How much space does the world's population need?
Not to have a nice lifestyle, you understand, or even to be able to lie down to sleep. I'm talking about standing room only, and it's a strictly theoretical exercise - let's hope it never comes to this in practice.
There are getting on for 7.9 billion of us now, and the received wisdom is that you can pack up to five people into a square metre before they start pushing and shoving each other, falling over and getting trampled.
So we would need 7.9/5 = 1.58 billion square metres, or 1,580 square kilometres. (Remember, there are a thousand metres in a kilometre, so a million square metres is a square kilometre).
Thus, you could fit them all on the Isle of Lewis, which is 1,770 square kilometres, and with even more breathing room, into Luxembourg, which has a luxurious 2,586 square kilometres. Whether the inhabitants of Lewis or Luxembourg (let alone everyone else) would be happy with these arrangements is another matter, of course.
When I was a child, I remember reading that everyone in the world could fit onto the Isle of Wight. But at a mere 390 square kilometres, that seems out of the question now. And I think I must have seen it in a book my grandparents had bought, as 390 square kilometres would accommodate a mere 1.9 billion people, so it cannot have been true after about 1925. Which brings us onto the topic of exponential growth, but I will write about that another time.
By the way, the total land area of the earth is about 149 million square kilometres. "Million square kilometres" is a real mouthful, so I like to abbreviate it to Misk. Misks are a useful unit when thinking about planetary-scale problems, like how to make sure 7.9 billion people have enough to eat even when they're not all standing on the Isle of Lewis.