Research interests
Language and literacy, Educational intervention, Linguistic and cognitive skills, Perspective taking, Discourse knowledge, Academic language, Digital literacy
Research methods
Quantitative methods, Qualitative methods, Meta-analysis, Applied linguistics
Kim, Y. S. G., Lee, J. W., Cao, Y., & Cho, M. (2025). Perspective taking and writing quality for secondary students. Reading and Writing, 1-22.
Wang, J., Kim, Y. S. G., & Cho, M. (2024). Linguistic features in narrative and opinion genres and their relations to writing quality in fourth grade writing. Journal of Research in Reading. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12453
Cho, M. (2023). Discourse Knowledge in English Education: The Key to Understanding Academic Language and Decontextualized Language. The SNU Journal of Education Research, 32(2), 55-70. https://doi.org/10.54346/sjer.2023.32.2.55
Cho, M., Kim, Y.-S. G., & Wang, J. (2023). Perspective taking and language use in secondary students’ text-based analytical writing. Scientific Studies of Reading. 27(3), 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2022.2132864
Cho, M. (2023). Psychometrics of Perspective Taking in Writing: Combining Manual Coding and Computational Approaches. International Journal of Advanced Smart Convergence, 12(1), 120-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.7236/IJASC.2023.12.1.120
Cho, M., Kim, Y. S. G., & Olson, C. B. (2021). Does perspective taking matter for writing? Perspective taking in source-based analytical writing of secondary students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 34(8), 2081-2101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-021-10136-7
Kim, Y. S. G., Dore, R., Cho, M., Golinkoff, R., & Amendum, S. (2021). Theory of mind, mental state talk, and discourse comprehension: Theory of mind process is more important for narrative comprehension than for informational text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 209, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105181
Cho, M. (2025). A case study of college EFL students' reflections on ChatGPT use for reading and writing: Implications for digital literacy. The New Korean Journal of English Language & Literature, 67(3), 145-177. DOI: 10.25151/nkje.2025.67.3.007
Cho, M. (2024). Bridging Theory and Practice: A College English Instructor’s Reflective Practice on Second Language Acquisition. Asia-pacific Journal of Convergent Research Interchange (APJCRI), ISSN: 2508-9080 (Print); 2671-5325 (Online), KCTRS, 10(12), 343-356. doi: 10.47116/apjcri.2024.12.23.
Graham, S., Cao, Y., Kim, Y. S. G., Lee, J., Tate, T., Collins, P., Cho, M., Moon, Y., Chung, H. Q., & Olson, C. B. (2024). Effective writing instruction for students in grades 6 to 12: a best evidence meta-analysis. Reading and Writing, 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-024-10539-2
Graham, S., Kim, Y.-S., Cao, Y., Lee, J. w., Tate, T., Collins, P., Cho, M., Moon, Y., Chung, H. Q., & Olson, C. B. (2023). A meta-analysis of writing treatments for students in grades 6–12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(7), 1004–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000819
Cao, Y., Kim, Y.-S. G. & Cho, M. (2022). Are observed classroom practices related to student language/literacy achievement? Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543221130687
Cho, M. (2021). Marketing the wang-chobo identity: Problematic construction of English learner identities in the advertising discourse of South Korea’s English learning platforms. The SNU Journal of Education Research, 30(2), 23-42. https://www.dbpia.co.kr/Journal/articleDetail?nodeId=NODE10728845
Cho, M. & Kim, Y.-S. G. (2024). Examining linguistic and discourse features in oral text production and their dimensionality. First Language. https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237231219843
Cho, M. & Kim, Y.-S. G. (2023). Do second graders adjust their language by discourse context? Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 54(2), 569-583. https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_LSHSS-22-00100
Work in progress (working title)
Types of teacher talk and their relations to elementary students' literacy achievement
Comparison of ChatGPT vs. human holistic and analytic scoring
ChatGPT vs. human feedback on college EFL writing and their impact on revision quality
Perspective taking in college EFL students' opinion writing and its relation to holistic and analytic writing scores
Meta-analysis of the relations of word reading and spelling skills in Korean
Review of Korean national English curriculum at the secondary level
Longitudinal studies on the development of oral text production in elementary students (G2-4)