Notes:
Clusters classified into (a) Asheim and Gertler's (2005) typology of (entrepreneurial and institutional) regional innovation systems and (b) Moulaert and Sekia’s (2003) territorial innovation models (innovative milieu, industrial district, new industrial spaces, etc).
See below list of clusters and respective institutional links on the internet.
Map made in R language.
Author: Iván G. Peyré Tartaruga (@ivantarta) - November, 2020.
List of innovation clusters into the map:
Famous clusters:
Silicon Valley (California, U.S.A.)
Baden-Württemberg region (Germany)
Emilia-Romagna region (Italy)
Route 128 (Boston, U.S.A.),
Cambridge region (Cambridge, U.K. )
M4 Corridor (oeste de Londres, U.K. )
Sophia-Antipolis (Valbonne, France)
Toyota city (Aichi, Japan)
Grenoble scientific polygon (Grenoble, France)
Other clusters:
Hsinchu Science Park (Hsinchu, Taiwan)
Research Triangle (North Carolina, U.S.A.)
Hong Kong Science & Technology Park (Hong Kong, China)
Cartuja Science and Technology Park (Seville, Spain)
Silicon Alley (New York, U.S.A.)
Bangalore (Bangalore, India)
Singapore’s Technology Corridor (Singapore)
TAGUSPARK (Oeiras, Portugal)
BIOCANT Park (Cantanhede, Portugal)
Digital Harbour (Melbourne, Australia)
Porto Digital (Recife, Brazil)
Parque Científico e Tecnológico da PUCRS - Tecnopuc (Porto Alegre, Brazil)
São Leopoldo Science Park - Tecnosinos (São Leopoldo, Brazil)
Feevale Techpark (Campo Bom, Brazil)
Regia-Douro Park - Science and Technology Park of Vila Real (Vila Real, Portugal)
TECMAIA Park (Maia, Portugal)
Sanjotec - Science and Technology Park of São João da Madeira (São João da Madeira, Portugal)
Alentejo Science and Technology Park (Évora, Portugal)
UPTEC - Science and Technology Park of the U.Porto (Porto, Portugal)
References
Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. (2005). The Geography of Innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D.C. Mowery & R.R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 291-317). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Moulaert, F., & Sekia, F. (2003). Territorial Innovation Models: A Critical Survey. Regional Studies, 37(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340032000065442