This study was conducted at HD Ningbo School, a private K-12 bilingual school in Zhejiang Province, China. The school is open to students from diverse backgrounds, but due to the high tuition fee, all the students come from upper-middle- class families. It offers students a world-class education, preparing them for university study throughout the world. The population of the primary division is about 400. Local Chinese students mainly make up the student body, while around 5% of the students hold overseas passports from USA, UK, Australia, New Zealand and Peru. Approximately one-quarter of the students can use English fluently in daily life and study.
Currently, I am the Head of Science for the primary division and the science specialist teacher for all the Year One and Two students. Our unique science curriculum combines the Chinese National Standard with Cambridge Primary Science Framework. I am also a member of the School ICT Committee and provide training for teachers and parents on educational technology integration.
I conducted this Misconception Probe in two steps with two different classes. I have been teaching both classes for one and a half years, so students are familiar with my teaching methods and philosophy. We just started a new unit on electricity last week. First, I created six true or false questions using Kahoot (www.kahoot.com). This is a website where you can make a quiz online, and later students can play it as a game on individual devices. All of my students have been using it for formative assessment, classroom opinion polls, and so on.
I let one of my Year Two classes do the quiz during a science lesson last Thursday. This class is made up of 10 girls and 14 boys with two non-Chinese native speakers. Nineteen out of 24 students participated in the Kahoot game. Two students were absent that day due to personal leave while other three chose to watch the game instead of playing. I gave each student a tablet, then they opened the Kahoot app and entered the game pin. Each time one statement about electricity was shown on the screen in front of the class, and students would choose true or false on their tablets. The results of the answers were shown on the big screen after all the students had made their choice. After finishing all six true or false questions, Kahoot showed the five students who got the most questions correct on the big screen and each student's ranking on their own tablet. Later I downloaded the results from Kahoot website. It automatically created an Excel file that included all the choices from the students and the percentage of correct answers. I used this information to analyze the data and prepare for my next step.
From the results of the Kahoot game I realized many students were confused with how electricity was generated and what static electricity is. So during the weekend I made a story about a windmill called Willy and created a Chinese digital book about it. In the book four students discussed about how windmill generates electricity. Three days later, I showed the book to another Year Two class of mine, and asked them to write down whose explanation they agreed with and why. This class is made up of 10 girls and 11 boys, all of them Chinese Native Speakers. I emphasized that the purpose of doing the assessment and my MSSE program and the results would not be used for any grading process for them. All 21 students wrote down their answers on yellow sheets and later I entered them to my Google Form for data analysis.
The results of the Kahoot game indicated that two of the questions caused a lot of confusion. Just 26 percent of the students disagreed with the statement that a generator creates electrons for making electricity (N=19). Nevertheless the correct percentage about the question of static electricity is even lower (Figure 1). The total correct answers for the whole game were 54 percent, and only one student got all six questions correct.
Figure 1. Kahoot results of Electricity Misconception Probe , (N=19).
According to the answers written by the students from the second class, more than 42 percent of the students agreed with Cherry who said the energy would make more electrons which created electricity (N=21). The same amount of students supported Amy or Alan, while no one decided to vote for Eric's answer (Figure 2). The data revealed that most of the students don't understand how electricity is generated by windmills. Among the students who agreed with Amy, one student wrote "we can collect static electricity so that it becomes electrical current." Many students chose to support Cherry because they thought electricity is made by electrons, so more electrons means more electricity. On the other hand, some students thought Alan was correct but they couldn't explain the reason clearly. One reason written down on the yellow paper was "I know there are magnets in the windmill but I don't know whether it is the cause."
Figure 2. How does the windmill generate electricity? , (N=21).
After we read the story and voted for the answers, all the students were very eager to know which answer was correct. I sent a link for the book to all the parents and told the students that their homework was to discuss with their parents how windmills generate electricity. Surprisingly, many of the students came in the next day and told me that their parents weren't sure about the answer. I made this question into a challenge question for my peer-teaching program and asked who wanted to do some research on the topic and prepare for the presentation. One boy volunteered to do that and he made a PPT about windmills and mentioned there were generators inside the windmills. Students asked questions about how the generator made electricity and I showed them a broken hand generator so they can see the wires and magnets in it. I also explained the generator just make the electrons move rather than creating more electrons.
According to the feedback, I modified my lesson plans for the next week. After we learned about the basic electrical components and how to make a circuit, each group was given a motor with a fan. They added the motors to the circuits to see if the fan would start turning. Many students said they achieved a better understanding of the interaction between electricity and magnets after they saw how the motor moved and they understood the invisible power between the magnets and the wires. I told them it was called a magnetic field and I promised them we would learn more about it in the future.
The Misconception Probe went very well and the results exceeded my expectation. It provided me the opportunity to understand some common misconceptions about electricity from my students. I saw the power of using story books designed for my students and how excited they were when they saw themselves or their classmates on the websites. The interaction between students, parents and the teacher were very positive and extended our science lessons beyond the classroom. It also helped me modify the lesson plans in order to fit the needs of my students and my students enjoyed being one of the designers of the lesson.
I made this report into a web page which includes a Google Form, Kahoot link, digital books and graphs. My professional website is now getting more and more interesting and dynamic. In the next few months I will be training all the international teachers who will be teaching science at my current school preparing them for the next school year. I will share these web pages and the research I have done with the head masters and the teachers so they can have a better idea about how I am running the science program. After I move to my next school in August 2018, I will be the head of science for the whole school. I believe this information will be useful for me in the future.