While Fahrenheit 451 takes a major lead in effective ethos and pathos, 1984 presents a compelling and robust logos appeal that resonates throughout the narrative. One critical quote that underscores 1984’s strong logos appeal occurs when Winston Smith reflects on the potential for revolt among the oppressed working class, stating, “Until they become conscious, they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled, they cannot become conscious” (Orwell, 74). This statement encapsulates a fundamental truth about human nature: we cannot rectify what we are unaware of. The characters in 1984 are victims of incessant censorship and manipulation, living under a regime that systematically suppresses information and distorts reality. The mind control tactics employed by the Party—such as the manipulation of language through Newspeak and the alteration of historical facts—serve to keep the populace in a state of ignorance. If individuals are unaware of their oppression, how can they ever envision a different reality? This raises a critical question: what would it take for them to awaken from their slumber of complacency? Unless a catalyst emerges to enlighten them about the possibilities for a better existence, those ensnared by censorship will remain passive, unable to fight for their rights or freedoms. On the other hand, Bradbury articulates society’s collective disdain for literature through the insights of Montag’s friend, Faber, who asserts, “So now do you see why books are hated and feared? They show the pores in the face of life. The comfortable people want only wax moon faces, poreless, hairless, expressionless” (Bradbury, 96). This metaphor highlights the essential role that literature plays in revealing the complexities and imperfections of human existence. While books may not inherently provoke fear, their contents are laden with knowledge that challenges the status quo. The unease surrounding literature stems from the profound truths it can unveil, truths that threaten the superficial comfort many seek. As a result, society collectively decides it is safer to eliminate these sources of knowledge rather than confront the discomfort they may bring. This pervasive fear surrounding books and other forms of media has only intensified in recent years, as censorship laws increasingly encroach on intellectual freedom in the U.S. The unsettling reality is that if such trends continue unchecked, we may reach a point where censorship becomes so overwhelming that humanity loses its ability to think critically or reflect on its past, echoing the grim fate portrayed in Orwell’s narrative. This is why 1984 stands out for its powerful logos appeal: it vividly illustrates the potential consequences of censorship when taken to extreme measures. By employing logical reasoning and stark examples, Orwell compels readers to confront the dangers of a society that prioritizes conformity over individual thought. Through the lens of both novels, we see the stark realities of censorship, yet it is Orwell's chilling depiction of a world stripped of awareness that serves as a profound warning against the erosion of free thought.