I found myself thinking about Wilson and Alcantara's analysis of existing research about whether Inuit/ Inuvialuit use of non-Indigenous Corporate structures will lead to an intercultural interchange or it is an integration of Inuvialuit peoples into the existing colonial structure (Wilson & Alcantara, 2012). Will elements of Indigenous governance will be incorporated into the systems of Canadian governance through the Inuvialuit Regional Corporation, or is this use of a Corporation structure flawed because it folds Inuvialuit into Canadian state structures? (Wilson & Alcantara, 2012). Should the Inuvialuit pursue Indigenous forms of self-determination outside of a colonial framework? I think this Corporation holds more of a role than 'capacity building within a capitalist economy.' Their success includes cultural elements in such a strong way that southern/colonial governments could learn from the Inuvialuit Corporation. Also, the Inuvialuit must still be able to work with the existing political system (Wilson & Alcantara, 2012) when it benefits them and their goals. Additionally, through the Inuvialuit Final Agreement Canada accountable to the Inuvialuit the obligations they have made in this modern treaty (Selle & Wilson, 2021). Also, self-governance is a dynamic process that will continue to evolve. It is not, as Wilson and Alcantara said, "a static or single event" (Wilson & Alcantara, 2012). One of the ways that the Inuvialuit have to lead the way in Indigenous self-governance models is because the model is community-centred and includes strong involvement of elders in governance (Wilson & Alcantara, 2012). It has also shown a substantial profit recently which are all signs of the Inuvialuit Regional Corporation being a capable institution of governance which Simeone describes as a prerequisite of sovereignty (Simeone, 2007).