Around the country, students, parents, teachers, and staff of schools are being asked a seemingly impossible question: how many people are we willing to let die so that we can open our school buildings?
In the midst of their own global pandemic, Americans in 1918 faced the same question.
The answers they came up with and the lessons they offer for us today --
this week, on Context, Please.
This Denver Post cartoon got at the fears of many students and teachers - would closures in the fall of 1918 mean year round school and no holiday breaks?
The health risks of a potential opening were seen as equally consequential: As Utah’s state superintendent of public instruction Dr. E.G. Gowans put it bluntly in the Deseret Evening News on December 30: ”We do not know whether the reopening of schools is going to sacrifice some children’s lives or not, but this we do know, that there could hardly ever have been a time when the daily health inspection of the pupils was more important than it is right now.”
“We have just grounds to complain of unfairness. We are in a better position to care for the children than the city health department, which made no investigation whatever before issuing the order closing the schools. Dr. Guilford’s action is throwing 50,000 children into danger. The best place for children in an epidemic is in school. Dr. Guilford will rue the day when he closed the schools. I think he was ill-advised and hasty.”
What made Board of Education speaker Henry Deutsch so incensed at the city's health commissioner? The full story on this week's episode.