Articulos
Altamirano M.A., Estrada F., Gay C., 2021. A new method for assessing the performance of general circulation models based on their ability to simulate the response to observed forcing. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-20-0510.1.
Botzen W.J.W., Nees T., Estrada F., 2021. Temperature effects on electricity and gas consumption: Empirical evidence from Mexico and projections under future climate conditions. Sustainability, 13(1), 305; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010305
Botzen W.J.W., Estrada F., Tol R.S.J., 2021. Methodological issues in natural disaster loss normalization studies. Environmental Hazards. DOI: 10.1080/17477891.2020.1830744.
Connolly PJ, McFiggans GB, Wood R, Tsiamis A. 2014 Factors determining the most efficient spray distribution for marine cloud brightening. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372: 20140056. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0056
Corner A, Pidgeon N. 2014 Geoengineering, climate change skepticism and the ‘moral hazard’ argument: an experimental study of UK public perceptions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372: 20140063. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0063
Crutzen, P. J. 2006. Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? Climatic Change, 77(3-4), 211-220.
Dykema JA, Keith DW, Anderson JG, Weisenstein D. 2014 Stratospheric controlled perturbation experiment: a small-scale experiment to improve understanding of the risks of solar geoengineering. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372: 20140059. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0059
Estrada F., Tol R.S.J., Botzen W.J.W., 2025. Economic consequences of the spatial variation and temporal variability of climate change. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. S. Aceptado
Estrada F., Perron P., Yamamoto Y., 2023. On the persistence of near surface temperature dynamics in a warming world. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. S., 1-15, https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.15088.
Estrada, F., Mendoza-Ponce, A., Murray, G., Calderón-Bustamante, O., Botzen, W., De León Escobedo, T., Velasco, J. A. 2023. Model emulators for the assessment of regional impacts and risks of climate change: A case study of rainfed maize production in Mexico. Front. Environ. Sci. 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1027545
Estrada F., Perron P., Yamamoto Y., 2023. Anthropogenic influence on extremes and risk hotspots. Scientific Reports, 13, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-27220-9.
Estrada, F., Calderón-Bustamante, O., Botzen, W., Velasco, J. A., Tol, R. S., 2022. AIRCC-Clim: a user-friendly tool for generating regional probabilistic climate change scenarios and risk measures. Environmental Modelling & Software, 157, 105528.
Estrada, F., Mendoza-Ponce, A., Calderón-Bustamante, O., Botzen, W., 2022. Impacts and economic costs of climate change on Mexican agriculture. Regional Environmental Change, 22(4), 1-16.
Estrada F., Botzen W.J.W., 2021. Economic impacts and risks of climate change under failure and success of the Paris Agreement. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14652
Estrada F., Kim D., Perron P., 2021. Spatial variations in the warming trend and the transition to more severe weather in midlatitudes. Scientific Reports. 11, 145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80701-7
Estrada F., Kim D., Perron P., 2021. Anthropogenic influence in observed regional warming trends and the implied social time of emergence. Communications Earth and Environment 2, 31 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00102-0.
Estrada F., Botzen W.J.W., Calderón-Bustamante O., 2020. The Assessment of Impacts and Risks of Climate Change on Agriculture (AIRCCA) model: A tool for a rapid global risk assessment for crop yields at a spatially explicit scale. Spatial Economic Analysis, doi: 10.1080/17421772.2020.1754448.
Estrada F., Velasco J.A., Martínez-Arroyo A., Calderón O., 2020. An analysis of current sustainability of Mexican cities and their exposure to climate change. Front. Environ. Sci., Interdisciplinary Climate Studies, doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2020.00025.
Estrada, F., Perron, P., 2019. Causality from long‐lived radiative forcings to the climate trend. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. doi:10.1111/nyas.13923
Estrada F., Perron P., 2019. Breaks, Trends and the Attribution of Climate Change: A Time-Series Analysis. Economía, 42(83), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.18800/economia.201901.001
Haro A., Mendoza-Ponce A., Calderón-Bustamante O., Velasco J.A., Estrada F., 2021. Evaluating risk and possible adaptations to climate change under a socio-ecological system approach. Frontiers in Climate. doi: 10.3389/fclim.2021.674693.
Ignjačević P., Botzen W., Estrada F., Daanen H., Lupi V., 2024. Climate-induced mortality projections in Europe: Estimation and valuation of heat-related deaths. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 111, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104692.
Keith, D. W. (2013). A Case for Climate Engineering. MIT Press. (https://ieeexplore-ieee-org.pbidi.unam.mx:2443/book/6642235)
Latham J, Gadian A, Fournier J, Parkes B, Wadhams P, Chen J. 2014 Marine cloud brightening: regional applications. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372: 20140053. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0053
Latham J, Rasch PJ, Launder B. 2014 Climate engineering: exploring nuances and consequences of deliberately altering the Earth’s energy budget. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372: 20140050. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0050
MacMartin DG, Caldeira K, Keith DW. 2014 Solar geoengineering to limit the rate of temperature change. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372: 20140134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0134
Mendoza-Ponce, A., Corona-Núñez, R., Kraxner, F., and Estrada, F., 2020. Vulnerability of biodiversity in the anthropocene: spatial prioritization for biodiversity conservation in a megadiverse country. Anthropocene. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2020.100267.
Möller, Ina, 2023: The emergence on Geoengineering, Cambridge University Press. 88p
Morrow, D. R., Kopp, R. E., & Oppenheimer, M. (2009). Toward Ethical Norms and Institutions for Climate Engineering Research. Environmental Research Letters, 4(4), 045106.
OldhamP, Szerszynski B, Stilgoe J, Brown C, Eacott B, Yuille A. 2014 Mapping the landscape of climate engineering. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372: 20140065. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0065
Parker A. 2014 Governing solar geoengineering research as it leaves the laboratory. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372: 20140173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0173
Parson, E. A. (2014). Climate Engineering in Global Climate Governance: Implications for Participation and Linkage. Transnational Environmental Law, 3(1), 89-110.
Rasch, P. J., Tilmes, S., Turco, R. P., Robock, A., Oman, L., Chen, C. C., & Stenchikov, G. L. (2008). An Overview of Geoengineering of Climate Using Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosols. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 366(1882), 4007-4037.
Rios, B., Estrada, F., 2022. Reduction in Crop Yield in Mexico Due to Ozone Associated with Emissions from Biomass Burning. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 233(10), 1-14.
Robock, A. (2008). 20 Reasons Why Geoengineering May Be a Bad Idea. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 64(2), 14-18.
Sánchez-Vargas A., Méndez-Astudillo J., López-Vidal Y., López-Carr D., Estrada F., 2023. Assessing the effect of the U.S. vaccination program on the Coronavirus positivity rate with a multivariate framework. GeoHealth, 7, e2022GH000771. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GH000771
Serrano-Candela F., Estrada F., Raga G., Gonzalez Salazar C., 2024. Data-driven complementary indices and metrics for assessing national progress on climate risk and adaptation. PLOS Climate. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000365.
Storelvmo T, Boos WR, Herger N. 2014 Cirrus cloud seeding: a climate engineering mechanism with reduced side effects? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 372: 20140116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0116
Trisos, C. H., Amatulli, G., Gurevitch, J., Robock, A., Xia, L., & Ziska, L. H. (2018). Potentially Dangerous Consequences for Biodiversity of Solar Geoengineering Implementation and Termination. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 2(3), 475-482.
Van Hemert, Mieke, 2017: Speculative promise as a driver in climate engineering research: The case of Paul Crutzen’s back-of-the-envelope calculation on solar dimming with sulfate aerosols. Futures, 92, 80-89.
Velasco J.A., Luna-Aranguré C., Bustamante O., Mendoza-Ponce A., Estrada F., González-Salazar C., 2024. Drivers of urban biodiversity in Mexico and joint risks from future urban expansion, climate change, and urban heat island effect. PLoS ONE 19(10): e0308522. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0308522.
Velasco J.A., Estrada F., Calderón-Bustamante O., Swingedouw D., Ureta C., Gay C., Defrance D., 2021. Synergistic impacts of global warming and thermohaline circulation collapse on amphibians. Communications Biology 4, 141 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-01665-6.
Reportes:
United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP). (2019). The UNEP Perspective on Climate Engineering.
The Oxford Principles (2010). A Code of Conduct for Geoengineering Research.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2021). Reflecting Sunlight: Recommendations for Solar Geoengineering Research. National Academies Press.
Royal Society. (2009). Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty. The Royal Society.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2022). Climate Change 2022: Mitigation of Climate Change – Contribution of Working Group III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the IPCC.
Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques (ENMOD Treaty, 1976).
Ligas útiles:
Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – A global climate modeling initiative analyzing SRM scenarios. Website: https://climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/GeoMIP/
Harvard’s Solar Geoengineering Research Program (SGRP) – Leading research group on SRM. Website: https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/
World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Reports – Regular assessments of climate engineering risks and benefits. Website: https://public.wmo.int/