. 194.
[2] Der jetzige König war noch nicht im Theater, hatte noch keine Musik bei sich, noch sonst ein Merkmal von Liebhaberei zur Musik gezeigt. Malum signum schreien undere Afterpropheten. Allein ich denke, wenn einmal die Riesengebürge von Staatsgeschäften, die auf seinen Schultern liegen, werden zu Sandhügeln abgeebnet seyn, wenn er seinen Staaten den goldnen Frieden wird wieder geschenkt haben, daß alsdann auch das goldene Zeitalter für die Musik eine neue Periode bei uns haben wird (“Auszug eines Schreibens aus Wien vom 5ten Jul. 1790,” Musikalische Korrespondenz der teuschen filarmonischen Gesellschaft, 28 July 1790, cols. 27–31; reprinted in Rudolph Angermüller, Antonio Salieri, 3 vols., Katzbichler, Munich 1971–74, p. 55).
[3] John A. Rice, “Emperor and Impresario: Leopold II and the Transformation of Viennese Theater, 1790–1792,” PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1987.
[4] Hieronymus Löschenkohl, Beschreibung der Huldigungsfeyerlichkeiten seiner königlichen apostolischen Majestät Leopolds II. Königs von Ungarn und Böheim, Erzherzogs von Österreich, welche von den Nieder-oesterreichischen Landständen zu Wien am 6ten April 1790 gehalten wurden, Vienna, Löschenkohl, 1790.
[4a] The same combined forces presented Druschetzky's Harmonie a few months later in Vienna, at Tonkünstler-Sozietät concerts on 16 and 17 April 1791; see C. F. Pohl, Denkschrift aus Anlass des Huntertjärigen Bestehens der Tonkünstler-Societät, Vienna, 1871, 63.
[5] Sergio Durante, “The Chronology of Mozart’s ‘La clemenza di Tito’ Reconsidered, in Music and Letters, vol. 80 (1999), 560–94.
[6] À l’egard de l’Opera serieux d’Italie c’est trop tard de se procurer quelque chose de bon et c’est d’ailleurs un spectacle si ennuyant que je ne crois pas jamais en faire usage (Joseph to Kaunitz, Versailles, 31 July 1781, in Adolf Beer, ed., Joseph II., Leopold II. und Kaunitz: Ihr Briefwechsel, Braumüller, Vienna 1873, p. 101).
[7] Rice, op. cit., 133–36; Dexter Edge, “Mozart’s Reception in Vienna, 1787–1791,” in Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart: Essays on Life and His Music, ed. Stanley Sadie, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996, pp. 66–117 (88–93).
[8] Ich schrieb indessen eine andere comische Oper La Caffettiera, welche im Pratter spielte. Sie wurde, weil sonst keine andere Partitur vorhanden war, bey Ankunft S. M. des Königs von Neapel zur Aufführung bestimmt und fiel allgemein durch. Wie konnte auch eine Pratter Geschichte bey Anwesenheit so hoher Gäste interressieren. Ich muß oftenherzig gestehen, sowohl Buch als Musick hat kein besseres Schicksal verdient und ich kann noch nicht begreifen, wie man hat gestatten können, eine solche Handlung von einem Anfänger (denn das war ich noch im strengsten Verstande) zu so einer Feyerlichkeit aufzuführen (Rudolph Angermüller, “Zwei Selbstbiographien von Joseph Weigl [1766–1846],” in Deutsches Jahrbuch der Musikwissenschaft 16 [1971], 46–85 [55]).
[9] Dorothea Link, The National Court Theatre in Mozart’s Vienna: Sources and Documents, 1783–1792, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1998, p. 362.
[10] Rice, op. cit., pp. 57, 76.
[11] Theater-Kalender auf das Jahr 1790, p. 276.
[12] Jeri in contemplazione delle LL. MM. Siciliane la Corte dette una superba corsa di Slitte fino a Schombrun, ove fu gran pranzo con molti altri Personaggi di questa primaria Nobilità. Nel ritorno passarono tutti col medesimo treno per le principali strade, e piazze di questa Città, dopo di che si trasferirono all’Opera in Musica le Nozze di Figarò al Teatro Italiano; quindi intervennero alla Sala del Ridotto, ove per la scelta delle persone concorse, lo Spettacolo riescì dei più belli, che si potessero mai vedere (Gazzetta univerale, 22 February 1791, published with commentary in Dexter Edge, “The Habsburg court and guests attend Le nozze di Figaro,” in Mozart: New Documents, edited by Dexter Edge and David Black, first published 12 June 2014, accessed 16 June 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.7302/Z20P0WXJ ).
[13] Milada Jonášová, “Semiramide riconosciuta - opera k pražské korunovaci Marie Terezie 1743,” in Barokní Praha - barokní Čechie 1620-1740. Sborník příspěvků z vědecké konference o fenoménu baroka v Čechách, Praha, Anežský klášter a Clam-Gallasův palác, 24.-27. září 2001, Scriptorium, Prague, 2004, pp. 19–68.
[14] Rice, op. cit., pp. 254–304.
[15] Gazzetta toscana 1791, p. 63 (article dated 16 April).
[16] See Ian Woodfield, Performing Operas for Mozart: Impresarios, Singers and Troupes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2011, which places the Guardasoni troupe’s performances of Mozart’s operas within the context of a migratory existence through which it contributed to the operatic life of Leipzig and Warsaw as well as Prague; and John A. Rice, “Antonio Baglioni, Mozart’s First Don Ottavio and Tito, in Italy and Prague,” in Böhmische Aspekte des Lebens und des Werkes von W. A. Mozart, ed. Milada Jonášová and Tomislav Volek, Prague, 2012, pp. 295-321.
[17] The playbill is illustrated in the article “Vienna” in The New Grove Dictionary of Music, Macmillan, London, 1980.
[18] Ludwig Köchel, Chronologisch-thematisches Verzeichnis sämtlicher Tonwerke Wolfgang Amadé Mozarts, 6th ed., Breitkopf und Härtel, Wiesbaden, 1964, p. 419.
[18a] Rice, op. cit., pp. 141, 181, 266.
[19] John A. Rice, Antonio Salieri and Viennese Opera, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1998, pp. 505–7.
[20] For an account of the entire series of festivities, see Wiener Zeitung, 1791, pp. 2069–70 (10 August 1791).
[21] Der damahlige Kronprinz Erzherzog Franz war zu einem grossen Feste nach Esterhaz zu dem Fürsten Anton Esterhazy eingeladen. Ich hatte von dem Fürsten den Auftrag, eine grosse Cantate Venere ed Adone zu schreiben und ganz für die Aufführung alles zu besorgen, da Kapellmeister Haydn zu dieser Zeit in London war. Ich besorgte alles, die Sänger, Chor, Baletgesellschaft, und die Cantate wurde in Esterhaz mit aller Pracht und zur Friedenheit der anwesenden allerhöchsten Herrschaften gegeben und wir alle von dem Fürsten reichlich belohnt (Angermüller, op. cit, p. 55).
[22] In Ansehung der zu Esterhaz jüngst gewesenen Freudenfeste stimmen alle darüber eingegangenen Berichte überein, daß, unter der Reihe von abwechselnden Ergötzlichkeiten, welche durch Ordung, Geschmack und Schönheit sich so vorzüglich auszeichnteten, und gleichsam um die Zufriedenheit der Anwesenden wetteiferten, die bey dieser Gelegenheit aufgeführte Cantate: Venus und Adonis, den Preis errungen habe. Die Poesie derselben ist vom Hrn. Abbate Casti, die Musik aber von dem Hrn. Joseph Weigl, in Diensten des Nationalhoftheaters, welche von der Erzherzoge KK. HH. sowohl, als von dem anwesenden hohen Adel und dem übrigen Gästen dieses Festes mit dem lautesten Beyfall den sie von Kennern der Tonkunst auch ganz verzüglich erhielt, beehrt ward. Das spielende Personale bestand aus 4 Mitgliedern des Wiener Hoftheaters, der Demoiselle Giuliani, der Madame Bussani, und den Herren Calvesi und Adamberger (Wiener Zeitung, 1791, pp. 2102–3 [13 August 1791]).
[23] Merita di esser riportata una lettera pervenutaci da Esztherazy in Ungheria in data del dì 8. del corrente, in cui si fa menzione delle grandiose feste date da quel Principe Regnante Esztherazy nel dì 2. per solennizzare la fausta memoria delle beneficenze compartite da Leopoldo II. Non potendo intervenirvi la M. S. per le grandi occupazioni vennero esse onorate da tutta la R. Famiglia col seguito di cento Nobili Viennesi, oltre i mille 600. Nobili Ungaresi, i quali passarono tre giorni in continovi divertimenti. Nel primo appena che fu arrivata la Corte, si dette lo spettacolo al Teatro, ove si rappresentò una Cantata col titolo di Venere, e Adone. La poesia del Sig. Abate Casti, e la superba musica del giovine Sig. Giuseppe Weigel all’attual servizio del Teatro di S. M. Cesarea ottenne un generale incontro. La Sig. Giuliani per la prima volta, che si è fatta sentire sopra questi Teatri corrispose a quella espettazione, colla quale viene giustamente decantata, non mancandole cos’ alcuna delle molte, che si richiedono in una abilissima Cantratrice. Terminata la prima recita, ebbe subito in dono da quel Principe un superbo anello di brillanti, e 500. zecchini, e tutti gli altri Soggetti, che cooperarono al buon’ esito della festa vennero equalmente ricompensati. Le decorazioni, il vestiario, e le macchine erano tutte analoghe, e ben’ intese, poichè la direzione del fratello della Sig. Giuliani fu ottima e sorprendente. Nell’ ultima scena varie di dette macchine si viddero calare in volte in diverse nubi, che riempiendosi dei personaggi, e rimontando in aria a vista del pubblico, rapportarono il palco scenico, e fecero comparire una sala da ballo. La R. Corte, e gli spettatori applaudirono questa trasformazione, e l’inventore ebbe in regalo una tabacchiera d’oro con 200. zecchini (Gazzetta universale, 1791, p. 566; article dated Vienna, 22 August).
[24] Le roi a été pénétré de l’acceuil que le peuple, qu’on lui avoit présenté comme un composé d’hommes féroces et de régicides, lui a fait (Chronique de Paris, 23 September 23 1791).
[25] Samuel Romilly, Memoirs, 2nd edition, 3 vols., John Murray, London, 1840, vol. 1, p. 436.
[26] Au moment où les Furies dansaient en secouant leurs flambeaux, et où cet éclat d’incendie se répandait dans toutes la salle, je vis le visage du roi et de la reine à la pâle lueur de cette imitation des enfers, et des pressentiments funestes sur l’avenir me saisirent (Madame de Staël, Considération sur la Révolution Française, Charpentier, Paris 1862, vol. 1, pp. 337–8).