(11th and 12th of November, 2024 - Ruusupuisto, University of Jyväskylä)
Authors: Lulia, Lina, Tamami, Saad, Prabathi, Nitesh, Mariya, Martha, Asha, Jayanandi, Vy
On the first day, Professor Shukrani Mbirigenda opened the seminar with a thought-provoking speech on the decolonization of Development Studies (DS), highlighting its transformative implications for future expertise. His consistent argument has been that DS entered a new era in which it glorified capitalist developmental states under the premise of development much to the exclusion and marginality of all other paradigms with the collapse of the bipolar world; thus, DS became dominated by such liberal economic theorizing. Based on Northern knowledge systems, this thinking also propagates the assumption that 'the North is the world', permitting others to conform rather than innovate. He urged that decolonizing DS would entail confronting the historical injustices of theft, plunder, and exploitation from which global inequalities attend. Only through silencing these issues and nourishing inclusive foundations of learning can a rich and just basis be established as an equitable and authentic one for global expertise. His call to reimagine development is vital to restoring intellectual diversity and justice in the discipline. He also urged that decolonizing DS is not merely a structural adjustment but an epistemological and ontological transformation. His impassioned advocacy across borders for intellectual diversity and justice instils hope for equality in global expertise.
Meanwhile, the workshop featured presentations by panellists about the NDDS project, sharing the main conclusions regarding the core competencies development studies programs must include to face future challenges and prepare competent professionals in development. Insights from the project include comments regarding the future of development studies, as well as a critical view on the current practices of development studies programmes, highlighting the need for decolonization theories and practices to be included, as capitalist development practices have perpetrated exclusion and kept unequal power dynamics between the Global North and the Global South. The workshop concludes with a proposal for Development Studies core competencies and curriculum, outlining the main subjects and areas that must be taught, as well as the critical competencies and critical thinking that must be fostered, emphasizing decolonization theories to recognize the effect Northern theories of development have left in the South.
Photo credit: Julia
Another workshop featured presentations by three panellists who shared their expertise and brought significant perspectives on development cooperation, with a special emphasis on education and policies. Marinka Räsänen from the University of Helsinki presented her project addressing the gender issue. Minna Hakkarainen from Finland's Ministry for Foreign Affairs shared her experiences as a Counsellor for Education & Head of Cooperation at the Finnish Embassy in Kyiv. She discussed Ukraine’s educational development and aid before the war and the current challenges related to policy and development cooperation in education. The previous educational support to Ukraine before the war and the current situation relating to the role of policy and its issues for development cooperation for education. Bonn Juego from the University of Jyväskylä provided insights into global educational reform and its social context.
Following the panellist presentations, an open forum was facilitated in which many of the participants for the workshop actively engaged in the discussion, sharing ideas and posing questions to three panellists. At the same time, as part of the two-day seminar on SDG 4 and 20 years of development studies at the University of Jyväskylä, I had the honour of moderating a transformative workshop led by Dr Elizabeth O. Crawford. Centred on empowering educators for holistic growth, the session brought together diverse participants to explore strategies for nurturing teachers’ well-being. Dr. Crawford emphasized the crucial link between educators’ holistic development and quality education. Key themes included fostering resilience through mindfulness, peer support, time management, and promoting mental well-being by creating inclusive, safe spaces and providing mental health resources. Participants shared experiences and collaboratively envisioned solutions to systemic barriers, addressing cultural and socio-economic inequities. The workshop’s interactive approach energized discussions, highlighting that supporting educators elevates learning environments. Reflecting on the session, it’s clear that empowering teachers is a powerful step toward achieving SDG 4 and building a sustainable educational future.
Photo credit: Vy
Moreover, the workshop “How do International Alumni Contribute with Their Expertise to Education Development?” was conducted with three alumni from the University of Jyvaskyla. Three Alumni were Clara Gracia, Orsoly Tuba, and Sam, who are working in different fields and contributing their expertise in development and education to the same fields. The discussion considered different aspects of the topic “ How do International Alumni Contribute with Their Expertise to Education Development?” such as what are the real-life challenges and how JYU prepared them for it , Building up networking through the facilitators, approaching the working and how the theoretical knowledge work in the field of practical.Through the discussion, the alumnus suggested alumina networking. They shared their experiences on how their master’s degree helped and prepared them for the future work culture. They also highlighted the importance of internships during the study period. Finally, the Q&A session opened the opportunity for the participant to lead the discussion with the alumni.In that discussion, participants and Aluminium pointed out the importance of career services and info sessions.
The last workshop showed the importance of the love and affection of family members in pursuing a quality degree. We suffer from lots of problems and stress during our educational journey. Despite these challenges, we need to move forward and achieve success. Life is a combination of both happy and sorrowful events. The main point of this workshop was to make us remember our parents' contribution to making our lives happy. This workshop was a very emotional task. Researchers involved in this workshop make us think briefly about how your parents came from your childhood to make you graduate. Suddenly, I remember my mother's contribution to making me a better and more educated son. After my graduation, I lost her. This incident makes me sad. It took me years to move on for me. Everything is dark without her. So, I remember my mother badly because her contribution made me what I am today. Love and affection motivate us to achieve success in our lives.
The first day ended with the DEICO 20th Anniversary Celebration. The event opened with remarks by Dean Mika Lähteenmäki, who emphasized the importance of education as a tool for global development and cooperation. His speech set the stage for the insightful discussions that followed. Liisa Laakso from The Nordic Africa Institute and Tiina Kontinen from the University of Jyväskylä then addressed the audience, reflecting on the program's legacy and its contributions to fostering inclusive and equitable education through research and partnerships. Their reflections highlighted the program’s impact on advancing critical educational priorities aligned with SDG 4. A key celebration highlight was the DEICO Alumni Panel, moderated by Hillary Nwozi. Panellists Clara García Millán, Bidemi Coker, Bui Tran Nhu Phuong, and Janika Valtari shared their personal journeys and professional experiences, showcasing how the DEICO program has shaped their careers in development education. Their dialogue inspired the audience by illustrating how alumni drive meaningful change worldwide. This anniversary event not only celebrated DEICO’s two decades of achievements and struggles but also reinforced the program’s commitment to promoting sustainable development through quality education and international collaboration.
Photo credit: Vy
Photo credit: Vy
On the second day, in her keynote presentation, Dr. Peace Musiimenta, a Senior Lecturer at Makerere University in Uganda, highlights how feminist pedagogy can transform higher education. The keynote emphasized a case study from Makerere University, where Dr Musiimenta's research demonstrates that feminist pedagogical principles have played an important role in addressing systemic teaching and learning weaknesses and opportunities in the School of Women and Gender Studies at Makerere University. Feminist pedagogy is rooted in feminist theory and should not be mistaken for the divisive narratives between men vs women often seen on social media. It seeks to overcome power hierarchies in education. It advocates for more inclusive, empowering, and transformative learning; however, it faces resistance in academic spaces with patriarchal traditions as it challenges conventional power structures in education. The Covid-19 pandemic exposed the limitations of traditional teacher-centred models, where teachers act as the only knowers and students as passive recipients of knowledge. This crisis exhibited a need for a change in education. Feminist pedagogy could respond to this change as it promotes student agency and active participation guided by inclusivity, critical thinking, empowerment, and collaboration. Following Dr. Peace Musiimenta's keynote presentation, participants actively engaged in a discussion, raising thoughtful questions and sharing insights on feminist pedagogy in diverse educational contexts.
On the same day, the workshop was presented by Michael Hakansson, a senior lecturer in didactics at the Department of Education, Stockholm University. The presenter initiated the question, “What do we need to transform?”. Accordingly, changing habits sustainably will be needed for transformation. However, he highlighted the fact that the change may not be convenient. He presents three phases of transformation. Initially, a problematic situation may arise. For example, people who do not need to change their habits may feel inharmonious at this stage. Secondly, the inquiry happens. Finally, the situation ends with a feeling of satisfaction. The old habits need to be buried to accept the new habits. It needs to be critical and innovative to find new values to live on and to act for sustainability. This is called transformative learning. However, everyone has limitations to transformation since individuals are different and unique. The extent to which the transformation could be done should be ethically considered.
Photo credit: Mariya
Photo credit: Vy
Furthermore, the research on Antiracism in Finnish Teacher Education has been conducted as a qualitative study to explore how antiracist pedagogy is integrated into Finnish teacher education. This combined research is done by analysing the classroom teacher education curricula from the University of Helsinki, the University of Jyväskylä, the University of Oulu, and Åbo Akademi University. This topic is important as it supports achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals related to well-being, education, reducing inequalities, peace, and justice, significantly influencing higher education and elementary curricula. However, the challenge is that these teachers and students lack resources to address racism, improve inclusion and eliminate societal division. The research shows it is a complex issue to address as it is a multi-layered and often contradictory phenomenon. The issue cannot be solved with a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach. The solutions usually seem influenced by positionality, privilege and identity. All these can be shifted and evolve with time. Though the Finnish education system is often regarded as fair and good, it is not without flow; this is true with any education system in the world. The knowledge of racism within it can feel paralysed. Teachers in schools every day feel challenged and face their struggles addressing racism, questioning the education system and their knowledge and preparedness to address the issues. This leads to the critical question of whether the teacher educators have done enough to equip these teachers with sufficient knowledge, skills and tools to address the issues. Finally, antiracism requires a well-connected education landscape and ongoing commitments from all parties of all layers of education to address the challenges effectively.
Ultimately, the SDG4 Seminar was a vibrant gathering that fostered meaningful dialogue among participants, culminating in an engaging Learning Cafe. As attendees enjoyed a late afternoon meal, they mingled and discussed seminar topics, energized by four thought-provoking questions on the whiteboard standees. Each participant eagerly selected a question, contributing their insights on colourful sticky notes, creating a lively collaboration and exciting atmosphere. Following this interactive session, the group reconvened to discuss the emerging key themes, with volunteers summarizing the common points and allowing others to share their thoughts, further enriching the conversation. In her closing remarks, Anna-Maija Poikkeus, Dean of the Faculty of Education and Psychology, expressed gratitude to all participants and keynote presenters, highlighting the seminar's achievements and the positive strides towards the SDGs. She emphasized the success of the event and the ongoing commitment to advancing educational development, leaving attendees inspired and hopeful for future progress in the field.
(21st and 22nd of November, 2023 - Ruusupuisto, University of Jyväskylä)
Authors: Tharanga Pingamage Dona, Upeksha Rathnasena, Lin Zheng, Kaan Var, Pablo Sardi, Victor Oni
For this year's SDG4 seminar, students and education professionals on a mission to see how the Sustainable Development Goals are put into practice with respect to context came together. For students at the University of Jyväskylä, we had the privilege to step into the role of seminar assistants for this event. Most of the volunteers comprised EDUMA students and a couple of students from the DEICO program. In this blog, we compile the learnings we acquired from our experiences both as seminar assistants and as participants.
Workshop: Creative Approaches for Dialogue and Change (Anna Lehtonen: University of Jyväskylä)
This workshop provided access to innovative and embodied resources for teaching and facilitating sustainability. Warm-ups, participatory activities, and energy-boosting exercises were used as teaching tools. Specifically crafted to align with the GreenComp, European Sustainability Competence Framework, the workshop incorporates practices that target various sustainability competence areas. The workshop guided participants in navigating diverse attitudes and motivation profiles related to sustainability, employing techniques such as role-taking to elevate dialogue within a secure environment. Emphasis was placed on making our interconnectedness with sustainability visible through engaging activities. Additionally, the workshop focused on fostering resilience amidst the ongoing sustainability crises. Throughout the session, discussions and activities were geared towards exploring potential pathways leading to a more sustainable future. The overall objective was to provide a dynamic and interactive approach to enhance sustainability education, encouraging a profound understanding of its principles.
Workshop: Crafting Your Ideal Educator: Drawing Insight from Inspiring Educators from Our Past and Present (Stockholm University Comparative and International Educations Students)
I chose to assist in this workshop as I was quite intrigued by the crafting aspect. It was a well-planned workshop with a team of seven from Stockholm University who facilitated all the hands-on activities. The workshop provided the participants with the space to reflect on the traits of the teachers who had a lasting impact on their learning and life. The participants were highly engaged and exchanged their experiences from different parts of the world with different educational backgrounds, and had such lively, insightful discussions. The workshop was built around communication styles and demonstrated both positive and negative communication styles and several mini-activities provided the participants with the opportunities to identify both styles and to connect them and craft the traits of ideal educators. The final activity got participant groups to design a model that represents the essential qualities of inspiring educators. Materials needed for the models were provided by the facilitators and the groups had an enjoyable time creating their models. They came up with unique models that symbolized several traits of ideal educators. Representatives from each group explained the rationale behind their model at the end and the participants shared that this was a refreshing learning experience for them that prompted reflection.
Photo credit: Clara Bentanachs
Keynote: An intercultural collaboration for teacher educators’ professional learning
In her keynote presentation, Dr. JIANG Heng, an Associate Professor at Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, shared her research on promoting teachers' professional development through interculturally collaborated lesson study. Alongside Dr. Heidi Layne, they embarked on a lesson study journey within the framework of learning boundary theories, observing and researching each other's lessons. Describing this process as a "two-way mirror," Dr. Jiang Heng highlighted the value of enabling teachers to approach pedagogy from diverse perspectives, encompassing both peer and student viewpoints. This intercultural lesson study as she shared helps “develop inquiry stance for sustained professional learning for educators”, as well as encourages teachers to be open and reflective to different cultural backgrounds, students' voices, insightful conversations, and consequences of teaching practices.
Workshop: Student Thesis Presentations
I attended the student thesis presentations during the SDG seminar, and as a first-year master’s student, I can say that it gave me a firsthand understanding of the thesis writing process. Each presenter talked about why they worked on their topic and how they conducted their research. Observing the different research topics and designs gave me concrete ideas on how I can approach my thesis. Also hearing the discussions between the presenters and Barthelemy Bizimana was very interesting as it also made me think about my thesis topic idea and potential questions it can raise. Thanks to this experience and the practical insight I got from the presentations, I feel more confident with my upcoming thesis writing process. I hope I can present my thesis in the same workshop next year.
Panel: Finnish Teacher Education and Minority Languages
On this panel, Ulla Sivunen, Anu Savolainen, Tuomo Kondie, and Armas Hagert talked about the situation of autochthonous minority languages in Finland, from a social and educational perspective. The panel provided insightful views on a sometimes-forgotten topic, the inclusion of minority languages (other than Swedish) in education in Finland. Sivunen and Savolainen provided a perspective on Finnish sign language, Kondie on Karelian, and Hagert on Romani. Teacher education, language policies, language attitudes or the presence of those languages in schools were some of the topics covered during the panel, which was moderated by Tamás Péter Szabó.
Photo credit: Clara Bentanachs
To sum up the event, the participants and assistants all came together to answer the most intriguing questions that stemmed from the seminars they participated in or the SDG goals themselves. Not only did we gain insights from the speakers and facilitators, but also from the thoughtful questions and comments of the participants involved. This year's SDG4 seminar is truly one for the books.
I participated in the SDG 4 Thesis seminar on day 1 and it was an insightful experience. I got to listen to and ask questions about the different theses presented by current and past students. The topics were very interesting as I got to understand the several gaps still waiting to be filled in educational practices around the world, especially in Finland. On day 2, I participated in the review of the answers to the various questions asked along with 3 other seminar assistants. The audience gave diverse answers, opening another discussion on people’s educational experiences in various contexts. It, therefore, altered my understanding of education because the emotions that went into some of the answers gave a clue to a solution to educational practices around the world as a not a one-size-fits-all, but individual and collective efforts can bring education closer to what we envisage it to be.
Serra Giacomo, University of Oulu
The webinars of the “Education for Emergencies” project played a meaningful role in co-creating my thesis. When I attended them, my thesis idea was still nebulous, and not a single, viable research question had materialized in my mind. I felt that sort of ‘cosmic’ indeterminacy that most master’s students experience for a while, I guess. I recall sitting in front of my laptop, hoping for inspiration and insights. Thankfully, the panelists did respond to my hope, with their whole being.
During my studies, I often wished to have more opportunities to hear from practitioners. We dig deeper and deeper into theory, but the insights that flash up in texts then call for a reality check. For instance, how do teachers experience the moment of responding to an emergency, or caring for their pupils? The panelists invited to this project shared such responses. I felt a kind of embodied, heartfelt, and mindful sensitivity in what they were expressing. Their lectures sparked insightful connections and even made me find a contact for my research.
Eventually, my thesis was about processes of pedagogical co-creation (you can find it here). Through my encounters with educational theory and six co-inquiring teachers, I explored what can be felt as being co-created in school environments. I pursued a holistic understanding that embraced the co-creation of learning as well as spaces, relationships, care, and world-forming processes.
I realized that a master’s thesis is itself a process of pedagogical co-creation. And so are this website, the E4E research project, and the EdDisCo educational discussions I joined in 2022. Indeed, I recall joining the webinars not only for my learning purposes but to also participate in the student-led partnership projects that a group of students and teachers from the University of Jyväskylä had organized. As a master’s student at the University of Oulu, I felt, and still feel, a sense of relationality and friendship toward them and their initiatives. I deeply appreciate the significance of co-creating learning, togetherness, and relational networks among different universities. These processes are vital to building a conducive spirit of cooperation in responding to emergencies.
Abitha Chakrapani, University of Jyväskylä
Towards the end of my research trip to India, I visited a tribal school situated in the Nilgiris mountains of southern India - Vidyodaya. I spent over 3 days in the school interacting with different teachers and children.
Vidyodaya is run by an organization that works for the welfare of tribal communities. It is a community-driven organization that works with five indigenous communities (Paniya, Kurumba, Kattunaicker, Bettakurumba, and Irular tribes) of the area on matters related to their education. The vision of Vidyodaya is to establish culturally appropriate and relevant learning systems for the tribal children with the active participation of the community.
One such initiative that I learned about and understood in detail is the concept of recapturing space for tribal education and designing it according to their needs. The community they work with is extremely low in literacy with even lower enrollment rates. One of the first steps, when they want to collaborate with the community is to understand the nature of problems faced by the community and its dynamicity. A major issue faced by many Indigenous countries in India is public schools neither empathize nor respond to the cultural needs of the community. The root cause for this attitude among educators is the perception that education is not the same for the communities in these areas. Due to these system hurdles many of these children are pushed out of school into the informal labor market. This cause and effect deepens the social emergency of inequity and injustice faced by them.
The organization's intervention was
to create a safe learning space for the children using activities like arts, crafts, games, and cultural forms to re-create the joy in learning
using people from the community to be tutors. Training them not only to teach but also as leaders who can help to build social capital that will be replicated in later years.
giving the onus to the community to decide what kind of education and therefore what kind of society is needed in the future.
In my time spent at the school, these values can be observed in day-to-day activities at the school, the teaching practices followed at the school, and in terms of the proportion of community teachers versus outsiders who are working at the school.
One of the older students at the school expressed how the challenges these communities faces are often neglected by educators while attempting to educate them. In public schools,
a common issue is children do not know the local language fluently and teachers do not know the tribal languages;
teachers discriminate against the children for the clothes they wore, their names which were different from Hindu names, and so on;
teachers use corporal punishment;
children who were experiencing a different sense of space in the forest were now confined to four walls the whole day; and,
finally, the community could not understand why their knowledge and culture found no place at all in the school system.
The different conversations with individuals opened many questions and made me wonder
If education (what we, educators define) brings equality?
What is inclusive education?
What can we as outsiders do for the community?
What is the community's meaning of empowerment, what are they seeking to become, their aspirations?
How and what education can provide for these children to become confident of their identity while trying to create a newness in them to feel the same as others in society?
This visit is just the beginning, more visits and engagement are needed to find answers to these questions and to know the impact of the school on communities.
Below are some photos of Vidyodaya school. Photo credit to Abitha Chakrapani.
(23rd and 24th of November, 2022 - Ruusupuisto, University of Jyväskylä)
Authors: Elmedina Brkic, Hülya Akkaş Arslan, Mélina Nantel, Miracle Akangbe, Radhika Singaraju, Vereniki Nanou, Wencheng Shi
This year’s SDG4 Seminar was conducted by the Department of Education and Psychology of the University of Jyvaskyla in Finland. Twelve workshops and seminar sessions were conducted by speakers across the world, from Finland to India to South Sudan. The Seminar was held in a hybrid model with in-person sessions happening in the Ruusupuisto building at the University of Jyväskylä and virtual broadcasts over HowSpace and was attended by more than 300 participants.
Workshop: Curriculum and Pedagogy: Recreating an authentically Australian "both-ways" Education
Ben Wilson & David Spillman hosted a seminar talking about how the country can be viewed as a teacher during their workshop. With the country of Australia as the main focus, the lecturers highlighted the importance of both-way education: non-indigenous, which is based on the “Western” culture, and indigenous, learning from tradition and nature.
Workshop: “Science for Everyone: Science in a Refugee Camp”
This workshop was led by students of Comparative Education from Stockholm University, who discussed creating safe learning environments with materials that are easily accessible. The lecturers noted how important it is to provide fun learning opportunities in refugee camps. With this workshop, the lecturers provided a fun learning experience to refugees of different ages. The experimental aspect of the workshop allowed the participants to have fun and work together without necessarily having a common language. During the seminar, the workshop was recreated with students of all ages and from different countries, some of them even on Zoom.
Day One Evening: GINTL Networking Event
As dinner guests were gratefully seated with food provided by GINTL, Elmedina noticed that there was someone else from Kentucky in the dining room: Alex. Not only is it rare to run into someone from Kentucky while in Finland, but especially someone from the same city - Louisville. Despite being an ocean away from home, we live in a small world.
Elmedina Brkic & Alex Shapero displaying the Louisville Cardinals ‘L’ hand symbol in Jyväskylä, Finland. Photo credit to Orsolya Tuba
“I enjoyed the seminar and found the depth of conversations and breadth of attendees exceeded my expectations. I found myself challenged and pushed in my thinking!” - Alex Shapero, University of Helsinki
Evening event by GINTL
Workshop: Phenomenon-based STEAM Learning for Sustainability: Hands-on Modeling and Augmented Reality-Kristóf Fenyvesi & Takumi Yada
Although the themes are all different, the key areas around which they revolve are broadly the following: community, sustainability, transformative, and problem-based. In the Phenomenon-based STEAM Learning for Sustainability: Hands-on Modeling and Augmented Reality, the researcher, in collaboration with the local authorities, has proposed the construction of a water tower based on the lack of water in Cape Town, drawing on the structure of the natural material itself. Local teachers and schools used bamboo and readily available materials, and software to help children move from understanding the principles of water tower construction, to using models to try to model, and through a cycle of practice, problem generation, and problem-solving to complete the water tower. In this educational activity, the construction of a water tower is based on a social issue and is aimed at sustainable development. The whole process takes a long time and requires the support of teachers with different expertise, but in this way, it stimulates the children to understand the changes in their place of residence or society and stimulates their thinking while allowing them to apply their knowledge practically.
Roundtable Discussions - Tabu Julius Alex and Simon Zoro
During the Roundtable Discussions hosted by Edicso, Tabu Julius Alex and Simon Zoro Martin who came from South Sudan to Uganda and continued their secondary education in the Bidi Bidi Refugee Settlement in Uganda shared their experiences of schooling in the refugee settlement.
Being able to listen to people from the Refugee camp in Uganda was especially impressive as we usually see people reporting words of people with first-hand experiences in such academic events, which is also crucial. However, usually the people who experience the story told, stay in the background. In this way I believe it is difficult to reflect the reality by all aspects in the specific contexts and some aspects are lost in translation. So what Edisco did by inviting Simon and Tabu to share their stories was utterly valuable. And I would like to thank Simon and Tabu for sharing their stories and being a voice for people with similar experiences.
The Learning Café was a great moment to connect with the content of the seminar, as well as to share ideas and reflections on the four main topics. In a cozy and more informal setting, the participants had the opportunity to grab a piece of paper and a pen and write down their thoughts. I particularly enjoyed how participants were sometimes answering to each other over the post-its. Although the reflections were written down, the learning café really created a dialogue.
One of the questions, “How do you view the role of activism in education for emergencies?” was particularly interesting, since it raised different points of view. There were many post-its answering to each other, and redefining the term “activism” in different ways. The learning café also created a space for networking: while people were exchanging thoughts and ideas, some were also talking for the first time. Connecting people through the lens of ideas is always a great way to create networks!
SDG4 2022 event appears on the 'Ruusupuiston kärkiuutisten uutisvuoden 2023'.