Gta Vice City Emotion 98.3 Mp3 Download

The station assumes a more relaxed, laid-back, soft attitude than other pop stations. It encourages listeners to not fight their feelings, and even cry. Fernando's poetic yet eccentric musings about passion, emotion and desire become the central part of the radio in his first time as a DJ. He gets lost in his romantic ramblings lots of times, and tells listeners tips on how to pick up ladies, going on with his Latin lover attitude.

Emotion 98.3 (also stylized as emotion 98.3) is a radio station hosted by Fernando Martinez (voiced by Frank Chavez) in Grand Theft Auto: Vice City and by Lionel Makepeace (voiced by Steve Stratton) in Grand Theft Auto: Vice City Stories. The station features power ballads from the late seventies to the mid-eighties. Emotion 98.3 is one of three preferred radio stations by the Patrol Invest Group and Bikers, evidenced when the player steals their gang vehicles, which may be tuned to Emotion 98.3 by chance. An album of the songs from the station is available separately or as part of the Vice City soundtrack box set, and is the only radio station with all of its songs on the official CD.

Download Zip 🔥 https://shurll.com/2y4ymf 🔥

By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising.

A leading psychologist challenged her audience to view love as co-experienced positive emotions during her presentation at the 20th annual Lawrence & Nancy Golden Memorial Lectureship on Mind-Body Medicine.

Fredrickson said she used to think that all positive emotions were very similar, but she has come to the conclusion that there is one super nutrient for growth and resilience and that is positive emotions that are co-experienced.

The study of emotion tends to breach traditional academic boundaries and binary lingustics. It requires multi-modal perspectives and the suspension of dualistic conventions to appreciate its complexity.

This book analyses historical, philosophical, psychological, biological, sociological, post-structural, and technological perspectives of emotion that it argues are important for a viable social psychology of emotion. It begins with early ancient philosophical conceptualisations of pathos and ends with analytical discussions of the transmission of affect which permeate the digital revolution.

Building Mastery: Skills for Emotions, Relationships, and Life is a four-part workshop series (come to one, a few, or all sessions!) to help students increase abilities to regulate emotional responses, manage stress, improve relational functioning with development of effective communication and improve problem solving skills to better manage stressor in all environments.

Aristotle's preferred term for the emotions was pathos[pl. pathe], which makes the emotions largely passive states,located within a general metaphysical landscape contrasting active andpassive, form and matter, and actuality and potentiality. Thepathe are first and foremost responses found in the embodiedanimal to the outside world, very much like perceptions. They can thusbe associated broadly with matter insofar as they represent capacitiesor potentialities that need to be actualized by external causes, whichalso explains how they are directed at objects. Of course, thepathe are not pure potentialities. They are actualized in theexperience of an occurrent emotion, and even the mere capacity toexperience pathe requires a determinate form, asoul. Moreover, the pathe have close connections to action,and Aristotle treated them as movements of a sort. For all thesereasons, the pathe can be attributed to the soul insofar asthe soul informs a body. Yet since their causes lie outside of theanimal who experiences them, the question arises whether and to whatextent we can control them.

That is a question addressed in several different ways by the mostimportant Aristotelean texts on the pathe available to laterancient and medieval authors: the Nicomachean Ethics andRhetoric. Each work presents lists of emotions, althoughwhere the Nichomachean Ethics serves up 11, theRhetoric dishes out a full 14. They differ too in their aimsand tenor: the Nichomachean Ethics is concerned with theplace of the pathe within the economy of acting according toour habits and desires as moderated by reason, whereas theRhetoric concerns the arousal and management ofpathe in the context of producing persuasion. In both cases,however, the pathe are treated as susceptible to rationalinfluence and voluntary action, although not directly subject tochoice.

This comfortable relation between the emotions and reason, however,hits some snags when Aristotle turned to the distinctive ways in whichwe can fail to act well. For example, the akratic, orweak-willed person, recognizes what should be done without actuallydoing it. Aristotle's solution to this puzzling, if common,phenomenon, was to lay the blame at the feet of some pathos,particularly the pathe of either anger or pleasure. Herethese pathe might seem to oppose reason. Aristotle, however,appears to have thought of them more as exercising a cognitiveinterference that disrupts our completion of the practical syllogismthan as an external force overturning our otherwise smoothly operatingreason. (For this reason, the pathe seem to have cognitiveaspects themselves; see Kraut 2005). In contrast, theenkratic person feels the same disruptive pathos,but does not give way to them in action. The enkratic is thussuperior to the akratic, but still not as admirable as theperson who feels the pathe as the virtuous person would, thatis, in accord with the dictates of right reason. So Aristotle'sethical works treat the pathe both as susceptible to reasonand as integral to the good life, even as they allow that the emotionscan impair our reason.

Aquinas borrowed yet other principles from the Aristoteleanclassification of physical motions to produce a taxonomy of elevenbasic kinds of passions. Crossing good and evil with three differentkinds of motion describing the movement of the appetite produces sixconcupiscible passions: love [amor] and hate[odium]; desire [desiderium,concupiscentia] and aversion [fuga]; joy[delectatio, or its internal sub-species, gaudium]and pain [dolor and for internal pain,tristitia]. The specific irascible passions are produced bymultiplying the nature of their objects with the direction of themotions with respect to those objects to produce the four passions ofhope [spes] and desperation [desperatio], fear[timor] and daring [audacia]. To these, Aquinasadded the rather special case of anger [ira], whichpresupposes a concupiscible passion of pain, and is a resoluteappetite to remove the present source of pain. Unlike Aristotle,Aquinas denied that anger has a contrary. Although the results mightseem a bit baroque, Aquinas obviously put great stock into histaxonomy, considering it superior to both Augustine's reduction ofpassions to love and Cicero's scheme of four primary passions(although he goes to some pains to interpret each view in asympathetic way).

In keeping with his medical interests and reliance on Galenistpsycho-physiology, Vives also placed a good deal of emphasis on thephysiological aspects of emotions. However, unlike many otherRenaissance Galenists, Vives did not assign emotions specifically tothe heart, but instead emphasized the interplay between emotions,judgments of good and evil, and bodily states. Despite theseconnections, Vives took it that the proper way to manage and controlthe affects is by invoking other affects. These views, rather than hispeculiar taxonomies, mark his importance for later authors. e24fc04721