Related work
G. Albertin, A. Miaschi, and D. Brunato. On the role of textual connectives in sentence comprehension: a new dataset for Italian. In Proceedings of the Eighth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it), 2021.
R. Barzilay and M. Lapata. 2008. Modeling Local Coherence: An Entity-Based Approach. Computational Linguistics, 34(1):1–34, 03 2008.
Y. Belinkov and J. Glass. 2019. Analysis methods in neural language processing: A survey. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 7:49–72, Mar. 2019.
A. Beyer, S. Lo ́aiciga, and D. Schlangen. Is incoherence surprising? Targeted evaluation of coherence prediction from language models. In K. Toutanova, A. Rumshisky, L. Zettlemoyer, D. Hakkani-T ̈ur, I. Beltagy, S. Bethard, R. Cotterell, T. Chakraborty, and Y. Zhou, editors, Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2021, Online, June 6-11, 2021, pages 4164–4173. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021.
D. Biber, S. Conrad, and R. Reppen. 1998. Corpus linguistics: investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
D. Brunato, C. Chesi, F. Dell’Orletta, S. Montemagni, G. Venturi, and R. Zamparelli. Accompl-it @ evalita2020: Overview of the acceptability & complexity evaluation task for Italian. In EVALITA, 2020.
G. Caliendo. The popularisation of science in web-based genres. The language of popularisation: Theoretical and descriptive models, 3:101–132, 2012.
A. Celikyilmaz, E. Clark, and J. Gao. Evaluation of text generation: A survey. ArXiv, abs/2006.14799, 2020.
M. Chen, Z. Chu, and K. Gimpel. Evaluation benchmarks and learning criteria for discourse-aware sentence representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.00142, 2019.
A. Conneau, G. Kruszewski, G. Lample, L. Barrault, and M. Baroni. What you can cram into a single $&!#* vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic properties. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 2126–2136, 2018.
Elsner M. and Charniak E.. 2011. Extending the entity grid with entity-specific features. In Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. Association for Computational Linguistics, Portland, Oregon, USA, pages 125–129.
B. Elvev̊ag, P. W. Foltz, D. R. Weinberger, and T. E. Goldberg. Quantifying incoherence in speech: an automated methodology and novel application to schizophrenia. Schizophrenia research, 93(1-3):304–316, 2007.
Y. Farag, J. Valvoda, H. Yannakoudakis, and T. Briscoe. Analyzing neural discourse coherence models. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Computational Approaches to Discourse, pages 102–112, Online, Nov. 2020. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Y. Farag and H. Yannakoudakis. Multi-task learning for coherence modeling. In ACL, 2019.
B. J. Grosz, A. K. Joshi, and S. Weinstein. Centering: A framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 21(2):203–225, 1995.
M. A. K. Halliday and R. Hasan. Cohesion in English. Longman, London, 1976.
D. Iter, J. Yoon, and D. Jurafsky. Automatic detection of incoherent speech for diagnosing schizophrenia. In Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology: From Keyboard to Clinic, pages 136–146, 2018.
A. Lai and J. R. Tetreault. Discourse coherence in the wild: A dataset, evaluation and methods. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 214–223.
J. H. Lau, A. Clark, and S. Lappin. Grammaticality, acceptability, and probability: A probabilistic view of linguistic knowledge. Cognitive science, 41 5:1202–1241, 2017.
Li, J. and Jurafsky, D. 2017. Neural net models of open-domain discourse coherence. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 198–209. Association for Computational Linguistics
M. Mesgar and M. Strube. A neural local coherence model for text quality assessment. In Proceedings of the 2018 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pp. 4328–4339, 2018.
H. C. Moon, T. Mohiuddin, S. R. Joty, and X. Chi. A unified neural coherence model. In EMNLP, 2019.
L. Pishdad, F. Fancellu, R. Zhang, and A. Fazly. How coherent are neural models of coherence? In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 6126–6138, Barcelona, Spain (Online), Dec. 2020. International Committee on Computational Linguistics.
A. Shen, M. Mistica, B. Salehi, H. Li, T. Baldwin, and J. Qi. Evaluating Document Coherence Modeling. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 9:621–640, 07 2021.
S.-K. Tanskanen. Collaborating Towards Coherence: Lexical Cohesion in English Discourse. 2006.
D. Tien Nguyen and S. Joty. A neural local coherence model. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 1320–1330, Vancouver, Canada, July 2017. Association for Computational Linguistics.
T. A. Van Dijk, W. Kintsch, et al. Strategies of discourse comprehension, 1983.