Embedded Files
The 8th Judicial District
The 8th Judicial District
The 8th Judicial District should be investigated for their collusion in the sabotage of Susan Holmes Open Records case. Two Judges involved from this District have openly admitted their bias in this case. The Chief Judge and Judge Julie Field who was recused from the case.
The 8th Judicial District should be investigated for their collusion in the sabotage of Susan Holmes Open Records case. Two Judges involved from this District have openly admitted their bias in this case. The Chief Judge and Judge Julie Field who was recused from the case.
May 20 2019 Judicial Complaint.pdfMay 20, 2019
May 20, 2019
Complaint: District Management of Civil Case has Impeded Due Process and a Timely Resolution of my Case
Complaint: District Management of Civil Case has Impeded Due Process and a Timely Resolution of my Case
Chief Judge Stephen E Howard transferred Susan Holme's case to Judge Julie Kunce Field on February 4, 2019. Judge Field's husband is an adjunct professor at Colorado State University. Colorado State financial disclosures document Judge Field's income from CSU.
Chief Judge Stephen E Howard transferred Susan Holme's case to Judge Julie Kunce Field on February 4, 2019. Judge Field's husband is an adjunct professor at Colorado State University. Colorado State financial disclosures document Judge Field's income from CSU.
Why would Judge Field accept Susan Holmes case without immediately reporting her bias?
Why would Judge Field accept Susan Holmes case without immediately reporting her bias?
Complaint Judge Field Commission.pdfMay 26, 2019: Complaint Filed Against Judge Julie Kunce Field with the Colorado Commission on Judicial Discipline
May 26, 2019: Complaint Filed Against Judge Julie Kunce Field with the Colorado Commission on Judicial Discipline
Chief Judge Stephen E Howard of 8th Judicial District
Chief Judge Stephen E Howard of 8th Judicial District
Judicial Complaint Response to Susan Holmes.pdf Judge Howard's Shocking Response to Susan Holmes Complaint from May 20, 2019
Judge Howard's Shocking Response to Susan Holmes Complaint from May 20, 2019
“Your most recent e-mail to Ms. Brunin references C.R.S. § 24-72-305(7) as providing a right to a hearing at the earliest possible time on your claim of violation of due process. The statute you cite concerns access to criminal justice records and only provides for a hearing when a request for access to criminal justice records has been denied. There has been no request for any criminal justice records, nor does it appear that any criminal justice records are relevant to any of the concerns you have expressed. Therefore, there is no basis for a hearing.”
“Your most recent e-mail to Ms. Brunin references C.R.S. § 24-72-305(7) as providing a right to a hearing at the earliest possible time on your claim of violation of due process. The statute you cite concerns access to criminal justice records and only provides for a hearing when a request for access to criminal justice records has been denied. There has been no request for any criminal justice records, nor does it appear that any criminal justice records are relevant to any of the concerns you have expressed. Therefore, there is no basis for a hearing.”
June 11, 2019
June 11, 2019
Chief Judge Stephen E Howard has a duty to be impartial in his management & oversight of civil cases in his jurisdiction.
Chief Judge Stephen E Howard has a duty to be impartial in his management & oversight of civil cases in his jurisdiction.
All of Susan Holmes requests for unredacted body camera footage can be found under the Home tab in the December section of this website. Requests for body camera footage falls under the Colorado Criminal Justice Act (CCJRA). Based on this law, body camera footage is a criminal justice record. According to the CCJRA, Susan Holmes is entitled to a hearing at the earliest practical time. C.R.S. § 24-72-305(7)
All of Susan Holmes requests for unredacted body camera footage can be found under the Home tab in the December section of this website. Requests for body camera footage falls under the Colorado Criminal Justice Act (CCJRA). Based on this law, body camera footage is a criminal justice record. According to the CCJRA, Susan Holmes is entitled to a hearing at the earliest practical time. C.R.S. § 24-72-305(7)
Susan Holmes Response to Judge Howard's Opinion of Her Open Records Case
Susan Holmes Response to Judge Howard's Opinion of Her Open Records Case
Response to Chief Judge Howard 8th Judicial District June 12 2019.pdf"Your clearly stated opinion completely supports Susan Holmes’s claims that there is a violation of due process in the management of her case. In fact, in your capacity as Chief Judge you have stated that there is ‘no basis for a hearing.’ The Public needs to understand the implications of your position: there will be no fair and impartial hearing for Susan Holmes in the 8th Judicial District." June 12, 2019
"Your clearly stated opinion completely supports Susan Holmes’s claims that there is a violation of due process in the management of her case. In fact, in your capacity as Chief Judge you have stated that there is ‘no basis for a hearing.’ The Public needs to understand the implications of your position: there will be no fair and impartial hearing for Susan Holmes in the 8th Judicial District." June 12, 2019
What the Public Needs to Understand
What the Public Needs to Understand
Susan Holmes filed a complaint on 20 May 2019 documenting the overt manipulation by the 8th Judicial District to impede due process in her Open Records case against Colorado State University. The Chief Judge of this District has admitted (in the document posted on this page) that he was responsible for transferring the case from an impartial Judge to Judge Field who had strong ties to CSU. Chief Judge Howard and Judge Julie Kunce Field were both appointed to their positions in 2011. Why would Judge Howard knowingly transfer a case involving Colorado State University to a Judge with ties to CSU?
Susan Holmes filed a complaint on 20 May 2019 documenting the overt manipulation by the 8th Judicial District to impede due process in her Open Records case against Colorado State University. The Chief Judge of this District has admitted (in the document posted on this page) that he was responsible for transferring the case from an impartial Judge to Judge Field who had strong ties to CSU. Chief Judge Howard and Judge Julie Kunce Field were both appointed to their positions in 2011. Why would Judge Howard knowingly transfer a case involving Colorado State University to a Judge with ties to CSU?
Susan Holmes Complaint to Judicial Commission filed against Chief Judge Howard of the 8th Judicial District
Susan Holmes Complaint to Judicial Commission filed against Chief Judge Howard of the 8th Judicial District
Amended.....Request For Evaluation of Judicial Conduct Chief Judge Howard.pdfComplaint: Chief Judge of the 8th Judicial District
Complaint: Chief Judge of the 8th Judicial District
Susan Holmes has filed a complaint with the Colorado Commission on Judicial Discipline against Chief Judge Stephen E. Howard. His judicial misconduct has been documented in this complaint.
Susan Holmes has filed a complaint with the Colorado Commission on Judicial Discipline against Chief Judge Stephen E. Howard. His judicial misconduct has been documented in this complaint.
Google Sites
Report abuse