Download Quick Heal Server Edition

as I looked at the Quick Heal AV stuff on different forums and then downloaded it into a test environment (completely seperated from production servers) it did exhibit very suspicious behavior.... Sophos flagged its behavior for review, and a few other Credible AV softwares flagged it as well..... I personally would nuke the box and pave over it with a fresh clean install if it is a desk top. if it is a server I would by a AV software that is credible and scan and remove with it..... say ESET Nod32 or Sophos, or for that matter SkyRecon Storm Shield......

It also encourages safe browsing as it has the power to automatically determine dangerous websites and prevents you from visiting them. Unlike Quick Heal AntiVirus Pro, Quick Heal AntiVirus for Server is especially dedicated for large corporate servers.

DOWNLOAD 🔥 https://geags.com/2y4Ax2 🔥

Vulnerability doesn't mean it is an immediate threat, it means anything in your systems that can be used by attackers to Hack your system.

You can just understand it as weak points in your system which is not good for your privacy and your data. And the Quick heal will take necessary action against this so nothing much must be done from our side

AhnLab's products tend to pop up in our tests at fairly random intervals, but generally put in decent performances. The latest server edition looks slick and glossy with a clean and clear layout, and proved to run pretty smoothly on Windows Server 2016 with only a single incident of the product GUI crashing out. Our performance measures showed pretty low use of resources and a fairly sizeable slowdown of our set of standard tasks, although they still ran through a good bit faster than with Windows Defender operational. File read times were also a little slow on first encounter of items, but again mostly better than with Defender enabled, and they sped up considerably on repeat runs. Scanning speeds looked decent too, particularly over the local system partition.

Avira's products show up in most of our tests and generally put in strong performances. The server version has the usual simple, angular appearance with a strong set of controls under the covers, and this month held up well under the pressure of testing with no stability problems noted. Scanning speeds were decent, while file read times look fast thanks to there being limited scanning on-read by default. Performance measures show slightly elevated resource usage and a noticeable but not too heavy impact on our set of activities.

Another member of the 12/12 club with a perfect pass record in recent years, eScan's server edition has a very bright and colourful tiled main screen, with other areas including the ample set of configuration options looking a little less slick, but generally working well. We noted a single GUI crash, during normal usage, as well as a single problem with logging not behaving as expected, but nothing too serious. Scanning speeds were impressive, file access lags pretty light for the most part, and our set of activities wasn't hit too hard, with reasonable resource consumption.

Kaspersky's history in our tests is complicated somewhat by the vendor's large number of product lines, which appear in differing combinations depending on the test. The server solution is a full enterprise offering leveraging the MMC system for its main interface and controls, which are provided in the comprehensive depth one would expect and seem fairly simple to navigate and operate. There were no stability problems noted, earning the product a 'Solid' rating. Scanning speeds were not the fastest, and overheads seemed a little heavy too, with a long time taken to complete our set of tasks and fairly high use of RAM and CPU cycles.

PC Pitstop's unusual whitelisting-heavy approach has earned it some stellar detection rates of late, although a tendency to false alarm has meant no certification for a while. The interface is focused on software vulnerabilities with some information on malware protection and basic configuration controls. The GUI itself remained reasonably stable, but we saw a number of fatal blue-screen incidents at all stages of the test (to be fair, we should note that the product is mainly geared towards the consumer market and not intended for use on server platforms). With so many issues noted no speed or performance data could be gathered, but we at least managed to complete all the detection tests, which showed once again some superb detection rates in the RAP sets, but a high FP rate and some issues with the WildList too, meaning there is no VB100 award for PC Pitstop once again.

Quick Heal's server version has a stark black-and-white colour scheme, leavened only occasionally with touches of green or red, and a clean, pared-down layout which nevertheless manages to provide a decent set of configuration options. Stability was good, with just a single incident observed of the scanner snagging. Scanning speeds were slowish, overheads not too bad to start with and barely discernible on repeat visits, while our set of activities wasn't too badly slowed down but resource consumption was on the high side.

It protects the server from malicious threats and other similar issues. This edition is for large corporate or company servers that undertake heavy loads and need to deliver power-packed performance. It provides protection against spyware, malware, and rootkits. e24fc04721