Detailed information

Title: THE AI ACCIDENT NETWORK: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LIABILITY MEETS NETWORK THEORY


Abstract: Network theory holds great unappreciated value when it comes to analyzing and confronting new legal issues induced by emerging technologies. It can assist regulators, judges and insurers to visualize multifaceted legal questions in a manner that assists them to better understand the complexity of new legal enquiries, and the appropriate policy intervention. A complex challenge the legal realm faces today is that of Artificial Intelligence (AI) liability. This Article utilizes network theory in this context. It does so by combining network theory's features with Fletcher's non reciprocal risks paradigm. This combination will provide essential tools which will show that a strict liability regime is the best suited regime to apply when AI causes harm and will provide indicators to identify the entity who should be held strictly liable. Fletcher's nonreciprocal paradigm was heavily criticized upon its emergence. Calabresi's cheapest cost avoider strict liability approach eventually became the prominent approach in the context of strict liability. However, this Article claims that today's network economy and networked society offer a new opportunity for this paradigm to be applied given the new ways in which we interact and inflict damages upon each other, which were not feasible in the past. This Article integrates network theory into the field of AI tort law for the first time. It presents a new and unique methodology to the ongoing dispute about the appropriate liability regime that should apply when AI causes damages.