Publications
“Behind the Screens: A Replication and Extension of Coasian Bargaining Experiments in the Digital Age” with Catherine Eckel, Ryan Rholes, and Meradee Tangvatcharapong. (2025). European Economic Review, 175: 105024. DOI.
“The Nature of Discrimination in Recreation Decision Making” with Richard T. Woodward. (2025). American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1-32. DOI.
“Onsite Characteristics and Diversity Avoidance in Marine Recreational Fishing Demand” with Richard T. Woodward. (2023). Marine Resource Economics, 38(4), 435-463. DOI.
“A Coupled Recreational Anglers' Decision and Multi-Species Fish Population Dynamics Model” with Masami Fujiwara and Richard Woodward. (2018). PLoS One, 13(10), e0206537. DOI.
Working Papers
“Strategic Reporting and the Effects of Water Use in Hydraulic Fracturing on Local Groundwater Levels in Texas” [Download]
During the last two decades, oil and gas firms have learned to extract more hydrocarbons from unconventional geologic formations by increasing the amount of water, among other inputs, used in hydraulic well stimulations. Since many unconventional resources are located in relatively arid regions, the industry’s increasing water use has created concerns over the impacts on local availability. In this paper, I study two interrelated issues regarding the water use of the unconventional oil and gas industry in Texas. Using a unique dataset of well-level reports on input use, I show that firms’ propensity to disclose details on water use worsens when a well is located within a groundwater conservation district, and a causal link between reported water use in hydraulic fracturing treatments and declining local groundwater levels. The findings contribute to a growing literature studying responses to disclosure laws and are helpful to inform a variety of discussions on resource management. But welfare questions remain, given that significant mineral owner absenteeism suggests the beneficiaries of development are often not the same individuals facing its negative effects.
“Turning Public Information Into Private Benefits: A Natural Experiment in Oil and Gas Leasing Activity”
[Revisions Ongoing]
Proficiency in oil and gas extraction is dependent on firms acquiring drilling rights in areas with abundant resource stocks and designing an optimal development program. In this paper, I study the first of these decisions using the U.S. Geological Survey’s first large-scale resource assessment of a prolific oil basin as a quasi-natural experiment on leasing activity. I use the assessment's set of geologically-defined boundaries and estimates of oil and gas abundance within to study how firms used its predictions as a meta-level guide to narrow their search radius and acquire drilling rights in areas with better geology. Relative to activity in the unassessed areas of the basin, in the assessed areas I find economically significant changes in the size of a new lease, the number of new leases acquired, and several pecuniary and non-pecuniary terms on leases signed after the assessment was published. Since the areas predicted to have the greatest resource abundance also experienced the largest changes in leasing activity, my findings indicate that firms knew relatively little about the spatial distribution of the basin’s geology during its early development, and that a government-funded project shifted their focus to areas with greater productive potential. Such a change has important implications for resource management from an allocative efficiency standpoint, but it also raises concerns over equity and fairness for less sophisticated private mineral owners in these areas, many of whom were negotiating leases with extraction firms for the first time.
“Corporate Power Purchase Agreements and Renewable Energy Growth” with Mathew Brander, Michael Gillenwater, and Charlie Inman
[Download] [In Submission]
Power purchase agreements (PPAs) are contracts that have become popular among private firms attempting to meet voluntarily adopted climate goals. Using data from the U.S. EIA and Energy Acuity, we construct a dataset on the electricity generation portfolios for U.S. counties over 1990-2021 and estimate two-way fixed effects regressions to explore the effects of spatially and temporally varying PPAs on the deployment of renewables. We find that, in contrast to the voluntary renewable energy certificate market, PPAs have influenced aggregate renewable generation capacity, although the effects are heterogeneous. PPAs signed by non-utility entities (e.g., corporations) generally have a smaller effect than those signed by utilities, but the effects vary by the type of renewable energy project (solar or wind) and spatially based on renewable resource potential, with non-utility PPAs appearing more flexibly used. For GHG accounting purposes, non-utility PPAs are therefore better treated as interventions outside of emissions inventories.
“Corporate Power Purchase Agreements: A Policy Perspective” with Mathew Brander, Michael Gillenwater, and Charlie Inman
[Download] [In Submission]
The market for power purchase agreements (PPAs) has exploded in the last decade due, in part, to non-utility entities (e.g., corporations) attempting to meet greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reduction targets. Recent empirical research has explored the effects of this PPA activity on the renewable energy (RE) transition. It finds that PPAs are associated with increases in the deployment and share of RE capacity in U.S. counties, but the effects are heterogeneous in three important ways—whether PPAs are executed by non-utility or utility entities, the project type (solar or wind), and the resource potential of the region. This paper discusses the policy implications of these findings, including instances in which non-utility PPAs may serve as substitutes or complements to traditional RE policies (e.g., Renewable Portfolio Standards) and RE investment by utilities. The paper also discusses the implications for GHG accounting, including the ongoing update to the GHG Protocol guidance.
“The Texas Grand Slam: Robbed by Red Tides?” with Yunyi Hu
[Revisions Ongoing]
Blooms of Karenia brevis, colloquially known as "red tide," release brevetoxins that disrupt marine ecosystems, harm human health, and impact coastal economies. This study estimates the social costs of red tides in Texas’ marine recreational fishing industry over 2004 to 2018. Using a rare panel dataset of monthly, site-level fishing pressures, we find that red tides reduce trips by 13% to 35%, depending on the severity of the bloom. Additionally, leveraging detailed Texas creel survey data, we estimate a discrete choice model and find anglers’ willingness to pay to avoid red tides ranges from $3 to $10 per trip, also depending on bloom severity. Our findings demonstrate the economic burden of an important coastal harmful algal bloom and suggest that improved satellite-based prediction, detection, and monitoring could help mitigate economic losses from bloom events.