I am broadly interested in smooth 4-manifold topology, particularly when there is a finite group action. I am also learning a lot about Khovanov homology as a tool to study 4-manifolds and related ideas, and I am really enjoying the associated homological algebra. I hope to apply Khovanov homology to cobordism and concordance problems for knots.
With Jeffrey Meier
Preprint (2025)
We lay the foundations for a theory of trisections for 4-manifolds X equipped with a smooth action of a finite group G. We begin by giving a solid definition, and show that such a trisection always exists for a given G-action on X. We show that an equivariant trisection allows you to 'see' the G-action via a G-action on a trisection diagram.
We then develop the technology some: we show that equivariant trisections behave nicely with respect to the quotient by the group action, we elaborate a large quantity of examples, and we classify examples of low trisection genus. Analogues of these results are also developed for G-invariant surfaces via a notion of equivariant bridge trisections.
We conclude by discussing several directions for future research. (arXiv, published in Groups, Geometry, and Dynamics)
With Jeffrey Meier
Preprint (2025)
We prove an analogue of the classical Laudenbach-Poénaru theorem in the presence of a finite group G acting on all manifolds involved. We first identify the correct analogue to a 1-handlebody in the equivariant setting, a class of G-actions on 1-handlebodies which we call linearly parted actions, and then directly manipulate the resulting equivariant handle decompositions. In the case where G is the trivial group, this gives a new proof of the classical theorem with interesting technical features. With an eye towards equivariant trisections, we also prove a generalization to the case where the 1-handlebody contains an invariant set of properly embedded, equivariantly unknotted disks. (arXiv, to appear in Michigan Mathematical Journal)
Preprint (2022)
In my first-ever research effort, we analyze an interesting property of polyhedra: a polyhedron P is Rupert if one can take two identical copies of P and bore a hole straight through the first, keeping it in one piece, which is large enough to pass the other straight through. Equivalently, P is Rupert if there are two planar projections of P so that one is contained in the interior of the other; see the image for such projections for the cube. We give two general sufficient conditions for when such a passage exists in which the two projections are arbitrarily similar. (arXiv)