Peer reviewed
with William T Daniel, Max-Robert Valentin, and Laurence Rowley-Abel in West European Politics
Blog posts and Book Chapter
with Timea Balogh, Louise Luxton, and Zoe Greene
with Louise Luxton, Timea Balogh, and Zoe Greene
with William T Daniel
with William T Daniel, Laurence Rowley-Abel, and Max-Robert Valentin
with Zoe Greene, James Cross, and Derek Greene
Social media has fundamentally altered the landscape of election campaigning, affording candidates unprecedented autonomy to communicate directly with voters outside of party-controlled channels with important implications for democratic accountability. This thesis examines parties’ cross-channel communication strategies during election campaigns, comparing the 2019 UK general election, the 2021 German Bundestag
election, and the 2022 French legislative election. The chapters offer a systematic account of cross-channel communication across party manifestos and candidate tweet during election campaigns, moving from what is communicated on the issue level, to how unified that communication is on the party level, to who diverges from it and under
what conditions on the candidate level.
Using novel applications of computational text analysis methods, including topic modelling and word embeddings, the findings reveal partial issue overlap across platforms, with more technical issues dominating manifestos and more general language prevailing on Twitter/X. Party unity is consistently high, though British candidates show lower manifesto alignment than their German counterparts when measured through textual similarity. Most candidates do not diverge substantively from their party manifesto positions. These findings offer important insights into how party system characteristics shape cross-channel communication strategies under increasingly fragmented media conditions.