Reviewing

Reviewers

Thank you to the reviewers that made this workshop possible!

Ahmed Wez, Akash Karthikeyan, Alireza Masoumian, Aly Lidayan, Anastasia Psarou, Ashish Mehta, Borna Sayedana, Calarina Muslimani, Cameron Allen, Caro Strickland, Colin Bellinger, Dane Malenfant, David Abel, David Hyland, Di Yang Shi, Esraa Elelimy, Fatima Daniela Davelouis, Fernando Rosas, Guozheng Ma, Isabeau Prémont-Schwarz, Jean Seong Bjorn Choe, John C. Raisbeck, John D Martin, Jon Vadillo, Juan Sebastian Rojas, Kenzo Clauw, Logan Mondal Bhamidipaty, Łukasz Gorczyca, Maia Fraser, Majid Ghasemi, Mandana Samiei, Matthew Vandergrift, Michael D Dennis, Nadav Amir, Pablo Samuel Castro, Padideh Nouri, Peter Dayan, Qi Zhao, Raghuram Bharadwaj Diddigi, Sandy Tanwisuth, Serena Booth, Stephanie Milani, Tianwei Ni, Uma Maheswari Natarajan, Yivan Zhang, Yuting Tang, Ziyan Luo

Review and Selection Process

• All reviews will be double-blind.

• All papers that are accepted will have posters at the workshop

• Selected papers will be given spotlight presentations.

• At least one co-author of an accepted paper is expected to register for RLC 2026 and attend the poster sessions.

• Work that is in submission or under review at a conference or journal is welcome. We are not accepting already-published work. This includes published work at RLC.

• All papers will go through a light-touch desk reject phase to inspect whether the work is complete, adheres to length requirements, and is broadly in scope for the workshop.

• Our reviewing  team consist of the organizers and the advisory board of this workshop.  We also welcome volunteers to help with the reviewing process. To nominate yourself please fill the form. 

• Self nomination reviewer form

• The review period will take place after the submission deadline and will run for two weeks, tentatively from May 29 to June 12.

• Please feel free to add your topic of preference or anything else that you would like us to consider in the final box of the form.