Download Convenience Store Fling

Arriving at work at the convenience store to replace the salesperson, Joo Ah recognizes a guy she ran into on the street. He is very grateful to her, he needs to leave the store to get the prize. Joo Ah remains to work in the store and meets young guys, there are four of them. They are all with different personalities, cute, funny, charismatic, cocky and charming. Now Joo Ah has a job and she needs to work conscientiously to become a worthy employee, but what kind of work is there and how can she resist when four handsome men simultaneously show her attention.(Source: doramafox.ru) Edit Translation

"Convenience Store Fling", "Something Convenience Store", or also "Sharing the stories of my 'sseom' while working part time in a convenient store" are all the unofficial literal English titles of the interactive web drama of Dingo.

DOWNLOAD 🔥 https://fancli.com/2y4O9K 🔥

Summary: It tells the romantic comedy story of JuGyeong, who is bullied for her appearance and then turns into a goddess through makeup with the help of her friend SuHo who keeps hidden scars. The two met and by sharing their secrets, they grow and restore their self-esteem.

Summary: "Twinkling Watermelon" focuses on Ha EunGyeol (RyeoUn), a model student who aims to make his parents proud. However, he's a natural-born, gifted guitarist who harbors a desire to pursue music instead. When this leads to an argument with his father, EunGyeol ends up discovering a strange yet enticing music store. After leaving the store, he finds himself in the year 1995 where he meets the teenage version of his father, Ha YiChan (Choi HyunWook). What ensues next is a story of youth, romance, family bonds, and music that gets everyone clapping along to its rhythm.

East Austin residents turned out in force to tell councilmembers their concerns about crime in their neighborhoods

photograph by Alan Pogue Lastweek's was one helluva cramped agenda agenda. The long-awaited unveiling of the sordid police audit, Jackie Goodman's$25 million corporate welfare check to FAIR, Ronney Reynolds' politicallyconvenient crusade against the garbage sticker fee, and Bruce Todd's LamarBridge expansion were only some of last week's haps. A change of scenery punctuated last Thursday's meeting when the whole councilentourage -- including city staff, reporters, and gadflies -- left the cityhall annex in mid-meeting, regrouping 15 minutes later at the Conley-GuerreroSenior Activity Center in the historic Zaragoza neighborhood in Central EastAustin. The public hearing was called by Councilmember Daryl Slusher, inresponse to the death of Northeast Austin resident Alma Ward, who was recentlykilled in a convenience store parking lot at the corner of Loyola andSpringdale by a stray bullet from an altercation between warring gangs. "Itshook the conscience of the city," Slusher rang out in a press release. (Italso grabbed the imagination of politicians -- last week council wannabe BillSpelman chose the shooting site as a backdrop for his campaign kickoffannouncement). Slusher and the rest of the council asked for community solutions to crime.Scores obliged. About 30 attended the first half of the hearing at the cityhall annex, and about 100 locals showed up at the second half in East Austin.The hearing was split because, due to a posting error, many mistakenly believedthat the meeting would take place at city hall. Interestingly, that's what EricMitchell and many of his followers wanted. Mitchell, remember, voted againstthe East Austin locale without explanation, apparently protesting East Austin'shigh-crime stereotype. Even more interesting is that his supporters went to thecity hall annex, while a primarily Mexican-American crowd gathered atConley-Guerrero. Though the messengers were divided, the message united around a plea forholistic solutions to root causes of crime: environmental racism, poverty, andsocial programs. We don't need more police, but a broader view of what policingshould be, the crowd chimed. The meeting was sometimes combative, sometimesoptimistic, but emotions climaxed with the final speech. "I can't keep my babynext to the window because I'm afraid," wept area resident Antoinette Humphrey."It shouldn't be like that. When they said my home loan would go through Ipraised God and said, `I'm getting out of here.' I wish everyone couldleave." The police audit released last Tuesday echoed the call for a community effortagainst crime. Amid numerous examples of financial mismanagement, the auditconcluded that the APD's six-year fling with community policing has resulted ina more modern mindset, but that operationally, little has changed. To fullyimplement the community concept, more resources -- to get police from out oftheir cars and onto the streets via foot patrols -- will undoubtedly berequired. Those resources will be increasingly harder to come by, even more so if JackieGoodman meets demands by the Federation of Austin's Industrial Ratepayers(FAIR, the group that represents the Electric Utility Department's sixindustrial users) for a $4.2 million apiece annual electric rate break for thenext seven or so years. Much to the dismay of consumer advocates, who say it'san un-FAIR deal for Austin's residential ratepayers (i.e., you and me),Goodman has kept the deal alive over the last several weeks, tweaking it,trying to get the FAIR corporations to promise to stay with Austin's utilitylonger than their original offer. Goodman explains that with impendingderegulation, the city's utility must find a way to keep its largest customerson board, even if it means giving them an incredibly sweet deal. "Deregulationmay not be here yet, but that's not keeping other utilities from approachingour easily identifiable customers and making deals now," Goodman says. "Cost ofservice may be important to us [with regard to how much we charge customers],but it's not necessarily the bottom-line for competing utilities." W. Scott McCollough, the consumer advocate who is representing Austin'sresidential and small commercial ratepayers, thinks Goodman should take theFAIR deal off the respirator and allow it to die. "The rates the city areoffering them are just too low," McCollough says. "And it'll be the residentialratepayers who will have to make it up." Ironically, even though Goodman refuses to listen to McCollough on this issue,she wants the city to hire him for $100,000 to act as a consultant on makingthe EUD more efficient. A heftier $400,000 deal for McCollough to join cityconsultants Metzler & Associates (we're already paying them $2.2 million)in making the EUD lean and mean didn't pass muster with the rest of the councillast week, so Goodman is trying again to put McCollough on the payroll. Shethinks his regulatory and legal expertise and consumer advocacy background area necessary element that's missing on the city's current EUD strategy team.Earlier this week Goodman had to dicker with the $100,000 proposed contractthat city staff drafted for McCollough. The language would have straightjacketed the energetic advocate by having him report to Metzler and the cityrather than to us, the ratepayers. Under that contract, McCollough, who hasbeen taking an adverse position to the city with regards to the FAIR deal,would have been virtually co-opted. Perhaps city staffers thought $100,000 wasa fair price to pay to muzzle a mouth like McCollough's. The contract'soffensive language, according to Goodman, has been changed. Good thing, says McCollough: "It would have been a conflict of interest. Irepresent consumers, not the city." However, McCollough still may have a hornets' nest of conflicts to tiptoethrough before Thursday's over. Although Goodman denies the deals are linked,word among councilmembers is that she will not vote for the FAIR deal unlessher consumer advocate contract for McCollough is approved. "That's what shetold me," says one councilmember. If an action McCollough takes (i.e.,accepting a contract) serves to secure the FAIR deal, McCollough says he willhave to leave the $100,000 on the table and walk away. "I can't benefit from[the council] screwing my clients." So far, McCollough says, he has no personal knowledge that there's anyhorse-trading going on; and if there is, Goodman's not admitting it to thisreporter. When asked if she will vote against FAIR if she doesn't getMcCollough on board, Goodman would only say cryptically, "That would certainlybe a decision I would have to make." Speaking of horse-trading, we only wish we could find a way to convince Todd,Mitchell, and Reynolds to drop their support for Goodman's corporate welfareproposal while still supporting her plan to hire a consumer advocate to keepwatch over the EUD streamlining process. Come on guys, when you're out of farmanimals, common sense will do.Also last week: Postponed was Todd's proposal to expand the Lamar Bridge from four to sixlanes, after an executive session on benefits for firefighters went longer thanexpected. Todd and Public Works Director Peter Rieck say that $1.8 million instate and federal funds is on the line if the city doesn't hire a generalcontractor to begin expanding the bridge pronto. Area residents like KarenAkins, Austin Neighborhoods Council VP, don't want the additional traffic andhigher speed of a bigger bridge. They point out that almost half of the $1.8million -- $889,000 from the state's Urban Streets Program -- can be usedanywhere in the city, and therefore doesn't need to be spent on the expansion.They also note that the program is intended for street maintenance, not theaddition of new streets. And finally, Reynolds' idea to postpone "Pay As You Throw," which wouldrequire residents to to put a $2.19 sticker on every trash bag that doesn't fitinto a city-issued can, was promptly trashed by the council. Over his six-yearcouncilship, Reynolds had voted for the program five times. But with two months'til E-day, he suddenly started complaining that the fee was unfair forresidents who had received 30-gallon garbage cans, instead of the 60- or90-gallon cans issued by the city. Never mind that right now residents canrequest 60-gallon cans. "This is free publicity for Ronney's campaign," came the refrain from ahandful of opponents. Only Mitchell, who's also up for re-election this May,hung with Reynolds. Mitchell believes that if he must pay for excess garbage,then, to be fair, he should be reimbursed when his garbage can has room tospare. By that logic, perhaps all Austinites should be reimbursed the cost oftheir traffic tickets when driving under the speed limit. Mitchell created nocredit for extra garbage can space when he, like Reynolds, voted to approve theprogram last September. But that doesn't mean Mitchell can't reimburse himselffor his own mistake by renting out space in his can to neighbors with excesstrash. Reynolds' proposal went down the chute quickly, as the council voted 5-2 tocontinue the program. An amendment passed from Goodman requesting a waiver ofthe July 30, 1997 expiration date on free stickers now being distributed as anintroductory offer. Goodman also ordered city staff to develop a variable ratefor the monthly garbage fee on your utility bill. Currently, all households pay$12.99 a month. But soon, rates could go up or down, depending on the size ofyour city-issued garbage can. Got something to say? The Chronicle welcomes opinion pieces on any topic from the community. Submit yours now at austinchronicle.com/opinion. e24fc04721