Arthur Koestler's concept of a holon describes any entity that is simultaneously:
A whole (autonomous, self-reliant, with its own identity and rules), and
A part (subordinate to, and serving, a larger system).
Society is organized as a nested holarchy of such holons. Here are clear, real-world examples across different scales:
Individual Human Being
Whole: A complete, autonomous person with thoughts, goals, and self-regulation.
Part: A member of a family, team, organization, or nation.
Family/Household
Whole: A self-contained unit with its own dynamics, rules, budget, and identity.
Part: A subunit within a neighborhood, community, or extended kinship network.
Team or Work Department
Whole: Operates with internal leadership, goals, culture, and decision-making.
Part: Contributes to the larger organization or company.
Corporation or Organization
Whole: Has its own strategy, brand, hierarchy, and profit motive.
Part: Operates within an industry, supply chain, and national economy.
City or Municipality
Whole: Self-governing with local laws, services, identity, and economy.
Part: A component of a state/province and nation.
Ethnic or Religious Community (e.g., Jewish diaspora communities)
Whole: Maintains distinct cultural practices, institutions, education systems, and identity.
Part: Integrated into (and contributing to) the broader host society and global civilization.
Nation-State
Whole: Sovereign entity with government, laws, military, and cultural narrative.
Part: A participant in international organizations (UN, NATO, EU) and the global system.
Supranational Entity (e.g., European Union)
Whole: Has its own parliament, currency (euro), court, and policies.
Part: A regional bloc within the emerging global system.
Humanity as a Whole (the emerging social superorganism)
Whole: Collectively shaping planetary systems through technology, culture, and economy.
Part: A layer within the biosphere/Earth system (Gaia), and potentially within larger cosmic evolution.
These nested holons illustrate the dual nature Koestler emphasized: each level asserts its own autonomy (self-assertive tendency) while remaining subordinate to the demands of the larger whole (integrative tendency). Healthy social evolution depends on balancing these two tendencies—too much autonomy leads to fragmentation; too much integration leads to totalitarian suppression of difference.