Genre: Autobiography. Again this means reflection and consideration of a position rather than straight reporting of what is seen. Her dilemma is the argument for and against hunting – the need to protect the environment against the need to survive in that harsh ands unforgiving environment. The final sentence – short and coming after much consideration suggests an acceptance of the need to hunt.
Voice: Though a personal response, much is told in an objective 3rd person in this passage. This helps to create distance between Herbert and her subject. It also helps to assimilate the information text elements about the narwhal into the broader text. The description is rich in figurative detail suggesting a genuine love and wonder for the land she describes.
Purpose: A reflection on a moral question which is at the centre of her life. We may not agree, but we appreciate her honesty and understand her better.
Structure:
1: Description of setting and place. Rich in visual imagery suggesting beauty and tranquility.
2: Information about the Narwhal is detailed and precise. Technical lexis gives authority.
3; Description of the hunt is split between the onlookers ‘clustered’ and anxious and then the single hunter – emphasising his vulnerability in his ‘flimsy kayak’. His opponents almost human in aspect – ‘talk[ing]’ under the water and immense in size. His courage is emphasised.
4: Her summary of the dilemma.