John Levis

Iowa State University, USA

Connecting the dots between pronunciation research and practice


Abstract
The (non)interaction of research and practice is a common issue in language teaching circles. At teaching-oriented conferences, teachers often lament that research presentations are not relevant to what happens in the classroom, and they seem to assume that direct application to classroom practice is the primary goal of research. Likewise, those who are interested in research often do not or cannot express pedagogical implications of their research that are clearly applicable to the classroom.
The disconnect between researchers and teachers is perhaps nowhere more evident than in teaching and researching L2 pronunciation, where researech has traditionally had close connections to pedagogical concerns. But teachers lack an understanding of key concerns that drive pronunciation research, and they are often inadequately trained to teach pronunciation (Foote, Holtby, & Derwing, 2011). This leads to comments that any pronunciation researcher is familiar with. Decades ago, at one of my first presentations at International TESOL, Judy Gilbert told me that she found my topic interesting but that she could not see how she could apply it to teaching pronunciation. More recently, at TESOL 2018, my invited talk received feedback from one attendee as having been “Theory only, no practice.” Because I have always tried to connect theory to practice, these and other comments I have received suggest that both research and teaching concerns, while related, are many more steps removed than we think. But there are steps we can take to make both more relevant to each other.
This presentation uses my own research history and that of others I know to illustrate some of the reasons it is so difficult to connect theory and pedagogy:1. Teachers and researchers work on different timelines. Teachers often need pedagogical activities immediately, while researchers’ concerns are not directly connected to the day-to-day concerns of teaching.2. Teachers are interested in what seems to work; researchers are interested in why and to what extent something seems to work.3. L2 pronunciation research is typically not directly based on teaching concerns; Similarly, L2 pronunciation teaching is typically indirectly connected to research concerns. 4. Both teachers and researchers are often not able to describe the connections of research concerns and classroom practices.
The goal of this presentation is to encourage non-researching teachers to understand what they can expect from research studies. It will encourage them to consider how some of the important questions in pronunciation research are intensely practical. It will also suggest what researchers can do to better frame their studies so that pedagogical connections are clearer. Finally, I will suggest why researchers should pay closer attention to pedagogy, both to enrich their research and to promote better pedagogy.
ReferencesFoote, J. A., A. K. Holtby, and T. M. Derwing. 2011. ‘Survey of the teaching of pronunciation in adult ESL programs in Canada, 2010,’ TESL Canada Journal 29/1:1–22.