Session 2.1: Methodological Challenges
Sections:
A. Learning and Data-driven control
B. Safety-critical systems
C. Resilience, security, privacy
D. Cyber physical and Human Systems
E. Architecture and control
Chair
Karl H. Johansson
Session 2.1.A: Learning and Data-driven control
Abstract Probably the biggest development in control in the past decade, and one of the most important moving forward, is the incorporation of machine learning enabled components into the feedback control loop. These developments are becoming game-changers in a variety of application areas, such as robotics, transportation, health care, manufacturing, infrastructure, agriculture. A central aspect in data driven control is the relationship between computations done off-line and on-line. Other important aspects are: How should data be collected for training? To what extent can experimental data be replaced by simulations? Is it possible to formally certify learning based controllers for use in safety-critical applications?
Chair
Anders Rantzer
Reviewer
Florian Dörfler
Session 2.1.B: Safety-critical systems
Description: TBA
Chair
Aaron Ames
Reviewer
Kevin Wise
Session 2.1.C: Resilience, security, privacy
Description: TBA
Chair
Dan Work
Reviewer
Bruno Sinopoli
Session 2.1.D: Cyber physical and Human Systems
Description: TBA
Chair (Plenary)
Aaron Ames
Chair (Breakout)
Tariq Samad
Reviewer
Francoise Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue
Session 2.1.E: Architecture and control
Abstract The societal systems discussed thus far are composed of interconnections of interacting elements such as sensors, actuators, computers, communication devices, human machine interfaces, humans, algorithms, and software. 'Control architecture' describes how the system components are connected and how they interact. There is a growing awareness that architectural decisions play an important role in putting control technologies into real-world societal systems. While virtually all contemporary engineering systems of moderate complexity (e.g., aviation, processor design, autonomous-vehicles) take a top-down hierarchical and layered approach to architecture design, today’s societal-scale systems (e.g., internet, power-grid, social networks, policy) are the result of an evolutionary bottom-up and ad-hoc design, resulting in unforeseen, cryptic, and at times catastrophic failures. The goal of this section is to initiate the study of an integrated, unifying framework of architecture and of control as a `control architecture.’ While this remains a long-term objective, we point to methods that show some progress in this challenging research area.
Chair
Nikolai Matni
Reviewer
Frank Allgöwer