How does this approach differ in other movies?
Analyzing the ethical conflict of following one's conscience or conforming in films such as "Passengers," "A Few Good Men," and "12 Angry Men," reveals the different ways characters approach their moral choices and face the outcomes.
In the movie "Passengers" (2016), Jim Preston faces a moral conflict as he is alone on a spaceship after waking up too early from hibernation. Confronted with feelings of hopelessness and solitude, Jim wrestles with the moral dilemmas of deliberately rousing another traveler, Aurora, to combat his sense of loneliness. His decision to prioritize either his own well-being or the possible impact on Aurora's future embodies the clash between personal wants and moral obligations. In the end, influenced by his desire for connection, Jim's choice raises significant concerns regarding consent, autonomy, and the measures people take to escape solitude.
"A Few Good Men" (1992) showcases a key ethical conflict in the military, as Lieutenant Daniel Kaffee grapples with balancing obedience to orders and adherence to moral values. When given the responsibility of defending two Marines charged with murder in a "code red" mission, Kaffee must decide whether to follow institutional norms or seek out the truth despite potential personal and career consequences. His choice to confront the influential military institution highlights values like honor, integrity, and the individual's responsibility to uphold justice, even when faced with strong resistance.
In the movie "12 Angry Men" (1957), the ethical challenge revolves around the duty of jurors to reach a just decision by closely examining the facts, even in the face of external influences and individual prejudices. At first, influenced by assumptions and a need for a quick decision, the jury encounters a crucial moment when Juror 8 constantly disagrees with the majority view. His determination to carefully review the evidence demonstrates the crucial role of personal conscience in the quest for justice. By consistently questioning long-held beliefs and societal norms, Juror 8 in the film highlights the significant impact of moral courage when confronting challenges.
Throughout these movies, the characters face the conflict between their personal beliefs and fitting in with societal or institutional expectations. Their moral choices advance the storyline, encouraging viewers to contemplate their personal moral values and the intricacies involved in facing ethical challenges. The choices made by the protagonists, whether driven by personal desires, a dedication to justice, or a refusal to relent on principles, are examples of how individual morality can greatly influence human behavior..