Environmental Injustice

no environmental justice for kahuku

Environmental justice (EJ) is the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations and policies. Fair treatment means no group of people should bear a disproportionate share of the negative environmental consequences resulting from industrial, governmental and commercial operations or policies. Meaningful involvement means: People have an opportunity to participate in decisions about activities that may affect their environment and/or health; The public's contribution can influence the regulatory agency's decision; Community concerns will be considered in the decision making process; and Decision makers will seek out and facilitate the involvement of those potentially affected. (EPA, 2019)

Our voices should matter

“The worst thing was, they said they had meetings with the farmers....They never had meetings with the farmers who live closest to the turbines, so when I found out about it, I said, “Hey, you guys never met with the farmers.” I got this text. ​Since you required this meeting, we are going to offer to meet with you. We are going to meet with FARMERS ONLY.​ I said, “Let me think about it. At this point already, if you meet with us...we need back up.” ​Then we’ll meet with SOME farmers in groups.​ “No, we cannot just have some farmers. It’s just not right to just meet with some farmers. Especially, I worry about those that don’t speak the language.” The final text was,​ It’s ok. We changed our mind. We are going to meet with farmers individually.​ And that’s the end right now. No meeting. They are going to meet with farmers individually. I am thinking they just want to break us up and clamp us down totally. Most of the farmers here are so scared...They cannot speak up. Their voice cannot be heard, and they will not speak up because of the oppression already. We are really at a loss for what to do. We know the ill effects, it will be there. But there is nobody there helping us. It just feels so hopeless.” Chai Yoshimura

loss of property value

Requiring small rural communities to bear the expense of the transition to renewable energy is not only unfair, it is also doomed to fail. Trying to solve the global climate crisis with capitalist solutions ignores that it was these same corporations that got us into this situation in the first place. While we have the technology to solve global climate change, we will never generate the political will to solve the problem if it happens at the expense of local communities. There are about 578 homes in Kahuku. The median value of homes is $516,300. A 12% loss would mean $35,810,568 in losses for Kahuku homeowners. A 40% loss would mean $119,368,560 in losses for Kahuku Homeowners.

20 too many not fair

Our small town of 2,300 people will be surrounded by 20 industrial turbines and unfairly bear the burden of having 40% of all the existing turbines on O`ahu in our backyard. What other community here is surrounded by turbines? Other places may have the money to fight large companies, Kahuku doesn’t. This is environmental injustice. We want expanded access to rooftop solar and clean energy that doesn’t harm people and wildlife.

Why The Fight Against The Kahuku Turbines Matters

Winning the war against climate change requires socially equitable solutions.

By Christian Palmer / November 1, 2019

Protesters have been gathering nightly to protest the development of wind turbines near Kahuku. The rallying cries are “mālama ʻāina,” “aloha ʻāina,” and “kū kiaʻi Kahuku.”

It may seem that it is contradictory to love and care for the land and be opposed to wind turbines which are being installed to reduce fossil fuels. It is not. Harming local communities to fight climate change will make it impossible to bring about the radical social and economic changes we need to effectively decarbonize our economy.

In the last year, the world scientific consensus has come together to show that climate change is happening faster than anyone expected. The oceans are more acidic, coral reefs are bleaching, the Greenland ice sheets are melting, and record areas of the Amazon are burning. The scientists have spoken and the world needs renewable energy now.

The question is not whether we need to decarbonize our economy, but how we will do it and how the impacts and benefits are distributed. Globally, the question about the distribution of the impacts and benefits were the trickiest part in negotiating the Paris accords and is still far from being decided.

The fight against industrial wind turbines less than a quarter mile from the small town Kahuku is about the distribution of these harms and benefits. It is well documented that wind energy is noisy, reduces property values, and kills native bats and birds. There is a growing body of research that suggests that the noise is not only annoying but can impact nearby residents’ health.

These economic, physical, and ecological impacts are not felt equally but impact those who live closest. This unequal distribution of environmental harms has long been noted by the environmental justice movement. Industrial power plants, incinerators, and landfills are almost always located next to low-income communities of color.

Wind turbines for Kahuku arrive along Kamehameha Highway as protestors shout “hewa.” It is unfair that small rural communities bear the expense of the transition to renewable energy.

In Kahuku, industrial wind turbines are following the same strategies. These projects harm those that have benefited the least from the current fossil-fueled economic system that created the global climate crisis.

The cruel irony is that those least responsible will bear the greatest impacts. The poorest nations of the world will be hit hardest by sea level rise, increased hurricanes, and droughts.

Within richer, developed countries it is the rural and urban poor and communities of color who will be left stranded as waters rise and home prices plummet. We saw this as Hurricane Katrina rolled into New Orleans and Hurricane Maria flattened Puerto Rico.

Requiring small rural communities to bear the expense of the transition to renewable energy is not only unfair, it is also doomed to fail. The protesters of Kahuku identify with the protests against the construction of the Thirty Meter Telescope on Mauna Kea and protests against the expansion of a sports center in Waimanalo.

What all of these fights have in common is that local communities are tired of corporations and their politicians controlling the fate of local communities. Any strategy to solve for global climate change that does not address economic inequality will fail because these communities will fight against it.

Our current battle to save the planet is not a technological problem but a political problem. We have the technology we need to transition to a carbon-zero economy but lack the political will to make it happen.

In many countries like Brazil and the U.S., rising anti-corporate conservative nationalist movements have made the promise of a sustainable future seem like a pipe dream. Continuing approaches that require poor rural communities to be sacrificed for a clean-energy future will be fought tooth and nail and will make “environmentalism” a cuss word and doom any opportunity we have to create the long lasting, permanent changes to decarbonize our economy.

Our current battle to save the planet is not a technological problem but a political problem.

Trying to solve the global climate crisis with capitalist solutions ignores that it was these same corporations that got us into this situation in the first place. While we have the technology to solve global climate change, we will never generate the political will to solve the problem if it happens at the expense of local communities.

In Hawaii the protests against wind turbines will be in Kahuku, then Waianae, then Waimanalo, and then any new community where wind turbines disproportionately impact local communities. The top down projects are rightly seen as continuing the colonial processes that originally excluded these communities from active participation.

Green New Deal Needed

So where do we go from here?

The Green New Deal is so exciting because it imagines radically transforming our economy while simultaneously addressing social inequality. Any solution that is not both environmentally and socially equitable will fail.

So what does this look like in Hawaii?

We need to find solutions to climate change that are socially equitable. Wind power is not equitable. Solar power, ocean thermal energy conversion, improvements in home and business energy efficiency (that save local households money), smarter grid and variable energy pricing to accommodate more solar production, and carbon sequestration (planting trees) are all climate strategies that are supported by local communities and whose benefits are distributed equally.

These environmental proposals need to be accompanied by social progress with green jobs, affordable housing, and sustainability education.

Will these developments be as profitable? No, they will not, but they will prioritize communities over shareholders and people over profits which is essential to achieve a zero-carbon future.

About the Author

Christian Palmer

Christian Palmer is an environmental anthropologist and longtime resident of Koolauloa.

Artist: Jenica Taylor