S P E C I A L F E A T U R E
U p d a t e
Update in Endocrine Autoimmunity
Mark S. Anderson
Diabetes Center, Department of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-0540
Context: The endocrine system is a common target in pathogenic autoimmune responses, and there has been recent progress in our understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of autoimmune endocrine diseases.
Synthesis: Rapid progress has recently been made in our understanding of the genetic factors involved in endocrine autoimmune diseases. Studies on monogenic autoimmune diseases that include endocrine phenotypes like autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1 and immune dys-regulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked have helped reveal the role of key regu-lators in the maintenance of immune tolerance. Highly powered genetic studies have found and confirmed many new genes outside of the established role of the human leukocyte antigen locus with these diseases, and indicate an essential role of immune response pathways in these diseases. Progress has also been made in identifying new autoantigens and the development of new animal models for the study of endocrine autoimmunity. Finally, although hormone replacement therapy is still likely to be a mainstay of treatment in these disorders, there are new agents being tested for potentially treating and reversing the underlying autoimmune process.
Conclusion: Although autoimmune endocrine disorders are complex in etiology, these recent advances should help contribute to improved outcomes for patients with, or at risk for, these disorders. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93: 3663–3670, 2008)
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-
Autoimmune diseases represent a significant health burden in the developed world afflicting 5–10% of the population
(1), and a sizable percentage of these diseases involve an unto-ward immune response against an endocrine organ. Virtually any endocrine organ can be targeted by the immune system as part of an autoimmune response, and frequently responses to multiple organs can occur in the same patient as part of a polyglandular autoimmune syndrome. More common endo-crine autoimmune syndromes include Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, Graves’ disease, and type 1 diabetes, whereas more rare syn-dromes include Addison’s disease, oophoritis, lymphocytic hy-pophysitis, and hypoparathyroidism. For years, the etiology and pathogenesis of these disorders have remained obscure, but the diseases are generally thought to involve a cellular and humoral immune response that pathologically targets the affected or-gan(s). This is evidenced by a wide number of observations, in-cluding the presence of autoantibodies in affected patients, im-provement of some diseases by immunosuppressive drugs, and the demonstration of lymphocytic infiltrates in the targeted or-
0021-972X/08/$15.00/0
Printed in U.S.A.
Copyright © 2008 by The Endocrine Society
doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1251 Received June 9, 2008. Accepted July 31, 2008.
gans. Over the last few years, rapid progress in our understand-ing of these diseases has come through a number of efforts, par-ticularly in genetics. In this review, I will highlight some of the recent advances in our understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of endocrine autoimmune diseases.
Genetics
There is good evidence that most autoimmune endocrine diseases have a genetic component to their etiology. Some of the best evidence comes from familial inheritance studies on type 1 dia-betes and thyroiditis (2, 3). In the case of type 1 diabetes, the lifetime concordance rate for disease in monogenic twins is around 50% and for siblings is around 3– 4%. This shows sig-nificant risk when compared with the general population risk of around 0.3%. These data also show that there is a significant genetic contribution to disease risk and that other factors (i.e. environmental) are also involved in disease pathogenesis. For several decades, the major genetic association of autoimmune
Abbreviations: Aire, Autoimmune regulator; APS1, autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1; GWA, genome-wide association; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; IPEX, immune dysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked; MHC, major histocompatibility complex; mTEC, medullary epithelial cell; NALP5, NACHT leucine-rich-repeat protein 5; Treg, regulatory T cell.
abstract/93/10/3663/2627251 by guest on 08 October 2018
J Clin Endocrinol Metab, October 2008, 93(10):3663–3670 jcem.endojournals.org 3663
3664 Anderson Update in Endocrine Autoimmunity J Clin Endocrinol Metab, October 2008, 93(10):3663–3670
endocrine diseases with polymorphisms in the human leukocyte
endocrine autoimmunity and in highly powered genetic studies
antigen (HLA) region has been recognized. The HLA is a genetic
that include genome-wide association (GWA) efforts.
region on chromosome 6 that encodes a large number of immune
response genes, and in most cases disease risk maps to polymor-
Monogenic diseases
phisms in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II
Autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1 (APS1) is a rare
genes DR and DQ. The MHC class II gene products along with
monogenic autosomal recessive disorder characterized by a pan-
antigenic peptides are part of the ligand complex for CD4
oply of autoimmune syndromes in the same patient, many of
T-cell receptors, and the association likely highlights the impor-
which are directed against endocrine organs. Prominent clinical
tance of T cells in these diseases (4). Interestingly, it remains to
features are hypoparathyroidism, Addison’s disease, and muco-
be determined how these risk polymorphisms lead to increased
cutaneous candidiasis (7). More variable endocrine features also
susceptibility to autoimmunity. Some investigators have pro-
include Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, oophoritis, type 1 diabetes, and
posed promiscuous peptide binding by MHC risk alleles as a
lymphocytic hypophysitis. Through a positional cloning effort,
potential mechanism, but more definitive data are needed (5). It
the defective gene was identified in 1997 by two independent
is also important to note that in most cases, subjects harboring
groups and termed autoimmune regulator (Aire) (8, 9). Since its
a MHC risk allele are more likely not to develop autoimmunity
identification, much has been learned about the function of Aire
except in rare isolated incidents (6), thus, these risk alleles should
in promoting immune tolerance and has been accelerated by the
be thought of as being necessary but not sufficient for the devel-
generation of a mouse model by knocking out the murine or-
opment of disease. Recently, significant progress has been made
thologue of the gene (10, 11). Aire appears to function as a
in expanding our understanding of genetic disease risk beyond
transcription factor and is mainly expressed in a specialized sub-
the MHC, particularly with informative monogenic forms of
set of cells in the thymus called medullary epithelial cells
(mTECs). Within mTECs, Aire helps pro-
A
mote the transcription of many self-antigen
genes, including the insulin gene (a known
endocrine autoantigen) (11). A consequence
“Organ
of this self-antigen expression within the
Specific”
thymus is that it promotes the negative se-
Antigen-MHC
Transcription
complexes for T
cell presentation
lection (or deletion) of autoreactive thymo-
AIRE
“Organ
cytes that naturally develop in the thymus
Specific”
(12–14). Thus, in the absence of Aire, there
Antigens
is a failure to delete autoreactive T cells
within the thymus, which then leads to a
predisposition to widespread multi-organ
autoimmunity (Fig. 1). Mouse studies have
confirmed that the thymic defect is sufficient
B
Aire-positive Thymus
Aire-negative Thymus
to induce the autoimmune syndrome asso-
ciated with disease (11), and recent studies
in humans have suggested that the long-
known association of thymomas with the
Cortex
autoimmune syndrome myasthenia gravis
may be attributable to the loss of AIRE ex-
pression in this thymic tumor (15). In addi-
tion, there is a developing picture that
Medulla
similar mechanisms are in play for more
common endocrine autoimmune syn-
dromes, like type 1 diabetes, in which a poly-
morphism in the insulin gene has been dem-
onstrated to control thymic expression
Self organ-specific T
Self Organ-Specific T
levels and correlates with disease risk (i.e.
cells deleted
cells escape
high thymic expression alleles have lower
disease risk) (16 –18). Recent associations
Self organ autoimmunity
with variation in the thyroglobulin gene and
Self organ tolerance
thyroiditis (3, 19) could involve a similar
FIG. 1. Model of the function of Aire in the thymus. A, Aire appears to help mediate the transcription of
mechanism, but this has yet to be tested. An
autosomal dominant allele of AIRE has also
many self-antigens in mTECs in the thymus. B, Impact of Aire on T-cell selection. These self-antigens are
then presented in the thymus to developing thymocytes (blue-colored cells) in the medulla, and this results
been recently associated with Hashimoto’s
in the deletion of self-antigen specific thymocytes in this compartment. In the absence of Aire, the self-
thyroiditis (20), and recently the suscepti-
antigens fail to be generated by these mTECs, and self-antigen specific T cells mature and escape the
bility has been shown to be due to a quan-
thymus and migrate into the periphery and promote autoimmune responses.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-abstract/93/10/3663/2627251 by guest on 08 October 2018
J Clin Endocrinol Metab, October 2008, 93(10):3663–3670 jcem.endojournals.org 3665
titative effect on self-antigen expression within the thymus (21). Together, these recent advances on Aire have helped establish a critical relationship between thymic expression of self-antigens and the prevention of autoimmune endocrine syndromes.
Another monogenic autoimmune syndrome that has brought new mechanistic insights to immune tolerance is immune dys-regulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked (IPEX). This is an X-linked disorder that is characterized by a severe autoimmunity syndrome in which most affected subjects usually die before the age of 2 yr if they do not receive bone marrow transplantation. Common autoimmune endocrine syndromes in these patients include type 1 diabetes and thyroiditis (22). The defective gene in this disorder has been mapped to the transcrip-tion factor FoxP3, and recent studies have established that FoxP3 plays a critical role in the function of a special T-cell subset called regulatory T cells (Tregs) (23–25). Tregs are CD4 CD25 T cells that have the remarkable capability to suppress effector T-cell responses, including those directed at self (Fig. 2) (26). These cells develop within the thymus and are thought to have a preferential specificity for self-antigens, perhaps at least in part due to Aire-dependent mechanisms (27). Preferential depletion (28) or loss of function of these cells (through knocking out
Treg Teff
CD4+ CD4+
FoxP3+ FoxP3-
unclear
suppression
mechanisms
Self-tolerance
Treg Teff
CD4+ CD4+
FoxP3+ FoxP3-
IPEX
FIG. 2. Model of Treg function. Tregs expressing the FoxP3 gene play a key role in dampening responses by effector T cells (Teff), including autoreactive T cells specific for organ-specific antigens. This suppression is essential because the loss of Treg function has been demonstrated to lead to catastrophic autoimmunity like that in patients with the IPEX syndrome. The suppression by these cells in vivo also appears to be antigen specific and raises the possibility that these cells could be harnessed to induce antigen-specific immune tolerance in the future.
FoxP3) has been demonstrated in animal models to lead to cat-astrophic autoimmunity similar to that in IPEX patients. FoxP3 likely plays a number of critical functions in allowing the sup-pressor activity of these cells to be promoted, but the exact details of the suppression mechanism remain unclear, especially in vivo (29). Interestingly, Tregs have been used as a tool to suppress and reverse type 1 diabetes in animal models (30, 31), and this has important future clinical implications. This is because the sup-pression mechanism in vivo appears to be dependent on the an-tigenic specificity of the Treg population that is used. Thus, it may someday be possible to induce antigen or organ-specific tolerance by treatment with clonal populations of Tregs as a method to cure or reverse a given autoimmune disease without conferring the risk of global immunosuppression.
GWA studies
Rapid advances in human genetics have afforded the oppor-tunity to identify new risk alleles associated with common dis-eases, like type 1 diabetes and thyroiditis, that have previously been elusive. This has been due to a number of factors, including the completion of the human genome sequence, the development of a catalog of common genetic variation (i.e. the haplotype map), affordable technologies for high-density/high-throughput genotyping, and adequately powered sample sizes of cases and controls (32, 33). In this regard, the most progress has been made with studies on type 1 diabetes and thyroiditis, in which ade-quately powered sample collections have been amassed to detect common variants using GWA and confirm previously estab-lished associations. Studies with type 1 diabetes samples have established a large number of genes associated with risk outside of the HLA region. Before the advent of GWA, the insulin (17, 34), PTPN22 (35), CTLA4 (36), and interleukin-2 receptor a-chain (also known as CD25) (37) genes were established to be associated with disease, and have also been confirmed with GWA. With the advent of large GWA studies on type 1 diabetes, MDA5 (38), KIAA0350 (a C-type lectin of unknown function) (39 – 41), and several loci harboring other genes have been as-sociated with disease (41). Although Hashimoto’s thyroiditis and Graves’ disease are distinct in their clinical presentations, they likely share many commonalities in their pathogenesis. Most large genetic studies on autoimmune thyroid disease have used large Graves’ collections, and there has been difficulty in detecting loci when Graves’ and Hashimoto’s patients are pooled together (42). In fact, a very recent study on Hashimoto’s thy-roiditis patients has demonstrated different HLA class II asso-ciations when compared with Graves’ (43). To date, established genes outside of HLA for Graves’ include the TSH receptor (44, 45), PTPN22 (46, 47), CTLA4 (36), and FCRL3 (a Fc receptor family member) (45). Beyond these recent findings, it should be noted that there is an extensive body of literature examining candidate gene associations with thyroiditis, type 1 diabetes, and Addison’s disease. These reported associations may hold true associations but have yet to be replicated in these large collection studies for thyroiditis and type 1 diabetes. This may be due to many factors, but caution is warranted given the likely bias for reporting false-positive results in such studies, especially those that may be underpowered or may have unrecognized popula-
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-abstract/93/10/3663/2627251 by guest on 08 October 2018
3666 Anderson Update in Endocrine Autoimmunity J Clin Endocrinol Metab, October 2008, 93(10):3663–3670
TABLE 1. Autoimmune endocrine disease susceptibility genes identified or confirmed in recent high-powered genetic studies (see text for references)
Gene
Associated autoimmune endocrine disease
Putative role of gene variant
HLA-DR,DQ (MHC class II)
T1D,GD,HT
Antigen presentation to CD4 T cells
HLA-B (MHC class I)
T1D
Antigen presentation to CD8 T cells
HLA-C (MHC class I)
GD
Antigen presentation to CD8 T cells
Insulin
T1D
Thymic expression to promote negative selection
TSH receptor
GD
? Antigen recognition, ? thymic expression
CTLA4
T1D,GD,HT
Inhibitory T-cell signaling
PTPN22
T1D,GD,HT
? T-cell signaling
CD25
T1D
? Treg activity and function
MDA5
T1D
Innate immune response signaling
FCRL3
GD
Unknown
KIAA0350
T1D
Unknown
AD, Addison’s disease; GD, Graves’ disase; HT, Hashimoto’s thyroiditis; T1D, type 1 diabetes; ?, possible but not clearly established.
Downloaded from
tion stratification (48). The NALP1 gene, a likely regulator in the innate immune system, was also recently shown to have an as-sociation with multiple autoimmune diseases in families with vitiligo (49). In this study, families with two or more members with vitiligo and at least one with an autoimmune condition that included but was not limited to type 1 diabetes, Addison’s dis-ease, and thyroiditis were collected, and convincing linkage was demonstrated to this gene.
In terms of the non-HLA genes outlined previously, the risk conferred by them, with few exceptions, is relatively small, with most having an odds ratio less than 1.5. In addition, the biolog-ical mechanisms by which these common alleles confer genetic risk still remain to be completely elucidated (Table 1). Despite this, when these findings are put into the context of what we know about autoimmunity and immune tolerance mechanisms, a picture is starting to emerge. First, there appears to be at least a set of genes that generally increase autoimmune disease risk, like PTPN22, CTLA4, NALP1, and FCRL3, which have estab-lished risk for many autoimmune diseases. For example, PTPN22 has been established as a risk gene for rheumatoid ar-thritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, juvenile rheumatoid ar-thritis, and myasthenia gravis, in addition to its established as-sociation with thyroiditis and type 1 diabetes. Second, some disease risk genes fit into context with established pathways re-lated to immune tolerance. For example, CTLA4 (which is highly expressed in T cells) is known to play a critical role in dampening and suppressing T-cell responses in biological studies (50), and its association with multiple autoimmune diseases makes good sense. PTPN22 encodes a signaling phosphatase expressed in T cells that likely controls T-cell signaling, and the risk variant encodes an amino acid change that likely confers biological ac-tivity in T-cell activation pathways. Third, there are associations with emerging immune tolerance pathways. For instance, the association with CD25 may have a relationship with the function and activity of CD4 CD25 Tregs. The association of innate immune response genes like MDA5 and NALP1 may help ex-plain the bridge between environmental triggers and activation of autoimmune responses. The association of the TSH receptor with Graves’ may also have a relationship with thymic expres-sion of self-antigens, but making these links will need more study. Finally, there are some associations that are not completely clear,
like KIAA0350, which may help identify unexpected pathways associated with disease.
Another general emerging set of findings with large case con-trol collections has been a more thorough analysis of the HLA region with high-density marker genotyping. The HLA poses a particular challenge to geneticists because it is such a polymor-phic and gene-rich region. This makes identifying true risk as-sociations more difficult because the identified risk may be in linkage disequilibrium with the true risk variant. In type 1 dia-betes, recent new data have emerged that have extended our growing knowledge of MHC class II alleles associated with dis-ease risk and protection (51), and also in identifying additional disease risk (albeit lower) associated with MHC class I alleles (52). Additional studies have identified MHC haplotypes that provide extreme risk for the development of type 1 diabetes (6), which likely contain several synergistic loci. Likewise, a recent study on Graves’ patients has demonstrated disease risk attrib-utable to MHC class I (53). Together, these findings reveal the rich complexity of the HLA region, and clearly a more detailed study of the region will be needed to unravel completely the risk associated with this locus.
Diagnostics
Autoantibodies
Autoantibodies are a key tool in the diagnosis of patients with autoimmune endocrine diseases and those at risk for these dis-eases. As outlined earlier, a major clinical phenotype of patients with the APS1 disorder is the presence of hypoparathyroidism, which is presumably autoimmune in origin, and a recent study has identified a parathyroid autoantigen called NACHT leucine-rich-repeat protein 5 (NALP5) (54). Interestingly, NALP5 is highly expressed in both the parathyroid and ovary, and auto-reactivity to NALP5 may explain both the hypoparathyroidism and oophoritis associated with the APS1 disorder. However, it still remains to be determined if NALP5 is expressed in the thy-mus under the control of AIRE. A similar set of studies searching for pituitary autoantibodies has revealed tudor domain contain-ing protein 6 as a pituitary autoantigen in APS1 subjects (55). The autoantigen is quite prevalent in APS1 subjects, but its direct
https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-abstract/93/10/3663/2627251 by guest on 08 October 2018
J Clin Endocrinol Metab, October 2008, 93(10):3663–3670 jcem.endojournals.org 3667
correlation with pituitary autoimmunity in APS1 or in isolated lymphocytic hypophysitis remains to be established. Another set of recent studies has found that autoantibodies to type 1 inter-ferons are generally predictive of the APS1 disorder (56 –58). The clinical meaning of these autoantibodies currently remains un-clear but may have some relationship to the candidiasis com-monly observed in APS1 subjects. The specificity of this test for APS1 also appears to be on par with gene sequencing of AIRE in the initial studies, and raises the possibility that this assay may be of utility in patients and those at risk for the disorder. Recently, a new autoantigen has also been established for subjects with type 1 diabetes (59). ZnT8 is an islet-specific zinc transporter for which a large number of subjects with type 1 diabetes have re-active autoantibodies. The marker may prove particularly useful in subjects who test negative for other established autoantibodies to glutamate decarboxylase, insulin, and I-A2.
Animal Models
Animal models have proven to be invaluable in furthering our understanding of autoimmunity, given the inherit complexity of these diseases. Both the Aire knockout and FoxP3 knockout lines of mice have been valuable in unraveling the function of Aire and FoxP3 as outlined previously, but there have also been other recent advances with other animal models. A broad concept worth mentioning with animal models is segregating these mod-els into those that have spontaneous development of autoim-mune disease vs. those that are induced (i.e. immunizing with organ extract or antigen in the context of a strong adjuvant). Although induced models may be of some value, they are also hampered in identifying precipitating factors for disease because this is likely bypassed by the immunization process. Certainly, one of the most widely used spontaneous models in autoimmune endocrine disease research is the nonobese diabetic mouse strain model of autoimmune diabetes, which shows defects in multiple pathways of immune tolerance (60). This mouse strain has proven to be valuable in dissecting out the role of various im-mune cell populations and immune pathways in their contribu-tion to the autoimmune diabetes process. In addition, it should also be noted that this strain has been shown to have an increased susceptibility to spontaneous autoimmune thyroiditis when its MHC locus is replaced in a congenic fashion (61) or when crossed to a dominant point mutation in Aire (21). A spontane-ous thyroiditis model was also recently described using a T-cell receptor transgenic approach and emphasizes the importance again of T cells in driving this autoimmune disease (62). Another interesting development in animal models is the recent demon-stration of genetic susceptibility loci in Portuguese water dogs for Addison’s disease (63). This dog breed shows a relatively high predisposition to acquired adrenal insufficiency with estimates around 1.5% of these dogs being affected [compared with ap-proximately 0.01% in the human population (64)]. With recent advances in the genetic study of dogs and excellent pedigree records for this breed, Chase et al. (63) were able to demonstrate significant linkage for Addison’s disease to two loci in the dog genome. One locus was in the region of the dog MHC, and the
second was in a genetic region rich for immune response-related genes, which includes CTLA4. Further work will be needed in this system to unravel the exact genes and polymorphisms re-sponsible for the Addison’s disease risk, but this unique animal model may bring new mechanistic insights for this disorder. These recent findings also suggest that further work in nonrodent models of autoimmune endocrine conditions may be genetically tractable given the rapid advances in whole genome sequencing.
Environmental Effects
Recent epidemiological evidence has suggested that there is an increasing incidence of many autoimmune conditions, including type 1 diabetes (65, 66). A prevailing hypothesis for the increase in these recent trends is the “hygiene hypothesis,” whereby the relative decrease in childhood infections from improved living conditions and increased immunizations may be a factor (67). Along these lines, Kondrashova et al. (68) recently examined the prevalence of thyroid autoimmunity in two geographically adjacent regions in Russia and Finland that share similar genetic ancestry. In this study an increased prevalence of antithyroid peroxidase and antithyroglobulin antibodies was observed in Finnish children over Russian children. The authors go on to suggest that the increased rate in Finland could be due to socioeconomic factors that include a lower rate of childhood infections.
Treatment
The mainstay of treatment for most autoimmune endocrine dis-orders is of course replacement therapy with the exception of Graves’ disease. To date, the main area for which some progress has been made in reversing or treating the underlying autoim-mune process has been in type 1 diabetes, and this was recently reviewed in this series (69). One developing area of immuno-therapy outside of type 1 diabetes worth mentioning involves the B-cell depleting agent rituximab (anti-CD20). This drug has been demonstrated to have efficacy in the treatment of several auto-immune diseases (70) with a relatively good side effect profile, and initial case reports suggested that it may have some efficacy in the treatment of Graves’ disease (71, 72). Because a pathogenic autoantibody is responsible for this disorder, this is a rational treatment, however, it should be noted that plasma cells do not express CD20, and depletion of mature anti-TSH receptor an-tibody producing cells may be intractable to this approach. Re-cently, two controlled pilot studies for the treatment of Graves’ with anti-CD20 showed less encouraging results but some effi-cacy in patients with low anti-TSH receptor antibody levels (73, 74). There has also been a case report of ulcerative colitis being associated with the treatment of a Graves’ patient in a similar trial
(75) and brings into question the need for this therapy over estab-lished treatments. Despite this, rituximab may prove to be worth-while in unique circumstances such as in the prevention of severe ophthalmopathy in those patients receiving thyroid ablation.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-abstract/93/10/3663/2627251 by guest on 08 October 2018
3668 Anderson Update in Endocrine Autoimmunity J Clin Endocrinol Metab, October 2008, 93(10):3663–3670
Conclusion
The endocrine system is commonly pathologically targeted by the immune system and can often lead to clinical disease through complete destruction of the organ. For years, our main genetic understanding of these disorders has been that the MHC genetic region encodes a significant degree of risk. Recent, rapid advances in genetics have shed new light on immune pathways and mechanisms that are involved in the pathogenesis of these diseases. These pathways include those revealed by monogenic autoimmune diseases, like APS1 and IPEX, which reveal the importance of thymic selection and Tregs in maintaining tolerance. In addition, rigorously pow-ered genetic studies have reinforced the notion that T-cell response genes are involved in disease pathogenesis and that many autoimmune endocrine diseases share similar genetic risk. In addition, to our advancing knowledge in genetics, there have also been recent strides in identifying new diag-nostic markers and new treatments for these diseases. Despite these advances, much work remains to be done, including addressing the fundamental question of why the endocrine system is so commonly targeted by autoimmune responses.
Acknowledgments
I thank Jason DeVoss for help with the figures.
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Mark
S. Anderson, M.D., Ph.D., University of California-San Francisco Diabetes Center, Box 0540, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, California 94143-0540. E-mail: manderson@diabetes.ucsf.edu.
M.S.A. is supported by the National Institutes of Health, The Pew Scholars, The Burroughs Wellcome Fund, the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, and the Sandler Foundation.
Disclosure Statement: The author has nothing to disclose.
References
1. Jacobson DL, Gange SJ, Rose NR, Graham NM 1997 Epidemiology and es-timated population burden of selected autoimmune diseases in the United States. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 84:223–243
2. Redondo MJ, Yu L, Hawa M, Mackenzie T, Pyke DA, Eisenbarth GS, Leslie RD 2001 Heterogeneity of type I diabetes: analysis of monozygotic twins in Great Britain and the United States. Diabetologia 44:354 –362
3. Jacobson EM, Tomer Y 2007 The genetic basis of thyroid autoimmunity. Thyroid 17:949 –961
4. Anderson MS 2002 Autoimmune endocrine disease. Curr Opin Immunol 14: 760 –764
5. Suri A, Levisetti MG, Unanue ER 2008 Do the peptide-binding properties of diabetogenic class II molecules explain autoreactivity? Curr Opin Immunol 20:105–110
6. Aly TA, Ide A, Jahromi MM, Barker JM, Fernando MS, Babu SR, Yu L, Miao D, Erlich HA, Fain PR, Barriga KJ, Norris JM, Rewers MJ, Eisenbarth GS 2006 Extreme genetic risk for type 1A diabetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:14074 – 14079
7. Perheentupa J 2006 Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:2843–2850
8. Finnish-German APECED Consortium 1997 An autoimmune disease, APECED, caused by mutations in a novel gene featuring two PHD-type zinc-finger do-mains. Nat Genet 17:399 – 403
9. Nagamine K, Peterson P, Scott HS, Kudoh J, Minoshima S, Heino M, Krohn KJ, Lalioti MD, Mullis PE, Antonarakis SE, Kawasaki K, Asakawa S, Ito F, Shimizu N 1997 Positional cloning of the APECED gene. Nat Genet 17: 393–398
10. Ramsey C, Winqvist O, Puhakka L, Halonen M, Moro A, Kampe O, Eskelin P, Pelto-Huikko M, Peltonen L 2002 Aire deficient mice develop multiple features of APECED phenotype and show altered immune response. Hum Mol Genet 11:397– 409
11. Anderson MS, Venanzi ES, Klein L, Chen Z, Berzins SP, Turley SJ, von Boehmer H, Bronson R, Dierich A, Benoist C, Mathis D 2002 Projection of an immunological self shadow within the thymus by the aire protein. Science 298:1395–1401
12. Liston A, Lesage S, Wilson J, Peltonen L, Goodnow CC 2003 Aire regulates negative selection of organ-specific T cells. Nat Immunol 4:350 –354
13. Anderson MS, Venanzi ES, Chen Z, Berzins SP, Benoist C, Mathis D 2005 The cellular mechanism of Aire control of T cell tolerance. Immunity 23:227–239
14. DeVoss J, Hou Y, Johannes K, Lu W, Liou GI, Rinn J, Chang H, Caspi R, Fong L, Anderson MS 2006 Spontaneous autoimmunity prevented by thymic ex-pression of a single self-antigen. J Exp Med [Erratum (2007) 204:203] 203: 2727–2735
15. Strobel P, Murumagi A, Klein R, Luster M, Lahti M, Krohn K, Schalke B, Nix W, Gold R, Rieckmann P, Toyka K, Burek C, Rosenwald A, Muller-Hermelink HK, Pujoll-Borrell R, Meager A, Willcox N, Peterson P, Marx A 2007
Deficiency of the autoimmune regulator AIRE in thymomas is insufficient to elicit autoimmune polyendocrinopathy syndrome type 1 (APS-1). J Pathol 211:563–571
16. Chentoufi AA, Polychronakos C 2002 Insulin expression levels in the thymus modulate insulin-specific autoreactive T-cell tolerance: the mechanism by which the IDDM2 locus may predispose to diabetes. Diabetes [Erratum (2002) 51:2665] 51:1383–1390
17. Vafiadis P, Bennett ST, Todd JA, Nadeau J, Grabs R, Goodyer CG, Wickramasinghe S, Colle E, Polychronakos C 1997 Insulin expression in human thymus is mod-ulated by INS VNTR alleles at the IDDM2 locus. Nat Genet 15:289 –292
18. Pugliese A, Zeller M, Fernandez Jr A, Zalcberg LJ, Bartlett RJ, Ricordi C, Pietropaolo M, Eisenbarth GS, Bennett ST, Patel DD 1997 The insulin gene is transcribed in the human thymus and transcription levels correlated with allelic variation at the INS VNTR-IDDM2 susceptibility locus for type 1 diabetes. Nat Genet 15:293–297
19. Tomer Y, Greenberg DA, Concepcion E, Ban Y, Davies TF 2002 Thyroglob-ulin is a thyroid specific gene for the familial autoimmune thyroid diseases. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:404 – 407
20. Cetani F, Barbesino G, Borsari S, Pardi E, Cianferotti L, Pinchera A, Marcocci C 2001 A novel mutation of the autoimmune regulator gene in an Italian kindred with autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dys-trophy, acting in a dominant fashion and strongly cosegregating with hypo-thyroid autoimmune thyroiditis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:4747– 4752
21. Su MA, Giang K, Zumer K, Jiang H, Oven I, Rinn JL, Devoss JJ, Johannes KP, Lu W, Gardner J, Chang A, Bubulya P, Chang HY, Peterlin BM, Anderson MS 2008 Mechanisms of an autoimmunity syndrome in mice caused by a domi-nant mutation in Aire. J Clin Invest 118:1712–1726
22. Ochs HD, Gambineri E, Torgerson TR 2007 IPEX, FOXP3 and regulatory T-cells: a model for autoimmunity. Immunol Res 38:112–121
23. Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S 2003 Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science 299:1057–1061
24. Fontenot JD, Gavin MA, Rudensky AY 2003 Foxp3 programs the devel-opment and function of CD4 CD25 regulatory T cells. Nat Immunol 4:330 –336
25. Ramsdell F 2003 Foxp3 and natural regulatory T cells: key to a cell lineage? Immunity 19:165–168
26. Sakaguchi S, Yamaguchi T, Nomura T, Ono M 2008 Regulatory T cells and immune tolerance. Cell 133:775–787
27. Aschenbrenner K, D’Cruz LM, Vollmann EH, Hinterberger M, Emmerich J, Swee LK, Rolink A, Klein L 2007 Selection of Foxp3 regulatory T cells specific for self antigen expressed and presented by Aire medullary thymic epithelial cells. Nat Immunol 8:351–358
28. Kim JM, Rasmussen JP, Rudensky AY 2007 Regulatory T cells prevent cat-astrophic autoimmunity throughout the lifespan of mice. Nat Immunol 8:191–17
29. Tanchot C, Vasseur F, Pontoux C, Garcia C, Sarukhan A 2004 Immune reg-ulation by self-reactive T cells is antigen specific. J Immunol 172:4285– 4291
30. Tarbell KV, Yamazaki S, Olson K, Toy P, Steinman RM 2004 CD25 CD4 T cells, expanded with dendritic cells presenting a single autoantigenic peptide, suppress autoimmune diabetes. J Exp Med 199:1467–1477
31. Tang Q, Henriksen KJ, Bi M, Finger EB, Szot G, Ye J, Masteller EL, McDevitt H, Bonyhadi M, Bluestone JA 2004 In vitro-expanded antigen-specific regu-latory T cells suppress autoimmune diabetes. J Exp Med 199:1455–1465
32. Altshuler D, Daly M 2007 Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Nat Genet 39: 813– 815
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-abstract/93/10/3663/2627251 by guest on 08 October 2018
J Clin Endocrinol Metab, October 2008, 93(10):3663–3670 jcem.endojournals.org 3669
33. Manolio TA, Brooks LD, Collins FS 2008 A HapMap harvest of insights into the genetics of common disease. J Clin Invest 118:1590 –1605
34. Pugliese A, Miceli D 2002 The insulin gene in diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 18:13–25
35. Smyth D, Cooper JD, Collins JE, Heward JM, Franklyn JA, Howson JM, Vella A, Nutland S, Rance HE, Maier L, Barratt BJ, Guja C, Ionescu-Tirgoviste C, Savage DA, Dunger DB, Widmer B, Strachan DP, Ring SM, Walker N, Clayton DG, Twells RC, Gough SC, Todd JA 2004 Replication of an association between the lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase locus (LYP/PTPN22) with type 1 diabetes, and evidence for its role as a general autoimmunity locus. Diabetes 53:3020 –3023
36. Ueda H, Howson JM, Esposito L, Heward J, Snook H, Chamberlain G, Rainbow DB, Hunter KM, Smith AN, Di Genova G, Herr MH, Dahlman I, Payne F, Smyth D, Lowe C, Twells RC, Howlett S, Healy B, Nutland S, Rance HE, Everett V, Smink LJ, Lam AC, Cordell HJ, Walker NM, Bordin C, Hulme J, Motzo C, Cucca F, Hess JF, Metzker ML, Rogers J, Gregory S, Allahabadia A, Nithiyananthan R, Tuomilehto-Wolf E, Tuomilehto J, Bingley P, Gillespie KM, Undlien DE, Ronningen KS, Guja C, Ionescu-Tirgoviste C, Savage DA, Maxwell AP, Carson DJ, Patterson CC, Franklyn JA, Clayton DG, Peterson LB, Wicker LS, Todd JA, Gough SC 2003 Association of the T-cell regulatory gene CTLA4 with susceptibility to autoimmune disease. Nature 423:506 –511
37. Vella A, Cooper JD, Lowe CE, Walker N, Nutland S, Widmer B, Jones R, Ring SM, McArdle W, Pembrey ME, Strachan DP, Dunger DB, Rebecca Twells CJ, Clayton DG, Todd JA 2005 Localization of a type 1 diabetes locus in the IL2RA/CD25 region by use of tag single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 76:773–779
38. Smyth DJ, Cooper JD, Bailey R, Field S, Burren O, Smink LJ, Guja C, Ionescu-Tirgoviste C, Widmer B, Dunger DB, Savage DA, Walker NM, Clayton DG, Todd JA 2006 A genome-wide association study of nonsynonymous SNPs identifies a type 1 diabetes locus in the interferon-induced helicase (IFIH1) region. Nat Genet 38:617– 619
39. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2007 Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature 447:661– 678
40. Hakonarson H, Grant SFA, Bradfield JP, Marchand L, Kim CE, Glessner JT, Grabs R, Casalunovo T, Taback SP, Frackelton EC, Lawson ML, Robinson LJ, Skraban R, Lu Y, Chiavacci RM, Stanley CA, Kirsch SE, Rappaport EF, Orange JS, Monos DS, Devoto M, Qu H-Q, Polychronakos C 2007 A genome-wide association study identifies KIAA0350 as a type 1 diabetes gene. Nature 448:591–594
41. Todd JA, Walker NM, Cooper JD, Smyth DJ, Downes K, Plagnol V, Bailey R, Nejentsev S, Field SF, Payne F, Lowe CE, Szeszko JS, Hafler JP, Zeitels L, Yang JHM, Vella A, Nutland S, Stevens HE, Schuilenburg H, Coleman G, Maisuria M, Meadows W, Smink LJ, Healy B, Burren OS, Lam AAC, Ovington NR, Allen J, Adlem E, Leung HT, Wallace C, Howson JMM, Guja C, Ionescu-Tirgoviste C, Simmonds MJ, Heward JM, Gough SCL, Dunger DB, Wicker LS, Clayton DG 2007 Robust associations of four new chromosome regions from genome-wide analyses of type 1 diabetes. Nat Genet 39:857– 864
42. Taylor JC, Gough SC, Hunt PJ, Brix TH, Chatterjee K, Connell JM, Franklyn JA, Hegedus L, Robinson BG, Wiersinga WM, Wass JA, Zabaneh D, Mackay I, Weetman AP 2006 A genome-wide screen in 1119 relative pairs with auto-immune thyroid disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:646 – 653
43. Zeitlin AA, Heward JM, Newby PR, Carr-Smith JD, Franklyn JA, Gough SCL, Simmonds MJ 2008 Analysis of HLA class II genes in Hashimoto’s thyroiditis reveals differences compared to Graves’ disease. Genes Immun 9:358 –363
44. Dechairo BM, Zabaneh D, Collins J, Brand O, Dawson GJ, Green AP, Mackay I, Franklyn JA, Connell JM, Wass JA, Wiersinga WM, Hegedus L, Brix T, Robinson BG, Hunt PJ, Weetman AP, Carey AH, Gough SC 2005 Association of the TSHR gene with Graves’ disease: the first disease specific locus. Eur J Hum Genet 13:1223–1230
45. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Australo-Anglo-American Spondylitis Consortium 2007 Association scan of 14,500 nonsynonymous SNPs in four diseases identifies autoimmunity variants. Nature 39:1329 –1337
46. Velaga MR, Wilson V, Jennings CE, Owen CJ, Herington S, Donaldson PT, Ball SG, James RA, Quinton R, Perros P, Pearce SH 2004 The codon 620 tryptophan allele of the lymphoid tyrosine phosphatase (LYP) gene is a major determinant of Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:5862–5865
47. Criswell LA, Pfeiffer KA, Lum RF, Gonzales B, Novitzke J, Kern M, Moser KL, Begovich AB, Carlton VE, Li W, Lee AT, Ortmann W, Behrens TW, Gregersen PK 2005 Analysis of families in the multiple autoimmune disease genetics consortium (MADGC) collection: the PTPN22 620W allele associates with multiple autoimmune phenotypes. Am J Hum Genet 76:561–571
48. Newton-Cheh C, Hirschhorn JN 2005 Genetic association studies of complex traits: design and analysis issues. Mutat Res 573:54 – 69
49. Jin Y, Mailloux CM, Gowan K, Riccardi SL, LaBerge G, Bennett DC, Fain PR,
Spritz RA 2007 NALP1 in vitiligo-associated multiple autoimmune disease. N Engl J Med 356:1216 –1225
50. Salomon B, Bluestone JA 2001 Complexities of CD28/B7: CTLA-4 costimu-latory pathways in autoimmunity and transplantation. Annu Rev Immunol 19:225–252
51. Erlich H, Valdes AM, Noble J, Carlson JA, Varney M, Concannon P, Mychaleckyj JC, Todd JA, Bonella P, Fear AL, Lavant E, Louey A, Moonsamy P, Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium 2008 HLA DR-DQ haplotypes and genotypes and type 1 diabetes risk: analysis of the type 1 diabetes genetics consortium families. Diabetes 57:1084 –1092
52. Nejentsev S, Howson JM, Walker NM, Szeszko J, Field SF, Stevens HE, Reynolds P, Hardy M, King E, Masters J, Hulme J, Maier LM, Smyth D, Bailey R, Cooper JD, Ribas G, Campbell RD, Clayton DG, Todd JA 2007 Localization of type 1 diabetes susceptibility to the MHC class I genes HLA-B and HLA-A. Nature 450:887– 892
53. Simmonds MJ, Howson JMM, Heward JM, Carr-Smith J, Franklyn JA, Todd JA, Gough SCL 2007 A novel and major association of HLA-C in Graves’ disease that eclipses the classical HLA-DRB1 effect. Hum Mol Genet 16:2149 –2153
54. Alimohammadi M, Bjo¨ rklund P, Hallgren A, Po¨ ntynen N, Szinnai G, Shikama N, Keller M, Ekwall O, Kinkel S, Husebye E, Gustafsson J, Rorsman F, Peltonen L, Betterle C, Perheentupa J, Akerstro¨ m G, Westin G, Scott H, Holla¨ nder G, Ka¨ mpe O 2008 Autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1 and NALP5, a parathyroid autoantigen. N Engl J Med 358:1018 –1028
55. Bensing S, Fetissov SO, Mulder J, Perheentupa J, Gustafsson J, Husebye ES, Oscarson M, Ekwall O, Crock PA, Hokfelt T, Hulting AL, Kampe O 2007 Pituitary autoantibodies in autoimmune polyendocrine syndrome type 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:949 –954
56. Wolff AS, Erichsen MM, Meager A, Magitta NF, Myhre AG, Bollerslev J, Fougner KJ, Lima K, Knappskog PM, Husebye ES 2007 Autoimmune poly-endocrine syndrome type 1 in Norway: phenotypic variation, autoantibodies, and novel mutations in the autoimmune regulator gene. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:595– 603
57. Meager A, Visvalingam K, Peterson P, Moll K, Murumagi A, Krohn K, Eskelin P, Perheentupa J, Husebye E, Kadota Y, Willcox N 2006 Anti-interferon au-toantibodies in autoimmune polyendocrinopathy syndrome type 1. PLoS Med 3:e289
58. Zhang L, Barker JM, Babu S, Su M, Stenerson M, Cheng M, Shum A, Zamir E, Badolato R, Law A, Eisenbarth GS, Anderson MS 2007 A robust im-munoassay for anti-interferon autoantibodies that is highly specific for patients with autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1. Clin Immunol 125:131–137
59. Wenzlau JM, Juhl K, Yu L, Moua O, Sarkar SA, Gottlieb P, Rewers M, Eisenbarth GS, Jensen J, Davidson HW, Hutton JC 2007 The cation efflux transporter ZnT8 (Slc30A8) is a major autoantigen in human type 1 dia-betes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:17040 –17045
60. Anderson MS, Bluestone JA 2005 The NOD mouse: a model of immune dys-regulation. Annu Rev Immunol 23:447– 485
61. Braley-Mullen H, Sharp GC, Medling B, Tang H 1999 Spontaneous autoim-mune thyroiditis in NOD.H-2h4 mice. J Autoimmun 12:157–165
62. Quaratino S, Badami E, Pang YY, Bartok I, Dyson J, Kioussis D, Londei M, Maiuri L 2004 Degenerate self-reactive human T-cell receptor causes sponta-neous autoimmune disease in mice. Nat Med 10:920 –926
63. Chase K, Sargan D, Miller K, Ostrander EA, Lark KG 2006 Understanding the genetics of autoimmune disease: two loci that regulate late onset Addison’s disease in Portuguese water dogs. Int J Immunogenet 33:179 –184
64. Lovas K, Husebye ES 2002 High prevalence and increasing incidence of Ad-dison’s disease in western Norway. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 56:787–791
65. Harjutsalo V, Sjo¨ berg L, Tuomilehto J Time trends in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in Finnish children: a cohort study. Lancet 371:1777–1782
66. Writing Group for the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study Group, Dabelea D, Bell RA, D’Agostino Jr RB, Imperatore G, Johansen JM, Linder B, Liu LL, Loots B, Marcovina S, Mayer-Davis EJ, Pettitt DJ, Waitzfelder B 2007 Inci-dence of diabetes in youth in the United States. JAMA [Erratum (2007) 298: 627] 297:2716 –2724
67. Bach JF 2002 The effect of infections on susceptibility to autoimmune and allergic diseases. N Engl J Med 347:911–920
68. Kondrashova A, Viskari H, Haapala A-M, Seiskari T, Kulmala P, Ilonen J, Knip M, Hyoty H 2008 Serological evidence of thyroid autoimmunity among schoolchildren in two different socioeconomic environments. J Clin Endocri-nol Metab 93:729 –734
69. Eisenbarth GS 2007 Update in type 1 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92: 2403–2407
70. Levesque MC, St. Clair EW 2008 B cell-directed therapies for autoimmune
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-abstract/93/10/3663/2627251 by guest on 08 October 2018
3670 Anderson Update in Endocrine Autoimmunity J Clin Endocrinol Metab, October 2008, 93(10):3663–3670
disease and correlates of disease response and relapse. J Allergy Clin Immunol 121:13–21
71. Salvi M, Vannucchi G, Campi I, Rossi S, Bonara P, Sbrozzi F, Guastella C, Avignone S, Pirola G, Ratiglia R, Beck-Peccoz P 2006 Efficacy of rituximab treatment for thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy as a result of intraorbital B-cell depletion in one patient unresponsive to steroid immunosuppression. Eur J Endocrinol 154:511–517
72. El Fassi D, Nielsen CH, Hasselbalch HC, Hegedus L 2006 Treatment-resistant severe, active Graves’ ophthalmopathy successfully treated with B lymphocyte depletion. Thyroid 16:709 –710
73. Salvi M, Vannucchi G, Campi I, Curro N, Dazzi D, Simonetta S, Bonara P, Rossi S, Sina C, Guastella C, Ratiglia R, Beck-Peccoz P 2007 Treatment of Graves’ disease and associated ophthalmopathy with the anti-CD20 mono-clonal antibody rituximab: an open study. Eur J Endocrinol 156:33– 40
74. El Fassi D, Nielsen CH, Bonnema SJ, Hasselbalch HC, Hegedus L 2007 B lymphocyte depletion with the monoclonal antibody rituximab in Graves’ disease: a controlled pilot study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:1769 –1772
75. El Fassi D, Nielsen CH, Kjeldsen J, Clemmensen O, Hegedus L 2008 Ulcerative colitis following B lymphocyte depletion with rituximab in a patient with Graves’ disease. Gut 57:714 –715
International Society for Clinical Densitometry 2009 Annual Meeting Impact of New Paradigms on Skeletal Assessment: Are You Prepared? March 11–14, Orlando, Florida
http://www.iscd.org./
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-abstract/93/10/3663/2627251 by guest on 08 October 2018