As I wrote my annotated bibliography, I learned how to limit how much I would discuss my sources. The rough draft of my annotated bibliography had too many details that a reader would not necessarily need (e.g. specific percentages, steps of a research study, etc.) A summary is supposed to be substantially shorter than the original source so it will be easier for readers to comprehend. When I revised, I reread my summaries to figure out what ideas I could get rid of while maintaining the main point of the source. I even reworded a few sentences to cut down on awkward wording (e.g. "could" instead of "might be able to"). As for the evaluations, the peer reviews made me realize that I forgot to establish why my sources were credible. Accordingly, I added tidbits of information about the authors in my evaluations, tying that information in with transitions to and from specific ideas they discussed in the source.