Follow us on Instagram
The Cold War is the name the U.S. has promoted to describe the international world order that lasted from 1945-1991. Norwegian Cold War historian Odd Arne Westad notes in his award winning work The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times that “the Soviets never used the term officially before the Gorbachev error.” Still. emerging from the destruction of World War II, two “super powers,” the USA and the Soviet Union, led two coalitions of nations in a world order based on a constructed simplified binary. Yet, this duality was never fully exclusive. Moreover, a third group, the Non-Aligned Movement, resisted the super power construct and vision of world order. Main countries involved included Indonesia, India, Yugoslavia, Egypt, and Ghana. However, membership expanded to nearly 100 nations during the “Cold War Era.”
The ubiquity of standardized narratives reinforces a history that is rarely, if ever, challenged. In fact, more nuanced, analytical responses on tests that challenge the dominant explanation would be penalized or marked as wrong. The demands of contemporary education, globalization, and new scholarship about the Cold War invite alternative perspectives of the Cold War Era. Providing these opportunities for students develops critical thinking skills they will use to engage with information in a complex global world.
In what ways does the study of the Cold War era from 1945-1973 impact our understanding of past and contemporary international relations and globalization?
What are the limits of the Cold War binary narrative and how does modifying periodization beyond the standard rendition – 1945-1991 - support complex and deeper learning?
To what extent does our understanding of the Cold War impact our understanding of the past, contemporary issues, and our own world views?
What nations are given agency (the power to act) and what nations are presented as marginal, passive, or silenced players during the Cold War?
Scholar Screencast, by Joseph Golowka
Recording: 23 Minutes
“If we take a global view of the Cold War, the conflict looks very different. The thirty years following World War Two saw the rise of large revolutionary nationalist movements in Asia, Africa, and Latin America that sought to end foreign domination of their nation.”
Note: We suggest adding primary and secondary sources found in this module to the C3 Inquiries below. Doing so will add a dimension of "how to globalize U.S. history?" not found in the original design.
Digital Archive: Sino-Soviet Relationship 1949 – 1989
Melvyn Leffler, Inside Enemy Archives: The Cold War Reopened in Foreign Affairs, Vol. 75 (1996).
Sam Tanenhaus, A History Lesson Needs Relearning, New York Times Editorial (2014).
The Angolan Civil War 1975 – 2002: “The Angolan civil war may have been considered a Cold War proxy war by the rest of the world, but Pearce’s study finds few ordinary Angolans cared about that ideological divide. (2015)
Smithsonian.com article “What Does the 6th Day War Tell US About the Cold War” (2017)
Declaration of Independence of the Democratic Republic of Vietnam (1945).
President Sukarno of Indonesia: Speech at the Opening of the Bandung Conference (1955).
Prime Minister of India Jawaharlal Nehru:Speech at Bandung Conference (1955).
Fidel Castro speech to the UN denouncing imperialism and colonialism (1960)
Kwame Nkrumah speech: “I Speak of Freedom” (1961)
President Kennedy’s telephone call with British Prime Minister Harold Macmillan (Oct. 26, 1962)
Macmillan offers a deal to disarm some of their nuclear arsenal.
“There are Two Intermediate Zones”, speech by Mao Zedong (1964).
The Shah of Iran’s Final Speech (interrupted by student protests) (1968)
Additional Measures to Expose Imperialist Policies, Soviet Memo (1971).
Joint Communique of the United States of America and the People’s Republic of China (1972).
Salvador Allende Speech to the United Nations – excerpts (1972).
National Security Meeting Minutes, June (1975). President Ford is briefed on the situation in Angola and requests possible options that the US could pursue to be made ready.
Memo of Conversation between the White House and China about Angola, December (1975). The Chinese emphasize that South Africa must exit the conflict if there is to be any chance of rallying other African states to oppose Neto.