Welcome to Grade 7 English!
This module will help you become a more confident communicator, critical thinker, and thoughtful reader. Throughout these lessons, you will learn how to express ideas clearly, evaluate information wisely, understand literature deeply, and write organized academic essays.
You will explore the features of academic writing, practice effective interpersonal communication, and develop skills in evaluating ideas and media for truthfulness and accuracy. You will also study literary conflicts, discover how literature helps shape identity, and appreciate Filipino values in our connected global community. Finally, you will learn how to write a clear and well-structured informative essay.
By the end of this module, you will be better equipped to think critically, communicate respectfully, and write with clarity and purpose.
click the file or here to download the entire document
click here to download the entire document
What is Academic Writing?
Academic writing is a formal, objective style of communication used in scholarly environments to convey complex ideas. It is characterized by logical organization, precise language, and a formal tone that avoids slang or personal bias. Unlike casual writing, it relies on evidence-based arguments supported by rigorous research and proper citations. By prioritizing clarity and accuracy, academic writing ensures that findings are verifiable and professional, upholding the intellectual integrity required for global scholarly discourse.
It is also known as scholarly writing, is a formal style of writing used in educational and research contexts. It is characterized by its focus on presenting ideas, analyzing research, and constructing well-supported arguments.
Formality - Academic writing avoids casual, everyday language. Which means there aren’t any slang, conversational tones, and contractions (e.g., writing “do not” instead of “don’t”).
Objectivity - Tends to focus on facts and arguments rather than personal opinions or feelings. Avoids first and second person pronouns, instead opting for third person phrasing. (e.g., “The study shows..”, “The researcher found..”, etc.)
Precision - Facts, figures and data are exact. Nothing is left open to other interpretations; Focused on giving specific information. (e.g., instead of “a lot of people” we’ll say the exact number)
Explicitness - Transition words and phrases are used to show how information is connected with one another. (e.g., however, furthermore, for instance, etc.)
Hedging - Cautious approach in making general statements that can be easily proven wrong. (e.g., instead of “This proves..”)
Complexity - Intentionally making sentences longer and grammatically complex than normal speech, often utilizing a higher-level and specialized vocabulary.
Accuracy - Words are carefully chosen to exact what is intended for them, which narrows down meanings to avoid confusion.
Responsibility - Claims and arguments must be backed by solid evidence and justification. Citing sources also falls in this category.
Organization - Flow of text is structured logically, typically moving from an introduction to the body, and ends with a conclusion.
Overall, academic writing is defined by a structured, objective approach designed to convey complex information with maximum clarity. By utilizing logical organization, writers ensure their arguments flow predictably, while precise word choice eliminates the ambiguity often found in casual conversation. A formal tone maintains professional distance, keeping the focus on the data rather than the author's personal feelings. Ultimately, the backbone of this style is the evidence-based argument, where every claim is anchored by credible sources or empirical data, transforming subjective ideas into scholarly contributions.
Universal Communication Strategies
Active Listening - Fully concentrating on what is being said rather than passively hearing the message. It involves nodding(if understood), maintaining eye contact, and avoiding interrupting the speaker.
Non-Verbal Communication - Maintaining an open posture, appropriate eye contact, and facial expressions that match the tone of the discussion that you are engaged in.
Clarity and Conciseness - Speaking clearly and getting straight to the point. Avoid rambling and using overly complicated words when simple ones will do.
Empathy - Try to understand the emotions and perspectives of the person you are speaking to, which builds trust and understanding.
Clarification and Paraphrasing - Repeating words and phrases from what you heard ensures both parties are on the same page which prevents misunderstandings.
Conversation
Informal and spontaneous. The goal is usually social connection, building rapport, or casual information sharing.
1. Ask open-ended questions: Encourage the other person to share more (e.g., "What did you think of that movie?").
2. Share the floor: Ensure a balanced back-and-forth exchange; do not dominate the talking time.
3. Use relaxed body language: Lean in slightly and use natural, friendly gestures.
Dialog
Collaborative and meaning-focused. The goal is exploring different perspectives, solving a problem, or reaching a mutual understanding.
1. Suspend judgment: Listen to understand, not just to reply or argue.
2. Validate their perspective: Acknowledge their feelings even if you disagree (e.g., "I can see why you would feel that way...").3. Use "I" statements: Express your views without accusing (e.g., "I feel concerned when..." instead of "You always...").
Interview
Formal and highly structured. The goal is specific information gathering or assessment (e.g., a job interview, a journalistic interview).
1. Prepare in advance: Anticipate questions and have clear, structured answers ready.
2. Maintain professional etiquette: Use formal language, maintain strong posture, and avoid slang.
3. Be highly focused: Answer the specific question asked directly, providing evidence or examples to back up your claims.
Determining the worth of ideas involves critically evaluating a speaker's claims for relevance, logic, and evidence. This process ensures you can distinguish between well-supported facts and personal opinions or biases.
Evaluation Criteria
Validity: Does the evidence logically support the conclusion?
Reliability: Is the source of the information credible and consistent?
Relevance: How does this idea apply to the current context or problem?
Criteria for Evaluating Ideas
Use the following criteria to verify ideas you listened to.
Relevance
Does the Idea directly relate to the main topic being discussed?
Is it important to the overall message, or is the speaker just rambling and going off topic?
Accuracy & Evidence
Is the speaker presenting verifiable information, or just making things up?
Does the speaker provide evidence to back up their claims, or are they expecting for you to just believe them?
Objectivity vs. Bias
Is the speaker presenting a balanced view, or are they heavily biased?
If the passage relies entirely on extreme emotions rather than logic, the worth of the ideas decreases
Practicality & Soundness
Is the idea logical?
If the speaker is proposing a solution to a problem, is it doable in the real world?
Strategies for Active Evaluation
Listen with a Purpose: Before everything starts, always remind yourself that you are listening to evaluate, not just to be entertained.
Identify the Main Claim: Figure out the speaker’s core message as early as possible. Everything else they say should be judged on whether it supports the main claim.
Take Worthy Notes: Write down the speaker’s main points along with a quick judgement of the ideas.
Question the Source: Always ask yourself who is talking, and what they have to do and gain by making me believe in this?
Screening Viewed Materials
Truthfulness vs. Accuracy
These two concepts go hand-in-hand but mean slightly different things.
Truthfulness: Is the overall message honest? Does the creator intend to inform you genuinely, or are they trying to deceive, manipulate or trick you into believing a falsehood?
Accuracy: Are the specific details correct? Even if a creator is trying to be truthful, they might accidentally use wrong information, misquote someone, or present false statistics.
Strategies for Evaluating Viewed Material
Investigate the Source
Always ask yourself who made the video, and what are their credentials? Production videos from media outlets are far more reliable than a conspiracy video made of snippets by an anonymous source.
Identify the Core Purpose
Analyze the Visual Manipulation
Check for Evidence
Cross-Check the Claims
Creator
Identifiable, transparent about who they are, has a good track record.
Anonymous, hard to trace, or known for publishing hoaxes.
Tone
Objective, calm, presents multiple sides of an issue.
Highly emotional, uses "clickbait" titles, relies on outrage.
Evidence
Cites clear, verifiable sources and experts.
Uses phrases like "they don't want you to know" or provides no proof.
Visuals
Unedited footage that provides full context.
Choppy edits, mismatched audio, or heavily manipulated images.
Every great story is driven by a conflict—a struggle between opposing forces. Without conflict, there is no plot! But this lesson goes a step further: it asks you not just to spot the problem, but to evaluate how characters handle it, specifically focusing on the importance of non-violent resolutions.
Discovering the Conflict
Conflicts in literature are split into two main categories, Internal and External.
Character vs. Self
Character vs. Character
Character vs. Society
Character vs. Nature
Resolving Conflict in Non-Violent Ways
Historically, many action movies and epic stories resolve conflicts through fighting or war. However, a major goal of this competency is to recognize that in both literature and real life, violence often creates more problems than it solves.
Open Dialogue
Characters sit down and express their feelings honestly without yelling or attacking each other.
It clears up misunderstandings. Many "villains" or antagonists are simply misunderstood.
Compromise
Both opposing sides agree to give up a little bit of what they want to reach a middle ground.
It creates a "win-win" situation where no one feels completely defeated.
Empathy
A character actively tries to put themselves in their opponent's shoes to understand why they are acting a certain way.
It breaks down anger and replaces it with compassion, making a peaceful agreement much easier.
Appealing to Authority/
Law
Instead of taking matters into their own hands, characters use the justice system, mediators, or community leaders to settle a dispute fairly.
It ensures that rules are followed and prevents cycles of revenge.
Literature helps readers understand who they are and how other people live, think, and feel. Through stories, poems, and plays, students learn about different cultures, beliefs, struggles, and experiences. Literature becomes a mirror (showing our own identity) and a window (showing the lives of others).
Identity – The qualities, beliefs, personality, culture, and values that make a person unique.
Characterization – How an author presents and develops a character (through actions, dialogue, thoughts, and description).
Point of View – The perspective from which the story is told (first person, third person, etc.), which influences how identity is shown.
Theme – The central message or lesson of the story.
Cultural Context – The traditions, beliefs, and practices of a group that influence characters and events.
It builds empathy.
It exposes readers to different lifestyles and traditions.
It encourages respect for diversity.
It teaches that people may respond differently because of their background.
What Is a Global Village?
A global village refers to the idea that the world is closely connected through communication, technology, trade, and culture. What happens in one country can affect others.
Philippine literature reflects values that are important not only in our country but also in the global community.
Bayanihan – Community cooperation and helping one another without expecting payment.
Pakikipagkapwa – Treating others with respect and shared humanity.
Responsibility – Being accountable for one’s actions and duties.
Family Unity – Strong family ties and support.
Respect (Po and Opo) – Showing courtesy, especially to elders.
Shows characters solving problems together.
Highlights consequences of selfishness.
Encourages understanding and unity.
Demonstrates responsibility within families and communities.
Image source: Mel. (2018, March 24). The Bayanihan spirit. The Mixed Culture. https://themixedculture.com/2013/09/25/filipinos-bayanihan/
What Is an Informative Essay?
An informative essay is a type of academic writing that explains a topic clearly and objectively. Its purpose is to provide facts and information, not personal opinions.
Introduction
Hook (interesting opening)
Background information
Thesis statement (main idea of the essay)
Body Paragraphs
Topic sentence
Supporting details (facts, examples, explanations)
Clear transitions
Conclusion
Restate thesis
Summarize key points
Closing insight
Objectivity – Avoid personal opinions (no “I think”).
Clarity – Ideas are clearly explained.
Organization – Logical arrangement of ideas.
Evidence-Based – Facts support claims.
Formal Tone – Avoid slang and contractions.
Definition Essay (explains a concept)
Process Essay (explains how something works)
Cause-and-Effect Essay
Compare-and-Contrast Essay
References
Grade 7 English Module: Determine the Worth of Ideas Mentioned in the Text Listened to • DepEd Tambayan. (2026, January 26). DepEd Tambayan. https://depedtambayan.net/grade-7-english-module-determine-the-worth-of-ideas-mentioned-in-the-text-listened-to/
Grade 7 English Module: Strategies for Effective Interpersonal Communication (Conversation, Dialogue,. (2026, January 26). DepEd Tambayan. https://depedtambayan.net/strategies-for-effective-interpersonal-communication-conversation-dialogue-interview/
Grade 7 English Module: The Features of Academic Writing • DepEd Tambayan. (2026, January 26). DepEd Tambayan. https://depedtambayan.net/grade-7-english-module-the-features-of-academic-writing/
Copyright Disclaimer
This website (Digiskwela) is dedicated to educational and nonprofit purposes in accordance with Section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976 and Section 185 of the Republic Act No. 8293 of the Philippines.
Fair Use Statement
The content on this Website may contain copyrighted material, the use of which may not have been explicitly authorized by the copyright owner. This material is made available for educational and nonprofit purposes to advance understanding and learning.
Attribution and Compliance
We make every effort to provide proper attribution to copyright holders and to comply with all relevant copyright laws. If you believe that any content on this Website may infringe upon your copyright, please contact us at: cvvillaverde1@up.edu.ph, ________ or upneo @up.edu.ph, and we will address your concerns promptly.