"...But, then I got to the art foruns online and was a bit shocked. There is a lot of hate for AI Art out there. But, why? ..."
And there was an explosion of activity in AI Art generators following the few months after DALLE anouncement. I have tried personally a few of then, and some are very impressive. It is a interesting tool, and, as somebody that always liked to play with the best tools I started tinkering with it. I saw no problem with that: I mean, after all I was already trying to transition from pen-and-paper to digital art. So, for me, it was just another thing in the toolbox...
But, then I got to the art foruns online and was a bit shocked. There is a lot of hate for AI Art out there. But, why?
Well... Why not? Hate is a very abbundant resource and this is nothing new...
I mean, people is upset about new tools and ways of doing things all the time. It has always been so. Since I am not exactly young, I can remember several instances of that hapenning from just a few years ago: I remember tghat a few decades ago people complained that digital art was not "real art". How can that be art if it is "imaterial", just "ones and zeros", etc.*"?*
When I pointed this fact to some friends, many said that "this time it is different 'cause It does everything, there is no role for the artist". Well, what can I say about it? It reminds me of an older relative vehemently stating his opinions on why photography could never be a "real" art since you had no controll over the fine details of the final product. You literally "just" push a button! In his view (and his own words) a simple stick figure was clearly more "art" than the best photography ever taken .
Most of the time, these opinions lack knowledge on the techniques and technologies that they are criticizing. As I hope I will show you, the case for AI Art is actually very similar to the case for photography: you need the concepts and references, you need to understand the technology to go through the many steps of refining, and, you need retouching. A lot of it. It is actually, in my view, an obvious evolution of digital art, like filters and digital effects where before it.
So, in the next pages I registered my journey while trying to learn and incorporate this new tool. I am just a beginner both in AIArt and in digital art, so, I hope my journey will be easy to relate. I also hope that my mistakes, will help you form your own opinion about AI Art.
Lets begin...
*How can that be art if you car always erase your mistakes? How can that be art if you can use infinite layers to help you with your reference images? The arguments seens to always boil down to something that seens "unfair advantage". If you look at music this also happened: people also complained that using samplers, electronic keybords, synths, or, even before that, electric guitars. All of that was not "real" music. All of that was considered "cheating" by some people. There is nothing new in that: In fact, when the clavichord (the grandfather of the piano) was first introduced, there were those that though "just pressing keys" to get notes was not "real music". It was "too easy". It "sounded bad"...