hit ctrl+shft+esc, select processes tab, find explorer.exe, then click 'end process.' select 'applications' tab then 'new task.' enter a single period ["." (without quotes)] to start a windows explorer. use that to navigate to your diablo folder or cd and start playing. when you're done, hit 'new task' again and key in "explorer.exe" and whiz-bang, you're back in the 2010's. if you find an obsidian ring of the zodiac, i'll gladly accept that as thanks!
>: John
>I don't think you answered his question very well there John... If he doesn't like win95,
>it's up to him. If you do like it, it's up to you. Just SHUT UP about it and try answering
>the question posed.>Okay...now to the answer (at last!)... From what I've heard, and seen a couple of months
>ago on the web site, I don't believe that Blizzard have mentioned anything about Diablo
>being windows 95 only. However, I may just be sadly misled in this, as I certainly hope
>I can play it in dos :-(>Silk.
I hope you both realize that your both going to have to install WIN95
sooner or later because thats what just about everything is gonna be
made for in the next coupla years. Dontcha just hate the technology
curve?
John
Diablo 1 Free Download Windows 7
tag_hash_104 🔥 https://tinurll.com/2yjWmL 🔥
: I believe any software carrying the win95 logo (certified by Microsoft),
: thus claiming to be a win95 native (32-bit) application has to also run
: on NT. What I'd like to know is how well NT workstation runs DOS games.
: With all the DOS overhead I have heard win95 does a better job. Anyone
: have any experience with this?Hmm. Doesn't Corel WordPerfect Suite for Windows 95 have that
logo? I heard that Statistics Canada bought a huge amount of them for
Windows NT and it wouldn't allow them to install it. A cute little
windows pops up saying, "You Can't Run this Under NT" Needless to say,
they were all annoyed. I believe they called Microsoft and supposedbly
Microsoft has relaxed the rules for the Win95 logo. However, I do believe
a fair amount of programs for Windows 95 do work on NT.
Jason
--
Jason Kehler Zuk...@UltraTech.Net "Fraser versus an Ancient
CompTech Systems Team OS/2 Ground Sloth with Diefenbaker
My Home Page: as the Judge!"
IRC Realms where I exist: #Sloth,#DueSouth "May the Sloth's be with you.."
>
> I may be mistaken but I've been told that OS/2 warp is by far better
> than any of the aforemention OS and will run any 32 bit windows apps. If
> I am wrong please lemme know.
>
>
Actually, since I work for Computer Support for a University in new
Zealand, I have found that those staff members who have switched to
Win95 - the rate of support calls for those staff members dramatically
drops off....Win95 seems to be inherently more stable, faster, and if something
does crash you can close it down - and I find it much easier to
support than windows 3.11 (or god forbid 3.1 *erk*)For those that complain that workgroups is better than 95 - well
microsoft actually does own BOTH products - so either way they win...Personally I find nothing wrong with 95, am looking forward to playing
with NT 4. I also don't mind looking at other operating systems,
considering its all part of the job....You state that you hate people that run around going microsoft rulez
when they have no idea - well sort of like those that run around going
Microsoft Sucks i imagine....the operating system is more often dependent on the hardware in your
computer - faulty hardware often leads to so called "continuous
problems" no matter what operating system....My personal preference is with Win95, but then if someone asks me
about say the Mac O/S, I say there is nothing wrong with it, and if
they ask me about an "unusual operating system" i say that i don't
know as i dont have enough experience with it...ranters bore me to tears...
"MAD!!! You dare call me MAD!! The greatest mind that ever lived!!!"
0852c4b9a8
free download m indicator java
free sims 3 hair download for pc